Already, I mean, within moments almost. I seemed to have experienced strong positive effects from the taking prayers of protection out of my normal repertoire.
I would normally perhaps, take a bit longer to take in the effects. But, I have experienced the same thing before when I have stopped prayers completely. So I feel I have enough information to come to a conclusion.
One of the blockages I have noticed within myself is the "women are cute" kind of thought process. It's a kind of annoying and a bit nauseating internal thought process. Infantilising them. But I cannot seemed to have gotten rid of it previously. It just seems to be "there".
I believe that Stefan Molyneux's idea on love, that love is "Our involuntary response to virtue if we are virtuous". But this has not been able to be applied to a few women in my life. In my past. I can recognise that they have basically no virtue that I can identify. But my feelings remain very positive towards them.
Well, since stopping the protection prayers, I, all of a sudden, do feel that sense of "repulsion of the magnet". Towards said women. (Is this understanding turning to acceptance?)
I don't quite know what has happened here. My internal dynamics seem to have massively changed because I am retro actively, taking in some of the female rejections I have had. It feels like. As though the prayer of protection. Was blocking off some legitimate criticism.
It could also be that "protection" often involves walking on eggshells around some abusive figure, the one that we need protection from, the one that would cause harm. So perhaps the "women are cute", is a way of preventing legitimate criticism of them. Which would then lead to pushback from them. And women in this society are extremely dangerous. (Reputation destruction, social ostracism, false accusations etc.)
It is an extremely positive change I think. I wonder what change this will lead to in the real world after a couple of months of having changed this thought pattern. Potentially this would open the door to other positive processes like entropy. Which can kind of collapse non useful thought patterns.
Out walking today, I remembered a girl that I had seen walking past a church a few months ago, and having not been able to stop thinking about her. Just pure attractiveness. I imagined talking to her and the kind of humourous lines I would use. All of a sudden, this whole thing seems kind of cringey. I have a repulsion of the magnet from the entire thing. All of a sudden it seems that the kind of "immature" kind of frame I would use is ridiculous. (It is one I used with some success with a girl that later rejected me!)
Donald Trump was rude to Rob Reiner.
Based on all the right wing women suddenly turncoating because Trump was "rude" in their estimation. Any right wing movement has to prepare for the moment when women stab them in the back en mass, for something like this.
It is very likely Rob Reiner sexually abused the son that killed him, he made pretty direct jokes about this. I have no patience with these super passive people! Evildoers must be opposed, and the turncoat right wing women, have no authority, and do not deserve the authority. Of speech policing everyone!
Youtube, Marks Cosmic Adventures: Trumps 3rd Term. David Wilcock's Dildo Stalking! End of the W.H.O. Project Blue Beam imminent? May 1st 2026:
https://youtu.be/vdqF1nsLOcA?si=UiPNpLqlq_doW75_
The discussion is from about 14 minutes:
16 min: This guy, and I understand this guy, and I think it is important, that we question people, when they are making big claims. I do, but there's other ways of doing it, right. I don't think it's cool, to find out where somebody lives, go up to their gate; and then find out where somebody goes walking to plant something, as a joke. That is stalking. And that is outrageous.
Well, I don't agree.
Firstly, "there are other ways of doing things". When pushing back against someone like David Wilcock. I would like to know what his ideas are. Especially since he seems the type to platform someone like David Wilcock. He has just platformed someone that says that Satan was killed on March 22nd.
What would be a good way to oppose him? To start off a little foundation thing like James Randi? This would go nowhere, and to make a platform out of opposing people like David Wilcock. It has to be humorous.
Let's actually look at David Wilcock and the things that Steven Cambian has investigated him for.
The Pete Peterson Go Fund Me scam. Even the new age knew there was something wrong with this one. The money just disappeared into Davids account for several years and was given to Pete Peterson 3 or so years later when there was too much attention.
The Emory Smith scam: Emory Smith was in hospital for "deep state attack", and David was getting his audience to send money to him. But Emory Smith had a drinking problem and was in hospital for alcohol poisoning.
Platforming Corey Goode and supporting him against Gaia: David Wilcock was responsible for Corey Goodes rise to fame and all the resources he got from that. After which he started a stalking campaign including taking pictures of peoples houses in order to intimidate them. David enabled someone that went on to sue his critics, sometimes causing them a great deal of emotional and financial distress.
David Wilcock should have been in jail. Steven has mentioned that he has talked to people that were giving their last paycheck to David and could barely afford to eat. He was a constant victim. He made up a lot of things about Steven Cambian including that he was a hacker and a child predator. (This was years later than the Dildo thing)
David, it seems to me. Wanted the world to just shut up in exposing being a con artist. So he could carry on being a con artist. And when he couldn't. When people said "Actually, no you are a fraud, actually no you haven't paid your taxes". Out of protest, he killed himself.
He definitely deserved dildo's buried on his hiking trail. So that people could become aware that he was not, in fact, a psychic.
And Marks Cosmic Adventures did precisely nothing to oppose David. In fact, he enabled those that support the general paradigm. So he criticises those that did oppose David. From his little porch.
I recall when I was a lot younger, I had inherited money and I would read David Wilcock a lot. I was a true believer. Steven Cambians coverage "saved me", in essence, from that madness that was making my schizophrenic tendencies far worse. I remember thinking I could invest in Davids film and looking back now reflecting on how vulnerable I was. I didn't do it, since I knew my family would not let me do it. But even so. There are plenty of people out there like that.
No comments:
Post a Comment