An insight from the Law of One, into the negative polarity. (Session 20.32)

The session and answer is as follows:

Questioner: How would such stone heads influence a people to take the path of service to self?

Ra: I am Ra. Picture, if you will, the entities living in such a way that their mind/body/spirit complexes are at what seems to be the mercy of forces which they cannot control. Given a charged entity such as a statue or a rock formation charged with nothing but power, it is possible for the free will of those viewing this particular structure or formation to ascribe to this power, power over those things which cannot be controlled. This, then, has the potential for the further distortion to power over other-selves. 

There are a lot of parts of the Law of One that are obviously, unspeakably, profound.

This is not one of them. Unlike Session 19.17 or 10.12. This is one of those that sounds like casual, and for practical purposes, irrelevant. But, this kind of passage is the reason it is worth going through the Law of One with a fine tooth comb. In my view, it is actually very important.

What is being said here, is that when people hold a God like being. But not God. Like, a statue, or perhaps a figure like the Native Americans worship animal guides. Or the polytheistic religions in general. Or even, the Law of Attraction often does this; people have been quoted as part of Law of Attraction groups saying things like people deserved Volcanoes destroying their villages because they were thinking wrong. When people, as part of that religion, ascribe to those forces the power over things like... wind. This is actually a negatively polarised way of looking at things.

Which is quite interesting. Because it is quite a frequent way of looking at things within spiritual and religious cultures.

It reminds me of one of David Wilcocks stories. He said that he went out into the forest and it was incredibly windy, and he shouted something about being free as part of some sort of ritual. And the wind immediately stopped after that. 

I have recently talked about stopping with a dream catcher. This has turned out well. It appears that nightmares it was apparently blocking which I am getting now. They seem to ground me. And my ability to write music appears to be returning! 

So I was thinking about what the Dream Catcher probably means on a "magickal" level. The Native Americans were not the peaceful loving people almost all US media seems to paint them as. I picked up Benjamin Franklins autobiography. As Benjamin Franklin is someone that the Law of One advises to study further. Benjamin talks about dealing with them in non positive terms. And they were also known to go to war with each other and use rape as a weapon of war. 

Considering that. It is quite the bastardisation of history to express Native Americans in only positive terms. As they are in the media.

If the Native Americans were like this. Then it would be likely to me that a dream catcher would serve the function of keeping away the most negative parts of their minds so they would not be bothered by their own behaviours and carnage. So the dream catcher was likely, not "negative" per sey. But with negative people. It allowed them to have an apparently positive dream life while being a negative, warlike culture. 

Whereas, in todays culture. Where many of us have not even used a weapon in combat. The apparent 'negativity' in our subconscious minds potentially serves a positive purpose.  

Another person that the Law of One advised to study further was Thomas Jefferson. The founding of America seems to have been given a positive nod by the Law of One. And this did come at the destruction of the Native American culture.

The Q Agenda and the Insufferable Woke.

On another blog I had. The second you put a video in the blog. It would embed. I thought up until recently it still did that. It was so much cooler. Now it doesn't do that. This has the benefit of if I am going to say something other than positive about the video the person is not pinged, and so isn't invited to view it. But it is also. Pretty uncool! 

Two videos I think are interesting;

Youtube: Mark Walsh: Why I'm no longer talking to woke people. October 28th 2026:

https://youtu.be/Xh52rXZlnGQ?si=1EsWVanlckHrC7wD

And this:

Youtube. Liam Out Loud: The West Has Become One Giant HR Department: October 29th 2026:

https://youtu.be/vtu4vfbaR3s?si=uwcR82Ry8PUc6zOR

From a Q paradigm.  

But first, I wanted to talk about QAnon and what the idea is behind what is happening at the moment from the perspective of those communities. 

I am struggling to source relevant posts here because I have not done so previously and there are a lot of Q posts floating about. 

The idea behind the Q posts. Is that. Firstly, we were and to an extent still are ruled by very negative forces. There are differences within the community as to whether this is a process and humanity has only partially overtaken the deep state through Trump. Or that, behind the scenes, the good guys have taken over, and for some strange reason, perhaps a tragetted psy op to awaken the population. Has kept the entire charade going:

The Q community has provided a lot of very valid proofs. But they have also provided a lot of invalid proofs. Sometimes, all the signs come together to prove something truly spectacular. Like they did at the last election (when I was starting to lose faith). But a lot of the time they get all excited and nothing happens. Too many times now. 

For me personally. This has been going on way too long. Firstly, I used to get all excited about astrology transits. This is a common theme in the astrology community. Then, obviously I followed David Wilcock for years. Very frequently he would 'ring the bell' and nothing happened. I prepped when David Wilcock advised it in 2016. Those tins got so expired they literally exploded into black goo in the cupboard I was keeping them in. I had no idea they could even do that. 

Then there has been the predictions of the Q community themselves. And I am tired. This has been a long road to the eventual just exhaustion and 'entropy' with political subjects in general.  

So tired, in fact, that even when things happen now. Like the BBC, the mainstream. Coming around that it is important to prep. Almost like, as several commentators have said. They "know" something. War with Russia? Something Epstein list/ Q. Trump related? I just... Don't care. 

The first relevant point. 

Bearing that in mind there are two relevant issues for me. One, like many other people I suspect. I like my personal life. I walk my dog. I go to the gym and improve my health. I make slow progress on spiritual matters like I talk about on this blog and I read the Law of One. This is a nice life for me. A rewarding life and what I would probably do if I was rich enough to live how I wanted. 

BUT, at the same time. In practical terms. In practical real world terms such as in the area of career, money, friendships and romantic relationships. In the area of real world movement and personal power... Well, nothing moves at all. This is, largely, I believe. Because of the stagnant state of society. DEI hiring, and no hiring because of bad economic conditions. The stuck state of consciousness of the world with all these leftists walking about. The stagnant state of... power. It is my belief that because power is set in the same few hands. Which is, with some exceptions, that of those that conform ideologically. Nothing moves about socially in society either. 

We need a couple of people that have been ostracised by the left to gain power to rewire social dynamics I think. In that way, those ideologues have to watch their step. Lest they offend someone that they would regret doing so! The left also, don't believe in meritocracy, a.k.a actually being good at the job, or 'goodness' really. They prefer virtue signalling. So it is only when people outside their orbit gains in the world. Like Elon Musk. That the world actually, practically, moves forward.

The second of the two relevant points. 

There is a new revolutionary zeal on X at the moment. The Q team have put forward a sudden. Not slow. Mass arrest kind of scenario. 

They have also put forward a specific number. Is it a date? Who knows. It's the kind of source where something could later turn out to be something else. But the post, which I don't have on hand, states something like "11.3 verifies as first marker and confirms future direction".

This is the first time since the Q posts started that the date of November 3rd actually falls on a significant day. The US Mid terms are on November 3rd. So the Q Community on X are very excited about this. 

I also, personally, think this all relates to the Law of One. It is quite possible that the source for the Law of One has some relevance here. Either consciously or otherwise. The challenge that the Q Community has is watching all these crimes. From mass migration and such. And doing nothing. The Q Community is also deeply Christian. An important number in relation to Q is the number 17 because Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet:

Session 17, Question 17:

Questioner: Can you tell me what the Orion group did in order to try to cause his downfall?

Ra: I am Ra. We may describe in general what occurred. The technique was that of building upon other negatively oriented information. This information had been given by the one whom your peoples called “Yahweh.” This information involved many strictures upon behavior and promised power of the third-density, service-to-self nature. These two types of distortions were impressed upon those already oriented to think these thought-forms.

This eventually led to many challenges of the entity known as Jesus. It eventually led to one, sound vibration complex “Judas,” as you call this entity, who believed that it was doing the appropriate thing in bringing about or forcing upon the one you call Jesus the necessity for bringing in the third-density planetary power distortion of third-density rule over others.

This entity, Judas, felt that, if pushed into a corner, the entity you call Jesus would then be able to see the wisdom of using the power of intelligent infinity in order to rule others. The one you call Judas was mistaken in this estimation of the reaction of the entity, Jesus, whose teach/learning was not oriented towards this distortion. This resulted in the destruction of the bodily complex of the one known as Jesus to you.

What happens in society as all this goes on?

So what happens on the ground level to all of us civilians then as we wait for this to happen? 

There was a section in the Law of One where they were discussing Venus and the source was talking about the troubles that Venus had in properly polarising. On Venus apparently. They didn't have any negative polarity. So people that were naturally negative did not have the ability to polarise in that direction. They just kind of sat there super resentful with... as Ayn Rand called it... "The hatred of the Good". (It was only when two positive wanderers came along and accidentally became negative that they were able to do some real world actions of war making!)

The way the world is working at the moment, it seems to me that the current situation is handling that in some manner.

Imagine if, in 2020 or earlier. We had had the mass arrest that the Q Community was expecting far earlier? The trouble with that issue is that, back then, DEI came directly from the government. You did not have a choice but to comply. If these arrests had happened then. If the DEI Karens that have taken to pathologically shouting that white men should not be hired in their HR departments. Were suddenly confronted with an opposing narrative. They would all proclaim their innocence in all sorts of ways. "I did not ever believe in it. I just had to do it to feed my family". 

The situation as it is working out at the moment. Does have a "Wheat and the Tares" feeling to it. After Trump removed DEI hiring and the entire woke agenda. Corporate America, meaning, the HR departments. Pulled together to make sure it continued. After it came out recently that in America, from about 2020 to 2024 (I think). America hired 94% ethnic minority candidates. After there was outcry about that. In America in August of 2026. They hired 92% female candidates. 

This has the effect I think, of them taking responsibility for the behaviour, and not being able to outsource it to tyranny. 

I think that this is a big reason, behind the scenes, perhaps even, beyond the Q team themselves. That the world is like it is at the moment. The left are divinely ignorant of anything outside an incredibly narrow viewpoint. The world is as it is, so the power dynamics are as they are. So them, the leftist individuals. Can act out of those power dynamics with impunity. They can disrespect anyone that the establishment has deemed to be a legitimate target. 

In the video above by Mark Walsh. He said that leftist friends he had used to have, when he turned away from leftism. Had turned on him viciously. People that had been to his wedding, had known him personally, made hit pieces about him. There is a feral aggression in leftism that the Conservatives do not seem to share. 

This happens in far FAR more subtle ways than HR Karens. People need a certain time in order to reveal their true natures. They need 'enough rope to hang themselves'. Ever broken off with a friend and had regrets about that. Wanted to believe it was a misunderstanding? Then you get on with them again for a while. Then they do exactly the same thing again.

"Oh, it is like that then, that behaviour was deliberate. It was not an error on their behalf! It was not a good natured miscommunication."

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." 

These seem like small decisions. But from a Law of One perspective. Everything being about polarity and morality... Essentially. This is what it's about.  

It is not enough to have a golden age of humanity. It is not for everyone. This is what David Wilcock wanted I think. That a golden age or humanity would arrive and his sins would be wiped clean by it, without him taking any accountability. But the evildoers must be identified. And if there is one common behaviour of evildoers. It is that they refuse accountability. 

Our purpose.

I come back to this. A point that has annoyed me no end. One of the things talked about in the Q posts, mentioned a few times. Is that the people in the Q community should be protecting and nurturing the NPC's who have never asked a question in their lives about this kind of thing. If there were mass arrests and the sudden mass revelation of information. Some of it shocking and malevolent. These people would, assumedly, be shocked.

But I don't know whether this is the only 'catalytic' value of these events. Assumedly, on a deeper level. Committing mind and soul to falsity and then having to have the humility to walk all of that back. Would be a positive thing for spiritual evolution. 

What would be happening in the grand scheme of things. At the higher levels. Is the bringing in of accountability. So logically, this same experience would filter down to the civilian level. 

For this reason. For me, there are some people that I would respond positively to in this circumstance. But at the same time. If the mass arrests were to happen. I consider the benefit of this event to be able to separate from, and not see again, the individuals that have behaved like this.

TV shows embedding messages in us.

A dream I had recently related to a real situation. Something happening in my life at the time. Something that related to politics and so might have related to my sudden lack of enthusiasm for politics. 

But the situation didn't make a lot of sense for a while. Then I got a sudden breakthrough and the dream made sense. It would obviously be better to do it the other way. But this is the way I did it. 

So, in Star Trek Deep Space Nine. There was a character called Odo. Who was a shapeshifter. The Starfleet people, his colleagues obviously. Were at war with an invading army headed by shapeshifters. The shapeshifters generally, did not do any of the fighting. They were like Kings of sorts. They had all the authority.

They also loved Odo a great deal. He was one of them. They had quite a Jewish presentation. They were effectively space Jews that were super evil. So Odo was like one of the 'chosen people' with higher status. So during various war like situations. Odo had an incredible amount of status and such. There were other characters with this same thing. In fact, the show seemed to be made of characters like this. Worf had authority and power with the Klingons. Having interacted with their leadership and being a respected warrior. Garak was a Cardassian. The Shapeshifters and the Cardassians worked together. Even though Garak had no status and would have been put to death by Cardassians, it was a similar dynamic in a sense. He was still closely connected on a personal level to extremely senior Cardassians. 

But, it is in a way an advert for multi culturalism in a sense. Or not even that. It is an advert for the idea that we can all get along with differing viewpoints. The right and the left can get along well.

But, it is not, in fact, the case. I don't think. It's a belief that can slip into your mind while watching one of these types of shows. But the truth is, that if I phoned one of my leftist ex friends. Even previously very close leftist friends. They would not respond to me positively. When Britain landed on the beaches of Germany in 1945. There was no eccentric English poet living in Germany that had authority over the British troops. That could say 'Oh, don't massacre these civilians here. I will just call Churchill and Hitler and we can have a sit down.'

Another little bit of TV programming that I realise has slipped in a bit. One of my issues. That relates to my physical or mental health. Well, it is not quite clear what it is or where it is from. But I previously had a bunch of really dark Hellraiser types of dreams. While I could sleep. I could not sleep properly. I was always tired. Then I got a dream catcher and the nightmares stopped. Recently, I threw it away, and they are back. 

I remember in Stargate. There was a boy born that had the collective knowledge of malevolent entities. This genetic memory was so fierce it made pretty much all of them the worst kind of genocidal psychopaths possible. So this boy, who had been sheltered by an angelic entity. Had his subconscious mind suppressed. 

There was a statement he later made. "The memories held in my subconscious mind are too powerful. The only way to win is to deny it battle". 

This expresses a little bit how I felt about my own subconscious mind. But in fact, there is a great deal to be gained by allowing these nightmares in. They ground me. I focus on real things after one of those nightmares. They are like 'ultra grounding' in a way. All the way back to primal survival senses. They motivate me to tidy so I clean up the dust in case that is it. To exercise in case that helps. 

And I am a very ungrounded person. Dreams that ground me are very valuable!  

So there IS something to be gained from the battle with that kind of darkness. Mostly, it seems to me when things like that are first introduced to us we see the darkness first. Because, the female section of the subconscious mind. The catalyst of the mind. Is attracted to the darkness. I think the term is attracted. Don't quote me on that. But it is something like that from the Law of One. 

There are probably thousands of these types of examples rifling through the subconscious mind from various TV shows. And, we live in the real world. That is very tiring and very boring. One we need frequent physical and psychological rest from. So we will probably continue to absorb various things from these TV shows. 

Follow up, dream catcher.

I talked recently in the article, three blogs ago called 'The Boundary between the Conscious and the Unconscious'. About stopping a dream catcher and having nightmares because of that. 

Before I started using a dream catcher, 15 years ago or so. I was having quite serious nightmares. Now that I have thrown the dream catcher away. I am having said nightmares again. I did have these infrequently while I had the dream catcher up. But I am getting them more frequently and intensely now. And definitely not related to my physical health issues that I have more of a handle on. 

Unlike when I originally had a problem with dreams. There is a huge different in my physical health. And I am more confident in using tools like Prayer and the Law of One if it gets heavy.  

My theory is this. Of the changes I have so far experienced. Of the benefit of the nightmarish dreams:

A) I have suppressed a lot of the mental anguish caused by my physical medical condition. This is just a way of getting through that.

B) I have strange ways of thinking that I think the dreams are trying to correct. I think in a neurodivergent way, I suspect. Sometimes, I don't completely get emotionally, that people exist. I also do not see hierarchy very easily. I look at people responding differently to a person at a different part of the hierarchy in confusion. And the only way I can replicate that is to follow rules very precisely. But in a way that is obviously unusual. I can only partially replicate emotional deference and eggshell walking.

I think the nightmares are trying to put back some of the emotions to do with that. For instance, when I have been bullied before, it has been a little distressing at the time, obviously increased by my medical condition. But there is also an irrelevance to it. A non caring. I think dreams that see people as 'demons' starts to re- experience what I should be experiencing when people are unpleasant. What I would experience if I were emotionally engaged. 

It is the effect of being low status and it also provides a certain fire to improve aspects of my own life that relate to being low status. Things like motivating me to tidy or exercise. I am feeling a strong improvement in my self in this area. More determined to improve myself. 

C) There could also be any other number of things the dreams are trying to encourage or impart. One of these is that in order to understand why I suddenly was not interested in X anymore. I think this is because I had more access to my negative emotions. These then accentuated until I experience 'entropy' in the part of me that was putting out material and engaging with that. 

For instance, I might look into the work of Carl Jung for insight. 

This blog entry has been kind of self focused but... I don't have any more to say on any other subject. Working slowly through the Law of One again and taking more detailed notes. On session 20 at the moment. Also profound insights from dream interpretation.

I am also experiencing a bit of an 'air out of the tyres' effect. One of the only things I have done to significantly effect my viewer count is to stop going on X. My viewers go down significantly when I do that. Which is odd, people don't click on my blog that much when I post it. So people on X must be seeing me and being reminded I exist and going on this blog. 

"Care you not about the counting" - Law of One.  

But I do not have the energy for any politics, or even gender war stuff I also mentioned recently. I will not be going on X again, I don't think. At least not until significant political events happen which mean I need a non MSM angle. I have also not had that many ideas for the blog recently. I seemed to have mega slowed down and when that happens. I often want to post about it so I don't feel a mild sense of guilt if I don't post (for a while or ever again!) But at the same time. Everytime that has happened before to my memory. I have gotten right back to it. It was a "false alarm". 

Throwing away the dream catcher and nightmares have moved me into a different place.   

The mental diet.

My continual thoughts in trying to move forward. Trying to improve in general. 

Two insights, that I am hoping are both useful and powerful. 

The gym has been giving me amazingly powerful positive changes. I have before put together theories that when men experience life and their various stresses get stored in their muscles. (As hormonal combinations). When those muscles break down after a weights session. A lot of this is released. I mean, we know a lot of anxiety for guys is released at the gym. The releasing of that energy leads to increased insights.

It feels quite powerful. As though the part of me my body is first working on in making me more masculine is my thoughts. Which would be... Obvious, wouldn't it? 

First insight: Digital media. 

So the first insight I had, when I was watching one of the gym bros that I follow on youtube (and outside music is one of the only things that interests me on youtube). He was talking about how he 'avoids lust'. This is a biblical gym bro. That he simply does not go on instagram because it is full of bikini models. 

Another thing that has been happening for me. Is that the day after I got rid of the dream catcher. The next day. I just couldn't go on X. Which I have been going on everyday, many hours everyday, for years now. I just stopped. It feels uncomfortable. I don't want to go back. 

I realised, that a process has gone on in my subconscious that perhaps has not helped me. In the absence of clearly defined social roles in relation to women. In the absence of actual women in my life. Combined with a general interest in spiritual sources like the Law of One. Some of my sense of mysticism, or my seeking towards 'The Creator'. Has been caught up in the idea of understanding emotions. As though these would bring me some powerful insight. To that end, not often, but sometimes I will explore one of those young women on youtube talking about her feelings and how everything is going wrong. 

Yet another thing to link to all this. Going quickly, as quick as I can through the red pill argument. The red pill argument is that modern women. Due to dating acts and other cultural changes. Tend to spend their 20's dating only the very top guys (status, wealth and looks). Tend to believe, even if not stated, that those guys will settle down with them. Tend to get angry and bitter at men who do not commit to them. This is almost all women. Guys in their twenties are divided into two sections. One, is the top guys. The trust fund guys or guys alpha for some other reason. These guys get a LOT of one night stands. They are the men that "break the hearts" of the women just mentioned. Then, in their twenties, there is "the rest" of the guys. About 90%. Who have few if any relationships and sexual encounters. (This dichotomy between top and bottom guys has increased statistically, with various societal dysfunctions. The amount of 18-30 year old men who have not had sex in the past year is on an upward incline. It used to be around 10% but more recently is about 50%)

The red pill argument is that the top 10% guys are not damaged by their behaviour. They will sleep around then eventually pick one out of the "litter". There is no influencing them from doing what they want to do. What happens following this is that the women who could not get the top 10% guys. Find one below that and marry him. While being incredibly bitter at the top 10% guys (this is where "all men are trash" kinds of sentiments come from, women then blame all guys for their experience with the guys that had the options to treat them like that). And usually have a sexless marriage after that and possibly an extremely unpleasant divorce. 

So the way the situation works. The top guys, it does work for them. I mean, on a deeply spiritual or philosophical level maybe not. But as far as practicalities and statistics go. These men have fun and then settle down. They are fine. 

The women, this is all women. Not just a certain percentage. Are screwed up by this arrangement. They effectively, a lot of them, shot above their league in their twenties. But they were not aware of that. If they had gone within their league in their twenties and settled down with their match (their match is the most attractive man that will commit to them). Then they would have kids and live from that place. They would spend their youth and energy on the marriage itself rather than frittered away. And they would get a higher value husband in their twenties than who will settle down with them in their thirties. 

The bottom 90% guys. Well, this is who the red pill is aimed at. This pattern seems fairly correct anecdotally even. Women having fun in their twenties and settling down in their thirties. This is how most of us came to be But that was before the internet. The red pill is trying to tell those 90% of guys. "No, this is a bad deal, here is the information. Don't assume she had 5 partners in her twenties if she tells you that. Ask more questions". So those guys do not get themselves stuck with a resentful sexless wife. 

I am not saying this is 100% correct. I find small problems with this model every so often. It is very useful as a guy to know though because there are a lot of women that WILL tell you they had five sexual experiences in their twenties. While their true body count is three figures. What I am saying this is the red pill argument. 

But then, if you are on X. Every few months or so. You will get a bunch of women jumping on the viral point that the red pill is hypocritical because it shames women for body count but has no problem with mens body count. The women have to be sleeping with someone right.

This is an incoherent point. As already explained. Because it is a large proportion of women. Whom this arrangement effects extremely negatively. And a small proportion of men. Whom, as I have said, this arrangement does not effect negatively as far as can be proven. The majority of men, the bottom 90%, the red pills target audience, are mostly innocent in this arrangement. 

But nevertheless, these kind of stupid points, along with "incel" and other IQ 100 terms. They were already destroyed in the original argument. And yet, they are repeated and repeated. The same thing with Kay Podgees video on Paul being a false apostle. Paulians bring up the most basic points destroyed in the first 10 minutes of the video ("1st Peter says XYZ").

The case can be made, I think, that idiots repeating the same statements without analysing the argument they are pushing against. Is why we can't move forward as a society. If Jesus' true message was practiced. Our society would change overnight. Rather than their being endless Pauls message sermons. Our society cannot move forward due to the pure weight of stupid (and sometimes bad intentioned!) people. 

So bringing these three points together. The coming off X, the female emotion as spiritual mystery, the point about instagram models and the point about stupid people bringing up the same disproven points again and again and again and again and again. I realise this has become a redundant thing in my life. The time involved in trying to figure out female psychology passively... Is wasted. I do not need to go on therapy types of female youtubers. Not the ones oozing feminine softness anyway (I am still subscribed to one that is more logical and practical). I don't need to go on gotcha videos about say, the woman in France that was super pro Refugees then had her store looted by them. These people are idiots. They would be idiots if they incarnated as men. It does not matter what they think or do. There is certainly no larger spiritual relevance to it. I need, to avoid that kind of redundant energy from being something I ever have to pay attention to. 

Sounds subtle but, I think it is quite significant. Withdrawing from the various irrelevancies like this allows me to more completely focus on what is relevant. It allows me to access my real emotions more. To do more. Which might allow me to eventually work it into my music.

Second Insight: The potential irrelevance of Philosophy:

After I woke up and was not so interested in Twitter. Another day I went on a massive binge TV watch of a new series I am watching. The next day I was like. Damn, I need to read more. 

So I did. I read Poetry. I read astrology. And I read philosophy. The Philosophy I am focusing on at the moment is Simone Weil. Nietzsche. And on the shelf and planned to be next. Kierkegaard. 

And here, I have hit a snag. Poetry... Wow, I love poetry. And obviously it feeds into my direct goal of music. Astrology... has always been profound, and provides a specific kind of insight. I have a lot of astrology books.

The philosophy though. And I will provide excerpts here. Disgusted me so much I don't think I will continue on with it. 

Getting into philosophy originally was actually listening to Stefan Molyneux. Which I stopped doing when he said that people that had certain behaviours in their lives which I have, shouldn't listen to him. I have a lot of quotes by him which I re read every so often but, now that that is over I am not sure I can recapture the magic by following up on other philosophers. That period of my life was to meet a certain need at a certain time. Also, I clearly have other things I am into which provide a great deal of substance. Astrology is kind of a first principle (if astrology is right then...) I am reading the Law of One and I do have theological considerations.

Anyway, down to the quotes. Simone Weil. I did actually hear that she had a bad reputation for being totalitarian. But this is explained away. Nevertheless, when really reading it. It disgusted me. And it is not the only theoretical problem I find in her works:

The Need for Roots. Part IX.

In the current situation, it is good to allow people to form groups to defend their interests, in other words, pay and the like, and to allow these groups to act within very narrow confines and under the constant eye of the government. 

As for the political parties, if they were all rigorously banned in a general climate of freedom, it is to be hoped that it would at least be difficult for them to carry on a clandestined existence. 

It would not be difficult for political parties to continue underground if a fascist cunt like you was in charge, Simone.

Page after page reads like this. She just wanted to start up her own fascist government.  

Nietzsche, is not quite so clear cut. 

Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil. Part 13.

Physiologists should think again before postulating the drive to self- preservation as the cardinal drive in an organic being. A living thing desires above all to vent its strength - life as such is will to power - : self preservation is only one of the most direct and most frequent consequences of it. - In short, here as everywhere, beware of superfluous teleological principles! - such as it is the drive to self- preservation (we owe it to Spinoza's inconsistency). For this is a requirement of method, which has essentially to be economy of principles. 

So the most fundamental drive is the will to power and not the need for self preservation.

There is some basis for this idea I think. It is hard to justify suicide outside of potentially the desire for power. Suicidal people often want to take revenge on the world. I have often looked at them and thought that their distress is the anger that things didn't go like they wanted it to. If David Wilcocks desires had come to fruition - money, fame, and status (especially spiritual), presumably. It was what he talked about publicly. He would not have killed himself. He screwed up his life, and as if in protest at it not doing what he wanted, of it not working out how he desired it to. He killed himself. 

Suicide seems to me like an extension of the will to power and it also kind of aligns with the Law of One. Potentially. It can be interpreted. The most important thing in third density is the choice of polarity. This takes precedence over the chakra system. So it does make sense.

It also has rewired my understanding of polarity a bit. Nietzsche makes clear that even good people have the desire and mechanisms of power. This is a point not properly emphasized. I don't believe. In llresearches material. Such as the crucifixion of Esmerelda Sweetwater (where the philosophical engagement only happened AFTER the work stopped being a channeled work after Space Girl was abducted. In my view due to free will. My hypothesis is the llresearch groups model of polarity is that the negative experiences power and the positive are powerless). 

But Nietzsche's work also acknowledges the fundamental point that the yellow chakra is as important to the positive energy system as it is to the negative. It might take on a different manifestation being opposite polarities. But it is still important. 

But... and this is the point... Why would it matter? To me, it doesn't really. Nietzsche here hasn't justified his philosophy on first principles. Or a really rigorous argument of any description. It is just what some genius happens to think about some stuff. A modern book with studies and detailed historical arguments is arguably more useful. 

So for these reasons I might lay philosophy down and concentrate my reading time on things that feed back into things that matter to me, and that are useful to me. Like poetry feeding into music.  

I did see something on line that might legitimately be interesting though. Carl Jung seemed to me to be very much in line with the Law of One. Perhaps a fifth density individual, in touch with the Law of One contact. His work discusses things like emotional opposites being brought together:

 

Law of One. Reflection on Orange Ray Blockage.

Just got Google Analytics. Damn, it is confusing. I don't quite know what to do with the information yet. 

I've been thinking recently about the Law of One (for a change!) And I've been thinking of what it is to actually apply the information. Re- reading the Law of One and taking notes on almost every question. It leads to self reflection on how much of it I can use. Am I using it precisely. Even if I do not apply the specific passage I am reading, they are not all applicable to real life. Continuing to read through and scrutinise the text means that it is at the forefront of my mind and I think about other bits I have picked up previously.

One of the central themes of the Law of One, which I have taken more seriously over the past year or so, is the idea that what we experience in the world is catalyst. Which is then used as a kind of nudge towards better understanding our inner world. I have been using this thought process far more frequently. Enough to use it in my general everyday life. It is definitely a perspective that softens reactive, angry behaviour. "This thing is here to teach me, I am to process it and gain understanding on it". Is a different thought process than "you are challenging my status." 

Even with that though. Either the Law of One contact is being intentionally obtuse. Or I am not that able to understand it. This is more true of the second of these two answers:

I will add a bit of emphasis because it is a bit dense: 

Questioner: Thank you. I have a question here from Jim that I will read verbatim: “Much of the mystic tradition of seeking on Earth holds that belief that the individual self must be erased or obliterated and the material world ignored for an entity to reach ‘nirvana,’ as it’s called, or enlightenment. What is the proper role of the individual self and its worldly activities in aiding an entity to grow more into the Law of One?”

Ra: I am Ra. The proper role of the entity is in this density to experience all things desired, to then analyze, understand, and accept these experiences, distilling from them the love/light within them. Nothing shall be overcome. That which is not needed falls away.

The orientation develops due to analysis of desire. These desires become more and more distorted towards conscious application of love/light as the entity furnishes itself with distilled experience. We have found it to be inappropriate in the extreme to encourage the overcoming of any desires, except to suggest the imagination rather than the carrying out in the physical plane, as you call it, of those desires not consonant with the Law of One; this preserving the primal distortion of free will.

The reason it is unwise to overcome is that overcoming is an unbalanced action creating difficulties in balancing in the time/space continuum. Overcoming thus creates the further environment for holding onto that which apparently has been overcome.

All things are acceptable in the proper time for each entity, and in experiencing, in understanding, in accepting, in then sharing with other-selves, the appropriate description shall be moving away from distortions of one kind to distortions of another which may be more consonant with the Law of One.

It is, shall we say, a shortcut to simply ignore or overcome any desire. It must instead be understood and accepted. This takes patience and experience which can be analyzed with care, with compassion for self and for other-self.

Questioner: Basically I would say that to infringe on the free will of another self or another entity would be the basic thing never to do under the Law of One. Can you state any other breaking of the Law of One than this basic rule?

Ra: I am Ra. As one proceeds from the primal distortion of free will, one proceeds to the understanding of the focal points of intelligent energy which have created the intelligences or the ways of a particular mind/body/spirit complex in its environment, both what you would call natural and what you would call man-made. Thus, the distortions to be avoided are those which do not take into consideration the distortions of the focus of energy of love/light, or shall we say, the Logos of this particular sphere or density. These include the lack of understanding of the needs of the natural environment, the needs of other-selves’ mind/body/spirit complexes. These are many due to the various distortions of man-made complexes in which the intelligence and awareness of entities themselves have chosen a way of using the energies available.

Thus, what would be an improper distortion with one entity is proper with another. We can suggest an attempt to become aware of the other-self as self and thus do that action which is needed by other-self, understanding from the other-self’s intelligence and awareness. In many cases this does not involve the breaking of the distortion of free will into a distortion or fragmentation called infringement. However, it is a delicate matter to be of service, and compassion, sensitivity, and an ability to empathize are helpful in avoiding the distortions of man-made intelligence and awareness.

The area or arena called the societal complex is an arena in which there are no particular needs for care for it is the prerogative/honor/duty of those in the particular planetary sphere to act according to its free will for the attempted aid of the social complex.

Thus, you have two simple directives: awareness of the intelligent energy expressed in nature, awareness of the intelligent energy expressed in self to be shared, when it seems appropriate, by the entity with the social complex, and you have one infinitely subtle and various set of distortions of which you may be aware; that is, distortions with respect to self and other-selves not concerning free will but concerning harmonious relationships and service to others as other-selves would most benefit.

I get what a lot of this says in principle. That the life is an extremely complex process of receiving a catalyst. Experiencing a life event. Then going through analysing it and understanding it, accepting it. Etc. 

But in reading this quote. There were some powerful, relevant lines. Such as 'nothing shall be overcome. That which is not needed falls away'. This really helps when you have a strong instinct to try and fight for something that you can't actually get. "I have to do xyz or else my life path is off" kind of thinking. Or if someone is offering opposition to how a person thinks a relationship should be.

There are other relevant bits. But overall, the actual guidance is rather vague. And lines like 'What is correct for one entity may be wrong for another'. Is especially vague. When Don says that the thing not to do is to infringe on the Law of Free Will.  The contact does not validate that as correct. Why? This could be because it is not. Even though reading the Law of One would indicate that in my opinion. It could also be the Law of Free Will. Anyone who votes left, or for a right wing party pretending to be left. Is infringing on the Law of Free Will. So the contact might be infringing on free will by agreeing with that. 

It just struck me that the idea that there are no particular need for care for the societal complex might be a statement that is subtly against voting!? Rather easy for me, I live in a left wing safe seat. 

Anyway, having said that, there is far more of the Law of One to explore. I think that some of the most useable stuff comes from the discussion on archetypes in book 4. That's where you get to what you actually do, best practices to live with in real life. Indirectly in a lot of instances. I think of the Matrix of the Mind frequently.

The real world. Real grounded people. 

Some of this then will be more from memory. It would be silly to engage in a discussion that has a lot of Law of One roots and quote every passage.  

But it seems to me, that in terms of judgement. There are passages that are kind of conflicting. One of the passages. Either 94.9 or 95.9 says something like, in dealing with Carla, that she should ponder the non efficacy of judgement. But another, when discussing ways of understanding service to others and service to self polarity. It is specifically said that those words were the best used to judge accurately in others what is service to other sand service to self behaviour. 

In our lives. There are a lot of people of varying shades of service to self walking about. Some of them might be very service to others, but they are drug addicts or have some other issue that makes them service to self to the extent that it is a problem. 

I recently had the thought. And this does go along political lines. I have seen a lot of reports. Social media types of reports. That amongst homosexuals. There is a LOT of sexual activity. One post was from someone that had been talking to a colleague that said that he would go to a club for an orgy with new people every week. So body count would be in the 1000's. I suppose there is no reason not to. No risk of pregnancy and the male sex drive is high. Apparently, when researchers first heard the stories from this community. They simply couldn't believe it.

Imagining this reality then. Obviously they are not all like that, but of the subsection that are that promiscuous. Imagine someone whose world is constantly doing that. The incredibly energy expenditure that involves. Their lifestyle is that. They do not have any energy left over for reading philosophy or exploring political issues deeply.  

So if someone is engaged in conversation with them, and then starts talking in complex political terms. Redistribution of wealth this, meritocracy that... Or whatever. Then the reaction is not going to be based on a considered thought of said opinions. It's going to be knee jerk based on protecting themselves and their identity. I.e. fundamentally. The Christian right is not pro gay and the left is very pro gay. It is going to be based on that.

Now let's extend this to a straight guy that has a lot of hook ups. So we can capture some more of the subtleties of this point. Straight guys that do hook ups are less promiscuous than that. But some of them not by much. The body count will be in three figures rather than four. But, there is a lot that goes into one of these 'interactions'. Dealing with female emotions is heavy. Even if you are meant to be having a one night stand. Women are emotional by their nature, and, despite women not usually perceiving this and seeing their effect often as only positive. Very often that emotion is a burden. It is a burden men are happy to carry, but it is still a burden. Every honour is a responsibility.

This guy would likely have had to pay lip service to their beliefs and way of being. I have seen it said that pick up artists are more like women in their strategies. Cognitive dissonance means that we cannot engage too much in lying without starting to believe said lies. Also, these women will have a lifestyle. Alcohol and drugs might be what a person needs to remain 'interesting' to said women. 

Also, virtue costs energy. And these decisions mount up. It takes a long time for a person to get to casually being interested in philosophy to reading Nietzsche's original works. It takes a long time for a person to be convinced of the value of what is valuable. Another example might be investigating obscure forms of music. Over time, prioritising hook ups and this lifestyle over real relationships, can hollow out a person. 

If a person is hooking up a whole lot. Do they have the time to give their all to their other friendships? To their family? If someone has a long term relationship and wife those things are usually cut off anyway. But a long term relationship and wife will give more than what is purely carnal. You can spend time with friends with a long term relationship. You meet your family with your wife by your side. So it is not the same thing. 

What I am getting that with all these analogies is... Orange ray blockage. I am wondering if these behaviours are orange ray blockages. 

The boundary between the conscious and unconcious.

Today is going to be a highly weird post. It is in the area of things that are new age and that I perceive to be real. But many would see as crazy or schizophrenic. But then, a whole lot more new age folks very well might perceive as legitimate. 

While perusing Youtube. I came across a Christian channel. Which mentioned, offhandly. That he considered Dream Catchers as part of negative, black magick spirituality. 

I do not necessarily believe that. I don't know for sure that it is not true. But for me, I have found that I have used a dream catcher to good effect in the past. But that now, I have gotten rid of it. My dreams have seemed to have already changed in line with my understandings. But I think there needs to be a longer period for the change to really set in. 

Ah, no, there was no larger article here. Although I thought there would be. My best understanding of what dream catchers do. Is that they simply dismiss a lot of the more negative themes running through your subconscious. Since throwing mine away (Two dream catchers, and another symbolic/ lightly magickal thing related to Islam!) I have had a dream that is more engaged than my previous ones used to be. More like I am a person in a real situation, rather than kind of removed. Proper passionate arguments and such. I have not had a dream with an argument or similar close personal engagement in a dream for all the time that I have been recording and recalling said dreams! 

This also fits with a more secular understanding though. A real world understanding. I used to get loads of nightmares due to medical reasons I could not change. My medical condition causes huge amounts of anxiety. A very physiological, not psychological, anxiety. But now, with improved medical care. I am kind of undoing that. Not only am I handling the issues with the medical condition, But I am undoing all the muscular stress I experienced in those years via going to the gym, as much as I am able. 

So either way you look at it. The point of what I am doing now is to relax into allowing my own self to become more aware of the lower parts of myself that I previously blocked out because they were producing noise, rather than signal, that I was unable to use. 

So after I had that dream. I do feel differently about the world in a way that makes sense. But it might only be temporary. I felt very exposed going on Twitter and saying things. I was not so interested in various other things.

The thing is with this dream catcher kind of stuff is it all feels so... You know. Feminine and irrelevant. Like such a thing is an interesting cognitive exercise. But should not be serious enough to reflect into my real life. I should not be sensitive enough, being male, to it. But in truth, this has caused quite a stir within my being and I do feel that the changes will be significant, and it will be several days before I feel normal again. As this change integrates.