Wednesday, 10 June 2026

Human Design. Reflections and Transits. 4th and final part.

Here is background on the Makerfield election. For anyone that does not have this information:

Youtube: Podcast of the Lotus Eaters: It's All to Play for in Makerfield. June 10th 2026:

https://youtu.be/RsD53nr-jJE?si=5VX-xSmB_02VLZRl

There is a lot that goes into this. For someone that is not educated on  this area. They would assume that Nigel Farage is a legitimate right wing figure. But this would be an incorrect understanding from the perspective of most of the right wing... the right wing that matters. 

My understanding is that Nigel Farage is an intelligence asset. A person that is meant to look like someone that is a real freedom lover, but his real function has been what is called a 'containment op'. He is there to put a lot of the energy of the dissident right into one place that can then be sabotaged. 

Various mechanisms with this. Things such as responding in a bad way to media attacks. Since he is an intelligence asset, the intelligence services working through the media can attack him without being worried about an unpredictable response. being sued when they are in the wrong could be catastrophic. And other things, such as creating personality conflicts. Pretty much every single one of Farage's Party's. UKIP, The Brexit Party. Started an argument at the top levels through dysfunctional leadership and alienated those parties top human capital. 

Everyone knows this about Farage. They might not go as far as the specific technical explanation of how he sabotaged the parties or the likelihood that he is an intelligence asset. But people feel that he is a snake oil salesman. Even the left understand this. 

Currently, in the race for Makerfield. The contenders are Labour, the mainstream party. Reform, Nigel Farage's Party. And Restore. That is a party with a real dissident right figure. That is NOT sabotaging it. Who is running it all very effectively. 

The Globalist Game:

There is a lot, I believe, riding on this one by- election. It is not actually that significant. In the strict laws of politics. Restore or Reform or Labour getting this seat does not matter. Unless the Labour candidate Andy Burnam, does challenge Keir Starmer to the Prime Minister position. And turns out to not be a carbon copy clone of him. Which is unlikely. 

But it does have emotional consequences. At the moment, going on X, being politically engaged is one of the most depressing activities one can engage in. The Henry Nowas case, that lead to riots and arrests, lead to the establishment simply saying "Yes, we know it is unjust, and we are going to continue doing exactly what we are doing". Digital ID is going forward. Many, many seriously unpleasant things are happening at this moment, along with the general everyday disintegration of the society. High prices. Services becoming more and more 'streamlined' Etc.

The left/ tyranny doesn't just run on power though. It runs on the conviction of its adherents. The unflappable belief. That what it does is morally correct. That they are largely agreed with, and anyone that doesn't agree with them has a term under which to dismiss them, a way to minimise their emotional impact. Racist or incel or far right. 

If Restore were to win. Yes, it doesn't change anything technical. But it might change something emotional in how our society runs. It would give Restore supporters another MP and a lot of momentum. And it would scare the establishment. Perhaps make them draw back on some of their worst ideas.  

So the chart:

Firstly, the current transit has Mercury in gate 39 and the North Node in gate 55. All I can think of this as being is that the gate 55 is the hexagram of soul and intensity in a sense. I think this shows the zeal behind Restore. The 39 would be the many attacks against Restore. 

The South Node. "Union". Gate 59. Shows very much the strategy of some of the globalists. The whole 'We need the right to come together'. Their idea of strategy was for everyone to back off and let Restore win Makerfield.  

I wrote before about the channel 17-62. This was when Jupiter was in the gate 62. Jupiter is a kind of spiritual meaning. A spiritual message of sorts. Different from Neptune. An everyday spiritual message. One that applies to everything, not just the psychic areas. 

Mercury taking the place of this day shows what the energy of the day will be. It will be an articulation, a cerebral one. Of Neptune in the gate 17 and what that has meant. So, progressive politics. That there being anxiety over this being in detriment.

The sun in the gate 11.6 and Jupiter in gate 56.2. The 6th line tend to be cerebral and spiritual matters. The gate 56, one of it's big messages, is the Law of Free Will. Jupiter being in the gate 56 tells me that the message that people will need to take from this. If they are able to. Is that this was a free will choice. 11.6 is definitely a good line for the end of a fight. It then leads to gate 10. Which is about the self. So relaxing in a kind of positivity and contentment after a fight. 

Mars in the gate 23.5. This is an interesting line. The entire line, 43-23, is to do with eccentric kinds of insights and ideas (43) and then the tendency to get the group to agree to accept unusual people. The gate of assimilation. 

The 5th line. The throat chakra. Tends to be the place where the truth of the line is clearly shown. Each other line has its own agenda in a sense. The 5th line is truth. The gate 23.5 tends to be, in my opinion, and from the line. About deciding who should be in or out of the social group in general. 

That is simplified. There is a more emotionally complex explanation. But it will suffice. I would say that due to this election, the setting of the next social arrangements are made. If the left wing, then they will carry on with their ostracisation of the right in general as though nothing ever changed. Their will be their groups, and then everyone that can be dismissed. The racist, incel, far right. 

But if the right win. And from what is being talked about in Makerfield. The right are fairly normal business owners and powerful people. Then the left will be threated. And things will start to move into a place where the right are socially ascendant and the left are the ones facing ostracism. In America, this process is already underway. The various degenerates of the left. The immigrants, LGBT, the Karens. Are losing out as DEI and such goes out the window. And the right wing families and tough men are the ones that will be employed and have the resources. (As Trump returns manufacturing to America!)

The fact it is Mars in this position further shows this. I once used to follow Mars specifically around the Zodiac for precisely this kind of energy. A kind of tribal decision on how the group acts towards people.  

Conclusion:

I am glad this set of four articles is done. They feel kind of compulsive to write, but also energy draining. 

I wanted to say this at the beginning. But I have not said it yet. I do not believe in forecasting events like much of what is astrology does. Free will is relevant, and the human design is part of the same system, in my view, that talked about the law of Free Will. 

In the main Human Design. They say that if you experience a transit. you experience the transit 'or not'. The 'or not' is important. It is not nothing, it is the opposite of what the transit says, it is the energy in the opposite direction. Because free will is relevant. 

So what I have tried to say here is 'this is how the energy is set, but it could go either way'. As with my example of the Mars transit and gate 23.5. 

Human Design Transits and Reflections. Part 3 (Note on free will)

Despite my plan for these articles originally being to end the set talking about life planning and passages in the Law of One from Session 60. I have decided I should not go into that. 

I am reading the Law of One book 5. Getting re- reminded of a lot of the things that were said in it. The discussion of the Crucifixion of Esmerelda Sweetwater. I realise that a lot of it is too profound to casually discuss. I was going to talk about life planning and what might be going on in our respective lives. But when I read the Law of One book 5, and what happened with the Law of One group. I just feel that the entire area is a bit above my head. 

It also goes against the Law of Free Will a little it seems to me. The most important Law in the Law of One. Except possibly, and only possibly. The Law of One itself. It is a little frustrating to be writing about things like the Human Design, that is all very abstract. This transit is happening so it kind of correlates, from the channel description, to this other thing in real life. But the argument could be made that it is all just force fitting events to abstract things which could connect to any other abstract thing. I feel on an intuitive level though this makes sense. I do not have the 'authority' to really confront people with truths that could change their perspectives. It reminds me of this:

Youtube: gamer1001: TSCC FBI vs Cromartie Scene: August 15th, 2008

https://youtu.be/NWZFkPiFlkE?si=tKgx0bUQcAz3vwro

One of the things I love about science fiction. And one of the things that is often not done that well. Is when people that have refused to see something. People that are generally skeptical. Are confronted with something that is undeniably supernatural. And more powerful than they are able to confront.

This was a big draw for the book series 'The Expanse'. Where a kind of supernatural fungus starts doing a lot of things. Like, taking over a human space ship and making it go far faster for example. The thing about a lot of the characters in The Expanse. Is that a good deal of them were arrogant bureaucrats. The kind that perceive themselves to have a kind of absolute power. 

In this scene, a person from an organisation known to be tyrannical. The organisation that shows government power. Is absolutely slaughtered and someone who was previously suspicious of these kinds of things. Skeptical. Is suddenly confronted with a very real manifestation of that thing they do not believe exists. 

It often feels like it would be good if this breaking out of skepticism was from a positive force. But a negative force is just as good. 

Transits.

 

So, two left here then. The 21-45 and the 39-55. Then I will move to the Makerfield election. The 21-45 I am taking from my own experience only. The 39-55 is from the world only. Only the one I already did in part 2. The 17-62, did both internal and external. I will probably, not definitely, cover the 39-55 and Makerfield election in the next article together. I have noticed a strong correlation with the Nodes and political events. Since gate 55 is the North Node it ties both things together.

The 21- 45.

As I have looked into the Human Design. I have found the numbers following the hexagrams to be important and to show exactly what one would think they show. They are like a chakra system in a sense. 1 is the root chakra concerns. 6 is the spiritual concerns.

This happened with Venus' movement through the gate 39 recently. When transitting Venus was in gate 39.1 It was a heat wave day. While out walking I saw a blonde girl. Very thin body, with huge breasts, in a bikini going down the beach. About 20. It was hard to stop thinking of her. It is one of those intense thoughts that I am not sure what to do anything with. Like having a spare puzzle piece. But it would make sense for the first line. Being the root chakra. Being pure animalistic, evaluating of the persons physique and fertility. 

By the time Venus had got to 39.6 though. I grew annoyed with the constant subtle leftism of reddit. The endless sub reddits that are "non political". So any right wing posts are censored. But they just happen to let left wing posts through. Either directly but rarely. Open anti Trump jokes for example. Or very subtle left wing posts, but constantly. "This study shows this", when it does not show that. It showed almost that but you changed the title for your left wing sensibilities. 

Gate 39 is of course provocation and I think they fit a great deal. But if you think of it. The 6th line is the follow on from the 1st line. Leftism, being as illogical as it is. Would not have so much power if it was not supported by the pure, uncontested power, of attractive young women. 

I mention this in the discussion of the 21- 45 so I can talk about the lines. 

Saturn is in gate 21.4. When the Sun moved into gate 45. It became clear to me that, as I said in part 1. It was not at all productive for me to be on X, and part of what was annoying me about it was that there was a kind of unconscious need for connection. Which is a kind of mental program I have been running for a long time. 

I was deliberately socially ostracised in my first job. In a supermarket. They were all my peers. I started the job at 18. They all deliberately socialised together and did not include me for about four years, as has happened in other jobs. Almost every job in fact. This was why, I think, I was so active in blogging about the Law of One when I first got into it. I was not consciously aware of this, but I was seeking some form of connection. 

This then grew to going on X, commenting and getting ignored. But continuing to do so anyway. I woke up the day that the Sun was at 45.1. and this became obvious to me. 

Today we are at gate 45.4. The lines 4-6 look outwards, not inwards. So I can consider this in a more intelligent way. It seems to me that I do not need a lot of female perspectives on a lot of things. X is full of women giving unresearched perspectives. Things like "Men are just finding out that they have to provide value". Statistics, dating events, clubs and such, are showing men are actually withdrawing. Being subjected to this level of entitlement is toxic. 

The theory of the channel.

There are, in my view, two channels that mainly deal with status. At least as it is expressed in the real world. One is the 34-20. This is to do with purely animalistic status. Do you work hard? Are you tall? Good looking? Do you have a nice body? Nice hair? Are you fun on a night out (with that bouncy sacral energy?) Do you have friends, and nice clothes; and are you able to show off animalistic status?

The second is the 21-45. This is a more meritocratic way of thinking. It says "What do you have to actually offer to this situation?" This is where value becomes an issue. You can arrive with published books, or a podcast, or a skill no one else has. But you will be judged on that. And if you have nothing you had better pray!

It is very meritocratic and ideally should be able to show off something it has done. Or status in a heirarchy it has earned. Obviously it is literally called "The money channel". And money would be another thing here. 

For me, the transit has made me think. "What do I have to offer most of these people on X?" Especially the hot women I realised I was unconsciously trying to connect with in the same manner. The answer is, not a lot, which is why I am ignored. Only as the sun gets to gate 45.4 I realise that a lot of their opinions I find toxic. So they don't actually offer me anything of value either. In fact, the illusion of the possibility of connection. Is a net negative. 

Conclusion.

This is not just about this specific set of days. I have been thinking about my relationship with social media for a long time. Several times previously mentioning here that I went off X as an example. I think this is one of the things that Saturn in the gate 21, and the gate 21.4 has been showing me. 

In regards to the overall discussion. I think there is probably a natural way of solving things that people have. Like, if things are not going well for me in relation to others and I withdraw. Is there a natural way of solving this issue that comes along in that clarity that social media was preventing?

I don't know. But it is a possibility. That is pretty much how the immune system works. You take a rest and it does its work.  

Tuesday, 9 June 2026

Human Design. Transits and Reflections. Part 2

Good, so all the set up was yesterday in part 1 of this article. Now I can get down to the transits themselves. 

 

The three channels here are Neptune in the 17th Gate, meeting Jupiter in the 62nd gate. The 62nd gate also have Venus in it and later, during Makersfield, which is only a week away, will have Mercury there. Saturn in the gate 21.4 meeting the Sun in gate 45.1 on this chart. 45.2 today. And Mercury is currently in gate 39, meeting then the gate 55.

The channel 17-62.

The channel 17-62 is what is known as the "logical stream". There are three streams in the head area. One or two additional that are confined to the bottom half of the chart. The stream starts with gate 63. Which is doubt. Doubt is the beginning of the scientific process. It says "I don't really think that that is true". 

Then it moves on to gate 4. Gate 4 is known as 'youthful folly'. It is the place where mistakes are kind of let go of and forgiven in the main I ching. The point being is that it is the place where doubts get 'tested' and there is no judgement in that. 

If we have a doubt, that is not a really nice energy. So the next part of the chart is to "test" that doubt. "I don't think that is true"... "OK, well if it is not true, how would we test that", kind of energy. 

Then, we get to gate 17, and it becomes a strong opinion. Based on this. "I doubted this, then I could not prove that doubt wrong, so my opinion is that the doubt is correct which leads me to this opinion". Which is probably going to be controversial since it starts with doubt. That means that gate 62, the preponderance of the small, is sorting out every little detail in order to make ones case.

Of course, in real terms, if there is another reason, say propaganda, the resulting belief is more important than the process. For some sort of self centered reason. Then the opinion, once it is presented, has not backing, and it is taken apart at the level of the 17-62. With the proviso that at the level of the 17-62, there is real consequence. Whereas at the level of the 63-4, everything is still more cerebral. 

Real effect of the transit.

I have two places where I think this has shown up. This is one that I have a political event to attach to this. 

The first is in my own posts. I have been writing about the Law of One, potential contradictions. Things to do with healing energy and such. This is of that energy.

But also, there has been a massive political scandal, in the UK. Over the death of Henry Nowak, and the police prioritising, in the real world. Progressive politics at the expense of an innocent 18 year old boys life. I think that is this energy. I.e. like I said with propaganda. The 63-4 wasn't done properly. The opinion was formed without reference to a coherent cerebral process. So it was tested in the real world. The 17 is the opinion, and the 62 was it being applied in the real world. But since it is service to self, then comes the consequence.

Both these examples also fit with the transiting planets. Neptune is a very spiritual planet. With the Law of One example. It is all about dream interpretation or Law of One type of stuff. But the transit also shows political things and especially the madness of progressive politics in its negative aspect. That is effectively the service to self side of the same energy. 

Jupiter is also a very social planet to do with large groups of people. It is that celebratory aspects, like a party, or a religious group celebrating. There was a big social aspect to the Henry Nowak thing. 

Conclusion.

I had planned to do all three aspects here. But it is harder work than my normal blogs. I will do the other two aspects, plus the Makerfield election, plus, as I have already said, more thoughts on the Law of One and life paths and such. 

Monday, 8 June 2026

Human Design. Transits and reflections. Part 1.

The personal information and reflections I will include at the beginning here are going to directly relate to the substance of the post. I am explaining my experience and showing where it reflects into the transits. To gain insight into them. 

I am going to talk about things such as the personal pains of being low status and such like that. This is not to indicate I think I am uniquely in a bad place. I'm sure there are high status people out there with jobs they hate, abusive relationships, and world views that are a mess, that are living far worse than me. It is a reflection on the situation in reference to the transits. 

The Human Design is one thing that, intuitively, I feel is on a whole other level. Like, if I were to move forward with my insights and ability to handle life. I think the human design is important in that. But somehow, it also requires more energy to talk about. 

A reflection on status in general:

Youtube: Jonathan Bi: Look at the modern Neitscheans. August 30th 2024. 

https://youtube.com/shorts/k3FhaMy-WtM?si=nvIgDxKS-xszhg7B

I do not agree with this. Nietzsche had a chronic disease. So in an important way, he was not able to gain status. He was not able to walk around with a hot bird on his arm for example. 

Red-crested korhaan - Facts, Diet, Habitat & Pictures on Animalia.bio

But I would say, that as a person with a disability myself. This would create more insight into status, rather than less. 

The example given by Jonathan Bi. Of the jocks. I would say, that a "jock". Lives their life, then there is some reason they experience temporary low status. Then they go and do something, like go to the gym and win a football game. Then they are experiencing high status. They stop thinking about status a great deal. 

High status people tend to reflect on the annoyingness of low status people bothering them. But this is not so much about the mechanics of status. It is more about being annoyed. High status people also have a lot more people they are dealing with mostly. Not always but mostly. So they have less opportunity to reflect on what is going on with these things. They are suddenly thinking about their work project or wife or whatever.

Low status though, they do not get this let off. While some of them are in low wage jobs so I guess that is filling a lot of their time and taking their energy. If someone is disabled. I.e. effectively low status without some of the accompanying issues. So they are stuck with endless free time to think things over and no ability to gain status.

But their body knows status is important. So it continually pushes for them to think on that area to motivate them to uncover the keys to gain status. And reproduce.  

For this reason, I wonder if Nietzsches work isn't really for high status people. High status people probably don't need to be told they are all that, and there is a lot of purely economic arguments that can handle that side of things. Like Ayn Rand.

Nietzsche's work is about the low status. "I realise you have been dealt a bad hand but do not fall into slave morality". The only way to oppose that if the emotions are pushing for that sometimes is possibly to overcorrect. 

Todays Human Design.


On the subject of the Human Design. I have a little bit of an insight of myself as a manifestor. I explained yesterday, that sometimes I create mental reasons to incentivise me to change behaviours. Which never work. But the thing that doesn't work is just a single moment of clarity. 

What I think I mean by that clarity is "rage". Another thing I changed recently. On top of the alcohol and chocolate. Was I was on Reddit and someone just made a snide little comment. I realised the only thing I receive there are snide, whiny little comments. And I just thought... "You know what, I am done". And I have not been back. 

So the manifestor "anger" might be productive after all! It is almost like the tool to get rid of the negative. It is also interesting to me that this happened after I went to the gym. It kind of revealed an emotion I already had. I have felt for a long time, anger is somehow the key to positive movement forward.

A similar thing happened this morning with X. While I am not sure I will stop X per sey. I did notice an issue with it. 

Like the disabled person that constantly thinks about status. I think I am caught in a similar loop. As are a lot of people. X is partly filled with beautiful women. That a person can then either comment on or direct message. And pretty much never get any kind of response. The men are not much different. There is more of a 'pull' to female posts though. They say things that are easier to relate to. A picture of them or a simple one line point on something. Rather than an obscure essay (that differing style may be due to the differing status between men and women? Men try harder to be heard?)

I have been on twitter for something like eleven years. I think I first went on because I was passionate about UKIP in about 2015. Conversing like this with people in general. Saying a lot of stuff and not getting anything back. Is OK for say, a few years. But this has been many years now. My real life experiences are not much different. 

It also leads to self reflection. What is the reason I am doing that on a real level? The reason I am responding to messages, online, and in my real life. Is the general background idea that if I do so. Things will kick off and I will have people to talk things over with. I am not even as far as wanting anything physical to develop with any particular women. I just want to interact with them enough that they are not an alien (and distinctly aristocratic) creature. 

On youtube, the idea is things will kick off and people will value my insight. But on youtube, they brought in a kind of early digital ID that was voluntary. But since I did not do it, because I have an out of date passport. My views were canned. From like. 5 - 30 a video to 0 - 1.  A big reason I don't get much attention on X is that I have not paid the subscription for X premium. On the 'for you' tab, almost every post is from a premium account. On the comments, the premium comments are first in any thread. 

I can't even volunteer in my own life. I need a character reference, not a work reference. I don't have a character reference because I never interact with anyone.  

For later parts: 

This is a reflection on what Saturn in the gate 21.4, is saying I believe. It has suddenly gained a voice today, the day I have this insight. Now that the sun is in gate 45.  There is also the Neptune - Jupiter connection of 17-62, and I think that could relate to my conversation yesterday. About really analysing the Law of One quotes in depth and bringing in concepts like "first principles". That really fits with that channel. There is another channel here. The 39-55. The 55 is on the North Node and I have noticed the Nodal points are really big on politics. It will be interesting when the North Node goes into gate 30 at the end of July. Since I have some idea what gate 30 is. 

I also wanted to perhaps analyse the chart for the Makerfield election. This is on June 18th. So results will come in early June 19th. Analysing the chart for about three in the morning on June 19th. 

Then I might end with a Law of One quote reflecting on life paths and things from Session 60. Following on from the one I quoted yesterday from that session. 

I planned to do all that in one article. But it is not practical. Since these are parts of the same article though. I do not know if I will do part 2 later today or tomorrow.  

Saturday, 6 June 2026

Healing and it's many complexities.

One of the issues I have found with any kind of self improvement. Is that you think it would be great to do some thing or other. You move to do that. But then you realise there was a powerful reason why you have chosen that thing as a kind of support mechanism. 

It makes change slow. My priority goal at the moment is to push ahead a bit out of my comfort zone in relation to music. I want to push beyond scales. I love scales. But I need to do more than scales. Need to get music as songs and life force going.

So I planned to practice music before I do any watching TV. Go to sleep for the evening. Between about 18:00 and 22:00. I sleep in two sections. Wake up completely exhausted (eaten three cereal bars and some meat the whole day!) and watch TV to wake up a bit, no energy to play music. Not even enough to meditate. So TV before playing the intro to 'Nothing Else Matters'. The pattern re- initialises.

The things I have successfully broken off. Were not my own choice like that. They weren't like "well I need to change x habit to encourage y habit". They were just incredible deep and sudden realisations. Sometimes pushed by events. So I got allergic to chocolate. Stopped that. I had alcohol, felt ill and slept fifteen hours. Stopped that. But I have noticed many times with many different things. Assuming a person can change a habit through a kind of will power is not useful. Change happens due to emotions changing. As a kind of indirect effect of a positive movement in ones foundations. 

I go to the gym for the pure love of going. Never had to motivate myself to do that (I realise a lot of people do, but I have a deep aggression that feels like utter relief when it is gotten rid of for a while). A lot of positive behaviours. Prayer, meditation, dream interpretation etc. Change things incredibly slowly. Often working by just making a person a little more happy. So avoiding the absolute powerless energy drain of despair. Meditation changes things partly I think by just making things more intense. So a person is more disgusted and angry at their own bad habits. And those habits change in singular moments of clarity.

A bit of the wisdom that I think can add real benefit to peoples lives. It seems to me men are meant to put together this kind of wisdom to share with their kids. But the world is very dysfunctional and not a lot of people are having kids. 

Anyway, just thoughts. Not the main point I wanted to discuss.

Healing and it's many complexities.

The more I have gone into spirituality. The more there has been a kind of nagging annoyance that one of the things that motivates people into it, one of the claims, or expectations of the whole area. Goes seriously unmet. That would be, the idea that we can go into energy therapies or something like that. And that our health issues will be healed and improved. It seems a lot of the time. That regardless of this expectation. If someone has a serious disease. Arthritis, Eczema, Type 1 diabetes. They are stuck with that. They are stuck with the surgeries, medication, and other medical supports. 

It really rubs me the wrong way. Jesus never met someone and said he could not heal them because of their preincarnative choices. It just feels like something is amiss to me in that energy therapies in general are so apparently inefficient when judged on this standard. I do not have firm claims as to what energy therapy can and can't do. I do not know if it is changing something that would be considered very powerful by the Law of One contact. Like someones theological feelings. But what it cannot seem to do, as far as I am aware. Is heal something that is as serious as a lot of people live with.

Reading book V of the Law of One. In Carla's written excerpt before the session 60 fragment. She talks about how her Arthritis flowed with her will to live. When she felt unbelievably down due to Dons death and didn't want to continue. This does have the benefit of, at least, Carla's real and lived experience. 

Another thing that annoys me about the entire area, is when it is discussed by the Law of One. It is one of the only areas that insists on a paradigm that is difficult for me to access. While I suppose the fact they had a support group there and were doing magickal practices is also this. Much of the Law of One is very accessible. It talks about theology. The archetypes, in my view, lead in an almost atheistic direction. The potentiator is about the subconscious mind. The transformation even more so. These things are things that a secular paradigm works with (although much of the terminology of the 'secular paradigm'. Comes from Carl Jung who was extremely spiritual in his outlook and got a lot of visions). The subconscious mind I have found to be a tool that is both useable and clearly "there".

As a side point here, I suppose NDE's do, in some way, prove, a larger spiritual reality.  

The Law of One even makes a comment along these lines:

Questioner: This brings out the point of the purpose for the physical incarnation, I believe. And that is to reach a conviction through your own thought processes as to a solution to problems and understandings in a totally unbiased or totally free situation with no proof at all or anything that you would consider proof, proof being a very poor word in itself. Can you expand on my concept?

Ra: I am Ra. Your opinion is an eloquent one although somewhat confused in its connections between the freedom expressed by subjective knowing and the freedom expressed by subjective acceptance. There is a significant distinction between the two.

This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other inpourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.

That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third density.

With the energy work and preincarnative distortion stuff (which is very subjective, at least as far as I can tell. As it is experienced!). This is actually starting to shape up to be a contradiction within the material itself. 

Questioner: You are saying, then, that the physical distortions that the instrument experienced are part of a balancing process? Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The physical distortions are a result of the instrument’s not accepting fully the limitations placed prior to incarnation upon the activities of the entity once it had begun the working. The distortions caused by this working, which are inevitable given the plan chosen by this entity, are limitation and, to a degree consonant with the amount of vital and physical energy expended, weariness, due to that which is the equivalent in this instrument of many, many hours of harsh physical labor.

This is why we suggested the instrument’s thoughts dwelling upon the possibility of its suggesting to its higher self the possibility of some slight reservation of energy at a working. This instrument at this time is quite open until all resources are quite exhausted. This is well if desired. However, it will, shall we say, shorten the number of workings in what you may call the long run.

The only bit relevant is the first few lines of the answer. 

In the last section of this post I will talk about German New Medicine and a bit more about the idea/ paradigm. That a lot of these issues in some way come down to the idea that "everything is perfect". 

My point about this excerpt though is... how are we meant to understand and access that? I suppose we just know. How is Carla meant to know what her "pre incarnative distortions" are?

Arthritis is a very restricting disease. I think new age paradigms about what it is about talk about that a lot. Carla is in her position where very little of her life is under her control. Her life is very much "restricted". She cannot break off and go do something else. And a lot of the restrictions impose on her life and emotional state a great deal as well. 

Carla, didn't have kids. And this is a significant thing to be upset about. She also lost her reproductive window, since she was 25, to Don. This is not something that I would do to a woman. It would be pretty bad. It is something that would be considered, and I consider, a morally negative set of choices. It is rightfully considered a negative thing to use up a girls reproductive window, for like a decade, and not wed her. Thereby potentially ending her ability to have kids. I don't know in what world this would not be known about. 

I am not likely to have kids. At the moment, all I would settle for, in good conscience. Is either a girl who physically could not have kids (because women often change their mind when their biology kicks in at 30), free will isn't a strong principle when it comes to womens hormones; or something short term. And/ or a friendship. But I have learned women think they can change your mind when they can't, they fantasize. So I would be wary of even the friendship. 

I would like kids, and if a girl was able to have kids and wanted to make it work. I would fully discuss the limitations of my disability. Which I think would end in the practical realisation that it is not likely or possible. But if it turned out it was for some reason (like opulent wealth of something), that would be good.  

But everything that happened lead to the Law of One contact. This creates a few confusing issues. Did this set of choices, that I think can be defined as morally negative. Lead to the good result of the Law of One contact?

Possibly not. Don and Carla could have stayed in contact in a professional manner, if not lovers. But the entire situation I think adds a difficult dimension to the whole higher life planning philosophies.  

German New Medicine. Working the paradigm.

Reading the Law of One, Don's questioning on these areas. It seemed to me that the three of them were having trouble understanding how illness can in itself be an expression of perfection. I.e. the perfection of the Creator. 

German New Medicine offers some perspective here I think.  

In German New Medicine, the body adapts in a way that completely makes sense that causes the illness. But this is a very rational and in some cases preferable adaption. It only doesn't fit because of the world we live in today that interferes.

As an example. When a mouse runs to get away from a cat, when it has finished, it often lays down and experiences a kind of asthma for a few days. Another example is the idea of someone that feels threatened at home, so their bladder grows as a way of "marking" their territory. 

The one for type 1 diabetes, would be that a person experiences a lot of stress as a child, and because this stress requires an unbelievable amount of energy to psychologically meet. This breaks the pancreas in a sense. 

Again, this still does not really solve anything to me. It is not practically applicable. Dr Hamer, who created this system with the aid of a lot of brain scans and good evidence. Was able to heal people with these theories apparently. But how the rest of us do so is not known. 

It strikes me, that if a lot of these illnesses are based on a kind of perfection. Based on being subjected to stresses where a psychologically healthy person will shut down. Like, the child that experiences that stress and has no stress response is probably not healthy. The only self that is not effected is the one that does not have a self to hurt. Sensitivity is human.

But a lot of people, in our current society and economy. Are subjected to ongoing stresses of these types. For instance, in the lockdown. A lot of kids were not able to leave the house and go to school so they were killed by abusive caregivers. 

In that way, a lot of these breakdowns can be seen as kind of healthy. If we are all part of one big system. We are like the cells of a body. The breakdown shows where the problem is. Or indicates an area to investigate further.  

This whole thing does motivate people to solve the overall problem. If a bunch of people get ill, they all investigate the world from that place, identify the issue, and say they vote well, or promote the right philosophy. Eventually this becomes like a healing agent. They heal the society, and those that are not aware there is a problem get the eventual improvement of a healthier society. The whole body improves.

So I suppose it is kind of perfect. But in general. It is all... very unsatisfying.  

Working with prayer. Prioritising wisdom.

These are my efforts at working with different prayers and their effects.

This was the one I used for years which I have decided recently not to use, and have got quite a lot of good effect from stopping:

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle.

Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil.

May God rebuke him, we humbly pray, and do thou, O Prince of the heavenly hosts, by the power of God, cast into hell Satan, and all the evil spirits, who prowl about the world seeking the ruin of souls.

A very beautiful prayer. Like how much of the bible is very beautiful. It has literary merits even separate from theological ones. 

Anyway, in accord with the Law of One book 5 I decided this wasn't suitable. It tended to get me to focus on the evil 'out there'. To make up that mythology in my mind. When I had annoyances I would think of them while saying this prayer. 

So I changed it to this one, which Carla Rueckert said everyday:

Lord, make me an instrument of your peace:
where there is hatred, let me sow love;
where there is injury, pardon;
where there is doubt, faith;
where there is despair, hope;
where there is darkness, light;
where there is sadness, joy.
O divine Master, grant that I may not so much seek
to be consoled as to console,
to be understood as to understand,
to be loved as to love.
For it is in giving that we receive,
it is in pardoning that we are pardoned,
and it is in dying that we are born to eternal life.

Another thing which I have also been working on during this time was affirmations. I have about twelve affirmations or so. The last one was "I am able to perceive auras". 

This one, in my view, created another kind of blockage or problem. I walked around seeing auras for a little while last night. But I do not think this is a thing that is useful to me. I think it fits in with this whole 'love' way of being that is not suited to me. 

I got a lot of effects from this. I was more able to listen to others. But at the same time. I had less to say. That doesn't sound like a big deal. But it is a big deal. We are often told to listen twice as much as we speak or other such things. But I have found when I don't express a great deal there is a lot of awkwardness and silence. Like people are waiting for me to speak. 

People, also, in practice. Do not want a deep conversation. They want to express their frustrations and have them unsolved. Because people don't change much anyway. With this prayer I found myself asking logical questions like what value system the person is basing what they are saying on. So that the problem does not recur. 

I also got two other issues. One was exhaustion. The thing with 'love' as a mode of being is that it is purely giving, while wisdom has to watch how it uses it's energy. The other was what felt like an almost manic episode late last night. A very intense feeling that love was the solution and desire to send visualised love and light to everyone I could think of. 

This was immediately met by a corrective dream. 

So this is the one I am now settling with. I feel strongly this one is far more positive and suited to me:

Lord, grant that I may always allow myself to be guided by You,
always follow Your plans,
and perfectly accomplish Your Holy Will.
Grant that in all things, great and small,
today and all the days of my life,
I may do whatever You require of me.
Help me respond to the slightest prompting of Your Grace,
so that I may be Your trustworthy instrument for Your honour.
May Your Will be done in time and in eternity by me,
in me, and through me. Amen.

It is ironic. Over time I have shortcutted within myself that female expressions are generally "love" and male generally "wisdom". This prayer, one of those of Saint Teresa of Avici. Was written by a woman, and is strong in wisdom I think. It strongly suits me. It already feels better than the Prayer of Saint Francis that felt good, but even after I said it initially would often feel quite draining. The one immediately previously was written by Saint Francis. Who was male. That one is a 'love' one. 

Saint Teresa of Avici seems to me like a very wisdom oriented person. She has the same sense of visions and guidance and such as Carl Jung (I think this is a fifth density thing! Most of the time.). Someone that it might be good for me to look into and read in general. 

Anyway, the affirmation to see auras is out. The prayer of Saint Francis is out. And the idea that love is some sort of solution is out. It is a part of the background energy. But I have to prioritise wisdom. Rather than visualise love to people that are negative or indifferent to me. I prioritise wisdom. Like playing guitar. Or looking at philosophy and such. 

With the social issues in my life. They are not going to be solved by loving anyone. But with navigating through them with wisdom.  

Friday, 5 June 2026

Transcient information and a changing world.


One of the many tarot card like images I have made now AI is accessible. These are taken from dream images and they have specific meanings. 

This one is when some part of you, some truth, perhaps something you need. Is caught up behind some of the obscure ways of doing things in an office. The rucksack didn't need to be floating. The AI did that. 

That kind of neoliberal agenda kind of thinking. The idea that faceless weirdos in some higher, unseen, but not inaccessible echelon, are making decisions... "For the highest good". In the liberal way of thinking. 

Youtube: Promethean Updates: The Trump Bibi Call: What London Doesn't Want You To Know. June 3rd 2026.

https://youtu.be/tzqi6FPNG7o?si=yoMeHBlEOTopZcXa

Transcient information.

Yesterday, I wanted to talk about transcient information but did not do so. This was one of the videos. The other one was one that was more focused on things like Reptilian shapeshifters and whatnot. 

The Law of One contact, advised the people it was talking to about 'transcient' information, and that it was very negative. I do not quite understand why this is. But I have a theory. 

If I hear something about Reptilians. Like, in that excerpt it was that the queen is a Reptilian, and the woman was a survivor of Satanic rituals that sometimes featured said queen. 

The Promethean action video above. Is very very good research. In a lot of videos the Promethean action group are making the case that the UK is a kind of deep state. The UK is the head of the snake. And they bring receipts. Also that Trump is heading off a lot of the globalists operations. 

All of these things can be found in the real world. Most of these things are kind of relevant to our real lives. Not directly perhaps. But the things they talk about will come down the line eventually.  

But the thing with Reptilians. OK, so a woman says that she was abused by Reptilians. Once you have even entered this paradigm you are in a kind of trap polarity wise. Can I lie detect this? No. She could be telling the truth. She could be lying. If she is telling the truth, then assuming she is lying is not a particular nice thing to say. 

The lack of me being able to check any of this means that even if I found four people that were telling nothing but the truth. The fifth might be lying. Or lying like 20%. So it is pretty inevitable that anyone looking at that information is going to absorb a lot of falsity.  

There is also a rootlessness to engaging with that kind of material. I do not know what the truth in those areas is ultimately. But I suppose, for my purposes. I will find out for sure when everyone else does.  

The changing paradigm. 

I have observed something about the 'normal' paradigm. 

I would say men and women look at things in a different way. For men. The desire is kind of more grandiose. They want to live and to conquer. To be very good at what they do and to live in a meritocracy. To be unquestionable because of their amazing talent.

One film that I thought perfectly showed male and female desires was 'Walk the Mile'. Which was a fictionalised biography of Johnny Cash. He is a complete wreck. But because he is so amazingly talented people put up with him. So I'm talking about male psychology. Not the complete wreck part, just the amazing talent part.

The female response to this. His eventual wife in the show. Was also valued for her singing talent. But she was able to show Johnny a great deal of love/ compassion/ kindness but string out the option of a relationship for many years. So she was chased a long time by a high status man. Seeming outwardly to have behaved perfectly. 

I would say this is 'gods plan' in a way. That men are in a strong position and able to move and do things well. Women in this paradigm for some reason earn (but are not given) the reputation of being loving and idealised. 

The other plan, the one of 'the enemy'. Is the neoliberal agenda. Loads of weird committees of Karens and other things. Faceless bureaucrats making decisions and treating the populace in a way like infants. The normal people see the world like this. They have been, in a sense, trained to see things a bit like the Iraq war. Where people stand in UN rooms and make arguments and the media carefully massages the population into the deep states chosen actions.  Like with the Iraq war. 

We are in a period of change though. Trump has been doing things differently to the "meeting in stale board rooms discussing the meaning of everything for years before acting". In Cuba, he just went in, abducted their President. It was done. The Promethean action video talks about this. I think this model will move to other countries as well. Male or male style leaderships. Where the leaders are actually competent and do things. 

Revealing psychology.

The revealing of psychology of these political events I think is interesting and it might be partly what the point of all this is. As it relates to polarity. 

I used to know a girl in University. Not well. We were in opposite dorms and she was, we just talked a few times. She was just somehow grounded and social in some way. A few times I talked to her and the subject of conspiracy types of things came up. At which point she said she agreed with conspiracy and mentioned a documentary that had gone around recently. Rothschilds, WW2, things like that. 

Then, later on, the EU referendum became a thing and we had discussions about it. We disagreed but everything was fine. Then, the Brexiteers won the EU referendum. And I was blocked and she never talked to me again. 

A lot of 'moderates' and left wing types have this perspective. They are fine for you to have an opinion different to them. As long as it doesn't actually effect anything. As soon as they can't dismiss your idea as that of a powerless eccentric. You have suddenly become a real danger (You are no longer an 'infant'. Since the left is a very female way of thinking.)

It is partly to do with safety I think. People feel safe if there are this set of bureaucrats above them keeping everything running as they see it. I also remember going for a drink with some work colleagues. They were guys, were both pro EU. And both then told me about their horrible mothers. 

The psychology is a fundamental lack of feeling safe, and so attaching to bureaucracy, in replacement for religion. Or in replacement for a healthy psychology. 

Which means that, as things shift. The careful put together manner of a lot of these people will start to shift. Because they are only OK when the political system they believe exists for their benefit. That reminds them of female leadership. Is in place. 

Dismissiveness.

In many ways, the left and mainstream types are unaware of reality that is coming to meet them. Their emotions get in the way as I discussed in the last blog. They prefer not to see that Restore will likely win Mackelsfield. The BBC will oblige them because it is made by the same types of people. When these things happen, as they have with Trump. All these peoples unhealed trauma comes to the surface.