I am learn-ding. As Ralph from the Simpsons says! A few minutes ago I was completely unable to write this blog. I also had these strange feelings of malevolence, of being "unprotected". And I had forgotten my prayers and affirmations today. I did them, and the blog was just 'there' all of a sudden in my mind. I would have preferred to do the prayers earlier today but was genuinely rushed off my feet. My tasks were being fit in to the minute!
The details I am going to drop here are personal details, stuff I would not share with a large audience. But things that I think are OK to share with anonymous people online. Some that are from places like Kentucky, according to my stats. Which is not going to effect my personal life. Is not going to uncomfortably expose anyone or make anyone feel uncomfortable.
It is one of those things in life that what we have to express is often not valuable without honesty. Honesty often includes pettiness. It is a hard line to walk to remain honest and avoid unneccessary pettiness! Pettiness is a shared human experience!
So, I have the theory that a lot of our basic thoughts have a point. So, I noticed that some of my thoughts are relevant to the future and I have a belief and faith in the Q narrative. I believe that in the future, we need to get to the paradigm the Law of One describes. The Q narrative is the most likely route to meet that. A lot of the Q posts do check out. Although, it is not healthy to actually engage with it in my view. (Going to the Law of One's discussion on 'transcience'.)
The perfection of everything.
So I believe, and believed FAR more strongly when I was pathologically political. That in the future, there will likely be a mass arrest and events that will level the playing field a great deal in relation to status. If a fair few people in my life are not that pleasant, since I don't follow their left wing political views. There was a time I relished, as a revenge fantasy. Those people losing out and me being obviously correct. Now I no longer do. My personal life and health is improving and I do not think so much about that kind of thing. I also, am changing some of my viewpoints in powerful ways, but that is for another post!
But today I had the insight. Even if that never were to happen. As it might not. Or it might look very different. These kinds of thoughts prepare me for a future where the power dynamics have changed. Which they might do for any number of reasons. I am basically thinking of and subtly planning for, preparing for, a reality where I have more power and status than I do now. So the thoughts, even if they ended up being incorrect, are actually quite productive. The use of power probably will be relevant to my future in some manner!
Which brings me to the theory I wanted to discuss. I have often wondered about the nature of revenge and revenge fantasies. Revenge was talked a little against in the bible I would say. But I want to separate a kind of unhealthy revenge from this discussion. An unhealthy revenge I would define, is that the person was completely justified in doing what they did. But I did not like it. This is in contrast to a person claiming to be a friend, claiming the honour position of 'friend' and then doing unfriendly things. Because the latter chose the obligation, and potentially received through the deception. The unhealthy revenge is say... I want a connection with a girl and she does not want one with me. If I were to take revenge on that in a physical way, I don't think that would be right because her not wanting anything to do with me is her own sovereignty. Her own free will.
I do think there is a place for the second type in that, if I ask a girl out, she says no, then I gain in status and she looks regretful I can enjoy that. But I do not think 'revenge' in this circumstance is generally justified.
I am also not talking about serious revenge here. Not like... physically beating someone up. I just mean general petty grudges.
But I suspect, these little annoyances... Have a place. The people that have put us down and that we would like status to push back on them. I think this might be, in some cases, a positive indication of the right direction.
And so, this is where I end this blog. I had fully expected to go far further. It is all in my mind. But somehow I know I do not need to write further (Narrators voice... But he did, in fact, write further!). A point I was going to expand on with examples, is the idea that aligning with principles, such as those found in the Law of One and other places. Is likely to align you with what that 'revenge' would be against people that have treated you badly.
The two modes.
I have also noticed a concurrent insight. I have essentially two modes. One is the emotion I had since I was a child and this includes a great deal of sentimentality. The other, is the part of me that has grown up on the kind of information I talk about on this blog. The second part is the "correct" part, so to speak! What feels correct to me. This also connects to insights I have had recently about service to self and service to others. And left and right wing politics. Which is that the environment we see today is the result of the left being mostly successful. The left, the service to self, make a huge drama of not being given further concessions as though this was the worst thing in the world. They never appreciate anything they have 'achieved'. All the misery and death they have achieved so far.
This conceals the fact that they have actually done quite a lot so far. The welfare state has managed to create huge amounts of single mothers and with their various successes. The baseline levels have changed. With that, it means we have to doubt a lot of what is just 'normal' in order to arrive at what is healthy. For me, one of the realisations I have had is the complete lack of strong male role models. Really strong inspiring men in life.
Where this links in is that I said I have two modes. A childish emotional side and a more correct part that is reliant more on principles. Believes in things more. The principled version is that of a 'strong man' and that, is something that I had not completely understood existed, before the insight I just described.
So I will give a good example of this. A personal example I did not want to share. But I will. When I was young, and unwell, but I did not know it. One of the people that was relevant in my life was my little half-sister (referred to just as 'sister' from this point on for brevity). More than a decade younger than me.
I have mentioned her casually before. On my fathers death bed he asked me to look after her. Which... was kind of stupid. My father was the kind of person so disconnected from reality he did things that "appeared" to be correct, because that's what he thought he should do. In my view. By the time he died he was a severe alcoholic, so severe that morphene would not work on him! And he had done crimes in his past that, perhaps they ate at his conscience, although he never expressed anything like that. Or perhaps he lived without one. Perhaps it is some confusing mix between those two.
Because of this, I have put a lot of energy to connecting with my sister, a lot of messages to connect. But, this is of a semi compulsive nature. My early life was spent in 'mysticism' I would say, with a dose of schizophrenia. I assigned virtue to compulsions I had to do things. I was "guided".
As I have grown though, the second person I mentioned has grown. The person that is connected to more objective things. Also to the Law of One.
One of the things I feel "guided" to do every so often is contact my sister. To process things in my extremely powerful cerebral manner (i.e. this blog!) To try and smooth over the rough edges and communicate whatever I think is interesting or profound.
And what tools do I have against such a powerful inner compulsion? Well, contacting my sister has not been very successful. In fact, it has been constantly rebuffed. I have had to accept the idea that she does not like me. Perhaps that's too harsh. Perhaps she considers me a kind of annoyance but the feeling would not go as far as "dislike". Rather like how you don't actively dislike bird poop falling on your jumper. You are mildly annoyed and disgusted, put the shirt in the wash, and carry on with your day.
Against this clear contradiction. I have found a Law of One quote to help me. Now I am not saying anything about my sisters character. But even if she did have any service to self tendencies. I imagine she is service to others with a tiny amount of service to self. The kind a normal positive wanderer would have. But the advice in this quote still stands:
Questioner: Thank you. In closing that part of the discussion I would just say that if there is anything that we can do that is within our ability— and I understand that there are many things such as the ones that you just mentioned that are not within our ability— that we could do for this particular entity, if you would in the future communicate its requests to us we will at least consider them because we would like to serve in every respect. Is this agreeable to you?
Ra: I am Ra. We perceive that we have not been able to clarify your service versus its desire for service. You need, in our humble opinion, to look at the humor of the situation and relinquish your desire to serve where no service is requested. The magnet will attract or repel. Glory in the strength of your polarization and allow others of opposite polarity to similarly do so, seeing the great humor of this polarity and its complications in view of the unification in sixth density of these two paths.
When I get this instinct. And I have let in the more nightmarish compulsion adjacent part of my dreams recently. This is the wisdom I use to oppose it. Contacting my sister, is not going to go anywhere. Even if I said 'everything right'. There is not enough connection there to make a connection.
But without daily reading of the Law of One and keeping the "second person" in place. I would probably yield. Go back to messaging her like a schizophrenic, and have her avoid and ignore me.
The point here, which links to what I am just about to say. Is that the 'second person' is delivering a different message than the first. The young emotional self. I think the principles used by the 'second person' in this example. Does deliver a kind of justice or "revenge", or something like that.
The Q narrative
And this is where I connect back to the Q narrative that I started with, and something that links with the general 'revenge fantasy' kind of mindset.
In the Q narrative, the good guys have taken over and are now engaging in a kind of positive psy op to awaken the population. But what does that mean for us on the 'normal level'. While we kind of sit through societal dysfunction? We are not in danger. But we have not moved into a positive place where service to self viewpoints can be challenged and done away with yet!
For me, what this seems to mean, is that people that dug their heels in at COVID and acted in various disrespectful ways due to their perceived higher status than me (which would be correct, given my disability!) Have had the opportunity to really prove who they are.
I had two of these situations recently. One was a friend, whom I had broken contact with because he had cancelled about twenty arrangement (disrespect!) sometimes clearly having an opportunity to communicate clearly and not saying anything so I turned up anyway. I broke contact with this person clearly. But this person was very apologetic and wanted to meet up again. So I did meet up again. For one time. The second time we met up, some of this personal issues got sorted out because he got a phone call and now... He has gone back to being disrespectful.
A second one was a very long term friend who is now a passionate socialist. The conversation I had with him is exactly like the one that Dagny Taggart has with her brother at the beginning of Atlas Shrugged. The fact was that there was no way of connecting. The guy had, more than socialist tendencies in discussion. He also had very specific ideas about how emotional other people should be and what their views should be. Just like James Taggart.
I went through the ringer with these two and now am back out of contact with them I think. It is not official with the first one, but there is not a lot of time to undo the 'rudeness'.
The conversations after I thought about it though. DID serve a function. And they served the function of closing the door. And I think that is a beautiful thing. Because the door was half open for both of them. The first one because an apology could get him back through it. The second because I did not fully know the issue was not due to my own illness and craziness at an earlier time. Relating with that person once I was sane was very clarifying for me!
The insight.
Of the two inner beings I talked about. The first person would not want these connections closed. The second person though, does not care about the people involved. The lesson gained from the experiences, and the principles involved. Are what is important.
It's not really revenge I am talking about is it? The goal here is lack of sentimentality. A clean break. Where revenge might become relevant is if the Q narrative were to happen. I think the principles involved would lead me to not connect with these people, and if the societal changes happening were traumatising for them. Well that's some tough crap!
It is an insight that is opposed to the codependency friendly version of the Law of One teachings, and Christianity, that a lot of people promote!
A tool very often used in some of these interactions I have noticed. Is the false apology! The false apology was used once by my sister. She apologised and then went right back to the offending behaviour. And then by the second of the two individuals I mentioned. But the lesson I should have learned with my sister was to ask questions. Apologising for what? What behaviour do you think was wrong and how would you change it? What values do you think motivated it? Many other questions like this that refuse to let a person off the hook without genuine contrition and contrition, is hard, almost impossible for these sorts of people.
The kind of people that are putting you down for their own status anyway, are not able to yield status in contrition. If the questioning goes deep enough into their values, such as, a big part of the issue will be leftism in some way. That is an extremely close belief they will not want to have questioned or part with.
These experiences are kind of hardening and clarifying the theoretical basis I have for dealing with people.
Like I said, the second person, the person of the principles. CANNOT just flip to the old way of being. If someone wants to communicate it's like "OK, but I have, one hundred times tried to deal with people without questioning and getting answers on their values, so I will not do that this time". This is the only logical answer. But it also prevents a potential hurdle that some people, these kinds of people, cannot get over!
So, like I said, the principles, positive principles; correlate with the "revenge fantasy".
Conclusion.
Not sure all this was that interesting or relevant. But I think the idea that are grudges are actually an indication in the right direction, and not something to be thrown out in favour of some "love" based spiritual idea. Is one that is worth considering!



