Disclosure Day.

I remember a few years ago. Ten or so. When I still had friends :). A close friend of mine. I knew before this happened what he would say and then what would happen. I told him about this experiment:

https://youtu.be/vJG698U2Mvo?si=Q8tDkfxuoqsb2GVt

He said, very confidently, that if he was to do this test, he would get it because he had a better attention span than most people. I showed it to him, and he did what everyone does. What I did. 

People often have this defence mechanism of sorts. A sense of wanting to insist that they are not lower on the heirarchy perhaps as they see it. Of not wanting to admit any weakness. 

I often walk a dog that is a very scary looking dog. It is not actually my dog. My mother got it from a rescue shelter. It was not clear from the picture how big the dog is. She had been in the shelter for five years and my mother wanted to get her out. She was labelled as a Staffy. 

But when she arrived. It was clear she was actually an American Staffy. They are almost identical but twice the size. Similar to pitbulls, but definitely a separate breed. 

She is actually the softest dog my mother has had, frightened of absolutely everything. Frightened of someone crushing ice, can't bring my guitar into the same room as her. Probably partly because five years in a kennel is traumatising for a dog. But she looks terrifying, built like a tank, and she has a frightening growl/ bark.

The point is, is that I am now in the position of occasionally interacting with people over this. People will say it is fine and they are not scared of dogs. But you will see it in their eyes. Some people are genuinely not even slightly scared. Probably dog owners. It's not who you expect. A young girl the other day showed no fear and muscular men can be very afraid. 

The point, is in many of these conversations and interactions, sometimes conversations where this is relevant. People that are scared will not just say they are, they will say point blank that they are not scared when they clearly are. It is a similar defence to the selective attention test. 

Disclosure Day.

There are some indications that the Trump Administration might be putting forward seeds in relation to the idea of some sort of disclosure of extra terrestrials. Three things. Of course they might not be real signs. But they might be. 

One was Trump putting on his Truth Social posts about Aliens. He later retracted changed this to saying that Aliens are not little green men. But get the immigrants out. The second is that Steven Spielbergs 'Disclosure Day' is soon coming out. Talking about the effects on the world after the revealing of Alien life. The third is that Anna Paulina Luna has talked about getting classified government briefings on Alien hybrids and such.

These things are just small movements. Hints that maybe something like this is on the horizon. Interestingly, all three mentioned similar themes. They live amongst us. That they are already here disguised as humans. Or maybe they just look like humans. 

I have thought about it. I have thought about these things for years. I have always imagined that when these disclosures happen that I would be very surprised and shocked. That there is no way for humans to really be ready for this information. Imagining it to be both things. Both benevolent aliens; and Reptilians eating children or whatever. 

Now though, as I have gotten more into the Law of One, I don't think this. Studying the Law of One has a commitment to it. A commitment that the paradigm they discuss is the real one. At one moment Don asked the contact, about negative Extra Terrestrials... "Where do they come from?" The contact answered "They come from the Creator... in the shallower sense you mean, they come from..." It was one of the few statements from the contact that reads a little like it was bad mooded. A little annoyed. 

If it were to happen, I would use it as an opportunity to see other beings as the Creator. This would be consistent with my so far beliefs. So I would not have to endure as much shock as many people in theory. 

Of the everyday people though, that have never heard of the Law of One. It is one of those things that people say that they believe in but have put no real thought into. It is the kind of thing that before it happened. Everyone would say something like "Yeah, I know the government is probably hiding this stuff". But it has no real thought into it. They have no real way to prepare for it because they assume they are prepared, and that it is no relevant. 

I think that most people will go into shock when this happens.  

The act of condemnation.

Recently. The only thing I am interested in is the gym. The other day, after a two hour workout. I felt angry and gritty and very good. I have struggled to pull up a deep reservoir of anger that I have known was there but am mostly not able to completely access. When I do I become more productive, but my thought is that a good way to handle things within myself is to pull up that anger. Exercise it out. Weights will do that. Then pull up more. Eventually starting to make real headway into my general background psychology. Having insights into and clearing that anger. Cleaning out things I didn't even know were an issue and that I had remembered. 

While affirmations have been amazing. There are a lot of individual practices and things in general that have been very positive. The gym eclipses them all. I sometimes feel bothered when I go to bed and put the Law of One book 2 next to me and then I sleep. But even that sense of being "bothered" is not there when I have done a real workout. I am moved into a positive state, unbothered by such things. 

Anyway, I wanted to talk about two separate ways that I have undone "condemnation" within my own mind, and what the implications are. 

Negative "greeting".

I have mentioned previously. That I have stopped with the prayer of Saint Michael, and substituted the Prayer of Saint Francis. This is one of the relevant lines in the Prayer of Saint Michael:

"And oh, prince of the heavenly host, thrust into hell Satan, and all evil spirits that wander the earth for the ruin of souls".

A lovely poetic line. Like much of the Christian faith and bible.  

As I have mentioned before. This comes from a teaching in the Law of One, fundamentally book 5, so also including the writings of Jim and Carla. That if you characterise things negatively. Like any so called attack. That you kind of mythologise it, and put too much energy into it, and it becomes worse. 

I have applied that kind of theory to this set of prayers. I have said the prayer of Saint Michael for about 5 years or longer. I realise the way I have used it. 

The negativity in the world I am subjected to often doesn't seem to have an easily identifiable cause. This is very deliberate I believe, in the favouring of very bureaucratic tactics. Of creating power structures where it is just not clear who is doing what. Like in an office at work, where decisions are getting made, discussed in meetings and whatever. But you never really know who planned what and why. Things just start being moved around. And at some point or other one will effect you negatively, and there's nothing you can do. 

This works on a macro level as well. The system we live in doesn't actually appear to deliberately create any kind of slavery. It just creates a confluence of factors. The jobcentre is not meant to deal with illness. But if you are ill, and you go to the illness welfare place, and they have set the system so you aren't acknowledged as ill. Technically that is not the fault of said jobcentre. But they are still insisting you apply for jobs and threatening you about that while you are ill (not that they do actually, at the moment the jobcentre are quite understanding, but as a principle, and it has happened in the past). They also have nothing to do with the destroyed economy. 

For this reason. I liked that prayer. I liked the idea of an energy coming from the prayer that found the true evildoer in the situation, and subtly moving them a bit closer to hell.  

It gives you a little place that you can outlet that bit of anger you have at the situation. I heard a little bit, just a little, of the negative behaviour of a family member the other day. It's that kind of frustration.

But removing the prayer. I suddenly realised that emotion is no longer an option. It is interesting. But it does feel freeing in a subtle way. It doesn't allow, within oneself, that sense of "condemnation". 

I do not believe having said the prayer of Saint Michael ever really did anything. It was originally a church prayer and I imagine that in church, you have the connection of the group that mitigates some psychological aspects of this. 

I would also say that real world developments are on course to give people consequences in some form. What form that ultimately takes is really something for the higher forces to manage.  

There are no mistakes, the Law is One. 

This has been a huge one. 

A similar thought process to what I just talked about and an insight I only had once is stopped the previous prayer. 

The same process of minor condemnations is at work within myself, or was at work. I often now retell myself that there are no mistakes. 

This includes any real or imagined, but also in general discussion. I was angry about something with someone. I did not condemn it due to this teaching. Because I did not condemn it. The analysis that is natural when an issue comes up was not halted prematurely. And was continued on past the point where it would normally stop and did give additional insight. 

I think this is a little bit the positivity that can be gained from Buddhist teachings. Say you imagine that so on so slept with so on so in the past. You don't know for sure but you suspect. When you think of it you get angry, and let's say this is on some sort of boundary, where you are not sure if you have a "right" to be or not. Like a great deal of emotional upsets actually. 

"There are no mistakes" kind of says OK, if that were true, it would not be a mistake. If it is not a mistake what is it? It is an action that has consequences. All actions of consequences, it's called cause and effect. Also, being upset about it is not a "mistake" either. 

It simplifies a great deal of life to its mechanical bones and throws out a lot of thinking that doesn't seem that productive... But was not a "mistake" nevertheless!   

This is along the same lines as Buddhist teachings. They say that attachment is what causes pain. I would say condemning oneself within the mind is something to do with that attachment. Something of its mechanism. If you think about this imagined event, "There are no mistakes, the Law is One". Then it's just a thing that happens. You observe it inside your mind and move on. Then you focus back on yourself.

It allows you to process it emotionally, rather than get stuck on it. To clearly ask yourself... "What changes if this is true?"  

To be actually successful, I think, there is a lot of self focus. 

Check in post.

Meditation, affirmations (I haven't talked about this but I've made these work!) reading the Law of One and prayer. These are three things I do to improve my life. Meditation I intend to do everyday and prayer, I do everyday.

Friday evening I went for a longer gym session than normal. Rather than half an hour to an hour. I went for almost two hours. The effect was so powerful that temporarily. I didn't need any of the above strategies. I felt unquestionably good. I was good at dealing with situations around me with absolute calm. It was another world of good feeling. 

When I go to the gym and work well, I can feel more blood flow in my lower body than my upper body. So I don't think so much. I also had insights and started applying Law of One information to my real life, lines from the text I had not applied previously. 

Even though I discussed before that I had come off twitter. I change my mind. When I was not really well enough to do anything else. It did appear as a good thing to do for me to pass time. This is my issue with reddit though. 

Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Vent/comments/1tshfnd/the_lack_of_jobs_is_meaning_people_are_being/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

The lack of jobs is meaning people are being forced to accept terrible working conditions and power tripping managers

Honestly working in general nowadays just feels like giving my rights as a human being away for a tiny amount of pocket change that barely covers my rent or expenses.

to make it worse you have to deal with completely insane managers who should never have been in that position to begin with but the people who mange them are equally insane most of the time.

I hate how you have to put up with so much stuff you never would under any circumstance. And the answer people always use to this issue is “oh just find another job then” no because there is literally not another job available ever in all of my time working there has only ever been the one job i got and never anything else “i could just go to”.

I’m tired of this bs. Put more jobs on the market, make society an actual community again rather than a selfish capitalist hellscape and start treating workers fairly. it’s not a lot to ask.

As you can see at the end there. My emphasis. 

"Put more jobs on the market". The person sees a kind of communist authority that is responsible for all the good things in life. And Capitalism is responsible for the entire issues of society. 

So they are the same kind of person as who I talked about yesterday. The kind that if they worked for Netflix, would protest Dave Chappelle having a show. 

I agree that this kind of thing is an issue, the main problem. But to me it is a symptom of government intervention in the market. Of high taxes forcing people to take shortcuts. Lack of meritocracy. It is very true the 'find another job' line. From left wing employers who have destroyed the rest of the market no less. 

If this persons life is improved. If political events force a better market. It will be in spite of this persons effort. Not because of it. If they got the political system they voted for. It will be the same gas camp scenario of the Soviet Union. The same starvation as the Holodemor. The same issues as Venezuela, Columbia, Mao's Great Leap Forward, and all the other times when Communism was tried. 

It's a good example of someone deserving their suffering. 

The place this was posted. r/Vent. States in it's rules that there are absolutely no political posts. So anything that were to come through even slightly right wing would be deleted for that reason, as would any comment to this post that would highlight that. But left wing propaganda is allowed through. Many subreddits are like this. 

So anyone going on Reddit, even the subreddits that are nothing to do with politics, is supporting the left wing agenda in general.  

Making their own bed!

A video:

Youtube: John Griffin Life 2.0: Pretty Girls, Broken Reality. The Paradox Nobody Warns You About. May 27th 2026:

https://youtu.be/NAqcMtBwLk4?si=M4VJ8nIrqGM-NOBE

A few posts ago I talked about "The tragedy of beauty". This guy seems to have articulated it all far better than I have. He has perhaps more real world experience.

I have been thinking a bit lately about larger spiritual concerns about the gender issue. Partly, I have just been thinking of women and having lustful thoughts. Walking around in the extremely hot sun in England.

Then I found out the sun messes with my medication and so I have to be very careful with exercising in it... Like walks. I wonder if this is good or bad in some way? Is the reduction of opportunities for lustful thoughts good, as in, saving me from temptation and trouble? Or is it bad, in that actually, doing some pursuing and being inspired by physical beauty is good? 

On to beauty as a subject though: First of all, if you take what John is saying here as a kind of root of a lot of societies behaviour. Masses and masses of women, are completely delusional. Then obviously it starts to make sense as to why some things are the way they are. For instance, I have sometimes wondered about the online 'narcissism' types of communities. And especially people like Dr Ramani.

When I first discovered "narcissism". I first actually found the videos compelling. I still do watch them occasionally but I have more carefully chosen the Creators I watch now. 

I noticed with Dr Ramani, that she is very deliberate in framing every single one of the issues she talks about as what would be the male form of narcissism. The dating side. Like, how a man might act in a date if he was a "narcissist". 

What brought this back to me was when she was saying that it was OK to ghost people if you didn't know them that long. And I knew she was talking about women. That she was excusing womens unethical behaviour but would jump on it if it was something that men more likely do. 

It makes me wonder how many difficulties women have that start getting explained as "narcissism". Actually had basic social dynamic explanations.

The one on the right is how the world has changed now dating apps are available. The issue this causes, is that many, many women will chase the top guys. Who then don't have a lot of time, so they just run through these women treating none of them very well. 

Here is another video of how women self sort into the category of getting used:

Youtube: Emilywking: Men are sick of this!! Jane 6, 2026:

https://youtube.com/shorts/mR0SlZhv-Mk?si=WqdwTPHTVIUdsX1P

What I am thinking here, what I am trying to reach for. Is that I suspect, it would be logical. That what is happening here is in some way part of "Gods Plan". That we will look back and see that it was obvious that the world needed to go through this kind of thing.

It is like another thought I have had. There is an issue with leftist unions and leftist workers in America. Where if a company, say a streaming company, platforms someone they don't like. Who is right wing. They will all protest in some way.

Then because their own behaviour has started causing the decline of the company. They band together, and attempt to force via a union a higher paycheck and such. 

Youtube: Lack of Entertainment: Leftist Unions Are A Cancer On Creative Industry: May 28th 2026:

https://youtu.be/p0oZA_F82Ws?si=dQ11Ba7x2Nu7WfS3

I was reading a reddit thread of a lot of people that were saying how their lack of money makes their quality of life worse. I have felt bad at times when reading these things at various parts of my life. But I have to think. If they are these kinds of leftist workers. Well that kind of makes sense! If they are working in a streaming services and their presence actually DECREASES the profit of the company. If they are essentially... Negative productive. If they are deeply wedded to these insane, destructive, ideas. Which effectively enforce poverty on anyone. Then doesn't that make sense?

As I have mentioned before. Several points of the Law of One emphasized that people sometimes needed catalyst to change in certain ways. In the Significator of the Mind. It is noted that negative catalyst can produce positive polarity and positive catalyst can draw out our negative side. 

I think this is something the Significator becomes aware of and reverses to some extent. Such as in the practices of appreciation in things like Christianity. I would say most people function without a strong Significator. 

It doesn't feel clear to me at all what the future is. What, if any, karmic deliberation will fall down on these individuals? Is this deliberately angelically created? I was coincidentally reading on a youtubers posts section. That in Matthew 11 Jesus said that the fate of a town of sinners on judgement day will be worse than Sodom. I was in fact reading that same chapter a few days ago. 

Would this karma be met by the emotional distress of having political ideas they are obedient to destroyed? Like, Trump grows. Restore takes Makerfield in the UK, and the march towards right wing dominance continues? 

Would it be a change in social priorities that brings about said karma? The right wing men, previously powerless, shunned etc. suddenly having money and power? I can't see how that would change anything, because I have seen so much simping in my life. I can't imagine there would be any situation where men didn't make things as easy as they could for women. It seems to me that only a minority of men can really hold them to account.

But, I don't know the answer to these questions honestly. Neither do I have faith in any specific set of circumstance. I believe good people are protected. But whether the "bad" people are punished... Or what precisely is to be done with groups of people that are actually delusional? 

There is no way of handling all of this that feels particularly satisfying to me. 

Prayer. Politics.

I want to make an unusual post.

Firstly, I wanted to really reflect on the change from having turned my prayers around. From "protection" prayers. To the one that I talked about replacing it with. 

It has made a huge change. But even though, in my mind I can map it all out. Mapped out two previous dreams. Ways my mind has changed now I can't map out "negativity" in the same way. Like, I can't hook on to ways of condemning what I see as negative behaviour so easily. And even deep internal changes which seemed to have changed the way I look at sexuality.

It all seems way too nuanced and personal. Suffice to say, I do think it is a legitimate spiritual teaching to move away from verbalising protection prayers, especially when given terms like "evil" within the prayer. But also, perhaps there is a free will problem or some other issue. I won't verbalise that further.  

I used to use protection when I meditated as well. I do not pray for that, but when I am anxious, I do put on a visualised "light shield". This does not conceptualise any kind of evil outwardly thing. Visualised light is wordless. 

What I wanted to mention though is... politics. Something that I think I have largely stayed away from. At least since coming back to this blog. 

In the UK, there is an important by election that is getting a lot of news media attention. From what I have learned. Bearing in mind that I am biased towards Restore and the "real" right wing. Is that Restore. The kind of "Donald Trump" party. Has a huge volunteer base in Makersfield  While the other parties do not. It is all to play for. But out of Restores potential voting pool. Out of the people that voted in droves to hand Rupert an amazing victory in Great Yarmouth. Were people that in general do not vote. These are the same people that are discounted by traditional pollsters. 

It is very interesting. There are three contenders. Labour. That is the mainstream position. The one supported by the BBC. Restore. Who is Nigel Farage's party. Nigel is generally considered to be controlled opposition, and an unpleasant person who is must pretending to be revolutionary, but is probably an intelligence asset. And Restore. 

But Restore is not being talked about in the mainstream media. They are mentioning it here and there. One Times journalist mentioned that they are never prompting the discussion but other people are bringing up Restore. I heard the BBC talk about all this a few minutes ago and they are not mentioning Restore. Only Reform. 

So what could happen. Is that on June 18th, when the by- election is held. It is Restore that gets in. And the leftie luvvies of the mainstream media are not prepared for it. Mainstream people would simply not have heard that much about Restore. 

Which would be pretty cool. I feel like it would be the beginning of a powerful energy change in the UK.  

Improvement from insights. Steven Cambians coverage of DW.

Already, I mean, within moments almost. I seemed to have experienced strong positive effects from the taking prayers of protection out of my normal repertoire. 

I would normally perhaps, take a bit longer to take in the effects. But, I have experienced the same thing before when I have stopped prayers completely. So I feel I have enough information to come to a conclusion.

One of the blockages I have noticed within myself is the "women are cute" kind of thought process. It's a kind of annoying and a bit nauseating internal thought process. Infantilising them. But I cannot seemed to have gotten rid of it previously. It just seems to be "there". 

I believe that Stefan Molyneux's idea on love, that love is "Our involuntary response to virtue if we are virtuous". But this has not been able to be applied to a few women in my life. In my past. I can recognise that they have basically no virtue that I can identify. But my feelings remain very positive towards them.

Well, since stopping the protection prayers, I, all of a sudden, do feel that sense of "repulsion of the magnet". Towards said women. (Is this understanding turning to acceptance?)

I don't quite know what has happened here. My internal dynamics seem to have massively changed because I am retro actively, taking in some of the female rejections I have had. It feels like. As though the prayer of protection. Was blocking off some legitimate criticism. 

It could also be that "protection" often involves walking on eggshells around some abusive figure, the one that we need protection from, the one that would cause harm. So perhaps the "women are cute", is a way of preventing legitimate criticism of them. Which would then lead to pushback from them. And women in this society are extremely dangerous. (Reputation destruction, social ostracism, false accusations etc.)

It is an extremely positive change I think. I wonder what change this will lead to in the real world after a couple of months of having changed this thought pattern. Potentially this would open the door to other positive processes like entropy. Which can kind of collapse non useful thought patterns.

Out walking today, I remembered a girl that I had seen walking past a church a few months ago, and having not been able to stop thinking about her. Just pure attractiveness. I imagined talking to her and the kind of humourous lines I would use. All of a sudden, this whole thing seems kind of cringey. I have a repulsion of the magnet from the entire thing. All of a sudden it seems that the kind of "immature" kind of frame I would use is ridiculous. (It is one I used with some success with a girl that later rejected me!)

Donald Trump was rude to Rob Reiner.

Based on all the right wing women suddenly turncoating because Trump was "rude" in their estimation. Any right wing movement has to prepare for the moment when women stab them in the back en mass, for something like this.

It is very likely Rob Reiner sexually abused the son that killed him, he made pretty direct jokes about this. I have no patience with these super passive people! Evildoers must be opposed, and the turncoat right wing women, have no authority, and do not deserve the authority. Of speech policing everyone!   

Youtube, Marks Cosmic Adventures: Trumps 3rd Term. David Wilcock's Dildo Stalking! End of the W.H.O. Project Blue Beam imminent? May 1st 2026:

https://youtu.be/vdqF1nsLOcA?si=UiPNpLqlq_doW75_

The discussion is from about 14 minutes:

16 min: This guy, and I understand this guy, and I think it is important, that we question people, when they are making big claims. I do, but there's other ways of doing it, right. I don't think it's cool, to find out where somebody lives, go up to their gate; and then find out where somebody goes walking to plant something, as a joke. That is stalking. And that is outrageous. 

Well, I don't agree. 

Firstly, "there are other ways of doing things". When pushing back against someone like David Wilcock. I would like to know what his ideas are. Especially since he seems the type to platform someone like David Wilcock. He has just platformed someone that says that Satan was killed on March 22nd. 

What would be a good way to oppose him? To start off a little foundation thing like James Randi? This would go nowhere, and to make a platform out of opposing people like David Wilcock. It has to be humorous. 

Let's actually look at David Wilcock and the things that Steven Cambian has investigated him for.

The Pete Peterson Go Fund Me scam. Even the new age knew there was something wrong with this one. The money just disappeared into Davids account for several years and was given to Pete Peterson 3 or so years later when there was too much attention.

The Emory Smith scam: Emory Smith was in hospital for "deep state attack", and David was getting his audience to send money to him. But Emory Smith had a drinking problem and was in hospital for alcohol poisoning.

Platforming Corey Goode and supporting him against Gaia: David Wilcock was responsible for Corey Goodes rise to fame and all the resources he got from that. After which he started a stalking campaign including taking pictures of peoples houses in order to intimidate them. David enabled someone that went on to sue his critics, sometimes causing them a great deal of emotional and financial distress. 

David Wilcock should have been in jail. Steven has mentioned that he has talked to people that were giving their last paycheck to David and could barely afford to eat. He was a constant victim. He made up a lot of things about Steven Cambian including that he was a hacker and a child predator. (This was years later than the Dildo thing)

David, it seems to me. Wanted the world to just shut up in exposing being a con artist. So he could carry on being a con artist. And when he couldn't. When people said "Actually, no you are a fraud, actually no you haven't paid your taxes". Out of protest, he killed himself. 

He definitely deserved dildo's buried on his hiking trail. So that people could become aware that he was not, in fact, a psychic. 

And Marks Cosmic Adventures did precisely nothing to oppose David. In fact, he enabled those that support the general paradigm. So he criticises those that did oppose David. From his little porch.

I recall when I was a lot younger, I had inherited money and I would read David Wilcock a lot. I was a true believer. Steven Cambians coverage "saved me", in essence, from that madness that was making my schizophrenic tendencies far worse. I remember thinking I could invest in Davids film and looking back now reflecting on how vulnerable I was. I didn't do it, since I knew my family would not let me do it. But even so. There are plenty of people out there like that.  

Applying the Law of One (Prayer, Free will).

It's very sunny here in England. English weather is extremely variable. Partly from the humidity. It makes the cold colder and the hot hotter. You are either in a fridge, or a sauna. 

Yesterday, I fell asleep before doing many things that were important for me to do. At 21:00, slept through to 9:00; and I would've slept longer had the neighbours lawn mower not woken me up. 

I forgot my second prayer for the day. Also, I have had prayers of protection for the night time, a third set, but about 1/4th of the time I don't get to those. 

The same thing happens frequently when I have forgotten to pray. My dreams improve. And I have often wondered if the prayers are blocking out some sort of helpful energy. 

This is the reason, as I have discussed before, that I have stopped prayer previously. I do wonder if there is some other thing I should be doing. Some other spiritual practice I should be replacing it with.

But then I stop prayer and, predictably, my life just disintegrates. Problems far more serious than low level of dreaming appear. 

Today, also in conjunction with chatting it over with Grok. (I ask Grok to draw Tarot cards frequently.) I had a realisation that aligns precisely with the part of the Law of One I am reading at the moment. 

Of the prayers I say, I say three that are from the world, already out there somewhere. Then several, five to ten or so of my own made up ones.

The three prayers from the world. One of them is the prayer of Archangel Michael. Another is one I got from a Q post. 

Both of these discuss a battle against evil in some manner. This is very much not in line with the Law of One. That advised reframing experiences generally in a way that does not cause conflict. So a "negative psychic attack", becomes a "negative greeting", as an example. 

It could be that these specific prayers are not good. The ones blocking information that is relevant from coming in. 

It is likely that the spirits, or the part of my mind responding to this prayer. Are not able to fully know if something is good or bad in the large sense of things. Things are a risk. If I meet a hot girl. There is a risk she will jump off into kind of sociopathic behaviours. Cheating, creating drama etc. But there is also a risk of the girl deciding not to behave like that, and/ or me gaining something from those behaviours. Like, say the experience put me in contact with other interesting people. Or creating a good song.

It could be that the block of protection would just block the person out as an 'unknown'? 

Another example is, if people are sending information to you. If they are angry at you and you are receiving it, assuming that paradigm (Psychology would call this a conversation with your internal objects). Then their perspective might be based on nothing, societal brainwashing and lies. But that is still, nonetheless, their perspective. So receiving that energy might be helpful. It might be like 90% lies, and 10% truth?

Applying the wisdom. 

The dream tonight, I concluded from it, that I have framed previous situations in my head as my deliberately breaking contact with other people. But that's not the way it is, and I do not know why I did that. Perhaps it's a locus of control thing. The truth is... They broke contact with ME. This changes the conversation a lot. If I were to see them again in the future. I could say that. Especially if people were to frame it as me breaking contact with them, as it means they don't have to explain anything. It places the burden of the broken relationship squarely on me. This dream is a pretty priceless piece of insight.

I have had dreams before that far more directly gave the guidance that protective prayers were an issue. Years ago. About four years ago now. But I have only just got this! It could have been though that in that specific case. The protective prayers were preventing people from moving against me!

It is difficult holding my identity as "Christian". When I do not believe in salvation by faith. I was thinking it through today. But I do still pray, and do communion. I do believe in a God that is relevant to my life. My identity is closer to Christian than atheist. 

But, looking at the motivation of my spirituality. It is clear to me that it is very much based on Carla Rueckerts teachings. As I was reading in Book V of the Law of One. 

On that note. Even though this does not feel explicitly comfortable. I have replaced the two prayers I mentioned above. Which I am no longer comfortable with. With one that Carla said every day. The Prayer of Saint Francis:

Lord, make me an instrument of your peace:
where there is hatred, let me sow love;
where there is injury, pardon;
where there is doubt, faith;
where there is despair, hope;
where there is darkness, light;
where there is sadness, joy.
O divine Master, grant that I may not so much seek
to be consoled as to console,
to be understood as to understand,
to be loved as to love.
For it is in giving that we receive,
it is in pardoning that we are pardoned,
and it is in dying that we are born to eternal life. 

Changing this prayer around this morning has already had a strong effect. I feel, moreso, that I have not prayed. It seems to me that the two prayers I got rid of are the ones that provide much of the strong feeling I get from prayer.  

In the Law of One, the contact also told Carla she had been praying a certain prayer so long that it had manifested in her real life as it got to the roots of the mind. So it will be a while before the effects of the protection prayers fall away and, assuming I stick with this prayer, the effects of this one grow and manifest.

Deep teachings. 

Another gem, actually in line with what I have just discussed. Is this one. I am going to shorten the quote. It is a long quote but I only read the first line and wanted to sit with it:

Questioner: The instrument had some question as to her vitality. We were having a hard time appraising it. Is it possible for you to comment on this?

Ra: I am Ra. We scan this instrument and find that we may be of service without infringement due to this instrument’s decision to abide by the most careful appraisal possible rather than the most desired.

The profundity of this statement to my understanding of free will. Is spectacular. It has become suddenly clear to me that I might have never understood free will at all. 

So if someone asks a question, but the answer they want is not the truth, it is against free will to tell them the truth? 

We are held to less of a standard of free will than an angelic entity. But I always just assumed if people asked a question, then that was the free will permission to give them the answer? This explains a lot of discussions and experiences I have had.  

I do not necessarily think we are held to this standard. Like, Stefan Molyneux says that if your friend is going to marry the wrong girl. You stage an intervention. You tell him why. We are not floating in the ether with a constant awareness of the Creator. We live in the real world where things like who our friends marry is important and will effect us a great deal. Jesus directly corrected people a great deal. 

There is also the real world. Like, if someone says "who won that political race", and the candidate they hate won it. There is also objective reality meaning you have to tell them. Politics is interesting in that way because the law of free will doesn't seem to hold a lot of sway in politics. The losing side loses, and that's it. The economy crashes, and that's it. 

But even so, just for understanding the concept as a theoretical, in it's purest form. This one is big for me. I still can't quite get my head around it. This level of purity of free will would seem to disagree with the concept that correction was ever possible, I suppose in this case it was as it is desired. It probably also links to the Transformation of the Mind, and the hardening to the world of the negative polarity.

 

Finding outer teachers.  

Last point, all that stuff I was talking about yesterday. Understanding, Acceptance and Forgiveness. If this paradigm exists it will definitely exist outside the Law of One (a point I find Christians in general are resistant to. If their ideas are correct they have to exist outside the bible).

I found this video today while on youtube, I think it does very well in squaring with the Law of One ideas. In a sense this guy is doing what I am trying to do, since I am trying to find and discuss tools that improve life. But he has focused on self help types of sources so maybe he has done so in a slightly better way. Whereas my focus is more squarely/ exclusively, on spiritual and metaphysical ideas. 

Youtube: Clark Kegley: Is "letting go" part of acceptance? October 30th 2025:

https://youtu.be/T4Y-BQOIYHU?si=GmHSrdb_yeAm3fxs