Happy days, but these are still dark times.

Wow, very hard to keep myself focused today.

We are in a darker, more serious place than we used to be as a society, to maintain focus on some of these areas I need to keep away from relaxing too much.

I admit I do sort of dread seeing 'gorgeous women' around in this weather, you know, dressed to kill young things. There have been girls that liked me but something inside me won't co- operate, and I've liked girls and it's been a no show. And both liked each other but the other has preferred sadistic games.

Now my brain is in too much of a state to relate to them on an intimate level by my estimation. These problems have lead to what some would define as a break of mild 'schizophrenia' and I keep it down with will power.

The root of this problem is linked to how others behave, my hope is the social change we are likely to go through soon will bring greater light to these matters. Power always changes hands eventually. Currently and for a long time I, and many other good people, have not had the power. But it does not mean I always won't.

This is the same situation for a lot of people. Where lies have prevailed and they cannot move around because someone who deeply effects them has used their social power to ostracise them in some way. In this situation there is pressure from a kind of new age mainstream to forget about things... Move on etc. It cannot be proven someone has acted cruelly in some cases so others try and minimise the emotional impact it has had on you.

So, good things, the beautiful sun we are now experiencing, beautiful women, relaxation, meditation, good music, they become things to be pushed away, not let in or enthusiastically enjoyed. Because the mainstream joy of 'everything is alright' can't be accepted and hope has to be maintained by focusing on the forces that can defend against some of the negativity we are witnessing; and when there is hope of a defence force there also has to be focus on the negativity itself.

When I see something about Islam now my thought process has completely changed. This ex- Muslim explained something very interesting in her video:

I know when I decided, when I thought to myself, I think I'm an atheist. I think I'm not going to buy any of this, if felt like a weight was just lifted off my shoulders and the world felt like a bigger and more beautiful place, immediately. I mean it was shocking and it was kind of scary because now there was this chaos that didn't exist when my world was ordered in the way that Allah wanted it to be.

My blog here is largely an exploration of larger social trends and that 'chaos' is the good thing. The saving force finally powerful enough to bring a new paradigm that will disempower the negative forces. This chaos is the free market! Cause and effect/ consequence!

Her explanation here that she became more afraid of these randomised forces briefly and I wonder if the left have a similar perspective from inside their minds! It would seem likely they do.

I have seen more than two videos on twitter recently with previously Muslim women from Saudi Arabia exclaiming with clear distress their upset with Islam. One was in Canada shouting 'they killed my father, this is their constitution' among other things. Another was saying, when she was Muslim in Saudi Arabia, she would speak to herself every night that she did not want to pray and wear the hijab etc. Like I said, both seemed distressed.

Even with a video like that there was a time my curiousity was strong enough to not be harshly condemning of Islam in these sorts of example. However, now that I have finally got to the crux of the matter via my post concluding on this subject, I am starting to look at the whole religion differently. To be able to see it and think... 'Well of course you would want to leave, you were under the religion of the devil,' to be able to consider it top down; then simply forget about it.

If you were told this is a religion about a religion you would just assume it was mostly positive, as I did. But if you were told ahead of time it was a religion created by Satan and you believed it you would consider the whole thing differently. Viewing it through a different lens.

Good news though... Arron is on the move. His new party begins!:

Guido Fawkes: ARRON BANKS INTRODUCES “THE PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE”

How things could have been at Brexit.

My analysis of the world around me really goes quite deep!

With any decision there are two real choices, but in practice there are often 'sort of' three. This goes down to metaphysical concepts I mentioned in the last post, (but not explained).

There is positive that at the moment means freedom, negative that means enslavement... And the usual choice in this can- kicking wankerati reality... Unpolarised.

(Remember those days when it was thought in relation to Greece that they would actually be unable to kick the can any further... Aww... Bless!)

Where nothing really happens for some reason the can is kicked. (Obviously) But the energetic substructure (most sensible term, I know is a bit show off intellectual), the energetic substructure of the world is set up so the foundations are laid, the opportunity is there for all the resources to expand positively, or negatively, depending on which turn is taken.

If the whole society turns one way, we still have free will on an individual level, but the pressure is sometimes unbearable. If for instance you were in a Hillary Clinton America and you ran a business and she raised the minimum wage to $15 for your company. You have the free will to continue running that business and put in the extra money/ work, perhaps go into debt; technically. Practically of course you can't because you're not superhuman.

In Trumps America, you have free will, you are not forced to do anything in the same way as in Hillary's because he is positively polarised but keeping up the negatively polarised hatred is difficult. It can be done but it is a losing strategy that puts in a lot of time, effort and money and essentially reaps no reward. Also, business will be run better (less immigration and tax etc.) so it is easier to get a job and there will be more positivity. The gravity will simply be away from negatively polarised actions.

So, we had an EU referendum recently in Britain and I was just listening to LBC about how Farage would have handled it if he had been in charge. Clearly he summarised the most positive turn of events and before I heard it I was not aware of the positively polarised 'potential' situation we might have experienced.

Farage said that had he been running things on Englands behalf after the June referendum he would have run it like a business. He would fire the bureaucratic civil service and bring in business people; he would poach people from wherever in the world he could, such as other places that have good relations with the EU, New Zealand, Switzerland, Australia etc.

Like Taxi Driver says but not for the same implication... 'Can you even imagine' how positive that would be? Unskilled immigration would stop, The free market would aggressively assert itself and it would really clean out the crap! Green taxes destroyed! The sanctimonious wankers in the EU would not be able to cope and the feeling of prosperity would take hold as though being shoved through a rollercoaster at Alton Towers.

Also, in my own workplace at roughly around the time of the referendum, just after June is when my old manager left. This guy was a very good manager, he hired a lot of English outside the pattern in the industry of hiring migrants and having a high turnover (although there was still a high turnover). Everyone liked him and he bent over backwards to help everyone. He could keep a leash on troublesome people but still use them for their good points and improve them (all positively polarised people have this effect of kind of turning lightly negative people more positive, Trump and Farage have done this a lot)... Of course, he did have his flaws. He did have his temptations that we all have.

Had we gone with Nigels plan, unskilled immigration would have stopped and other restaurants of that chain would suddenly be facing a bit of a shock, of which, having British workers would be an advantage and his store would look good! Taxes and/ or regulation would probably ease up slightly and the very real prospect of effective competition would enter the minds of upper management. I don't think this manager would have left. He would have worked with the other positive people there and the place would simply have kept its positive glow that it almost had but kept losing due to the ever escalating feeling of 'crisis' that constantly engulfed the place.

The way it turned out was the path of least resistance. Nine months of not negatively polarised (Voted remain, now you've voted for it so you are helpless against these awful policies!) And not positively polarised (Getting on with Brexit) But dilly dallying in between. Listening to people like Gina Miller whine and having it on the BBC for nine months; the only people more useless than bureaucrats.

Hope is on the way, perhaps things can positively polarise. It is clear that Theresa May partly did not trigger article 50 immediately so as not to encourage the Wilders vote. As she does not wish to encourage Le Pen (but has encouraged her rival) and only came round to supporting Trump to avoid the potentially catastrophic move of alienating America.

Farage may be running again in South Thanet and the Conservative there could even go to jail! Unlikely but exciting nonetheless. Arron is going to run a UKIP like the old UKIP but not run like a squash club. A breakthrough is going to happen soon at some time because positively polarised people are still active.

After my previous post I simply do not want to think of Islam. In general I do not judge Geerts political ideas on the subject negatively. I think there is a limit to how much leeway Muslims should be given and with the mass rape of white girls, FGM, No go zones etc. they have generally pushed it too far.

Interestingly, any failure to dominate by the Muslims and any push back will weaken the higher negative forces that are competing on this gameboard! With any luck this will have indirect benefits as well.

Think I've learned enough about Islam now!

I set out learning about Islam to answer a question. My background in spiritual thinking from new age channeling made me have some question about Islam that formed in the back of my mind. One of them was that although I could see a path to practicing the positive polarity in Buddhism (meditation and wisdom), Hinduism (Chakras) and Christianity (Love and practical wisdom), I could not find a single positive thing in Islam. I did some mental gymnastics to summarise some potential positive things but they seemed like a bit of a long shot so I definitely was going to need some research backing these ideas up if I was going to believe them.

So I looked into it, I know a bit about the politics. Eventually I found that Islams history that we are presented with is fiction, almost nothing is known about how it really started but some is known about many things such as the location of Mecca are wrong and appeared in texts hundreds of years after Muhammed died. I learned about the behaviour of Muhammeds closest confidents after he died and the piles of bodies from the Islamic conquest.

I learned about what's in the Quran, partly by reading it although I couldn't read too much. I learned about the disgusting problems Islam has through the justification of paedophilia, incest and homosexuality; and I already knew about the political problems Islam caused and the fact that so many in the West were aiding it, and how the communist, (another viewpoint I think is basically service to self), have aided Islam throughout history, rather like a female political partner to Islams masculine political tract.

Even the most moderate intended-to-be-perceived-as-positive face of Islam is not positive. The five pillars of Islam includes the pillar 'Charity' but what this is in actual fact is a tax that is used for Islams political goals. There is no love in this act. It is one of submission.

So. I am therefore concluding, in alignment with my spiritual beliefs that include both positive and negative beings, that Islam is a service to self religion, started and maintained by negative entities. One of which I know the name interfered with the Cayce readings and has a similar name to both Allah and Halal.

There is beautiful context to my understanding of a lot of historical events. For instance, world wars 1 and 2 allowed the pillaging of gold to be placed in a central bank to start what we now know as currency.. and US dollar hegemony. The Cold war was an attempt by these same groups to unify half the world under communism and half under capitalism and bring them together for a One World Order. I have a sense of the kind of people that did these things. Including meetings with Extra Terrestrials and governmental agendas.

However, I have no such deep information on Islam. A story about who created it and why. If they knew they were practicing Satanism. If negative extra terrestrials were involved. I wonder if part of me will remain curious until I have this kind of context.

But I'm sure we will find out such things in due course.

I will end this with a video from a group that really are able to allow these insights to settle in, Ex- Muslims:

Note: After going on my bookmarks to find all this information I've realised there is a lot more sources on the subject, there are a lot of sources, some I've already mentioned on here (not in this post in previous ones). It is enough for now but there is simply too much information to carry on or branch this conversation out into politics...

Any further posts I think are relevant to this one I will link here:

(Edit 18th March. Just double checked the link 'fiction' was the correct one because have more than one Jay Smith video on by bookmarks. Added in correct link to be sure).

Update early morning 4th April: The New World: General theology, hell and Islam.

Update early morning 4th April: The New World: Eureka I have found it (Jk, lol!)

Good times. Article 50 is through!

I'm not sure I've felt this way in years...

I have been following the news today, a bit passively maybe. Not really quite taking it in. First the commons voted on the first Lords amendment; the rights of EU nationals in Britain, then they voted on the second one; MP's potential veto of the Article 50 in its later stages.

The first one got voted through, and the lords amendment was voted against, then the second thing got voted through, and the MP's are not going to have another vote on it.

Then it went through the Lords... Amazingly... WITHOUT AMENDMENTS! Smooth sailing, at least in theory!

Then Sturgeon came out insisting on a second Scottish Indyref and my mind went wild. First actually getting to the realisation that she did have a mandate to do that, while worrying that the Scots were going to let in the immigration and have them drain through their border with England. 'We need a wall on our Northern Border!'... I said, 'And Scotland will pay for it!' Responded another.

Then Theresa May put a stop in that. She stated that Scotland would not be able to have an Indyref like they had scheduled during EU negotiations.

I just feel happy. I feel happy! Yes there are other problems my Alt Right tweeters are talking about, why not trigger article 50 now? They ask, before March 31st.

But for the moment I am happy. I am just happy.

Feminist war against logic.

This has infuriated me:

LBC: A Victim Explains Why Education About Rape Needs More Than Logic

This woman is on a campaign against logic. The feminist way.

Firstly, she says that women should not be told that alcohol might be a problem in potentially getting raped, even though a judge has stated clearly that it is.

She compares it to saying if a man went out and got hit by a car it's comparable to telling him off for going out. No, it's comparable to telling him off to getting drunk of his face and walking in front of a car!

Presumably she wants to have a campaign telling men not to rape. As though a hardened criminal will give a crap what such a campaign would say. Also, I have never gone anywhere near raping a woman. Not even hinted at it. There are less rapist men than drunk women! So any campaign that blames all men is going to accuse more innocent people than a campaign shaming drunken slags.

Fucking people.

What is most likely at this point.

Wow, Benjamin Fulfords latest post, (that the readers here would likely have to wait until Thursday for if they are indeed interested), is really far out and interesting.

No doubt David will comment on this one.

As mentioned David Wilcock also thinks there will be a big change coming soon. It seems to be lining up. With also big events on the way in mainstream politics such as those already talked about a few times here on this blog.

Later today, Article 50 is going to be put through the commons again. There might be a Tory rebellion, or a Lords rebellion. However, it is likely neither of these will effectively rebel and it will be voted through today, announced tomorrow and then the Netherlands will have an election on Wednesday!

I remember yesterday overhearing BBC radio and them saying it won't likely go through and be announced Tuesday, but listening to them, it sounded more like they didn't want it to be!

We'll see what happens with the debt ceiling stuff as well!

Good times!

Deeper into Islam, the five pillars. Turkey.

So, more on this Islam thing.

Firstly, an update by Stefan Molyneux on the Hollands vs. Turkey situation:

Let's do a little bit of a numbers game, I'll show off my maths skills.  

So let's do the ratios of what could be considered politically aggressive actions. This is just since July 2016: 

Turkey; people fired by government decrees, over 128,000; people detained by government decrees, 94,224; schools, dormitory's and universities shut down, 2,099; academics who've lost their jobs, 7,316;  judges and prosecutors that have been dismissed 4070; media outlets shut down, 149; journalists arrested in Turkey, 162; 

All good then!

The Five Pillars of Islam:

So how do they present Islam as a reasonable religion to all the young kids in secondary school and the like, the "uneducated masses".

Five Pillars of Islam:

Faith, Prayer, Charity, Fasting and Pilgrimage to Mecca.

Most of these are not really relevant, they are words meant to seem relevant but actually they mean nothing. Faith? or loyalty? Prayer... People can pray and still be bad people. Fasting is another irrelevance and is more like health advice. Pilgrimage consists of walking for a few miles to see a stone in the desert.

Non violence is of course missing here. To me words that mean something might be, wisdom, courage to do the right thing in difficult circumstances,  respect of self and other etc.

There is one pillar here I have not mentioned yet...  Charity. So lets have a look at this Islamic definition of Charity. From wikipedia:

Some classical jurists have held the view that any Muslim who consciously refuses to pay zakat is an apostate, since the failure to believe that it is a religious duty (fard) is a form of unbelief (kufr), and should be killed. However, prevailing opinion among classical jurists prescribed sanctions such as fines, imprisonment or corporal punishment. Additionally, those who failed to pay the zakat would face God's punishment in the afterlife on the day of Judgments 

Scholars have traditionally interpreted this verse as identifying the following eight categories of Muslim causes to be the proper recipients of zakat:

• Those living without means of livelihood, the poor

• Those who cannot meet their basic needs, the needy

• To zakat collectors.

• To persuade those sympathetic to or expected to convert to Islam, recent converts to Islam, and potential allies in the cause of Islam

• To free from slavery or servitude, slaves of Muslims who have or intend to free from their master by means of a kitabah contract

• Those who have incurred overwhelming debts while attempting to satisfy their basic needs, debtors who in pursuit of a worthy goal incurred a debt

• Those fighting for a religious cause or a cause of God, or for Jihad in the way of Allah by means of pen, word, or sword, or for Islamic warriors who fight against the unbelievers but are not salaried soldiers.

• Wayfarers, stranded travellers, travellers who are traveling with a worthy goal but cannot reach their destination without financial assistance

This has been edited by me, I took a lot of Arabic words and references out.

So, that is not charity in the Christian/ Western interpretation of the word, it is a tax at gun (or perhaps sword) point. It is pure leftism, sliding towards socialism or communism. Or perhaps it is simply totalitarianism since the proceeds clearly are meant to mostly go to the war effort.

The protagonist of the New Testament did not mean spend money, or have it taken from you for war.

Political Islam:

This is not religious in the way I would understand it. What I have noticed about the negative path is that regardless of all the things they say, their true power lies in the manipulation of material resources. For instance, they are in Syria to secure a pipeline, in comparison to their pipeline and AI market work, the effect of the philosophies that grow from their self entitled feeling of superiority is negligible, people are mostly convinced not by their argument but by the gun in their hand. They concentrate power at the top so it doesn't really matter what most people think because they are under control.

Contrast to this is the positive path, which starts at the top with enlightened ideas then helps people and it grows from there. Faith in the goodness of people!

This Zakat is more like the negative way of doing things. It basically includes instructions for creating a totalitarian political ideology. It has made sure that in the core text is control over the resources, much as the Communists used in their takeover of Russia.