Mansplaining it to you. Terrorism.

You know, yesterday I stated, with a link to diagram evidence that:

A) Very often terror attacks seem to be happening to boost the stock market.
B) The stock market is currently falling, the most in a long time.

Today:

I'm sure it's unrelated!

The free market versus leftism and feminism:

This is a headline from the express today:

Express: Proof of our creator? ‘HAND OF GOD’ image in sky seen as a 'miracle'

To me, this could mean the 'invisible hand' (the force in the original right wing materials explaining the 'free market'). Consider this:

The Conservative Woman: Reader’s Comment: The Beeb is an incurable parasite

The BBC is incurable. No reform or regulation, no change in governance is going to make the least difference to this hopeless repository of quaint prejudices and exploded ideologies.
Let it be what it wishes to be - end the licence tax and allow the BBC its liberty. If it's half as good as it thinks it is, it will do just fine. And if its parasites are found starving in some ditch, well, it's no more than they deserve.

and this was one of the responses:

The BBC is beyond control, as are the NHS and teachers' unions. We have far too many politicians but none with the backbone to tackle our dreadful self-inflicted disasters

This is it, people are still thinking that political power will solve the problems. That this unholy mix of negative forces, feminism, communism, anti- fa and Islam can be sorted out by a few people laying down the law. But, actually, the real power will be when the free market comes along. It will make short work of leftist policies.

After Thatcherism leftism in England has never really recovered. It will likely not do so after Donald Trump either. This is the state of the university brainwashed left wing youth of today:

This is also the self entitled culture that feminism thrives in.

A culture that moves over to the free market will create a situation where these sort of people have to find work, that the culture and employers expect them too. The free market can also take down the BBC via alternative news media being more popular. To disable the current economic model of mass government intervention and taxation based funding of propagandist outlets will be a huge movement towards humanity's freedom.

The intensity of hate:

My dreams have been talking about feminism a lot lately. It seems to me that in the case of feminists hating Trump and hating on men who like Trump it has a weakening effect on male Trump supporters.

Of course this is sometimes reversed, with a woman on my twitter, a well known writer among Trump supporters, Kassandra McElwain having arguments with the father of her children because he can't see what's wrong with an illegal immigrant raping a 14 year old girl at their daughters school. (Classic liberal/ feminist).

What is irritating about feminists is that even though their hatred for humanity is so intense, and they cause misery pain and destruction wherever they go, they never seem to do anything that is actually illegal. They are the case for and against karma. Because if karma exists surely these women must face a backlash that harms them in a measurable way:

• In America feminists have done a number on the police services. Because of their incredible insistence of 'equality of outcome', women who are no good are fast tracked and a huge potential recruitment of men that are strong and efficient are not. This means that policemen do not feel they are backed up by their partners
• This has also lead to five foot grandma's escorting violent criminals to court cases, whom have then overpowered them and gone on killing sprees. 
• In the UK feminists have now insisted on a guilty until proven innocent law in rape cases.
• Another example of that is this case where feminist zealots got an innocent man thrown in jail for multiple rapes when he did not even rape one woman.
• In Sweden, while vicious third world Muslim migrants are beating and raping whoever they please, the Swedish women are afraid to speak out because the feminists will attack them.

Now there are other crimes that are due to feminism which are definitely illegal. For example, the 'guilty until proven innocent' attitude of feminists is likely partially responsible for a boy who got falsely accused of rape and killed himself and then his mother did also. But it is clear what should happen there, the girl involved should go to jail for a very long time and/ or be executed.

But none of these crimes are actually illegal. It is not illegal for feminists to intimidate Swedish women to not speak up about migrant crime, and many of these things included feminist lobbying groups acting within the law.

Perhaps though, as with politicians, even though the promotion of ongoing immigration is not illegal, it is highly likely that many in the political class supporting the EU are also Jimmy Savile style paedophiles. Perhaps the feminists of the world, the women, soulless enough to support feminism, also apply that same lack of conscience to other areas of their lives:

I jumped into this mix of gathering harpies on twitter through a 15 year old girl on my twitter that eats SJW's for breakfast, clearly a lot more intelligent than the feminist adults on the platform she interacts with:

... and this is where this cocktail of hatred begun:

When someone is attacked, very often they have to explode into detailed explanation of how they are being attacked, in order to defend themselves.

What these vicious human beings want is for men to never be able to defend themselves. So in court the man goes to jail no matter what. In arguments with feminists if anyone has proper evidence against any of feminisms ridiculous and oppressive fake facts, they can minimise that by accusing them of 'mansplaining'.

Any conversation with them at all results in the accusation of "mansplaining", as evidenced by the fact that I exchanged about three tweets with a girl on there and I was accused of it... (It is not even a real thing). However, it attempts to 'pathologise' communication.

The woman who responded to me on that first tweet is a nurse in a psychiatric unit. It is not outside the realm of considered possibility that she has drugged men because she did not particularly like them explaining themselves in order to defend themselves from a legitimate attack.

David Rockerfeller:

The real founder of feminism, not the woman... Gloria something, who started it up and later wrote books about how the CIA influenced her to do it (video evidence in that link), the real man who started it was David Rockefeller. His foundation has written at length about the need for depopulation in order to have a population that is controllable. He admits to trying to create a new world order and he has the means to do it, and there is a papertrail! The Rockefeller foundation is where all the information (science *cough*) come from that says that gender is created by the environment.  Just to make the link here, in order for their to be depopulation, according to Rockefeller, there needs to be a breakup of the family.

I believe very strongly in metaphysics, as you might have guessed. I used to figure that when someone negative is alive the people they have oppressed and damaged are continually sent energy from that person in order to keep the oppression going.

With any luck, the death of this man will start to cave in this sick ideology. 

We live in hope!

Deeper into Islam, the five pillars. Turkey.

So, more on this Islam thing.

Firstly, an update by Stefan Molyneux on the Hollands vs. Turkey situation:

Let's do a little bit of a numbers game, I'll show off my maths skills.  

So let's do the ratios of what could be considered politically aggressive actions. This is just since July 2016: 

Turkey; people fired by government decrees, over 128,000; people detained by government decrees, 94,224; schools, dormitory's and universities shut down, 2,099; academics who've lost their jobs, 7,316;  judges and prosecutors that have been dismissed 4070; media outlets shut down, 149; journalists arrested in Turkey, 162; 

All good then!

The Five Pillars of Islam:

So how do they present Islam as a reasonable religion to all the young kids in secondary school and the like, the "uneducated masses".

Five Pillars of Islam:

Faith, Prayer, Charity, Fasting and Pilgrimage to Mecca.

Most of these are not really relevant, they are words meant to seem relevant but actually they mean nothing. Faith? or loyalty? Prayer... People can pray and still be bad people. Fasting is another irrelevance and is more like health advice. Pilgrimage consists of walking for a few miles to see a stone in the desert.

Non violence is of course missing here. To me words that mean something might be, wisdom, courage to do the right thing in difficult circumstances,  respect of self and other etc.

There is one pillar here I have not mentioned yet...  Charity. So lets have a look at this Islamic definition of Charity. From wikipedia:

Some classical jurists have held the view that any Muslim who consciously refuses to pay zakat is an apostate, since the failure to believe that it is a religious duty (fard) is a form of unbelief (kufr), and should be killed. However, prevailing opinion among classical jurists prescribed sanctions such as fines, imprisonment or corporal punishment. Additionally, those who failed to pay the zakat would face God's punishment in the afterlife on the day of Judgments 

Scholars have traditionally interpreted this verse as identifying the following eight categories of Muslim causes to be the proper recipients of zakat:

• Those living without means of livelihood, the poor

• Those who cannot meet their basic needs, the needy

• To zakat collectors.

• To persuade those sympathetic to or expected to convert to Islam, recent converts to Islam, and potential allies in the cause of Islam

• To free from slavery or servitude, slaves of Muslims who have or intend to free from their master by means of a kitabah contract

• Those who have incurred overwhelming debts while attempting to satisfy their basic needs, debtors who in pursuit of a worthy goal incurred a debt

• Those fighting for a religious cause or a cause of God, or for Jihad in the way of Allah by means of pen, word, or sword, or for Islamic warriors who fight against the unbelievers but are not salaried soldiers.

• Wayfarers, stranded travellers, travellers who are traveling with a worthy goal but cannot reach their destination without financial assistance

This has been edited by me, I took a lot of Arabic words and references out.

So, that is not charity in the Christian/ Western interpretation of the word, it is a tax at gun (or perhaps sword) point. It is pure leftism, sliding towards socialism or communism. Or perhaps it is simply totalitarianism since the proceeds clearly are meant to mostly go to the war effort.

The protagonist of the New Testament did not mean spend money, or have it taken from you for war.

Political Islam:

This is not religious in the way I would understand it. What I have noticed about the negative path is that regardless of all the things they say, their true power lies in the manipulation of material resources. For instance, they are in Syria to secure a pipeline, in comparison to their pipeline and AI market work, the effect of the philosophies that grow from their self entitled feeling of superiority is negligible, people are mostly convinced not by their argument but by the gun in their hand. They concentrate power at the top so it doesn't really matter what most people think because they are under control.

Contrast to this is the positive path, which starts at the top with enlightened ideas then helps people and it grows from there. Faith in the goodness of people!

This Zakat is more like the negative way of doing things. It basically includes instructions for creating a totalitarian political ideology. It has made sure that in the core text is control over the resources, much as the Communists used in their takeover of Russia.

More on feminism.

I am starting to feel a feel that is almost identical as to that I felt before the Brexit election. I remember talking to some people online, former friends, who just believed the election would go a certain way, that we would stay in the EU even though the evidence for that was sketchy.

I have written about this before, after the election I was suddenly more of a real threat so they started talking down to me and arguing. In fact, I would describe it more like having temper tantrums.

Same is true now, the anti Trumpers think they have it in the bag. It has also made me think of feminism more.

When I messaged the woman from that forum, and when I got in arguments before with them, the conversation would go in a very basic way.

• They would say something ridiculous, unproven and accusatory, 
• I would ask politely for a source or why they thought that, perhaps adding some of my perspective, always being jokey and pleasant.
• They would start throwing insults and throw a few sources or insults.
• I would disprove those. Effortlessly and quite completely.
• They would accuse me of hate speech.

That that would actually work is ridiculous. This is what happens in feminist society, if feminists get their fragile little egos challenged they make accusations of having been persecuted or raped. 

It continued thusly:

• The 'moderators' would tell me to stop it without being specific. Being very unspecific.
• I would respond basically, not thoroughly.
• They throw insults.
• I mentioned those insults on the forum.
• I get told I am doing hate speech.
• To which I respond, the only hate speech in that post was the bit I quoted from you.
• I am banned from the forum.

Arrogance:

This goes against free will clearly, so it will inevitably lose. Love obviously respects free will less than wisdom that is the principle that is being perverted here.

There is this incredibly arrogance. That the moderator should be able to say something without any justification and have that be the law. The moderator is there to moderate which is a 'professional' duty. If I quote her it is not within the job description to accuse me of hate speech and ban me from the forum for a personal insult (as it wasn't her place to be insulting in the first place). She is using the position of power to back up her own personal preferences. Even before this time she wanted me to be quiet for expressing factual anti Hillary pro Trump views.

I always felt when I went on the forum before that there was a cold eye behind this astrology forum. A malice. I remembered being deleted before on a very personal post and being angry, no answer from the moderators or justifications. I left the forum after that one. Others on the forum also thought it was unfair and no doubt feel that now!

... and where I think this comes from, is loads of women all over the world who engage in a hatred of men that are never challenged because the society is not healthy enough. Imagine how many little nasty ways this has manifested in the world. These women advise other people sometimes... How many times have they told friends their boyfriends or husbands are useless because this is what they feel about men? How much astrology has been twisted for these peoples agenda?

When Trump wins:

Imagine the well spring of hate that is going to be pushed down on November 9th! Your hateful views are irrelevant!

Very often women seem to not understand that if they do nasty things to men the men will respond in a less than idyllic way. Not a negative way. It's just that you can't expect to be nasty to someone and get a nice response back, unless of course you are service to self and the response you get back is "fear". (Which these women are playing with).

... and they think they have the upper hand here. The feminist automatic hatred of men has been triggered with the accusations against Donald Trump. No jury or law, just what they would prefer to believe.

Because they feel it their emotion tells them other people do to. But feminists are not the majority. They can't gather that other people see things differently to them. Not just working class men, for instance, but even married middle class women that don't have a hatred towards men (the emotion for these feminists of being in a loving romantic relationship with a man is something they subconsciously cannot imagine feeling).

It is also interesting to wonder how widespread this is. If it is in media organisations, in schools, in government. Perhaps it will be in so many places that the ideological defeat of feminism will start to make a definite change in society.

Should be interesting!

If Hillary wins America might have a military coup anyway. That is unlikely though, Trump will win.

Even though the odds on Paddy Power are 9/2. Invest £100 get £550 back!

Quick note on Global politics:

I'm wonder if the Chinese will remain irrelevant because since they have no democracy and hence no expression of the law of Free Will in their country they cannot polarise.

In fact, I am going with that.

Also read this weird article that old people in China keep going missing. It is not a nice government.

Astrology of America's POTUS election and some thoughts.

Digging deep!

Previously I might have said that there is nothing in the US election date astrology chart of November 8th.

Personally I thought it looks more like Hillary is going to win. Although in my understanding it is not for astrology to tell results like that which are the product of free will. The astrology sort of sets the stage but people still make decisions within that.

I say that because November 9th holds the moon and Neptune opposing the North Node with the rest of the chart looking fairly unfocused and scattered. The Neptune and North Node being the social justice stuff and the rest of the chart being the worlds response.

But this conclusion is a little premature. I realise that to understand the event you need to run up the days before it.

And... BOOM:

I had not noticed this is the new moon date until I posted this chart. This is BIG. BIG astrologically.

The reason things like this are coming up at the moment all over the Alt Right is the Venus and Saturn approaching conjunction with a square to the North Node... I.e. thoughts of our civilisations future!

But the conjunction of Saturn and Venus exactly over my native Saturn, to me, represent the judgement, the court case on FEMINISM. One of the patterns from third wave feminism being that women can make accusations without recrimination. This form of social control also being reflected from within mainstream media organisations.

Sun in Scorpio, which is all about some darker psychological motivations (this is also over my natal Pluto.) Conjunct Mercury may mean the media and such matters. Trine Neptune which can either mean social justiceness or information that essentially leads back to extra terrestrial issues. Like hacking for instance.

Anger of the establishment (Capricorn) directed at Uranian themes, of science and revolution. 

The opening square of this incredible new moon is with the moon over Aquarius with Mars just heading into there also on November 7th. Full moon seems a bit more dull on November 14th. With the trusty Sun approaching my eighth house. November 21st closing square looks like the media will start to get some karma, with also Neptunian and collective future themes whatever they happen to be reaching a slow crescendo (long term trend). New moon on November 29th and there is still tension with this Neptunian theme.

Taken together, I wonder if this means Trump will win but the Social Justice Warrior problem, or something else of this Neptunian variety, is going to cause continual problems. The media getting some karma though would be good!

This new moon on November 29th will then be getting ready for our Italian referendum on December 4th!

One more thing. Two things I have learned from reading about World War 2: The Nazi's did not give up because they had convinced themselves of the rather stupid idea that there was a secret death ray that would save them. This is perhaps some of the thinking behind the 'scorched earth policy' the America establishment is pursuing.

Secondly, we seem to be following a pattern similar in some very rudimentary senses. Germany/ Merkel is yet again the villain of the EU, The British were the first in a basic sense to oppose the globalists with Brexit, but the Americans now involved will likely be the bigger influence over the charge against globalism. The British did not interfer with (though they did not support) the Americans successful, and strategically correct, desire to invade Germany and German territory towards the end of the war. Although technically the whole of Europe is involved this time not just factional countries.

This will be a very interesting few days for my personal chart but as I said... It is free will partly, what we make of it!

Also, I just wanted to say that this infowars interview with Nigel Farage is very good, in it Nigel Farage says the real thing that puts me in tune here. That Brexit is important because big corporates, such as pharmaceutical companies, are using the globalist model in order to stop all free market competition, by creating their own laws.

Also, it seems to me on a very basic level that there is a collective calmness at the moment because the liberals believe they are winning. That is just as it is, no comment really. We will see!

Things are getting 'interesting' again.

... and by that I mostly mean... The stock market is getting interesting again.

Economic collapse blog: The One Trillion Dollar Consumer Auto Loan Bubble Is Beginning To Burst

Also, other interesting ideas and details are as follows:

• The end of September is the end of the 'fiscal year' (Not end of March then?)
• The drug industry is taking multiple hits, stopping the cabal from keeping themselves going through that.
• China is going to become a reserve currency second of October.
• Many countries are still dumping treasuries.
• Even Gregory Mannarino's evolution system keeps showing a dump in Dollar.
• Is this why the Federal Reserve may try to hike rates? To make US treasuries more attractive?

I cannot think of a more politically exciting time to be alive! With the exception of the future potentially of course.

I have also been re- reading this Benjamin Fulford post to great interest. Had Benjamin been using a donation based blog this one post would have been worth more than the entire month he charges for, it is simply fantastic:

Kauilapele: FULL ARTICLE Benjamin Fulford: Economic and demographic data make it clear it is game over for the Khazarian mafia

What this means is that the G7 countries have been on a degenerate path for the last 40 years. The cause of this degeneracy can be traced back to the Nixon shock of 1972 when President Richard Nixon took the US dollar off the gold standard. Until 1972 the developed countries were experiencing strong economic growth under the gold standard. However, after Nixon dropped the gold standard, the G7 countries just started printing money out of thin air and using it to buy stuff from the rest of the world. This is the financial equivalent of using amphetamines. You get a huge immediate burst of energy but you are destroying your body in the process. The G7 reliance of fiat money turned them into huge parasites on the rest of the world.

You get an immediate burst of energy but...

I wonder if this is what happens with service to self behaviours in general.

If you think about government power in markets. You get an immediate burst of energy from interfering in the markets, but you have basically screwed the balance of that free market.

Is this the principle of all service to self actions?

Karma?

The inevitable end point of this is having a lot of enemies! That, on this service to others plane, become more powerful than you.

This perhaps is what happens with something like feminism. The generation of women that is now older, becomes nasty towards men who carry on treating them like angels because habits are hard to break. The new generation is more reluctant and the new generation of girls lacks the teaching from their mothers of how to dress up their biological tendencies in the garb of being sweet and feminine.

Whereas, if you think about womens biology, they often want something out of men. If they are not given it they might become provocative (SJW?) I recently heard that men who have sex have heart attacks more often and women that have sex have heart attacks less often. Perhaps the deep secret is that even though sex is put forward as something the man gets more out of, the woman in fact does get something out of it and the man is actually giving something in sex?

Of course, back to geo politics. I wonder if things are effected by the space war side of things. It seems likely. Perhaps it is only when things happen there that things will change here. (David Wilcock update soon?) I notice his last update I saw on facebook, talked about, as per my satire of him on here. He said as he does every single update he seems to have had... That he is on a 'well deserved break'!

Head not really in the game?

This is a post I put on Disqus recently:

I live close to Brighton. Endless reams of extremely attractive women barely dressed. Times really have changed even since I was young- er. Young girls are extremely openly flirtateous and there is more of an attempt to initiate. The reason being is men are on the whole stressed, broke or effeminate and women do not get approached much.I feel bad for them sometimes. But it doesn't change the fact I ignore them because I have other things to do, and I lack the 'emotional labour' of smiling at them.

Rise of feminism hasn't helped. I've heard vicious things young girls are up to in secondary school. They don't know how to square female instincts with female behaviour... That should be taught but is not anymore.

At the moment young men split cleanly into three groups. Those who are willing to work for sex who are somewhat neurotic and politically correct in order to stay in favour with their girls. Men who keep their girlfriends at arms distance and maintain some sort of individuality and those, a very large group, for whom the entire female realm does not hold any sway and have formed male subgroups.

Theresa May... Ouch!

This is not going to be an inspiring post most likely, but more of a dull catalogue of the political carnage:

The DOW is at 18,220. It's high last year, it's all time high, was 18,312. If the Dow goes above that it goes some way to disproving my lightning strike ideas in my opinion!

Andrea Leadsom (the pro Brexit candidate) has exited the Conservative leadership race, leaving the 'Sith Lord' Theresa May, Nigel Farage (leader of UKIP) is gone. Angela Eagle is running against Corbyn. All the parties then are in disarray (not counting the Libdems and Greens).

And the media is always there for all of these events:

So Brexit including the end of the free movement of people, is not going to happen while May is Prime Minister. With any luck there will be a General Election soon, a non rigged one; but I'm not holding my breath on that one! Theresa May has already counted it out.

But without democracy... Imagine how fearful the cabal would be if a few hundred thousand people or more (perfectly reasonable estimate with the size of Brexit vote and UKIP vote) if a few hundred thousand or more marched on downing street demanding Brexit!

After the Dallas shooting, these things and a few other little things lead to an uncomfortable feeling in the air... Were Leadsom and Farage out for death threats? Maybe, maybe not... But it does not look good:

Why are all the up and coming power mongers women? Theresa May, Angela Eagle, Angela Merkel, Hillary Clinton?

At least I have something on my local MP (who is very close to Chukka) if it does go to another General Election:

Free Speech on Israel: Labour Jews to Chuka Umunna – Stop using antisemitism smears against Corbyn

On a better note it appears I was wrong on Chilcot:

Chilcot Report: UK Oil Interests Were Lead Motive For Iraq War

David Wilcock wrote a little about this kind of thing in his book 'The Synchronicity Key'. That in stories the bad guy has to appear to be winning before his eventual defeat and that this was a code of how reality works... It does seem a little hopeless at the moment...

But there is hope!

Finance is so dodgy!

Countdown to the new moon:

So the energy is 'kind of' there for our next installment of 'reality'...

This is some idea of how finance is shaping up:
1):

2): Zerohedge: "We Won't Be Lectured" - Italy's Renzi To Defy Brussels Over Banking Bailout

3): Zerohedge: China Devalues Yuan Most In 10 Months As Premier Li Warns Of Brexit "Butterfly Effect" On Financial Markets, Economy

4): Zerohedge: Hedge Funds No Longer Have Any Idea How To Trade This Market

5): Zerohedge: Silver Spikes Over $20, Gold Tops $1350 As Post-Brexit Panic Sends Precious Metals' Positioning To Record Highs

So, for anyone who knows anything these are all doomsdaying headlines... But I will explain them.

First, I remember watching 'The Big Short' if any of you have seen it... The protagonists in this adventure were buying Credit Default Swaps, which betted against the housing market, so if it went down they profited... The market was saying on the surface that everything was fine. The ratings agencies giving triple A etc. So you might expect that the CDS was at a low price obviously, the mainstream official market data was that there was a close to zero percent chance these would pay out...

But that of course was not true. Certain people knew this. So the CDS was not valued at a level that made sense in relation to the mainstream market figures it was priced at closer to a real value.

This sort of juxtaposition, and strange alternate signals, is all over the market at the moment (4). The already abysmal, artificially improved. yield curve data is giving signals it's all going to come down. The big thing to crash markets is Chinese devaluation (which is happening now (3)):

On the left there:

Buybacks are the big thing that has been keeping the market going for about a year and a half. Now they have stopped (1) (and why?) the stocks should have stopped as well, this is the current DOW on a 1 year chart: 

Gold and Silver have very often been inversely correlated to the stock market. Gold and Silver are basically CDS's for the dollar... But Gold and Silver have been going up disconnected with the market (5).

Who knows... Benjamin Fulford might have offered some reason as to what this might be, as I've already talked about on this blog:

The bankruptcy of the EU was triggered by the bankruptcy of Deutschebank, the largest bank in Europe, according to members of the Rothschild banking dynasty. Deutschebank is now under Chinese control, they say. If the Chinese had not stepped in to save Deutschebank, its collapse would have triggered a domino effect that would have taken down the entire European and then Western banking systems, multiple sources agree.

(My emphasis)...

Which goes on to say this:

Rothschild family sources say there is now serious infighting at the top levels of the Khazarian mafia over what to do next. They say family meetings are going on and they have asked the WDS and its allies to wait until July. They have been given a deadline of July 10th after which the Khazarian mafia will lose any chance of participating in setting up a new, fairer and more earth friendly financial system. They will also be subject to a total and absolute boycott that will inevitably drive them into bankruptcy and obscurity.

So clearly, if the Chinese are ready to bail out any of the Western banks then all really is OK for the establishment, and there are no fundamental free market indications we can take as being in any way correct.

I do not know if they can indeed save all of the Western banks but it is not unlikely... Italy at the moment is undergoing a financial crisis so dire that the Italian government is considering ignoring EU rules and using taxpayers to bail out said bank... This could be another big blow for the EU and could make people panic and bank run all over Europe (2)... Leading to the collapse of the EU!

The Italian leverage in this situation is to simply offer a referendum if Merkel gets tough... This all seems pretty promising!

So, July 10th! How much can we believe this date? We can't really, many dates from Fulford have come and gone but then he has pointed out and explained (even predicted) things in the real world as well.

There is not really a conclusion here I suppose. If the Chinese are going to bail out who ever they think is convenient to bail out today, and we have no sensible explanation of any plans that are going on in these secretive groups of people that hold the power at the moment... We have no conclusion really do we?

Good news though on the Tory leadership election. The Times has been reporting that there is a lot of friction in the Conservative party and they have basically fought off Theresa May et al. who pushed for her to be made leader immediately... At least I can trust the English!

I have said before on David Wilcocks comment site that I don't want it all to crash because a lot of people will get hurt and I would feel myself to be a monster... But... At the moment, I can't see any evidence of another solution...

Perhaps Chilcot will be one that will actually rock the boat... As I have said before, exciting week politically!

On to 'political strategy'.

As I spoke of in my last blog, where we are at the moment is the end of a moon cycle. The new one will be on Monday and in days following we should see some real movements and action.

Right now:

Mars and Uranus inconjunct can't be helping matters either, for either side.

While I was on my blog the other day I had kept twitter open and it was the news about Jeremy Corbyn, and an anti semitic follower... but it's obvious now that was just white noise. As was the news from the Tory leadership campaign.

There were three possible establishment candidates. Hillary Theresa May, who is the utter 'remain' establishment. Boris Johnson and Michael Gove. Boris Johnson started out as the favourite and then was replaced by Michael Gove following a 'leaked' email where Gove's wife was pushing for Gove to not give his allegiance to Boris without being given assurances on immigration...

Now these people are both 'Vote Leave', so what I think happened was that Vote Leave are watching carefully from behind the scenes to make sure things go their way. They are the other establishment, because the aim of the game has always been to fix both sides.

They are trying to see what they can get away with not giving. Gove announced article 50 would not be triggered 'this year'... Can they get away with that? Boris Johnson wanted immigration in favour of 'business interests' and was broadly pro immigration, Vote Leave obviously watched peoples responses to these statements and figured that is one step they cannot get away with.

These two articles explain quite well what is going on... One is on Corbyn's leadership problems with the Blairites... And they are most definitely Blairites. The second is about the scheming of the entire establishment in opposition to Brexit:

The Canary: Blairite PR firm tied to Labour coup knew of “mass resignation pact” six months ago

The Slog: FACT: If the UK doesn’t have a signed deal by April 2017, Brexit is in grave danger

Conservative Home: Andrew Green: The people have spoken – and they want lower immigration. Now Westminster must duly deliver it.

This all sounds pretty dire but there is hope... Chilcot enquiry will with any luck see off some of these Blairites. Tony Blair wants to become a part of the Brexit negotiations. Possibly as a negotiator it would give him diplomatic immunity.

A candidate for the Tory leadership and hence, prime minister of England, growing in popularity in a similar way to how Trump was (without the controversy yet) is Andrea Leadsom...

Aside from possibly some views on immigration. The potential leaders of the three main British parties, Andrea Leadsom, Tories; Jeremy Corbyn, Labour and Nigel Farage, UKIP; are all on the same page in regards to sovereignty and the opposition to globalist agendas. If any of these is not in then there will be more fight obviously. The one with the establishment pawn at the top is the one that needs to be opposed.

Keeping the faith?

Wow, I've just had a sleeping session that feels more like 'coma' than 'sleep'.

In Benjamin Fulfords most recent update, he has talked about how Deutsche bank is very close to failing so the Chinese have bailed it out.

This offers a different pattern than the one some of us were expecting. It was my understanding that an economic crash was the big thing in these events.

However, China has stopped it in this case, and it is likely that any further economic turmoil will be bailed out by China as well. For instance, Italy is now struggling with the euro.

But rather than there being an economic crash like David Wilcock was told, the game seems to be to keep the threat of economic collapse happening while the politics changes. Meaning that the overthrow is happening in a less traumatic way... (This of course assumes China et al. have this capability, and since they are allied with some powerful entities this is a good bet.)

I'll still be keeping my prep!

34 referendums have now been called within EU countries, and many of these by either the party in power or one that isn't but is very high in the polls. Italy is having economic trouble. However, will likely be solving this by coming out of the EZ by referendum rather than crashing!

In England it is looking OK. Nigel Farage and David Cameron are saying the same things. Was David Cameron never that bad? Was he just being threatened through it all? Or has he been swayed by Nigel Farage's tendency to be magnanimous in victory?

Either way, it is all looking good it just isn't looking the way I had thus far planned for it to happen. There will likely not be another economic crash!

One other point (In relation to the Chilcot enquiry out next Wednesday). I have had dreams many years ago explaining that Tony Blair is a big part of all this. He still influences the Labour party. He still goes for meetings there. After he is gone there might be some room for some real change. My local MP is a Blairite and I will vote against that man in any new General Election! As I imagine will a lot of the country.

The dream more specifically said that Tony Blair is metaphorical for the negative beings that take people off their path. As he gets arrested peoples paths will start to slip back. (Because the negative stealing resources mean they can't organically go elsewhere so people can't do their paths, also as things fix both people will get resources for doing their true path and they will not get resources for not doing so.)

Jeremy Corbyn's followers in my opinion are responding to a kind of inner survival mechanism. That some experience as libertarianism and conspiracy theory. Survival perhaps for the less aware! The emotional impact that Tony Blair had was quite awful. I remember my mother being so happy in 1997 for the election of that bastard that then went on to betray us all! He was quite charming back in the day.

My apologies for not including a few pictures and linking to a few articles here. I had forgot to set my alarm and I am rushing to get to work on time!

Why Finance is not omnipotent.

Financial manipulation.

So, I wanted to explain something about financial manipulation.

Many people in the alternative media seem to think that the stock market is so completely rigged that the 'cabal' control every move.

I do not believe this one bit, I will explain why.

Essentially, the way a democracy has worked for years, is that the government tells stupid people how to think. If people do what they are told, as they almost always have thus far, the system all works fine; the body snatcher government is elected, the rights are taken away slowly. Wahoo for the bad guys.

But if, for whatever reason something unpredictable comes along, like UKIP, then things get a bit more unpredictable and the body snatchers have to adapt, by having to conciliate a bit of truth or freedom to people. Grudgingly.

The same thing I believe happens with finance. The reason finance works like it does and doesn't do that natural thing these corrupt institutions should do in a free market (collapse) is because the government, the federal reserve or whoever, rigs it. With crude ramps, with VIX rigging etc.

But if something unpredictable comes along, they are effectively screwed!

For instance, there has been talk recently that the cabal will be trying to punish England somehow due to the rejection of the EU at the referendum. While this may be true, evidence of this is more likely to be something like the ratings agencies taking the UK down a notch. The wobbles that followed the actual referendum itself were probably to do with banks taking their own exit polls, and getting the wrong answer, believing it will be remain. Then when it was leave dumping their positions... A very hysterical and organic process which is nothing to do with manipulation and all to do with self preservation.

Conservative leadership, EU referendum

Like out of a script of some sort of dark comedy, it is now clear that Boris Johnson is pro immigration... PRO IMMIGRATION. Which is no doubt why he and others are saying we will remain part of the single market.

This is utterly ridiculous, he won the referendum on the basis of stopping unskilled immigration. I suppose though, to be honest he didn't win did he? To make matters even more stupid Theresa May, who is REMAIN, is running against him on the basis he is pro immigration and she is anti... I for one prefer May!

I can't bring words at how ridiculously stupid and hypocritical this all is.

I do think the way this whole things works in the grand scheme is that people, both positive and negative are trapped in kind of immobile life situations, and given very simple choices. The people who have at least some negative leaning, people I might consider like Boris Johnson, are then trapped into doing things that are good (or perhaps saying they will do things that are good) even though they would not choose to if they had power over their situations.

Vote Leave had locked themselves into a situation where if they lost the referendum they were going to be out of a job so they went with the immigration argument even though they need butlers and reasons to pay the working class as little as possible.

Now what's happening is the EU leaders are pushing for the Conservative leadership election to be gotten on with. Perhaps that is because if they had a proper leadership election David Davis might get in?

If they have a general election, and these peoples first enemy is democracy so I doubt it... But if they did have one and it wasn't rigged. UKIP are going to wipe these people off the map.

Trying to blame Nigel Farage for the lies of vote leave wasn't going to work, people are getting wise to these peoples games.

I can't wait for the Benjamin Fulford update today. Even though he may or may not focus on the referendum. Some clarity at the moment would be good!

Lol @ Spain! They still don't have a government. No one got a majority in yesterdays election.