More on feminism.

I am starting to feel a feel that is almost identical as to that I felt before the Brexit election. I remember talking to some people online, former friends, who just believed the election would go a certain way, that we would stay in the EU even though the evidence for that was sketchy.

I have written about this before, after the election I was suddenly more of a real threat so they started talking down to me and arguing. In fact, I would describe it more like having temper tantrums.

Same is true now, the anti Trumpers think they have it in the bag. It has also made me think of feminism more.

When I messaged the woman from that forum, and when I got in arguments before with them, the conversation would go in a very basic way.

• They would say something ridiculous, unproven and accusatory, 
• I would ask politely for a source or why they thought that, perhaps adding some of my perspective, always being jokey and pleasant.
• They would start throwing insults and throw a few sources or insults.
• I would disprove those. Effortlessly and quite completely.
• They would accuse me of hate speech.

That that would actually work is ridiculous. This is what happens in feminist society, if feminists get their fragile little egos challenged they make accusations of having been persecuted or raped. 

It continued thusly:

• The 'moderators' would tell me to stop it without being specific. Being very unspecific.
• I would respond basically, not thoroughly.
• They throw insults.
• I mentioned those insults on the forum.
• I get told I am doing hate speech.
• To which I respond, the only hate speech in that post was the bit I quoted from you.
• I am banned from the forum.

Arrogance:

This goes against free will clearly, so it will inevitably lose. Love obviously respects free will less than wisdom that is the principle that is being perverted here.

There is this incredibly arrogance. That the moderator should be able to say something without any justification and have that be the law. The moderator is there to moderate which is a 'professional' duty. If I quote her it is not within the job description to accuse me of hate speech and ban me from the forum for a personal insult (as it wasn't her place to be insulting in the first place). She is using the position of power to back up her own personal preferences. Even before this time she wanted me to be quiet for expressing factual anti Hillary pro Trump views.

I always felt when I went on the forum before that there was a cold eye behind this astrology forum. A malice. I remembered being deleted before on a very personal post and being angry, no answer from the moderators or justifications. I left the forum after that one. Others on the forum also thought it was unfair and no doubt feel that now!

... and where I think this comes from, is loads of women all over the world who engage in a hatred of men that are never challenged because the society is not healthy enough. Imagine how many little nasty ways this has manifested in the world. These women advise other people sometimes... How many times have they told friends their boyfriends or husbands are useless because this is what they feel about men? How much astrology has been twisted for these peoples agenda?

When Trump wins:

Imagine the well spring of hate that is going to be pushed down on November 9th! Your hateful views are irrelevant!

Very often women seem to not understand that if they do nasty things to men the men will respond in a less than idyllic way. Not a negative way. It's just that you can't expect to be nasty to someone and get a nice response back, unless of course you are service to self and the response you get back is "fear". (Which these women are playing with).

... and they think they have the upper hand here. The feminist automatic hatred of men has been triggered with the accusations against Donald Trump. No jury or law, just what they would prefer to believe.

Because they feel it their emotion tells them other people do to. But feminists are not the majority. They can't gather that other people see things differently to them. Not just working class men, for instance, but even married middle class women that don't have a hatred towards men (the emotion for these feminists of being in a loving romantic relationship with a man is something they subconsciously cannot imagine feeling).

It is also interesting to wonder how widespread this is. If it is in media organisations, in schools, in government. Perhaps it will be in so many places that the ideological defeat of feminism will start to make a definite change in society.

Should be interesting!

If Hillary wins America might have a military coup anyway. That is unlikely though, Trump will win.

Even though the odds on Paddy Power are 9/2. Invest £100 get £550 back!

Quick note on Global politics:

I'm wonder if the Chinese will remain irrelevant because since they have no democracy and hence no expression of the law of Free Will in their country they cannot polarise.

In fact, I am going with that.

Also read this weird article that old people in China keep going missing. It is not a nice government.

Astrology of America's POTUS election and some thoughts.

Digging deep!

Previously I might have said that there is nothing in the US election date astrology chart of November 8th.

Personally I thought it looks more like Hillary is going to win. Although in my understanding it is not for astrology to tell results like that which are the product of free will. The astrology sort of sets the stage but people still make decisions within that.

I say that because November 9th holds the moon and Neptune opposing the North Node with the rest of the chart looking fairly unfocused and scattered. The Neptune and North Node being the social justice stuff and the rest of the chart being the worlds response.

But this conclusion is a little premature. I realise that to understand the event you need to run up the days before it.

And... BOOM:

I had not noticed this is the new moon date until I posted this chart. This is BIG. BIG astrologically.

The reason things like this are coming up at the moment all over the Alt Right is the Venus and Saturn approaching conjunction with a square to the North Node... I.e. thoughts of our civilisations future!

But the conjunction of Saturn and Venus exactly over my native Saturn, to me, represent the judgement, the court case on FEMINISM. One of the patterns from third wave feminism being that women can make accusations without recrimination. This form of social control also being reflected from within mainstream media organisations.

Sun in Scorpio, which is all about some darker psychological motivations (this is also over my natal Pluto.) Conjunct Mercury may mean the media and such matters. Trine Neptune which can either mean social justiceness or information that essentially leads back to extra terrestrial issues. Like hacking for instance.

Anger of the establishment (Capricorn) directed at Uranian themes, of science and revolution. 

The opening square of this incredible new moon is with the moon over Aquarius with Mars just heading into there also on November 7th. Full moon seems a bit more dull on November 14th. With the trusty Sun approaching my eighth house. November 21st closing square looks like the media will start to get some karma, with also Neptunian and collective future themes whatever they happen to be reaching a slow crescendo (long term trend). New moon on November 29th and there is still tension with this Neptunian theme.

Taken together, I wonder if this means Trump will win but the Social Justice Warrior problem, or something else of this Neptunian variety, is going to cause continual problems. The media getting some karma though would be good!

This new moon on November 29th will then be getting ready for our Italian referendum on December 4th!

One more thing. Two things I have learned from reading about World War 2: The Nazi's did not give up because they had convinced themselves of the rather stupid idea that there was a secret death ray that would save them. This is perhaps some of the thinking behind the 'scorched earth policy' the America establishment is pursuing.

Secondly, we seem to be following a pattern similar in some very rudimentary senses. Germany/ Merkel is yet again the villain of the EU, The British were the first in a basic sense to oppose the globalists with Brexit, but the Americans now involved will likely be the bigger influence over the charge against globalism. The British did not interfer with (though they did not support) the Americans successful, and strategically correct, desire to invade Germany and German territory towards the end of the war. Although technically the whole of Europe is involved this time not just factional countries.

This will be a very interesting few days for my personal chart but as I said... It is free will partly, what we make of it!

Also, I just wanted to say that this infowars interview with Nigel Farage is very good, in it Nigel Farage says the real thing that puts me in tune here. That Brexit is important because big corporates, such as pharmaceutical companies, are using the globalist model in order to stop all free market competition, by creating their own laws.

Also, it seems to me on a very basic level that there is a collective calmness at the moment because the liberals believe they are winning. That is just as it is, no comment really. We will see!

UKIP leadership election... Stating the obvious.

I'm reading 1984... It is an interesting book. In my opinion, it pales in comparison as a dystopian thriller to The Hunger Games... The difference being in The Hunger Games, the government had a vicious nasty intensity whereas in 1984 they seem a little sub human.

The true state of human stupidity is exposed in The Hunger Games as well... I heard that one of the older characters in Eastenders in the 70's was dogged during the show because so many people thought she actually was that Eastenders character.

I do though, see many reflections of 1984 mentality in modern life... All this talk of what is 'appropriate' while your feelings get stuck under the heel of some feminist monster is very reminiscent of the series. Because it is, of course, not appropriate for you to get a feeling a feminist doesn't want you to, even if they encourage it.

Also, in 1984 the government brainwashes the young... It is not on the same level of intensity, but when the remainers lost the election their vitriol against the elderly was not a joke... Many brainwashed statements from the remain campaign abound amongst the young... Utterly devoid of any facts and evangelically held.

UKIP election:

Steven Woolf has been denied a place on the leadership candidate list... Which I did expect... To prove my point about expecting this I will underline my thoughts on the matter before this unfolded:

Free Will:

The law of free will states there must be two opposite choices available for polarity in the situation we are currently in. To me one of these choices was Suzanne Evans... When she was rejected under unfair, spurious rules... It seemed to me that the positive counterpart to her would also not be able to stand.

This is how I know what was going to happen in the American leadership ahead of time. Despite people saying Hillary would be arrested, it did not seem likely to me this would be the case because she represents the negative polarities representative... It seemed likely Bernie would go because as I already summarised (and as rigged voting was showing) Bernie represents the unpolarised attitude that cannot prevail in this vibration.

In English then:

Let's take this down to normally worded statements then. When Suzanne Evans was banned by the NEC on the fly with a random rule about five year leadership that was not previously a rule... Did UKIP members complain about lack of democracy then? No, they didn't... Except the Evans supporters perhaps.

The Evans supporters whom I disagree with quite completely. But have supported the party even though they didn't like the leadership!

So... What happens when Free Will is not respected?

Loss of polarity... Which is what is happening now... UKIP is hemorrhaging members.

I don't know what will happen next... However, this is the first day of the new moon... It is all kicking off and personally... I just can't wait until August 13th! (Saturn goes direct).

The lack of democracy... What do we do now? Said Mr Wolf.

Lucas Papademos, Mario Monti, Gordon Brown and Theresa May...

These are four leaders who were put into positions of power without being elected.

The last one being still in play... The first three were each trounced in the following election...

Democracy is not just a government manipulation mechanism but is based on metaphysical principles... The negative likes to give people a choice between two not really that different alternatives, but give them the commitment to the government, to voting for it, so they can feel they have voted for it with their free will and so do not rebel...

This also includes brainwashing that in some way they freely choose... For instance, a person can carry on watching the British Brainwashing Corporation and buying their licence fee, and sit down and watch their brainwashing that tells them Blair is such a nice chap.

But as a system changes... as people awaken in this tightly controlled environment, they start being unpredictable... Several people have upset the establishment recently, it is always someone committed to their cause on one or the other wing.

Bernie Sanders/ Jeremy Corbyn, Donald Trump/ Nigel Farage and Brexit in general. There are many counterparts in other countries. All have the cultural backdrop of their own countries meaning that Trump and Farage, Sanders and Corbyn are actually different people with different policy concerns, but seem to have fit into the role that is created there.

As is coming out now in the DNC leaks, Clinton had the whole of the well funded establishment behind her and still would have lost if the rigged match of superdelegates wasn't involved; (and even more rigging on top of that). All these people are upsetting the establishment since the establishment has lost so much power in it's geo political wars that it is now weak. But they still have all the money and this was behind Clinton... The Clinton campaign essentially became the editor for the leading media in America, nothing was done without their approval. Clinton still would have lost if some of the worst rigging had not been allowed... This shows how the people are not responding to the negative controllers manipulation anymore.

This is where we are now and at every stage the establishment is trying to make decisions without consulting the will of the people... Therefore they are trying to disavow free will, so they will inevitably, (a nod to those of you who understand this from the LoO) they will lose 'polarity'... Which essentially means they will lose the inner conviction to fight for their case.

The Tories establishment wanted Theresa May not Andrea Leadsom... Andrea was the choice of the grassroots Tories (who are now leaving the Tory party since they want Brexit) she was forced out (yes her own choice, there should have been another Brexit choice) but it proves the democratic will would have elected her and would have gone against the establishment... The same thing is happening with Labour... They do not like Corbyn and have dragged their feet for so long trying to find a way to have a vote without Corbyn winning.

So what can they do about all this 'democracy'... They are winning the occasional battle. But they cannot win this war and they know it... Well, this is what all these "terrorist" attacks (of which there are many) are about:

Nice attack: 84 + possibly more dead. Truck driver plunges through people.
France: Muslim stabs a mother and three daughters for being 'inappropriately dressed'.
Germany: Guy attack train passangers with an axe. Gets a few.
Germany: Guy shoots up McDonalds.
Germany: Guy slices pregnant woman with machete.
Germany: Explosion in restaurant... No details yet but I'm guessing it wasn't a malfunctioning toaster... (Like, the real reason isn't a malfunctioning toaster).

Before of course when there weren't so many, it was easier to keep in mind that these are false flags:

So, the idea according to Fulford and another source, Partisan Girl, is that if they can create a situation of war between the 'hard right' and the 'Muslims', they can have martial law and cancel things like Brexit and elections.

It's a good idea in theory, but so far to me it seems like a lousy way of getting there.

The left hand does not know what the right is doing. If you want to stoke up violence you have to get the media in on it... But the BBC is trying to actively suppress things, and will downplay any Islamic connection. There are also holes in this plan... Why Germany? Even though I do not want a terrorist attack here, in England, it would be a more logical choice if you are hoping to cancel Brexit!

Any attack of that nature though would obviously grow UKIP... And UKIP are smart enough to direct themselves at the establishment... But if you're hoping to run an empire you can't run plans so schizophrenically like this!

I have often noted how Trump jumps on it when there is a terrorist attack and sometimes have wondered whether he does so deliberately to penalise the negative forces for pulling shit like this... If you position yourself well to benefit from the negative crap then it follows they will be less able to pull it.

We do have Theresa May who's doing quite nicely in blocking Brexit and I do not know the situation in Germany, perhaps the 'far right' are more dangerous there or the politics more dangerous for Merkel.

At this rate there will either be a crash pretty soon or the... at the moment daily, terrorist attacks will spread all across Europe. Who knows, maybe the Illuminati will get their blood. But whether or not it will be martial law or something altogether less predictable remains to be seen!