Not something I talk about a great deal. Not something I avoid either.
I.e. I do not have a degree in cultural studies or anything.
Anyway, I just wanted to offer my opinion on Islam that it is going through a kind of reformation. Apparently the Church, after the crusades etc. went through periods where it had political change. got rid of its radicals.
Perhaps Islam is going through that too, and certain foreign powers to Islamic countries, and indeed certain Islamic countries themselves are slowing it down. Since fanaticism often allows for certain criminal behaviours.
It is no secret that the American government fundamentally, since the cold war (that Nimr either didn't know about or didn't talk about with the American diplomats) has been replacing any regime that didn't fit it's political agendas, and that America prefers radicals to sane people.
A good example of a sane person is Bashar Al Assad (again might be putting my foot in it, but there we go). Whom refused Americans deal on pipelines which then lead to the Rothschild funding of Da'esh.
However, Bashar had a secular government and a very advanced culture. With diversity of religion peacefully living within Syria's borders.
Why radical jihadists would prefer to ally with America is anyone guess but it might be to do with the fact that sociopaths, like the American administration, are willing to overlook and even encourage autocratic regimes. Whereas other partners are not?
A blog on a few different metaphysical modalities such as the human design, Law of One, and general, everyday, thoughts.
Sunday, 3 January 2016
Whoa, and dream.
Who because my viewers suddenly went up. I don't know when this happened but I can tell you it seems to have shot up by 60% in a few days. (That's 60% of the total figure of pageviews EVER). I have no idea why this is.
Perhaps the dying gift of Nimr Ali- Nimr. (One I posted on Donald Trumps page). But perhaps not, since that post isn't getting most of the views. I do not know. Perhaps someone shared a previous post of mine or it came down from bring4th. Top traffic sources are divine cosmos. Which I haven't posted my blog via DC comments recently. Twitter, which makes sense and the hands down strangest one... Google. (Possibly bring4th?)
So, I wonder how far a lot of these people went back. Because more and more I have been doing politics recently. But I also put in a lot of astrology and things, and it used to come more from me, be more heavily eccentric than it is now.
I'm just about to do an eccentric one:
My dream:
I had this dream, forgot about it, but since forgetting about it, my dreams have stopped; which means to me that this dream is important to express.
Basically another very real feeling one. These used to be so rare they were cause for celebration but recently have been extremely common.
The dream afterwards felt as though it had been from the future. It was uncomfortable all the way through and did not feel excessively positive, but as I should know by now life doesn't always so we cannot expect metaphysical sensations to always be 'sweet and lovely'.
I was in London trying to do a music lesson which was not very comfortable, then I left, Then I transported myself to Hove and didn't realise what was going on. An attractive young blond mother, with a pushchair noticed me and tried to help me since I was lost and did not know what had happened.
Then somehow she found out I was 'not of this world' and turned on me a bit like an invasion of the body snatchers monster. And I realised I had to get myself out of the way and I transported again. To somewhere not too far away but it was still a strange sensation.
I spent the rest of the dream with the realisation I could teleport and trying to do the whole thing consciously.
It felt very real... and to indulge in a little thought play, if we did move into a new world (ha, title of blog) where these abilities are common place, that might be how it was. I've already written about how it is not inconceivable that wanderers and people with special abilities may be turned on (as in to turn on someone, the negative) slightly by society and I have had dreams of such things in the distant past, dreams I still remember for their intensity!
I also met a bunch of people that link to that dream that seem very like real world humans. (For anyone not familiar with the kinds of things I am talking about my spiritual base is the Law of One. www.llresearch.org and www.lawofone.info. That journey is personal though so whether you take the same things from it as me...?)
I just wanted to mention the original place I got the idea of some dream experiences being set in the future was from David Wilcock. Possibly in about 2004 this post would have been I am talking about. Or a bit later.
Perhaps the dying gift of Nimr Ali- Nimr. (One I posted on Donald Trumps page). But perhaps not, since that post isn't getting most of the views. I do not know. Perhaps someone shared a previous post of mine or it came down from bring4th. Top traffic sources are divine cosmos. Which I haven't posted my blog via DC comments recently. Twitter, which makes sense and the hands down strangest one... Google. (Possibly bring4th?)
So, I wonder how far a lot of these people went back. Because more and more I have been doing politics recently. But I also put in a lot of astrology and things, and it used to come more from me, be more heavily eccentric than it is now.
I'm just about to do an eccentric one:
My dream:
I had this dream, forgot about it, but since forgetting about it, my dreams have stopped; which means to me that this dream is important to express.
Basically another very real feeling one. These used to be so rare they were cause for celebration but recently have been extremely common.
The dream afterwards felt as though it had been from the future. It was uncomfortable all the way through and did not feel excessively positive, but as I should know by now life doesn't always so we cannot expect metaphysical sensations to always be 'sweet and lovely'.
I was in London trying to do a music lesson which was not very comfortable, then I left, Then I transported myself to Hove and didn't realise what was going on. An attractive young blond mother, with a pushchair noticed me and tried to help me since I was lost and did not know what had happened.
Then somehow she found out I was 'not of this world' and turned on me a bit like an invasion of the body snatchers monster. And I realised I had to get myself out of the way and I transported again. To somewhere not too far away but it was still a strange sensation.
I spent the rest of the dream with the realisation I could teleport and trying to do the whole thing consciously.
It felt very real... and to indulge in a little thought play, if we did move into a new world (ha, title of blog) where these abilities are common place, that might be how it was. I've already written about how it is not inconceivable that wanderers and people with special abilities may be turned on (as in to turn on someone, the negative) slightly by society and I have had dreams of such things in the distant past, dreams I still remember for their intensity!
I also met a bunch of people that link to that dream that seem very like real world humans. (For anyone not familiar with the kinds of things I am talking about my spiritual base is the Law of One. www.llresearch.org and www.lawofone.info. That journey is personal though so whether you take the same things from it as me...?)
I just wanted to mention the original place I got the idea of some dream experiences being set in the future was from David Wilcock. Possibly in about 2004 this post would have been I am talking about. Or a bit later.
Saturday, 2 January 2016
From Bring4th: A great man was executed today.
A man whose name in honesty I probably can't pronounce without auditory examples:
Sheikh Nimr Al-Nimir. The Muslim Shi-ite cleric executed by the Saudi's.
The more I read about him, passively though twitter, the more it sounded like he was kind of a Middle Eastern Trade unionist, then with the religious aspect perhaps some sort of Gandhi (perhaps not in Gandhi's ability to unite faiths, but in his non violent activism), considering the difficulties he faced,
Then I read the wikileaks cables on him (bearing in mind these are obviously not faked at all or put out by a sympathetic or hypocritical media), and he sounds like a real spiritual leader.
I seem to be wrong a lot recently, so it is of course possible some sort of horrible thing comes out about him later in this malign world, I hope not:
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08RIYADH1283_a.html
al-Nimr responded that if a conflict were to occur he would "side with the people, never with the government." He continued by saying that though he will always choose the
side of the people, this does not necessarily mean that he will always support all of the people's actions, for example, violence.
He quickly followed by saying that politically, he is on the side of justice, wherever or with whomever it may preside. He provided the example of Iraqi politics, saying that he does not support the aspirations of any Arabs - be they Sunni or Shi'a - or Turkomen who would aspire to power in northern Iraq. In al-Nimr's view, as the Kurds are an undoubted majority in the region, it would be unjust if they did not exercise a majority of power.
Al-Nimr attempted to distance himself from Iran, saying that piety is only God alone, and that all nations act in their own interests.
Also notable for the purpose of predicting al-Nimr's future behavior was his recognition of his own growing popularity, an observation supported by many in the community. Post contacts have described al-Nimr as someone who in previous years was largely an apolitical religious figure, and is still a secondary player in local politics. These contacts point to the death of Ayatollah Shirazi as the moment when al-Nimr began to take more political stances, his politicization a product of desire for greater community influence. Assuming al-Nimr's primary goals are greater rights for Shi'a and greater personal influence, it would seem his plan will be to continue forcefully calling for reform and creating unrest, endearing him to the disaffected, and fitting with his vision of instability as being the only catalyst for real change in the Kingdom.
Friday, 1 January 2016
Navigating a web of lies.
I have to say I am lost with all the information I am reading, and the possibility that some of it is lying.
But what if it is not lying? I've also realised that the best resource I possibly have is 'common sense' and that the truth is just 'right there' a lot of the time.
The 'cabal' are not necessarily controlling every piece of news I read written by independent (and I tend to believe well- meaning) journalists in a lot of these places. So;
UKIP: UKIP have suffered the most incredible establishment beating, including outright lies. However, this does not mean that any criticism involving them is not true. That's a shortcut.
I have heard from a Telegraph piece that Farage has a kind of 'tall poppy' syndrome where he does not tolerate people as intelligent as him in the party. Looking at the people surrounding Farage none massively stands out. Perhaps Jonathan Arnott. Perhaps this is true, perhaps it is not.
Labour and Corbyn: There is so much here; I have no idea as well. Is Corbyn an extreme left crackpot or is he being challenged by Rothschild pawns under the name 'moderate'... Or both? Is he an extreme left crackpot being challenged by Rothschilds under the name moderate? Out of the left vs. Modroth options I tend to take the latter, but if I was just taking what the media said I would go with the idea that he is very left wing.
I have read a piece saying that Labour MP's are very frightened and there is a feeling of the militant 80's. True or deception? True but deliberately intended to be misinterpreted... The light conceals as well as reveals sort of thing?
... and I wonder how much these people are talking in about the 'cabal' and have Fulford type knowledge of the world at large. In which case operating on COMPLETELY different concerns than is being shown.
Simon Danczuk seems to just say what he honestly believes about Corbyn, and I wonder with Danczuk... He seems very much like a wanderer to me since when I hear him talk it seems as though it is a deeply 'informative' experience. As though his mind and his self is constantly at that sort of level.
Does not make him perfect of course, but it shows a good way for me to think when confronted with this hotbed of lies.
Zerohedge has basically been a success. Richard North at EU referendum .com seems to explain things well.
On top of this of course, and to conclude... How much difference do I make to any of this anyway!?
But what if it is not lying? I've also realised that the best resource I possibly have is 'common sense' and that the truth is just 'right there' a lot of the time.
The 'cabal' are not necessarily controlling every piece of news I read written by independent (and I tend to believe well- meaning) journalists in a lot of these places. So;
UKIP: UKIP have suffered the most incredible establishment beating, including outright lies. However, this does not mean that any criticism involving them is not true. That's a shortcut.
I have heard from a Telegraph piece that Farage has a kind of 'tall poppy' syndrome where he does not tolerate people as intelligent as him in the party. Looking at the people surrounding Farage none massively stands out. Perhaps Jonathan Arnott. Perhaps this is true, perhaps it is not.
Labour and Corbyn: There is so much here; I have no idea as well. Is Corbyn an extreme left crackpot or is he being challenged by Rothschild pawns under the name 'moderate'... Or both? Is he an extreme left crackpot being challenged by Rothschilds under the name moderate? Out of the left vs. Modroth options I tend to take the latter, but if I was just taking what the media said I would go with the idea that he is very left wing.
I have read a piece saying that Labour MP's are very frightened and there is a feeling of the militant 80's. True or deception? True but deliberately intended to be misinterpreted... The light conceals as well as reveals sort of thing?
... and I wonder how much these people are talking in about the 'cabal' and have Fulford type knowledge of the world at large. In which case operating on COMPLETELY different concerns than is being shown.
Simon Danczuk seems to just say what he honestly believes about Corbyn, and I wonder with Danczuk... He seems very much like a wanderer to me since when I hear him talk it seems as though it is a deeply 'informative' experience. As though his mind and his self is constantly at that sort of level.
Does not make him perfect of course, but it shows a good way for me to think when confronted with this hotbed of lies.
Zerohedge has basically been a success. Richard North at EU referendum .com seems to explain things well.
On top of this of course, and to conclude... How much difference do I make to any of this anyway!?
Oh what a moron am I!
Just read an article from Breitbart on this subject.
Excerpt:
Look at the texts she sent him… “I’m quite turned on just thinking about it”… When he replies he’s horny, she says, “Good. That was my intention… another thought just popped into my head… of you [REDACTED]… moaning your name”.
Contrast this with another more deliberate situation, Natasha Bolter:
Same old tricks!:
... and just think of the timing of this, a week before Corbyns reshuffle, someone credible and vocal in the media that could challenge his leadership finds themselves in this trouble.
Of course, we cannot be sure of the real reason, we have to wait and see.
But at the moment, it seems to me it's the... Same old tricks!
Excerpt:
Look at the texts she sent him… “I’m quite turned on just thinking about it”… When he replies he’s horny, she says, “Good. That was my intention… another thought just popped into my head… of you [REDACTED]… moaning your name”.
Contrast this with another more deliberate situation, Natasha Bolter:
Same old tricks!:
... and just think of the timing of this, a week before Corbyns reshuffle, someone credible and vocal in the media that could challenge his leadership finds themselves in this trouble.
Of course, we cannot be sure of the real reason, we have to wait and see.
But at the moment, it seems to me it's the... Same old tricks!
From Bring4th. How Don could have survived? (and general) (updated)
Reject love.
Simples.
Since he was fifth density he often could not use that energy. When a high vibration sixth density is around they send you energy which increases your vibration, you repeat high wisdoms, then there is no one to recieve this wisdom unless there is a suitable 5D around.
I suspect one of the things that is going to become obvious as the 'veil' lifts is that 5D's and 6D's can't be in an equal relationship together, not if vibration is going to increase. They can where love is important but not intimacy, such as a familial relationship.
On another good note detailed on my blog is how I did some number play synchronicity wise and showed before it went on to happen that the rigging (showed by satanic synchronicities) is becoming less effective. It was VERY ineffective yesterday.
Update: Now for the real strange part of all this. Firstly, to say I see things in a very 'inhuman' way, compared with the sixth density whom seems to see everything as real, and relevant and alive.
A lot of my thoughts are divided up into this and that karmic pattern. I have learnt through trial and error that people generally don't object to what I say, and that when I want to express something I cannot contain myself often.
Take this as a not necessarily true expression of myself and what is relevant to me rather than what is true (Standard free will clause?)
Anyway, after that 'excess verbiage' I wondered if Don felt Carla didn't love him, under this 5D model I am working with, because he was subconsciously trying to block the energy from coming in.
It seems to me a fairly obvious thing to know or not know, as an energy even, so that's something that just popped into my head about it.
Last post updates
Firstly Katie Hopkins did not defend Simon Danczuk. Looks like this guy has few friends at the moment!
Anyway, this from my last post:
USDJPY ramp failed. WTI crude got from about -100 to -18 then failed. I didn't follow any VIX rigging. But possibly they gave up after that.
DOW ended -178. The target was clearly S&P 2058 that miserably failed as well.
Like ZH says, it means nothing still. Never predict is the best way to go in these matters. Or at least, only predict when you actually know something.
But the end of the year. 4 - 22nd January should be very interesting!
Anyway, this from my last post:
From yesterdays market activity this did happen.
So, I wonder, from this funky number play, if the 'devil' is starting to lose the wheel, and if we will see less successful rigging in the markets. Good timing with Asian Bank soon to officially open.
USDJPY ramp failed. WTI crude got from about -100 to -18 then failed. I didn't follow any VIX rigging. But possibly they gave up after that.
DOW ended -178. The target was clearly S&P 2058 that miserably failed as well.
Like ZH says, it means nothing still. Never predict is the best way to go in these matters. Or at least, only predict when you actually know something.
But the end of the year. 4 - 22nd January should be very interesting!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)