Thought about it a few times and got distracted, or not pushed myself to do it because usually I just write the article and there is no need for an inner 'push'.
However, perhaps because this is a slightly more technical article, there is some sort of subconscious reluctance.
Here we go:
I am going to define terms in relation fundamentally to their most modern interpretation as I see it, plus their original interpretation, missing out the vast gulf in between.
Many concepts are far enough from their original interpretation to be unrecognisable:
Marx, Socialism and Communism:
Firstly, I will say where all these ideas come from is fifth density entities. Their is not really a massive difference in the way these people think, but their theories sound very different so are interpreted very differently.
Marx described a certain dissatisfaction that the population might feel with the capitalist society, his original analyses would have fitted very well with the terms of 'chakras' and 'energies'. He was effectively describing workforce in relation to the sacral chakra on the personal level.
In his view, when the population was upset with the energy blockages we experience on this planet that relate to the industrialised world, They would form unions (very sacral) and overcome the establishment. Creating a temporary government (socialism) which was more giving to the working classes, leading to a kind of utopian idea of communism.
Communism is the idea that everyone is equal and is seen from a Marxian perspective to be the natural state of man.
However, one thing I want to note is that Marx would not have agreed with many of the behaviours of the current left wing. For instance, consider this sentence:
The criticism of religion disillusions man, so that he will think, act, and fashion his reality like a man who has discarded his illusions and regained his senses, so that he will move around himself as his own true Sun. Religion is only the illusory Sun which revolves around man as long as he does not revolve around himself.
This is the unfortunate perspective of a fifth density person whom does not understand fourth or sixth. The key point is that Marx saw people as individuals and disagreed with collectivism that stamped on individual liberty, This is at odds with the current left whom see collectivism as a big part of everything they do.
Marx also would not likely have agreed with the Climate change movement which offers so much money to Goldman Sachs.
No comments:
Post a Comment