I've been wanting to write an article for a while. Analysing the red pill. What have I found to be correct within it? What have I found to be not correct within it? (A short but very relevant list!)
Something about the article hasn't particularly worked though. Like, the words won't "flow". Perhaps it's because I don't deal a lot with women, as like, peers. In a potentially romantic sense. And I just don't care that much. Or perhaps it is because I am reaching for a higher point. Something that takes in the red pill as a reality. But is not the entire discussion.
I think a point that is relevant here is the unconsciousness of unethical behaviours sometimes.
Anyway, in looking through what the Law of One has to say on responsibility. Literally searching that term and reading for insights on that specifically (I wonder if responsibility is a distortion of the First distortion, the Law of Free Will, or the third distortion, the law of light/ wisdom?) I came across this. It is only the last paragraph that I actually want, but it feels wrong somehow to not quote the entire passage (even though it is long). Especially since I want to include the "I am Ra" at the beginning. I have a theory that that is there to call the relevant entity when you read it so you are watched over and not fooled by the negative:
Questioner: The pyramid shape then, as I understand it, was deemed by your social memory complex at that time to be of paramount importance as, shall I say, a physical training aid for spiritual development. At this particular time in the evolution of our planet it seems that you place little or no emphasis on this shape. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. It is our honor/duty to attempt to remove the distortions that the use of this shape has caused in the thinking of your peoples and in the activities of some of your entities. We do not deny that such shapes are efficacious, nor do we withhold the general gist of this efficacy. However, we wish to offer our understanding, limited though it is, that contrary to our naïve beliefs many thousands of your years ago the optimum shape for initiation does not exist.
Let us expand upon this point. When we were aided by sixth-density entities during our own third-density experiences we, being less bellicose in the extreme, found this teaching to be of help. In our naïveté in third density we had not developed the interrelationships of your barter or money system and power. We were, in fact, a more philosophical third-density planet than your own and our choices of polarity were much more centered about the, shall we say, understanding of sexual energy transfers and the appropriate relationships between self and other-self.
We spent a much larger portion of our space/time working with the unmanifested being. In this less complex atmosphere it was quite instructive to have this learn/teaching device and we benefited without the distortions we found occurring among your peoples.
We have recorded these differences meticulously in the Great Record of Creation that such naïveté shall not be necessary again.
At this space/time we may best serve you, we believe, by stating that the pyramid for meditation along with other rounded and arched or pointed circular shapes is of help to you. However, it is our observation that due to the complexity of influences upon the unmanifested being at this space/time nexus among your planetary peoples it is best that the progress of the mind/body/spirit complex take place without, as you call them, training aids because when using a training aid an entity then takes upon itself the Law of Responsibility for the quickened or increased rate of learn/teaching. If this greater understanding, if we may use this misnomer, is not put into practice in the moment-by-moment experience of the entity, then the usefulness of the training aid becomes negative.
On the subject of the general passage. My health has been bad for a few days and I have had to use a small pyramid for half an hour to even have the energy to pray! Also, another vague coincidence is that I have talked about several passages from session 60 a few times, from reading book 5. But the book 5 excerpt doesn't have this quote. It is just a coincidence.
Anyway, onto the red pill:
Evaluating red pill ideas:
There are many red pill ideas. I saw this video recently that I thought was fantastic:
Youtube: Pearl: How I got Red Pilled: Pick Up Artists: June 14th 2026:
https://youtu.be/SIbeS2Q7dFY?si=kHinBALiovNNbvlp
Pearl for me is just unadulterated truth. While analysis is sometimes very good. The take away understandings and rules are sometimes what is useful. With Pearl there is none of that. There is no rule there is just her pure experience with a small bit of analysis:
You will see the truth and you will like it:
This is another video that is relevant:
Youtube: John Griffin: The Secret Reason Women Pi$$ You Off So Much: June 14th 2026
https://youtu.be/3kw1p6KlL3A?si=3MXneJZ7bKwsmR5v
Life experience + a 20 year marriage + daughters.
The bad experience/ malevolence:
My mother has been a nurse for almost all of her working life. She has told me that she goes to house after house where a guy apparently did everything right (as far as we know). But because of divorce laws, he now has to live at home with his parents and fund the life of his wife and kids (plus probably her new lover). That he probably never gets to see.
The divorce court system, from what I understand. Is purely malevolent. And is very very common. I remember a guest talking on Pearl Davis' show, PI Russell I think, who said he had a friend who had a divorce. His ex wife took a bunch of his money. So he was living in his car. He worked and worked and worked and got a promotion. Then he got enough money to rent a flat. His ex went back to court to say his pay had increased so she deserved more. The judge agreed and upped the alimony/ child support, and he was then poor enough to have to live in his car again. So he killed himself.
When Ben Hart went to jail, in relation to a story of this same theme. Of feminist judges and crazy women. About 50% of the people that were in prison were there for unpaid child support. The situation is so bad for a lot of men that a lot of them throw away their ID's and become homeless. This is one of the reasons why they have such a big, unsolved, homeless problem in America.
Another video to illustrate the point I will follow with:
Youtube: TaylorisOnline0: What duties does a woman have in a feminist society? June 14th 2026:
https://youtube.com/shorts/FT4S3WRMhMc?si=LvyKhPH9C4UF4j1k
But what is the reason for this situation?
The reason is, as follows in my understanding. This follows on from what might be called red pill Lore or basics. I think Rollo Tomassi came out with it first.
A lot of women follow a predictable pattern. In their twenties, they go out and have fun. They do NOT want to settle down. Their attitude is very much that guys that do want to settle down are kind of boring and such and 'weird'. Then, in their thirties, all of a sudden it is the opposite. Their biological clock is ticking and their social life decreases. All of a sudden their perspective changes. They want to settle down and they socially shame others to meet this goal. The guys that are not serious with them are suddenly "weird" and "man children" or whatever the put down is.
And there is an issue here as well:
BUT, and this is a big but. If a girl does that. If they all go for the rich fun exciting guy that plows through them breaking hearts like a childless old feminist ploughs through cheesecake and wine bottles. They have been in a sense... "Alpha widowed". Meaning, they think excessively about the guy they could have had. And resent and hate their now husbands. They also want variety they had in their youth and do not have sex with their husbands.
Women have many strategies for this, and one of them, one of the main ones really. Is Christianity.
A lot of very naive guys in the Christian men will wife up these ex hoes. And the whole culture is there to support this. These women have a body count which is 50+, but when they go to church they play the Christian girl and most of them lie and say their body count is around 3.
So this is the reason the exploitative divorce laws are needed. On a basic level society needs someone to look after the hoes that have kids. Because if you treat the mother badly. Then that travels down to the kids. This creates dangerous kids. Crime. Poverty. Drug Addiction. So humans have a deep innate sense of making sure that these women are looked after, without considering the overall ethics to the men involved.
But there is another important aspect to bring in here, before we link it back to the Law of One quote and my larger point. This is all very unconscious from women. The second video there by Jon Griffin shows a bit of how they think. How these systems have formed in such a way. It takes a lot of commitment to create a Christian church for this purpose. Or to pervert and existing one.
When you actually talk to women about this kind of thing. All of this is unconscious. Not unlike their sociopathic political viewpoints. The left wing has been responsible for Communism, which killed one hundred million people in the 20th century. The Khmer Rouge, Venezuela, The Holodemor etc. And no, socialism is not separate from Communism. They are a sliding scale as the free market can't compete against taxation and the state gobbles up more and more.
When you ask a women, at whatever stage of this process. They will say they are conforming exactly to this model. When they are young they won't really engage with you but will indicate a kind of female empowerment and all of this partying stuff. Then at 30 sometime they will suddenly convert and settle down. Then later on they will just consider it all normal.
But now the red pill is waking up. This fully unconscious process, which they mostly still won't reflect on. Is getting stopped. The girls settling down in Christian churches rely on guys belief in the lie of their low bodycount. But guys don't believe this anymore. The dating services are empty of men. The clubs are empty of men.
Youtube: Dapper Dev: Consequences Have Not Yet Arrived For Women and the Truth About Women Must Finally be Told. June 8th, 2026:
https://youtu.be/3plKlrfFaaE?si=WUpVguytHYIBr7Os
The Unconscious Aspect.
The unconsciousness of this is what I want to focus on though. I believe all this behaviour actually has an earlier route, which is the coming off the gold standard. Twisting the economy to be able to fund these vanity projects like feminism.
But like I keep saying, as this is all unconscious, it has spawned a lot of second order effects. A lot which are contradictory and potentially self destructive. Men are, I assume, meant to serve as a kind of tax serfdom to enable womens committment to left wing politics. But DEI has forced men out of jobs. So they can hardly give all their money to women if they do not have any.
The vast amount of hatred and venom that women in general have for men does not work well for whatever deep agenda is at play here either. Women saying daily on tik tok various nasty things is a symptom of this whole process of exploitation. Running away on its own steam. This is effectively the system facing entropy.
As I said the process is unconscious. Women that are not in general unethical. Have done this entire process of partying and settling down, without any awareness. They genuinely think all these men out there doing things that slightly offend them are "narcissists". Not seeing their own tyrannical contribution to the situation. Or the completely natural forces at work (such as dating out of their league). So bringing awareness in has to become a very careful exercise.
Why no disclosure?
Bringing it all together then. Question, if the Q paradigm is correct and the good guys have taken over a whole bunch of the world and are just walking the population through a kind of anti brainwashing in order to not have too much chaos. Then why is this?
I think it comes down to the Law of One quote above. "If a greater understanding is not put into practice, then the usefulness of what is learnt becomes negative".
The way I think of this is thusly: Say I am in a bad relationship of some sort. I am very stressed and take it out on my partner. But I do not realise it. I genuinely think they are doing annoying things but it is actually my own stress I am responding to.
Then I receive some relevant psychological information, spiritual information or feedback. I realise that she actually isn't doing things wrong I am just angry -> So in the example this piece of information is the "Greater Understanding".
I can apply this in two ways.
One, is I could apply the information positively. OK then, I should apologise. I should make an effort to never be angry again. Etc etc. Or I could apply this negatively: "OK, wow, she isn't actually doing anything wrong. But when I intimidate her she has more sex to placate me". So I carry on doing it. As an example.
This example is deliberately simple to show the free will aspect. But in the example given in the Law of One quote. The reason to have the negative interpretation might simply be overwhelm. You learn a thing, but it is too much for you to learn and process quickly. So you just don't apply it. So you know what you should do. But you don't do it.
Now we can put these two points together. The point on learning and free will here, and the red pill stuff.
If we had some sort of disclosure or disclosure similar announcement. And people suddenly had more information. This might act in the way mentioned above. As an overload, that polarises people negatively.
Say for instance, it came out telepathy was real. And all of a sudden people had the idea that if they focused really strongly on other people that they could effect them.
Say then you had a bunch of women that felt it was the right thing to do to send loads of hate towards men (or the other way around). Technically, they might have been doing that anyway. But the extra awareness and focus would make things worse - would polarise them towards the negative with far greater efficiency. Bear in mind, I suspect if these energies are effectively blocked, it effects the person sending the energy negatively (depolarising them so to speak!).
So breathtakingly slow.
This, to me, could be why this whole process, the process that the Q people are waiting for. So breathtakingly slow. A whole societal change. Consequences on evil doers. Confrontations people need to have with their own amoral choices. Understanding. Has to happen.
I think a good deal of this might happen as the right wins at the ballot box. A lot of liberals are very well behaved as long as their side is winning. But completely lose it when their opponents seem to be winning.
A lot of people have been living in huge stress and poverty. Poverty can cause problems in some circumstance that mandate a somewhat negative outlook I think. The fact that a lot of people are out of work at the moment in the UK because of a destroyed economy. Might be allowing a lot of people time to think through things to prepare them for any positive movement forward of our society.
I am definitely learning slowly. I just came off Caffeine Free Pepsi Max (After caffeine and alcohol recently). It is late in the day to do that. To figure out drinking a black chemical isn't ideal when I have health struggles. I drink a lot of liquid. A LOT. I am like those monsters in the Faculty that just drink water. And I can't discipline myself sometimes to drink water itself so I had the Pepsi Max. But that is still a very basic health decision to still be learning (I actually read in the Law of One book 5 the opposite statement to that from the Law of One about an hour ago. "That one looks not at what has been done but at what is to be done" 94.9).
But I am probably a little further than a lot of people on the "spiritual" path. A lot of people have not even begun to take health decisions or spirituality seriously at all. Do not pray or meditate regularly etc. And I am still at this very basic level.
No comments:
Post a Comment