One of the many tarot card like images I have made now AI is accessible. These are taken from dream images and they have specific meanings.
This one is when some part of you, some truth, perhaps something you need. Is caught up behind some of the obscure ways of doing things in an office. The rucksack didn't need to be floating. The AI did that.
That kind of neoliberal agenda kind of thinking. The idea that faceless weirdos in some higher, unseen, but not inaccessible echelon, are making decisions... "For the highest good". In the liberal way of thinking.
Youtube: Promethean Updates: The Trump Bibi Call: What London Doesn't Want You To Know. June 3rd 2026.
https://youtu.be/tzqi6FPNG7o?si=yoMeHBlEOTopZcXa
Transcient information.
Yesterday, I wanted to talk about transcient information but did not do so. This was one of the videos. The other one was one that was more focused on things like Reptilian shapeshifters and whatnot.
The Law of One contact, advised the people it was talking to about 'transcient' information, and that it was very negative. I do not quite understand why this is. But I have a theory.
If I hear something about Reptilians. Like, in that excerpt it was that the queen is a Reptilian, and the woman was a survivor of Satanic rituals that sometimes featured said queen.
The Promethean action video above. Is very very good research. In a lot of videos the Promethean action group are making the case that the UK is a kind of deep state. The UK is the head of the snake. And they bring receipts. Also that Trump is heading off a lot of the globalists operations.
All of these things can be found in the real world. Most of these things are kind of relevant to our real lives. Not directly perhaps. But the things they talk about will come down the line eventually.
But the thing with Reptilians. OK, so a woman says that she was abused by Reptilians. Once you have even entered this paradigm you are in a kind of trap polarity wise. Can I lie detect this? No. She could be telling the truth. She could be lying. If she is telling the truth, then assuming she is lying is not a particular nice thing to say.
The lack of me being able to check any of this means that even if I found four people that were telling nothing but the truth. The fifth might be lying. Or lying like 20%. So it is pretty inevitable that anyone looking at that information is going to absorb a lot of falsity.
There is also a rootlessness to engaging with that kind of material. I do not know what the truth in those areas is ultimately. But I suppose, for my purposes. I will find out for sure when everyone else does.
The changing paradigm.
I have observed something about the 'normal' paradigm.
I would say men and women look at things in a different way. For men. The desire is kind of more grandiose. They want to live and to conquer. To be very good at what they do and to live in a meritocracy. To be unquestionable because of their amazing talent.
One film that I thought perfectly showed male and female desires was 'Walk the Mile'. Which was a fictionalised biography of Johnny Cash. He is a complete wreck. But because he is so amazingly talented people put up with him. So I'm talking about male psychology. Not the complete wreck part, just the amazing talent part.
The female response to this. His eventual wife in the show. Was also valued for her singing talent. But she was able to show Johnny a great deal of love/ compassion/ kindness but string out the option of a relationship for many years. So she was chased a long time by a high status man. Seeming outwardly to have behaved perfectly.
I would say this is 'gods plan' in a way. That men are in a strong position and able to move and do things well. Women in this paradigm for some reason earn (but are not given) the reputation of being loving and idealised.
The other plan, the one of 'the enemy'. Is the neoliberal agenda. Loads of weird committees of Karens and other things. Faceless bureaucrats making decisions and treating the populace in a way like infants. The normal people see the world like this. They have been, in a sense, trained to see things a bit like the Iraq war. Where people stand in UN rooms and make arguments and the media carefully massages the population into the deep states chosen actions. Like with the Iraq war.
We are in a period of change though. Trump has been doing things differently to the "meeting in stale board rooms discussing the meaning of everything for years before acting". In Cuba, he just went in, abducted their President. It was done. The Promethean action video talks about this. I think this model will move to other countries as well. Male or male style leaderships. Where the leaders are actually competent and do things.
Revealing psychology.
The revealing of psychology of these political events I think is interesting and it might be partly what the point of all this is. As it relates to polarity.
I used to know a girl in University. Not well. We were in opposite dorms and she was, we just talked a few times. She was just somehow grounded and social in some way. A few times I talked to her and the subject of conspiracy types of things came up. At which point she said she agreed with conspiracy and mentioned a documentary that had gone around recently. Rothschilds, WW2, things like that.
Then, later on, the EU referendum became a thing and we had discussions about it. We disagreed but everything was fine. Then, the Brexiteers won the EU referendum. And I was blocked and she never talked to me again.
A lot of 'moderates' and left wing types have this perspective. They are fine for you to have an opinion different to them. As long as it doesn't actually effect anything. As soon as they can't dismiss your idea as that of a powerless eccentric. You have suddenly become a real danger (You are no longer an 'infant'. Since the left is a very female way of thinking.)
It is partly to do with safety I think. People feel safe if there are this set of bureaucrats above them keeping everything running as they see it. I also remember going for a drink with some work colleagues. They were guys, were both pro EU. And both then told me about their horrible mothers.
The psychology is a fundamental lack of feeling safe, and so attaching to bureaucracy, in replacement for religion. Or in replacement for a healthy psychology.
Which means that, as things shift. The careful put together manner of a lot of these people will start to shift. Because they are only OK when the political system they believe exists for their benefit. That reminds them of female leadership. Is in place.
Dismissiveness.
In many ways, the left and mainstream types are unaware of reality that is coming to meet them. Their emotions get in the way as I discussed in the last blog. They prefer not to see that Restore will likely win Mackelsfield. The BBC will oblige them because it is made by the same types of people. When these things happen, as they have with Trump. All these peoples unhealed trauma comes to the surface.
No comments:
Post a Comment