I said in a recent blog post, that I had fallen out with Stefan Molyneux's view of the world. He said, very explicitly. At about thirty minutes in FDR podcast 6303. If anyone of his followers chooses to "break bread" with evil doers/ the left, then they should not follow him.
It was explicit, and passionate, and not something I needed to bring up again. But this morning, I woke up, and the subject is relevant to this morning. This exact subject turns up:
I am in a different position to Stefan. He has endured a lot. And the idea that he, with all his intelligence and power as an individual. A truly next dimensional intelligence. I think, according to his own ideas of life (heavily EvoPsych). It is unlikely he would have been able to avoid personal involvement in his philosophies and ideas. To have his emotional survival imperatives reflect into said philosophies.
Stefan has had to endure all kinds of malevolent madness in this life. First his mother. That was a mad person, in and out of nut houses, that beat him. Then, as well as I'm sure many experiences that were not talked about. He had a lot of personal friends who tried to sabotage him due to his philosophies opposing their world view. And as he became famous. They became positively feral. Trying to shut down his speeches and such. Bomb threats. The works.
Compromise:
This was not my experience. I live in a sleepy, highly highly left wing town. I have known girls that look precisely like those in the dancing pic in the tweet. A lot of them look like that. With the crazy hair. The somewhat childish lack of seriousness even once they are "adults". The same body language.
I also have a mother. Who is a nurse. Who is a casually left wing sort of individual. With the Boomer more casual left. They do not have a good grip on what the modern left have become. They do not have a good grip on modern woman psychology. The amount of degeneracy. That might have been growing in the 70's and 80's, but was nowhere near where it is now. The violence the modern left is willing to engage in was not understood by them, Life was simpler for them.
Another individual these sorts of thoughts refer to, in my view. Is someone like Carla Rueckert. Someone that the Law of One contact themselves stated was doing extremely well in her spiritual practice. In her Union with the Creator. But that was left wing.
Discerning that the left is in fact evil. In it's true form. Is beyond the scope of this article. But what I am hoping to explain here is that the left is made up of two types of individuals. Those who, are somewhat motivated by it's more negative features. And those who, are simply not that aware of them, but whom remain good people. I would say that this quote in the Law of One explains this position partly.
Questioner: I am interested in how the first distortion applies to the negatively polarized entity misplacing the mind/body/spirit complex. Why is the negatively polarized entity followed to the place of negative time/space? Why would one of us freely follow the entity?
Ra: I am Ra. The positive polarity sees love in all things. The negative polarity is clever.
"The positive polarity sees love in all things. The negative polarity is clever."
I have seen reflections of this. Wondering if it has been casually expressed in fiction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghSq2qlwrs0
So I am wondering if this is how the left is. The positive polarity sees love in all things. A lot of people that are otherwise positive people, especially women. Caring, friendly, warm. Are on the left. Because they are basically positive and have been 'tricked', in a sense.
But this does not mean that the left in general are all like this. 'The negative polarity is very clever'. Basically means that negative people are extremely committed to practiceable methods of deception. This does not just mean higher etheric entities. Propaganda. Governments. The evil that exists in the sense of a kind of all seeing Satan. But also reflects the internal workings of a leftist group. Some of those people in the leftist group have chosen this philosophy because, they are what they are, and they are exactly where they have intended to be. Promoting a political system that leads to mass tyranny, torture and death of the population.
Here are two X posts that show that:
https://x.com/FreyaVanadiss/status/2027313633647092017
Conclusion:
For me, I cannot go along with Stefans rules, which he attaches to his entire philosophy. Of not interacting with the left in general (as he defines them, "evildoers"). Now I could justify this to myself. Try and find a way through the cracks. But to relate to people wishing that you could not be relating to them is to have an exploitative attitude towards them.
My best option as far as I can discern. Is to simply relate to people as they are whatever their political affiliation. While of course, being mainly focused on spiritual matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment