Love in a natural society.

A strange one today that I was not aware I was going to write about ten minutes ago. 

One of my big insights in life has been to do with people and densities. Like, how people are from if they are fourth, fifth or sixth density. Another, that goes along with this, has been the statement from the Law of One that people are either wisdom, power or love. These were modelled by Don, Jim and Carla respectively. 

Along with these I obviously notice patterns in people. Most women are the love element and most men are either power or wisdom. Not all, several examples to the contrary. But there is a large gender skew in my perception. 

So I have correlated a little the "love" people. I had a friend who killed herself. A half sister. My mother. An acquaintance. There was actually a very unpleasant one I knew in a previous job. This is just my data set for correlations the tendencies here will not apply to them all. Boomers won't experience it like millennial women will as an example. 

I suppose when I talk about this that 'love' element might not be relevant, I might just be talking about women. But I feel it is important.

Questioner: I would like for you to define love in the sense— in its sense as the second distortion.

Ra: I am Ra. This must be defined against the background of intelligent infinity or unity or the One Creator with the primal distortion of free will. The term Love then may be seen as the focus, the choice of attack, the type of energy of an extremely, shall we say, high order which causes intelligent energy to be formed from the potential of intelligent infinity in just such and such a way. This then may be seen to be an object rather than an activity by some of your peoples, and the principle of this extremely strong energy focus being worshiped as the Creator instead of unity or oneness from which all Loves emanate.

 

This line I believe is something that is unbelievably profound and largely missed in the narrative on the Law of One's teachings. It's come up for me partly because if I am to classify women as largely 'love'. I think even outside the element of the spirit/ self/ soul, there is a yin yang element, love and wisdom, where women are in the love section anyway. Then this line is relevant. As my health comes back along with my sex drive. I am seeing girls in the street and feeling extremely positive feelings about them. But this quote offers a bit of a way out of that. I believe it is a point that describes the entire dysfunction in our society. All of it. 

But anyway, if we are looking at the way a lot of these women are. There are some patterns in our society that have pushed them in a certain way. Love people are the same way. Wisdom people are the same way I would say, probably impotently expressing their wisdom without the power to change anything, and power people are as well. I don't know about the power people. 

Women then, due to DEI policies. Have a lot more responsibility than I think they would in a natural society. In a natural society, men have an overpowering need to protect and provide. They want to get resources to provide for a woman, and it is this fundamental drive that has built the entirety of society. All the buildings, sewage systems, water systems, lorry drivers, walkways, almost all of the inventions, the computer, the internet etc. 

However, due to DEI, feminism, taxation based policies and a lot of other things, men are not getting the benefit from these things. This has lead to a lot of false jobs being created. For a lot of reasons. One would be to keep women basically dominant in the society. Which also lines up with divorce laws and such. Another would be to keep women spending. Unhappy unmarried women are the best consumers. Women spend $8 for mens $2. 

I think the natural way women are they are meant to, or they would naturally, with their huge amount of emotional energy; create communities, and create babies. While the world has convinced them to abort their children to fill in google spreadsheets daily. This is far away from their natural state of being. Had we not had the current political system most of their admin jobs would probably have been automated by now. 

A young womans inflow is fantastic. The amount of people that want a piece of her. The amount of guys that want to take her on a date or be friends (it is an immediate raise in status for guys to associate with an attractive girl!). The amount of female friends. The parties. Her family as well. I think, in a natural society, women wouldn't work a great deal. They would do these things. They would be in a constant "love" state in a sense. They would have community, possibly religion, friendships and babies. A lot of their jobs would be easier and simpler. Aside from some few called to be healers and various other things. 

BUT, we are not in that society. I think womens large emotional energy and general instinct to relate emotionally is still a huge emotional responsibility. They still have people in their life that rely on them and such. But on top of this, they have a hugely inflated worklife. So they effectively have two jobs in a sense. 

Then add in politics. Leftism. Which they don't have time to research and don't have men in their lives that will tell them otherwise, and there is no power incentive since men have been disempowered. The power is so deliberately in womens favour, because they have more tendency towards leftism/ centralisation of state power. The men in their lives are often leftist anyway. Going on the pill will make a woman prefer a more leftist guy. There are a lot of individual manipulations encouraging this state of affairs. 

But the end result is that these women are just... Controlling. Their activities and "emotional labour" are not responded to with any real nourishment. The emotional energy is by it's nature controlling. It is more capable of that admin organising type of thing they do. A secretary is basically doing a mothering role for a boss. Where a mother would know all her kids football dates, the secretary knows all her bosses meetings. 

So they are both doing the best thing for their polarity and such. They are actively "service to others". But like the wisdom person, whose wisdom does not produce any impact or change. All the energy they expend doesn't get a good result back. So you add it all together and they are just super controlling. Their main personality trait is their icey control of each and every thing around them. 

Their leftism is a total belief. 

So I think when something does change, and I am a believer in QAnon, technically just "Q" and "Anons". The sudden breaking of this very controlling and depleted nature, I think this will be quite a stepchange and I wonder how they will recover from any sudden and huge political shift like this.