Things have suddenly shifted for me. As such this is a bit more of a less structured blog post. My energy is in a bit of a new place. For a couple of weeks I have had to expend energy but now, the thing I was doing has been done. I am relaxing and I had absolutely no idea that I was so anxious before this. For the past few weeks I have watched between 1 and 2 Fringe episodes per day. 3 on rare occasions. Yesterday, because I felt relaxed and I am recharging, I watched 7 episodes!
This kind of thing really makes me think about how powerless I am in my life in general. I would say how powerless 'we' are, but I can't really speak for others. My impression is this relates to quite a lot of people. But I had no idea that for weeks I couldn't really relax. I just wasn't consciously aware until I did relax, and as such, in a way this was the most important thing happening in my life. While spiritual things I talked about were relevant. One of the larger lessons appears to be our relative powerlessness against what is going on in our lives.
Anyway, many things to say. I realise, I will not say as many as I expected to. I will probably keep it kind of brief.
First, is that for me personally, I am being drawn off various online places due to censorship from various sensitive people. I was censored on Pearl Davis' livestream yesterday. It was nothing insulting I assure you. Most of what I get censored for are just intellectual insights that people do not like. Like the following. This is when I went back on a Steven Cambian video recently and left this comment:
Two Law of One points. A) The Law of One explicitly talked against LSD in relation to Carla and I think, by implication, for many spiritual seekers in session 32.1. The justification is that the person we are naturally is perfect, is the Creator, and doesn't need to be changed with "harsh chemicals". B) The Law of One does not state that cancer is in all cases the "fault" of the person getting it as you have claimed/ summarised. The entire story is nuanced, and much of the Law of One comes back to statements like 'there is no best' and referencing the mystery of everything and our inability to really know what is going on "in this density". But session 73.19 among others talks explicitly against the idea that all cancers are curable.
I can see why Llresearch allegedly told David to not represent their work in his presentations. He butchers the quotes real bad.
Also, I wonder what perspective you are coming from as a Christian in this matter? One of the things about Christianity that I have wondered is why there is such a glaring difference between what Jesus taught on healing and what Christians today practice and apparently believe? Jesus said explicitly that his disciples should be able to heal and should do it regularly "When you go to a town, heal the sick among them and accept the food they give you". It would seem from a Christian perspective that diseases in general should be amenable to some sort of energy healing, that should be healable by modern day Christians? Unless I have misinterpreted these passages? It seems your perspective is more in line with a secular interpretation.
It is likely that last point is the one that Steven did not like. If you are challenging other peoples beliefs, as Steven was challenging the Law of One, by making a truth claim, then it is fair game to look critically at the truth claim you are making. With Steven it is 'Christianity is correct', of which he has ignored other challenges such as his 'test of a Prophet) claims. But there are many different truth claims from him and other Creators.
It just feels like people in general are excessively sensitive. It just is the way the world is at the moment. Or I have become more articulate at challenging others? But it is clear to me I cannot relate to Pearl or Steven if I am going to be censored. I don't really put up with censorship of my contributions. In theory, if it makes sense from my perspective then I would let it go; in theory. If the other person is in a position of disproportionate power (like Twitter historically) I do let it go as well. But I have never been censored for a reason that makes sense to my perspective. It has, each and every time, been what I consider a minor abuse of power by the moderator of whatever outlet.
Anyway, I wanted to carry on on that point and end it on what I think might be relevant to the last point there. It is a fair point from a mainstream Christian perspective. But it loses it's purchase once you bring in a Law of One perspective.
I have noticed that the Law of One mentioned a few characters positively. Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Albert Schweitzer. All were big on real world service. Schweitzer is a really interesting one and he is called a 'healer' but he worked exclusively as a medical doctor. Schweitzers brief section also mentioned that he gained in green ray energy by working with the organ. I have not previously fitted in playing an instrument to the overall service to others and Law of One paradigm.
Anyway, I am getting off track. Those three individuals, amongst only a small handful that the Law of One mentioned positively. All have their own interpretation of Christianity. Franklin and Jefferson took Jesus as a philosopher and rejected any records of supernatural abilities. Schweitzer had some ideas on Jesus that I have not yet understood despite reading. But they were different enough from the church that he was almost prevented from missionary work, and was banned from preaching in Africa, only allowed to work in a medical capacity.
I just think that is interesting. The relevant information on Christianity and healing adds up to an answer to why Christians don't heal in my view. Plus information on free will and a few other points.
No comments:
Post a Comment