"The Simp Epidemic" as Pearl calls it is something that seems to me to be absolutely unbelievably strong. In a left wing area, guys will not talk against feminism even behind closed doors with other guys.
Much of the negative agenda, in my view, would not be possible without one of it's largest promoters. White Liberal Women. A fanatical belief in all deep state agendas that relate to practical mundane politics. So, perhaps they would not agree with child sacrifice to Satan. But increased state control and a lot of other agendas are A-OK. Even good and morally righteous.
In order to get this state of affairs. The Deep State knows it won't get the full co operation of men. It is not a possibility. It is not a fight to be had. But it does realise it will have to have enough men supporting white liberal woman and their very slightly less liberal cohorts.
To this extent, I believe the brainwashing is very strong and deliberate to get men to be 'Simps'. I think that the combination of single mothers plus widespread female allegiance to feminism and mainstream narratives. Creates this in a lot of men. Almost all most likely.
I believe this happened to me. My mother was not a nutter. But she is not inclined enough towards working things out like political ideas that she has a lot of defence against some of the toxicity just floating around. I think, through various things, I was kind of subconsciously programmed to support a kind of female supremacy.
As I mentioned in the previous blog, and something I have many more examples of. I, like most men, have experienced a fair amount of fairly deliberate female cruelty. I would probably have been a happy simp had things gone differently. But they didn't, that's precisely the point.
But it combined I think with a lot of the spiritual stuff going on in my life.
Social ostracism has been a big theme for me. That and the obvious lack of support that meant that it happened in the first place. Anyway, in many different ways things were not going well for me socially and I think I then reached out, for connection or a substitute. To Bring4th and started blogging there.
This however, confused my energy field a bit. The alternative would probably have been worse. But engaging there set into place a deep conditioning, that I have talked about before; that I believed I was a "G- self to the throat' person. And a 1-8 person. It was all tied in. Supporting Llresearch. The belief in how spirituality should be and it's homogenisation.
But recently it has been broken and I am still doing the work, still getting the effects of that. It is a single moment, followed by what feels as much like a process as an effect.
The definition of Love.
As I have mentioned, I have often had difficulties with women. The social exclusion is one thing but it is really more of a symptom. The issue I think is, that I have an unbelievably positive view of women most of the time. Even with regular red pill content, my brain just snaps back to "simpiness" quite quickly.
There are a lot of versions of this in a sense. Breaking off with llresearch and anyone connected, since I was often talking to people that resisted me with their free will, is huge, and it is pushing the change I believe in a big way. Ending a lot of the difficult, simpy, behaviours.
But the battle still wages on. Within myself I know the feeling of the 'simpiness' that connects with a lot of the more troublesome stuff, and it is a kind of reverence that leads in the direction eventually of wanting to, or believing I can, use metaphysical tools to attract women. It is a position of weakness, rather like how Nietszche described weakness, deceptive and committed to trickery.
The real issue with this state of affairs is that a lot of times, I have thought everything was fine and a woman has absolutely hated me down to my very core it feels like. I consider this a lack of perceptiveness caused by A) A lack of information, but only partially, B) the Simp Wound.
There are a few different ways I have gotten out of this state. Recently, today, I read a section of the Law of One. It's intellectual element really separated me from that dysfunctional emotion. Before I have prayed, and it has also been effective. There are human design things that are effective as well.
But it is very relevant to Stefan Molyneux's definition of love:
"Love is the spontaneous recognition of virtue if we are virtuous".
The trickery:
I have heard Stefan talk to guys on his call in shows using this reasoning. Guys that are letting women absolutely walk all over them. I remember one guy who had been with a girl for 8 years, and then she decided to break up with him and get pregnant via another guy!
So the question starts to this guy: "What virtues were you attracted to," and the guy struggled for what felt like half the call. It was probably only ten minutes but it was excruciating.
The argument goes a bit like this, as I understand it. If we are relating to someone and they are following mainstream news. Their opinions are all the same as everyone elses. Then we aren't really loving "them". Like, if someone believes in climate change, and they read stuff that politicians write and repeat this to you, is that really "them"?
But if people are independent thinkers, then they tend to sit and work on their own virtues. Someone makes an effort to do something for you or has patience or some other thing, then we can recognise that and that's when love steps in.
One of the things with this is that animals cannot have virtue because they do not have free will in Stefans understanding. Free will is our capacity to compare our behaviours to ideal standards. A dog doesn't do that.
Nevertheless, it is an interesting definition as a tool in the war against simpery. Because that simpy feeling is strong. It is not purely sexual I don't think. Love is most certainly not defined only in relation to our romantic relationships. It is also a need to protect say a family member. In Stefans narrative, there is a whole lot of animal bonding that happens that is not love.
It is a difficult thing to consider. In the Matrix, the Oracle says at one point: "Being the One is just like being in love, no one can tell you you're in love you just know it". I think that is how most of the population sees the situation. It gives a lot of authority to our subjective interpretations This is how it appeared to me when some of that so called "loving" feeling comes through in the creation of music. But at the same time, it offers a framework that explains that feeling disappearing when I become more aligned with the Creator through various methods.
No comments:
Post a Comment