Synchroncities and the world changing.

Life changing synchronicities

This is a post of 'well I suppose I should'. 

We are not meant to explain to others our 'sychronicities' in relation to the Law of Free Will, at least in my understanding. Where I am getting this is a section where the Law of One contact, told the three doing the sessions that it would be a violation of the Law of Free will for them to explain to others the synchronicities they were getting to advise them on which house would be best for them, as they were looking for a new one.

I think this relates to dreams as well because of reasons I have worked through myself. With dreams it is kind of easy to conceal that a piece of wisdom came from said dreams or say, the human design chart, because the information just becomes it's own thing after it is figured out. But occasionally I do tell others parts of dreams and synchronicities. It just feels 'right' to.

So that is what I am going to do in this post. 

When the JFK files came out. Like, less than 24 hours after they came out. I had a look for myself. I scrolled randomly a few times about 10 pages in (1 page was about 30 files I think). It was quite a bit. I would go say, 5 pages, check out some files. Then 20 pages, check out some more. In total I didn't check more than 10 pages before realising it would need more knowledgeable and motivated researchers than me to swim through all this.

I downloaded exactly one page, here is a screenshot proving that. The screenshot was created yesterday and it clearly states that the relevant file, 104-10110-10621, was downloaded last week. I have deleted the metadata from this file as I do for all images. But I do still have the original with the metadata:

Because I had to allow the furthest left part of the screen to be shown I have to show all my files here. But there is the file. Sitting there under it's correct file name. It is good I never thought to change that.

Why is this relevant?

Unfortunately, the screenshot is not large enough to show the date. But here is the tweet itself:

https://x.com/MichelleMi10625/status/1903699033451090169

It is dated March 23rd. So a week or so AFTER I downloaded that document.

It's just a pretty big synchronicity to say Q is legitimate for me. Too-ing and fro-ing about this a lot myself. I consider Q to be legitimate, but the process of attaching to some mysterious military code dropper like a good Riddler or something, to potentially not be healthy. 

The real world. 

I talked in an article recently, not that long ago, about how it is hard to come to hard and fast moral rules when you expect the world to change in a big way in the future. I.e. if I have someone in my life that I feel has been unpleasant and I don't really like. There is a distinct possibility that this person will change, if such a global change happens like Q says it will. 

... and that change, the David Wilcock esque mass arrests looks like it is "in process". 

Since the character length increase, you pretty much can't get the date of a tweet into the screenshot. 

Here is the tweet: https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1904676405939490988 It is dated today, March 26th. 

This, if it were declassified, would in fact lead to the kind of outcomes talked about. The global deepstate going to jail and things really moving about. Opinions and incentives massively changing.

So that's all I have to say about that. Interesting huh?