The problem of Evil.

This was a subject that has been going around in my mind for a while. But with this video, it gives me an entry point into what I was going to say:

Youtube: Richard Grannon: Dealing with Evil in the World calmly (March 31st 2026)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msvEpRy5mlo 

I will be skipping over the explanation of some of the terms I use here. It just can't be helped.  

This person, I think, is sixth density. Could be fifth. Unlikely to be fifth (Fifth tend to have a thinner and more wisdom intense presentation, like Jordan Peterson. There is less "person" there).

This is the world as I see it with all the mix of various influences on this planet. 

We have, as I have talked about, on blogs and in videos. The different densities and how they interact with everything. 4th, 5th and 6th. We also have kind of different elements to people. Love, Power and Wisdom. (Who are respectively, Healer, Teacher and Adept).  

This is something else I think is relevant:

I agree with this. I remember watching a video on foxes. Where the show ended the series with saying that a female fox had shacked up with another family after it's own children had died, and was looking after the cubs of another female fox. Compare this to an example I had heard when I was younger of Lions. Where if the male wants to impregnate a "single mother". He kills her cubs. 

It seems to me that EvoPsych just takes the available information and creates a convincing story. 

I am obviously not an expert in this area. But the anti Darwinists, including scientists have made some good points. I remember reading a book excerpt where a guy said that when he had studied things in the laboratory. Types of animals no matter how much breeding they had tended to stay the same kind of animal. For instance, no matter how much you chop and change a dog. It is still a dog. It doesn't become a cat eventually. 

So why is EvoPsych held up so positively amongst so many people? Including people that are admirable?

The room of red dudes analogy.

So, let's take this to an analogy of a room of red dudes. Imagine, you are a person that is to give a speech to a room full of people. They are the cult of red. They are so deep. The lie has been so good. That they are not particularly fanatical. They are like boomer liberals. They don't offer any argument in favour of their beliefs. They just assume they are right.  

The red people will only listen to other red people. In this room. There are 80% people dressed in pure red. 10% dressed in a few colours that include red. 10% that do not have any red at all.

For the red people. If you are not dressed in red. You don't exist. They are not fanatical. They won't burn you at the stake. Since there are 80 - 90% of them. You offer no threat if you go in the room and say that red is not the most important colour, and it is possible to dress in yellow. If you were to do that. They would not argue with you with good points. (Maybe a 5% of fanatics would). They would probably just look at you in confusion. Then one of the fanatics would push you out of the room. which the red people would ignore. Because the person dressed all in yellow. Doesn't really exist anyway. They do... But they don't. 

This is what I think EvoPsych is like. In the larger sense. Even amongst so called believers in Christianity. I think most people work off a basically secular framework. In order to talk to people. In order to have any impact at all. You do indeed have to "dress in red". 

Then add the negative.

There is another colour here I have not mentioned. People that dress in black. The problem with the black. Is that they are not like the yellow. The people that dress in black belong to a real cult that is deeply negative. 

The trouble is with the people in black is that they are actually insane. They produce a lot of things and information that has no use at all. 

This, is a big problem. It is rumoured that the cult of the red started up originally. Because when people could choose whatever colour they wanted, the ones that chose black immediately went insane. They immediately started taking drugs and chopping off peoples heads. These people cannot be integrated into society. So at some point in the past, someone said. "You know what? Everyones gonna be red from now on. Yes, it's not ideal and yes, it sidelines some truly valuable eccentrics (the yellows say!) But society is just not going to function if we have any significant proportion choosing black. Which is what they will do if we don't force the main group of people to choose red".

The result.

The result of this careful, and mostly functional lie. Is that we have a functional society of industrious, builder, and ideologically confused reds (since red is not the "truth" really). Reds who only see red. But the other colours. Including the yellows and the blacks, do exist.  

The only way to communicate to the reds and improve things on a larger scale is to dress in red. To give a certain amount of consideration to it. But to actually understand what is really going on. You have to acknowledge the black. Since the black is so confusing, it is extremely unpredictable what will happen as things change. For instance, as an industrious group of blues say, get rid of the blacks. 

This analogy got away from me a bit. There is a lot of subtext here I wanted to add in about polarity and such. But I think, surprisingly, the analogy has done enough of the heavy lifting. Those other terms will probably just confuse people anyway. 

I have something additional to say that needed this foundation.