Analysing sociology of women.

But not in a nice way.

Recently, the Archbishop of Canterbury has had a DNA test and through a few different methods, found out that who he thought was his father, was not his real father.

This apparently hasn't effected the man himself. But those of us who don't want to stop any legitimate emotion and quest for wisdom under the veil of a religious ideal, would perhaps be more alarmed and upset. Regardless of his views, the fact is this man has spent time growing up with someone who was not his biological father, (we don't know the real ramifications of this down to the genetic level). This real father of his wanted to see him on his death bed but did not.

The amount of suffering caused to any non zealot individual would have been immense. There is one person who has created all this suffering to three people. Justin Welby, his biological father and his unknowing foster father. Justins mother, has allowed this lie to continue to the clear suffering of those around her.

But there are no consequences for her. Just like there will probably not be any for Michelle Fields. Like there are not any for those that cried rape at American campuses. Those who managed to fire scientists for such horrors as clearly stating facts on the IQ and variability in tests between men and women. A throwaway comment about women fancying scientists gets another fired. A man is taken to court for disagreeing with feminists on twitter. A group of women lie about a man called Ghomeshi raping them and face no consequences.

This is not all. It is in the DNA of our society seemingly. Say a man and a woman get together, have a child. The woman goes off and is disloyal, or is negative in another way and the man is understandably angry.

The woman then, rather than facing the reality of her actions can just scream 'victim' and get the state to screw the guy over, through child support or tax and welfare. Therefore, she is essentially using the apparatus of the state to do negative onto the guy.

Of course, occasionally it is one sided in the other manner, a rich husband has a child with his wife, cheats and leaves her as a single mother, without welfare her situation would be very bad. However, this is not the situation of every single mother. This whole analogy also applies to other situations without a child or marriage involved. It can simply be social ostracism for being upset that the girl is treating the guy badly.

On and on it goes. Now I believe, that when these women do something negative there should be consequences for that, no matter how loudly they scream 'victim'; with any luck someday there will be; and for other transgressions.

Fair... Don't you think?