Here we go, back at it.
I feel it is good to blog again today. The reason being is that I am taking in a lot of information. I don't feel comfortable taking in any more information. So it is time to express some information.
Also, the issue that I talked about in my last few posts has had time to settle a bit. As I talked about, I believed that I had 'conditioning' that was kind of toxic of bridging that electromagnetic connection 1-8. I did a whole video on this. I do feel now, that I might have moved into more of a 21-45 expression.
I could do with a bit of the luck that I have identified in connection with blogging and such. But this is kind of rare. Just sometimes things happen and I get a feeling. In relation to the Law of One, karma, and service to others, I think there is some precedence for this kind of thing.
My thoughts at the moment are on status. There are a lot of very relevant everyday signs that status is a very big concern. Despite the modern zeitgeist to kind of not really directly address it.
I am also looking at philosophy now. As per the last few posts. Going into what Christianity really means, trying to understand things in that lens didn't really work for me. Despite recently saying that I am NOT going into philosophy. I am actually doing so, and I feel it to be a very productive area for me.
Philosophy, I tend to think of as the male side of psychology. Where psychology is the female. Psychology is concerned with the internal state and best practices. Philosophy is mostly concerned with the outer world, and it has a very strong element of the thing that matters to men a great deal... Status. We can see this clearly in the work of someone like Neitszche or Rene Girard. But even in those that are not so outwardly concerned with status. It is there, and it is there in a big way. Think about Soren Kierkegaard who, from my understanding, talks about theological concerns in a sense. Actually, if you get into it, it is all about status and how it traps people away from his more ideal state.
It is slow going looking into philosophy. I have a Kierkegaard book and I have only read a few pages. There was an insight on about page 5, summarising Kierkegaards thoughts, not even getting past the introduction. The insight was about faith and was so profound I put the book down immediately. That was more than a week ago. My brain is still fried trying to figure it out.
I have met something that challenges me intellectually! I hope as I look into philosophy more I will be able to absorb more of it.
But why status and philosophy? It is something I think about. It is something I fret over even. It will come to pass in this time of great change. For others definitely, and maybe me as well, that a lot of guys will go from a relatively low status position to a relatively high status position. As Trump rolls back DEI and such.
I think it is a worthwhile question to consider these things. To have a model of status and how it works in shifting situations. My impression is that a lot of guys have this. Perhaps all guys. But in my mind, it is certain, not a nice imagining or a plan. But a certainty. That I will gain status in the future. I am doing not a single thing in my physical life to make this come to pass. I am not even a healthy person, although I am improving. But my "logic" is no match for this certainty. Outside a Q style world change I cannot see even a possibility of how this could come to pass in the real world.
Perhaps this is because I feel that the knowledge I have put together, about the human design chart and Law of One, is needed in the world. Or I believe deeply in the Q narrative. But it is just as likely a natural male belief. That all men have. Perhaps that all men should have as they strive for glory. I cannot be sure at the moment.
Thus, I wonder things like, when I do gain in status, how do I treat those around me who treated me badly due to my current low status position? If they suddenly want to be "friends" again?
I have also observed a lot about how status works in the real world. Especially when those with left wing beliefs come up against those with right wing beliefs. The things each side expects from each other.
So another thing of note I think is, say you have two people who are reacting to each other through an ideological lens. Then something comes along and gets rid of that as a concern. Something, some big world even, deletes the barrier between these two different sides. So each person is left to justify themselves without referring to their political beliefs. What happens then?
So yeah, these are my thoughts. It is of course a terrible strategy in blogging to say you are going to stop blogging on a blog you don't advertise much and don't have the ability to advertise much. (When I post on twitter I get 0 views reliably!) But I'm just updating you on my thoughts here.
No comments:
Post a Comment