Thoughts on Narcissism. Part 1: Real evil.

So, This is part one of what I think will be a long 6 or 7 part series. As already explained in the introduction.  

As already stated, it is going to explore the theme of narcissism and how applicable it is in society. The first two parts, this one and the next one, are going to be in support of the general theme. The following parts after that are going to look at the sociology of society. What might be considered collective delusions and the motivations people have for holding them. That might cast doubt on the legitimacy of this claim. 

There is a lot of variation in the abuse community and, I will state clearly. There are a lot of very evil people walking about. The abuse community has explanations of some behaviours that are then taken and misused by others. Such as the term gaslighting. Which, originally was about a person that very deliberately attempts to drive another person mad through cunning deception. Making them doubt their own reality, for strategic ends such as having them committed and claiming money. The term though, by some has been expanded to include pretty much any attempt at evasion or clarification when they are accused of something (hence "threatening the other persons reality").

However, there is also a strain of people that are really seeking support for genuine evil and abuse committed upon them. This can be a little strange sometimes. Reading through Quora, you will read someone that is committed to believing their partner is a narcissist because they talked to someone on facebook. So, jealousy really. Then you will, in basically the next post, read a post by a woman that disagreed with her husband and had her bones broken in three places. 

So let's talk about "evil". This concept might be discussed later, such as when I discuss confusion people get into which makes them think their partner is a narcissist when it is just a normal person. I wonder if sometimes people legitimate adaption to bad circumstance are behaviours that are non positive. 

To get a clear understanding of this I am going to include a couple of quotes from my spiritual base, the Law of One:

Ra: The entity polarizing positively perceives the anger. This entity, if using this catalyst mentally, blesses and loves this anger in itself. It then intensifies this anger consciously in mind alone until the folly of this red-ray energy is perceived not as folly in itself but as energy subject to spiritual entropy due to the randomness of energy being used.

Positive orientation then provides the will and faith to continue this mentally intense experience of letting the anger be understood, accepted, and integrated with the mind/body/spirit complex. The other-self which is the object of anger is thus transformed into an object of acceptance, understanding, and accommodation, all being reintegrated using the great energy which anger began.

The negatively oriented mind/body/spirit complex will use this anger in a similarly conscious fashion, refusing to accept the undirected or random energy of anger and instead, through will and faith, funneling this energy into a practical means of venting the negative aspect of this emotion so as to obtain control over other-self, or otherwise control the situation causing anger.

Control is the key to negatively polarized use of catalyst. Acceptance is the key to positively polarized use of catalyst. Between these polarities lies the potential for this random and undirected energy creating a bodily complex analog of what you call the cancerous growth of tissue.

Here, from session 46.9, we are really focusing on the negative experience. What the channel is saying, and I have included the quote so this can be confirmed. Is that if someone that has made a commitment to the negative/ satanic side. When they experience anger, not only do they suppress it but the best way it can work for them is to use it against someone else for a non positive purpose. Such as intimidation, or abuse. 

I have heard people who grew up in really abusive situations explain this. That as soon as the 'scapegoat' left, the abusive family members developed cancerous conditions and such. 

There is a lot in the Law of One about the fact that the negative exists as a legitimate energy, a legitimate spiritual path of a sorts. But I also wanted to bring in this quote for discussion:

Questioner: Then what is the motivation for the… Oh, let me finish that question first. What is the motiv— what is the mechanism that this unusual sixth-density entity would wish to gain to polarize more negatively through wandering?

Ra: I am Ra. The Wanderer has the potential of greatly accelerating the density whence it comes in its progress in evolution. This is due to the intensive life experiences and opportunities of the third density. Thusly the positively oriented Wanderer chooses to hazard the danger of the forgetting in order to be of service to others by radiating love of others. If the forgetting is penetrated the amount of catalyst in third density will polarize the Wanderer with much greater efficiency than shall be expected in the higher and more harmonious densities.

Similarly, the negatively oriented Wanderer dares to hazard the forgetting in order that it might accelerate its progress in evolution in its own density by serving itself in third density by offering to other-selves the opportunity to hear the information having to do with negative polarization.

Questioner: Are there any examples of sixth-density negatively polarized Wanderers in our historical past?

Ra: I am Ra. This information could be harmful. We withhold it. Please attempt to view the entities about you as part of the Creator. We can explain no further.

The relevant part here then is 'Please attempt to view the entities about you as part of the Creator'.

There is not much substance to this statement and I believe it was discussed a little more elsewhere. The idea that even with negative entities bearing down on you. You don't perceive them as super evil. But as somehow being of God that deserve love or something like that.

This is another part of why I am bringing this subject up. To call someone a 'narcissist'. To classify them in such a way. Brings in answers as to their behaviour. Essentially: They're evil and it can't be helped.

But a more theologically/ spiritually sensitive view might not be to use such a demonisation. 

I will explore these themes. In part 2, I am going to talk about having been involved in this kind of literature myself, then from that I am going to start taking the concept apart. Finally, potentially, coming back to my own real life examples.