Wow, been playing guitar for a few hours straight. Feels good. Also quite tired though. Anyway, wanted to follow up on this blog. It might not be an ideal subject for Christmas Eve. I really like the little rituals we have to increase our happiness in this life like Birthdays and Christmas.
But, there is something spiritual about this blogging. So I will do this now.
Obviously, if this is part two, the immediately preceeding post, part 1, is relevant. I am talking about how red pill realities are getting to a point now where they are relevant and a particular group of women I am talking about who turn against them.
So, following up directly from the last post, I can't summarise the whole thing. This is a post that I made on that same blog post:
That really isn’t a problem for me except in the few cases it is a problem. When I have met my sister, she has said things that I have heard stated by red pill guys. Like, she could have gotten a script from them (obviously she has never heard of them and can’t grasp that it is high value men who work off that information not some mysterious dysfunctional ‘incels’). If I could get one thing through to her I would say to her that guys know what is going on, and you can do what you like, but just assume that guys will be intelligent enough to know what you really mean later.
I don't want to dump my sister in it. But, this blog is anonymous. The readership is very low. It is rare that it reaches double figures. I am also only saying what I can. There is really not a lot of detail in this excerpt either. But I suppose I will have to say a little more.
This is the crux of the situation for women. I will show this by their response in just a second. Women are fine with the red pill existing. But, uniformly, if they are not at all sympathetic to the ideas, and if they like to see the red pill as 'woman hating' or something. Then they want to put down any men who are into it as being low status and, one of womens favourite weaponised terms... "Incels".
Deep feelings:
Possibly this is a big part of the emotional crux of why I brought this up with them. I will explain the damage they create in just a second by being so nasty about this set of beliefs.
Me and my sister don't get on really. Now "technically", we are on good terms. I have specifically stated to her that we are not on bad terms from my perspective because I imagine she is effected negatively if I said anything else. But, my sister, whom I wanted to create a mutually beneficial relationship with, along the lines of Stefan Molyneuxs philosophy. People that see each others blinds spots and helps each other out.
But, also in line with the Stefan philosophy of basically being honest with oneself. All signals are that she does not like me, or at the very least, is indifferent and does not intend to make any effort. After I tried to make contact with her, and did meet her one time, for the first time in years, she suggested we meet up, cancelled, in a very indirect way, then I suggested a phone call, clarified as to 'only written messages' (emails). Then when I sent messages she predictably ignored me. After apologising for precisely that in the past, she did it again almost immediately, which is something that I have taken up with people in the past... "Fake apologies". They invalidate any future apology.
My sister is 21. She is how I described women in the previous post. I may be wrong. Of course there always has to be an allowance made for a gap in perception. That, as an example, she wouldn't tell me if she simply saw me as a dangerous degenerate and she was nice to everyone except me.
Well actually, I doubt that.
But the women in the previous post. When they are young. Because of the great power beauty bestows on them. They treat people not that well.
And in the past that might have kind of work. Before red pill. There were a lot of guys ready to pick up women after they made disasterous choices in their 20's.
But not anymore. I am acutely aware that the guys surrounding her will think... precisely like I do. They are being friendzoned and otherwise ignored in favour of her chasing novelty. That things will get hard for her in the future due to this.
Low status incels:
So lets get back to how the anti red pill narrative at places like ElsaElsa work against this.
That same thread I carried on discussing things and the women didn't take up any issue with most of what I said. The blog owner did pick up the status point. But it was not a huge thing. One of the women I had talked to though, passive aggressively, mentioned it on another blog.
From a later post, December 11th 2024 "Morality & Body Language & Finding love", Elsa does not like da commas:
It’s actually NOT strong or high value masculine, only the
overcompensation of warped masculine traits, and from a deeply fearful
sense of victimhood and disempowerment – men are the poor victims, women
are the enemy. Men are not from Mars anymore! (Mermaid)
Pretty direct huh? To what I was saying. It also hits an emotional point in me. If I was trying to communicate something to my sister about this, then obviously it's going to hit a chord with me. There is a reason, as I will explain, that I highlighted this point, and that it is destructive for women to refuse to acknowledge it.
I should note in terms of 'the collective' on Elsa's forum. "Mermaid" was shut down when she came out with her feminist tripe of shutting down successful women as 'doe eyed tradcons'. A girl said that she considered herself traditional and that she had escaped a destructive feminist mother. So that is positive. Even so, I think the collective is as I describe the title. I was the one who made a fuss. I was easily provoked. Fairly directly provoked I think. It is always the passive aggressive that seem to win out on these forums. It seems to be set up that way.
The point:
And this is it. The point I am trying to get to. Is that when girls like my sister, and other women I have known. Think of their future. The status of men that are aware of red pill realities is directly relevant.
I don't understand the thinking honestly. But she thinks that it is only losers that are aware of red pill things, and she won't be judged on any red pill standards. She thinks she can simply choose not to have anything to do with anyone that has anything to do with the red pill.
It's what I said in the last post and it is confusing to me. Why do women think they can socially shame the entirety of reality into behaving how they see fit? I suppose, that God complex comes from the power she enjoys in her early twenties. Women of that age, in a way, do have the power of gods. Especially in our society.
But when it comes down to it, you can't choose what the other gender finds attractive. Statistics say that men who have, what today is called "misogynistic" views, (i.e. standards and awareness of female behaviour), are far more prevalent in men that are sexually successful.
It is older women like these astrology boomers who are against all things red pill that directly assault womens awareness of these realities, that in turn, gives younger women the wrong information with which to navigate the world. If they knew that it was rich, high status and intelligent men that are aware of these things. They would take that into account. But 'mermaid' is trying to make sure that doesn't happen.
Conclusion:
So I'm trying to stop myself going on Elsa. They are unlikely to miss me. I have recently made a video about my experience with passive aggression on another forum, and stated in a few recent blogs how I think withdrawing a bit from the digital world is where my energy is going.
The astrology of Mars (the forums) going over my Mercury, really fits. We'll see what happens after Mars goes direct again.
No comments:
Post a Comment