I have been reading the Law of One. There was something in session 66 which I just cannot get a handle on. Something like, that if someone uses an illness to improve their life, it becomes more difficult to cure that illness.
Very confusing. Something I have to turn over in my head.
Anyway, this from session before the point that I found interesting:
Questioner: I will ask if I am correct in this analysis. We would consider that the entity making this so-called attack is offering its service with respect to its distortion in our polarized condition now so that we may more fully appreciate its polarity, and we are appreciative and thank this entity for its attempt to serve our One Creator in bringing to us knowledge in, shall I say, a more complete sense. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. There is no correctness or incorrectness to your statement. It is an expression of a positively polarized and balanced view of negatively polarized actions which has the effect of debilitating the strength of the negatively polarized actions.
This, in general, is a very odd perspective. That negative people in the world should be kind of appreciated.
This was the interesting line for me though, when I last read it:
Questioner: Then how could we solve this paradox?
Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that you have no ability not to serve the Creator since all is the Creator. In your individual growth patterns appear the basic third-density choice. Further, there are overlaid memories of the positive polarizations of your home density. Thus your particular orientation is strongly polarized towards service to others and has attained wisdom as well as compassion.
You do not have merely two opposite requests for service. You will find an infinite array of contradictory requests for information or lack of information from this source if you listen carefully to those whose voices you may hear. This is all one voice to which you resonate upon a certain frequency. This frequency determines your choice of service to the One Creator. As it happens this group’s vibratory patterns and those of Ra are compatible and enable us to speak through this instrument with your support. This is a function of free will.
A portion, seemingly, of the Creator rejoices at your choice to question us regarding the evolution of spirit. A seemingly separate portion would wish for multitudinous answers to a great range of queries of a specific nature. Another seemingly separate group of your peoples would wish this correspondence through this instrument to cease, feeling it to be of a negative nature. Upon the many other planes of existence there are those whose every fiber rejoices at your service and those such as the entity of whom you have been speaking which wish only to terminate the life upon the third-density plane of this instrument. All are the Creator. There is one vast panoply of biases and distortions, colors and hues, in an unending pattern. In the case of those with whom you, as entities and as a group, are not in resonance, you wish them love, light, peace, joy, and bid them well. No more than this can you do for your portion of the Creator is as it is and your experience and offering of experience, to be valuable, needs be more and more a perfect representation of who you truly are. Could you, then, serve a negative entity by offering the instrument’s life? It is unlikely that you would find this a true service. Thus you may see in many cases the loving balance being achieved, the love being offered, light being sent, and the service of the service-to-self oriented entity gratefully acknowledged while being rejected as not being useful in your journey at this time. Thus you serve One Creator without paradox.
The reason this is interesting to me. Is that "sending love and light" to people that I do not get on with is something I have mulled over for a long time. I had thought that it is strictly not the right thing to do because it is a violation of free will. But this session seems to indicate that it should be sent to this purely malevolent entity that DEFINITELY would not consent to it under free will.
I have not found it to be effective to pray for others without permission. That DOES seem to be more of a free will issue. But sending love might not have been as bad as I had initially thought. I have decided many times NOT to send love, thinking it to not be positive. But this quote blows that out of the water.
But perhaps it is in fact fine. Also, I used to be able to write music, I used to flow more often. Now I am coming up with lyrics less often. This is probably just age. But I do wonder, when I was younger, if I fell out with someone, often a hot girl, I would still feel love due to that testosterone/ idealism type of thing that young men have. So I wonder, if I send love, it would allow me to continue with a lot of songs. In order to articulate a lot of the complexity in a situation. Love perhaps still needs to be involved.
No comments:
Post a Comment