In this blog I will include casual spoilers of The Mentalist, Person of Interest and Breaking Bad. Not real spoilers. Not like "This is the identity of Red John". But, "this is how it was emotionally with Red Johns accomplice".
Firstly though, just a personal note. I wrote two blogs ago about reading session 67 of the Law of One and, in my interpretation of the material, the idea that sending 'love and light' to people in general IS a correct thing to do.
There is actually quite a lot going into this, it became something I really thought over a few years ago. I have had quite powerful insights into how I originally got a schizophrenic break. I think insights into this could be a very positive thing to communicate in the future.
Right now though, the good thing is... "Sending love to people". I believed I should not do this previously, so I have reversed this. I am doing it with both people I have known personally and organisations and such. Not always with a clear cut agenda. Like, I believe the Law of One said that sending love to negative entities harms them in a sense. Reference sessions 25 and possibly 67. I also believe it is likely that sending positive energy to people you do get along with is mostly positive. Although, in some cases I explicitly don't do so. I think if you have an open, loving, normal relationship with someone. Artifically sending "love" is not necessarily a good thing.
Results, are few, and internal. But good. The main positive one. I mentioned on my original post how my ability to create music has kind of taken a nose dive in the past few years. In a strong way, said musical 'flow' returned. Not in making new music, but in playing old. It is true indeed I believe, that in order to connect with certain half finished previous songs. Sending love and light IS important.
I do feel that it is a big thing, a big insight I have had and I am expecting ongoing positive things. I just want to quote this first to explain one of the things I don't think is right about 'sending love':
I've thought through her opinions at various times, internally, as I go through my various experiences in relation to spirituality.
But, I want to oppose this one here. Sending love and light to a person does NOT, in my view, mean that you see them as more positive than you did before. Or that you would be less equipped to deal with conflict with them (in my case this is emotional conflict).
In general. When sending love and light to others. I get insights in general into my connections with them. This is simple things, but powerful things. Things such as: 'Oh, of course this person would have this perspective on the situation'. In a sense, I find that I am more able to let them go with these insights. It is folly to assume a certain thing will definitely cause a certain result. Sending love and light to someone does not automatically mean that I wish to never harm a hair on their head (perhaps this is the case with women and a more maternal love!) It might be shortened in a sense to 'attention'. And giving attention to something tends to reveal its truth. Rather than dictate a certain direction.
I seriously think that this mental change for me will create real life changes as time goes on. The music insight alone is extremely powerful!
Anyway, onto our next subject here. This might not be relevant but I'm just posting it since it got to me a bit:
I made an article angry at this but then deleted it. '10 days' is a significant date in the Q communities and people were retweeting this. The Q communities are very used to false starts and disappointments. But they still will give it another weak shot. It's kind of annoying in a sense because a lot of people are suffering and holding out hope.
Donald Trump had a statement today, and this man, Stephen Miller, was part of that statement. Was it of groundbreaking importance? I don't know, time will tell. It is not significant in the same way a mass arrest of Democrats including the Clintons would be significant. But it might still be significant.
Stephens announcement was that he has found corruption and lies within the reporting of crime statistics in Washington D.C. For me, I have always thought the mechanisms of gaining statistics is one of the best manipulation tactics of our politicians and neo liberal elite. If you don't know what a problem is, you can't address it. It was not crime statistics specifically that made me catch onto this.
The characterisation of villainy.
The mentalist:
I've been thinking, in general recently, as I watch a LOT of TV. (Being unemployed and of ill health). About the way these shows characterise negativity in general. Sort of like, crime or evil.
In the Mentalist. a cop show but focused on a protagonist that uses mental tricks to solve crimes. The show focuses, for FAR too long in my view. On chasing a serial killer who has started off a kind of cult and has a lot of supporters. Hidden supporters.
In almost all of the episodes of this show where a supporter is caught, they turn out to be the most mundane person that you could imagine. A therapist, a policeman, some guy on the board of a charity or something. The character will be all normal, and then when they are cornered completely shift: "I serve Red John".
It makes me wonder about the nature of evil. I would expect a certain 'eliteness' to malevolence. But truly, is this the case? Anyone you talk to who has worked with victims of severe physical abuse, will tell you that it is quite common, and quite severe. People all over the world are going home and beating their kids half to death. Child trafficking is a big problem in the west.
If that is the case, if it is not just 'the elite' doing these things, if the numbers are large, many of us could have interacted with some truly evil people, unawares.
Though, it is not in that same style. It is not people that get a glaze over their eyes and start telling you about something as evil, and unambiguous, as their worship of a serial killer.
One thing that springs to mind is the sudden aggressive physical opposition of ICE even when they are attempting to deport, sometimes, people that have violated children. But in a lot of cases serious criminals. It is difficult to strongly connect people with left wing beliefs from the genocidal chaos that is leftism as it gets more pure. A lot of left wing policies, if you try and communicate them to others, you won't be believed. Even their own supporters don't understand these things.
But the pattern is kind of there all the same. The AWFUL's being arrested by ICE are the most normal people that you would hope to meet!
Breaking Bad:
The world of criminality, is one that I do not have any experience of. I wonder sometimes how much I am being educated about real criminality when I watch these shows. How much is just completely incorrect and made up. Breaking Bad, when I watched it, really gave me a feel I was looking into some very educated information about how said criminal world works.
A lot of inside information about how to make Meth. In one scene Jessie, who has experience in the criminal underworld, says to Walter: "Why are we here? This is like a non drug dealers idea of where a drug deal should be. We should have gone to the mall". Then when the drug dealer they are dealing with meets them he says "Why are we out here homie? Was the mall closed?"
Person of Interest;
A new gem I have found. I don't think it is as popular as the previous two. I am not that far through it. But so far it is a professional show.
In Person of Interest, there is a group of corrupt cops. The reasoning behind one of the senior members makes a great deal of sense. He said that he liked one of the new up and coming criminals because he "keeps a low profile and he greases the right wheels". To him, for the police to control an entire territory is too much work. Too unpredictable. To have a criminal that is reasonably civilised doing it. This makes sense in strange, structured, cop logic.
One of the things I also wondered about in this show was that this 'up and coming' criminal was a bit like a Wall Street Guy. Extremely intelligent. The kind of person that would get more money in stocks than controlling the streets. It is another thing I wonder. Do these people really exist in the criminal world?
Going the other way
The other way this could work is looking at real criminal things and seeing if they correlate with the show.
In one of these shows. there was a person going around killing single parents. When investigated, this turned out to be that they were not in fact single parents before they were killed. The children were falsified after they die so an individual could claim to have adopted the children and receive money for this.
Well, let us look at a real situation like this. The daycare fraud in Minnesota. In the show, this was all a very refined event. Full of complex maneouvering and generally smart, high IQ, people. The Somalian fraud is not that. The Minnesota fraud is very unsophisticated. It was discovered by a 23 year old youtuber driving around different daycares having a look.
I don't know if there is this incredible refinement to negativity. Evil is, in a lot of cases, incredibly lazy. It's excuses are often made on the fly and they are ridiculously easy to see through. I can't remember where I heard this, perhaps in some analysis of Lord of the Rings. But there is an incredibly reliable, "disgusting" aspect to evil.
And, not evil but negativity in general. Crime, drugs, sexual degeneracy of various intensities. There is a LOT of it. If it ever does start to be handled. It does seem to be at the moment. Perhaps we will get a clearer image of what it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment