What point does healing end?

This is my video for this post:

Youtube: Common Ego: This Question Exposed What I Missed About Healing. 

https://youtu.be/n3lqYXNYED0?si=iK2-ZE0r6JwVW4fR

In order to address this video. I want to talk about a few different things. One is gender differences. Another is the environment in general, in a larger societal context. Another is philosophy. 

It's an interesting question. At what point are we healed from negative experiences? 

Creativity 

Firstly, gender differences. Is my answer the same as the answer would be for a woman? Nietzsche believed that one of the highest goals of human experience is to transform pain into a useful experience through creativity. So, Johnny Cash might be an example of this. "I taught the weeping willow how to cry".

For me, this is one of the ways that I do process my experience in general. I will not go as far to say that I process explicitly negative experiences in this way. But it is the way I opine on the confusion of life. 

I have talked a little bit recently about separating from my half sister. I am not saying my half sister is any kind of abusive whadjamcallit. But I was listening to Richard Grannon the other day, who said that when you get into a difficult relationship everything becomes so confusing all of a sudden. That was the experience I had with her. 

One of the lyrics from one of my new songs goes: "If I wanted to enrage you I would take an interest in you". With my sister, I feel that any curiousity on my behalf is met with hostility. As though she labelled me as a sexual predator a long time ago. Thankfully, in our entire history, I have never been alone with her. You can see how this kind of dynamic would be confusing.

But this kind of thing is kind of maddening right? But there is relief in expressing this kind of thing creatively. There is something about music that can capture a subtlety here. It is HARD WORK, I find, creating music. Creating lyrics. A lot needs to be in a good place to create so much as a paragraph. I found gruelling real life work a lot harder. But, the effort does lead to something positive. Something transformative. 

BUT, and this is a big but, it leads to a next large area... 

Gender differences. 

If you have read this blog previously you know I am heavy on the Law of One. As I have theorised in previous blogs, that women are love and men are 'light' or wisdom. The more correct Law of One term I recall is Love/ light and Light/ love. 

One of the first articles I read pushing back against feminism and it's extremely confused gender roles was an article called 'Is there anything good about men?' That made the point that women lack a sense of individual creativity and inventiveness often. Women have not invented things like men have traditionally. This is likely due to the huge amount of solitude that is needed for inventiveness to take place. Women need connection and community most of the time. 

Creativity, individual creativity I would argue, comes from testosterone. As an example, Asian culture is extremely high IQ. But not very creative. They tend to copy things and perform existing instruments really well. 

But one of the strongest creative groups and periods was black men during the 1910's roughly. When they were still in a semi slavery position. New instruments had just become more widespread and middle class white women had access to those instruments as well. But it was only the men making the music. 

So from this perspective, I wonder if pure creativity is not an open avenue for women in the same way. What is the female solution here?   

Environment.

One of the unspoken assumptions in this video, is that healing itself IS possible. 

In my recent video on the human design and manifestor strategy. I mentioned that perhaps there is, in practicality, a glass ceiling. Sure, you can improve your life by doing your strategy and authority. But the second your improvement runs up against an entrenched power dynamic, a heirarchy, it stops there. 

I think that might be relevant here. You can heal a great deal, but the problem you start to meet is that society itself is quite dysfunctional and it might not be inclined to bring people together in a way that is healing. 

We are in a strange position as a society. Decades of propaganda which is perhaps starting to break down. Dysfunctional economies. Inflation. People are atomised as a part of this dysfunction. 

Sometimes when I have had an unpleasant health issue I have gotten resentful about something unconnected. A social issue from a few years ago perhaps. Then when my health has improved. When I have done exercise or eaten fruit. It has fallen away. Like it never existed and I have marvelled at the issue of how health underlines some problems that don't appear to be health problems. 

This, I think, is part of the answer. Sure, if we had someone screw us over in the past it makes us angry. But there are a lot of ingredients that can go into making our lives great now, that would make us not feel like that. If we meet someone new, or get excited about a hobby or career, or if we improve our health. If health was improved across the board how many apparent emotional and social issues would just disappear?

But there is a problem with that. The problem is that we are living in a situation of widespread poverty and ill health because people in power want it to be that way. Society is fractured and atomised for a reason. Because of a very deliberate propaganda campaign that cost trillions. 

Conclusion.

Of course, ultimately the answer might be more complex than this. But I think this is a good grounding to the question.