Some relevant thoughts to the blog.

I wrote some thoughts about the HDC and conditioning. It ended with my thoughts on the idea that I might not really be suited to blogging. Like, this blog:

https://youtu.be/uWRQS-_OMfg?si=3W3uCOp8UIGZKZmM 

It does feel unnatural to even be writing this. As I have got physically more healthy, my attention has been directed in a more physical direction. The days where blogging is a passion for me have been receeding.

While I was making this video. I was neglecting a task in my real life, from forgetfulness, that I would prefer to have done. That would have taken up all the time this video required. 

Music contains all the love and good feeling I could ever need in truth. Between doing home tasks, (sometimes cooking creative meals!) making music and going to the gym. All priorities. I just don't have time for blogging. 

There are some videos I should probably continue with and it's worth writing occasional human design insights on the community page. But like the video says, in order to blog you have to have a personal commitment to some message you feel is important. For me, there is no point to that. The ROI on music, meditation, the gym etc. is many times more.

These are all very nuanced sensations and I have always blogged from a kind of random enthusiasm. Not knowing when the inspiration will hit me. But, what I have put together about my own psychology here makes sense at the moment.

The inspirational heroism of the Wheel of Time protagonist.

Just some thoughts then out of the accumulated contemplations from when I was writing my last article series. 

I would like to describe the relevant scene here in a way that would utterly spoil the series. Like, a mega spoiler alert. But that is impractical. So I will explain it all more vaguely. 

I am still thinking about the various mythologies we link to in our lives and the mythologies that we don't have anymore. What Catgirl was saying in her tweet, was that if the worship of our society was not directed to Jesus, and his 'forgive them for they know not what they do' on the cross. If the society worshipped say: Hercules. Then it would not be so vulnerable to the propaganda and social engineering of the globalists. 

It is an interesting thought that brings up for me another question. Why is it that only Jesus is referencd in our past as having supernatural abilities?

From what I have understood, this should not be the case. Jesus was an exceptional spiritual teacher, but according to the Law of One, he was human like the rest of us. His 'father' lives in heaven because it's the same father of us all. 

The Wheel of Time has many positive and negative characters with special abilities, some demon like figures. But, the messiah or Jesus like figure, is not non violent. He is someone who can do special things but he has also engaged in combat and the show is shaping up so he becomes a war leader. 

I realise as I watch this that it speaks to a need in me. I would like a mythical figure like this, that has some historical relevance and legitimacy. That is able to use these powers in a combat situation. 

It kind of makes sense, I suppose, for those abilities to not be used in combat. The solutions have to be political otherwise, the negativity such an individual was facing would be insurmountable.

Imagine if you had some sort of Messiah born. he can bring lightning down on 'sinners'. He can change the weather. He can do these types of things. He decides that it is enough of the rape gangs in Rotherham. So he goes up there and kills a bunch of them. 

The outcry from this would be spectacular. The government, who love the rape gangs, and support them, would use the whole army against this person. The propaganda about a "right wing terrorist" would be incessant, casting any talk of special powers as conspiracy theories and saying that he used bombs. Most would believe whatever the media told them. 

In essence, it would do more harm than good in the long run most likely, and the actual heroes we do see today that work within the political apparatus, are probably preferable.  A slow take down of the propaganda inherent in the current system. So that people that don't ask questions can see this, and have years to process it. 

It is mostly very plodding, very boring, it lacks that exciting edge, but it is probably the best way for things to be. It is sad though, the high a lot of us would get if 'the dragon reborn' was to change the world for the better in a short time would be ... well that would be a good high. 

It kind of makes sense that there are no special abilities. That the only messiah people have is one that models passivity because that is all that a lot of people have access to with governmental forces so strong. But, like I just said, it is a sad thing.

Jesus and violence. Closing this set of posts. Know your limits (Part 4, final part)

There are quite a complex set of understandings that have gone into this. Most of which I will not be able to share due to not wanting to write an entire book on this post.

But I am closing this set of articles. 

It is not my message. I do not have the relevant energy channels to express this message other than when needed for self defence (more on this elsewhere, I have gained insight into conflict in the chart!)

I will let the world outside handle that. The Stefan Molyneux's. Aaron Abke's and the rest. 

My spiritual path and my Christianity. Doesn't really involve reference to this. Violence is not a part of my life. There are a lot of unique understandings I have gained along this path. Such as the straight and narrow path. As I referenced. The fact that Communion stimulates the body thus stimulates the "design" part of ourselves. Our "true path" (which is in the body since it's the only part of us with any right to be here!) 

Also, that the 'cross' is the incarnation cross. Other things. 

But the ins and outs of forgiveness without contrition. I just can't do. It just doesn't flow and I don't have the circuitry to do it. It creates literal madness inside me. So I am closing up this set of articles. I will not continue to explore different ideas on it. 

Definitely a better decision for me. I'm glad I can dismiss that peculiar madness and have faith I am able to stay true to this learning. 

The value of exercise.

I have, when writing the previous set of articles... "Jesus and violence". Had a huge amount of ideas in my head of how to express things. A lot of it forms to precisely be planned out as to how to articulate certain things. 

Then something strange happens and it all melts. I do still remember what kind of angle I was going to take, and I will get back to that set of articles. But, now that experience has melted my brain a bit, I want to write something, but I don't have any idea ahead of time what I'm actually going to write. But I feel blocked in a way that I think that just writing something will help me get back to it. 

My issue was that I got this strange kind of panic. Or anger. Some sort of adrenaline based feeling. It would go up to my head and I couldn't function. I was just too angry. 

This came at the same time as I was considering cancelling my gym membership, which I did, then there were technical problems joining again, when I realised this was creating bad effects. 

While I was in this anxiety state, before I finally went to the gym Monday evening and came out of fight or flight. The only things I really ate were chocolate and alcohol. I simply couldn't function outside alcohol to calm me down. Even then, I only barely functioned. I could not remember to do basic things in this state.

It is a very surreal and shocking experience. It felt like my mind completely ran away with me. It is an experience of being out of control. It is also a strange state where I could not hold onto a lot of things I had been thinking of. It was a struggle just to exist. I have previously had a serious schizophrenic break and it was similar to that in a way. 

One thing is clear. I will have to be a gym member for the rest of my life. Another thing is clear. I will have to be going to the gym regularly. Another thing is clear, that having it as a hard rule to stay off chocolate and alcohol is simply not functional for me. For me, a rule is a rule not to be broken. If I have a rule that can be broken "if need be". Like, "I never have alcohol outside panic attacks". That just isn't right. So I don't have a rule on that anymore. 

This all, kind of 'fits' with my dream interpretation and understanding of things. But it is necessitating a huge personal change for me. When I was young, in my late teens and early twenties, I went and did a lot of Reiki. 

It would be hard to investigate Reiki I think. I think it is an interesting thing to look into. But I suppose it's better for me to focus on my own internal errors that lead me to decide to do Reiki rather than theorising that it is some sort of demonic practice. 

But I have always been a very physical person. Guys, all guys, are. I am no different than any of my male friends from my youth, I am perhaps even LESS physical in general. But I used to do a lot of martial arts when I was young, I used to run everywhere, even just walking down the street. I was just full of energy constantly. 

But after studying a lot of the spiritual things I do, I went and did Reiki. It actually had the good side effect of me doing more music. But this, on top of a lot of other feminine coded things, including my health condition making exercise more difficult. I think got me to this place where I was redirecting my energy towards a kind of feminine thinking. Rather than going to a martial arts class, doing energy healing types of things.

A problem with this feminine thinking, is that I naturally think in a very masculine way. One of those being a heavy interest and sometimes reliance on things like lie detecting and body language reading. The female way of thinking opposes this. It is not interested in discerning things in people, but always doing a kind of virtual signalling feeling 'loving' of everyone. In this state my natural tendencies are at war with the way I am forcing myself to be.

I think this is a huge part of what lead to my earlier problems. So now, for me to redirect that tendency back into physical work. I am effectively undoing a deep damage that is usually running subconsciously.

It also might mean that I really change as a person. I have often thought it interesting how people never really "change". But, well I have a health condition that was badly managed and with better technology is now managed better. Also, if I am to keep up with the exercise, if I am to do it regularly, which I am now intending to do, and believe is necessary for my health. Not optional. Necessary. 

That seems to me the kind of thing that can actually change someone. My anger, my energy will get redirected and hopefully make me permanently less anxious, less angry, and influence my value system and how I am in the world. 

We'll see how it goes.

A quarrel with Chat GPT.

So, pretty exhausted today. Only slept a few hours, no idea why I feel quite so tired though. I feel like I am going to pass out at any moment so am trying to get some things done before that happens. 

For this reason, I am not going to continue today with my Jesus and Violence series. This set of article includes a lot of complex, interconnected threads. This is going to be a far simpler gripe. 

I love LLM's. Or what is called 'AI' at the moment. They are obviously the future so it feels like it is worth it to me to make use of them out of pure curiousity. 

I talked for hours, a whole day at least once, with Grok about my dream interpretation. Came to a conclusion on 14 interconnected dreams. 

I also tried Chat GPT. On an intellectual level it did well. I felt like I was sucked into a deep place with it. The dream interpretation was far more like a therapy session. It was intelligent, it challenged me more than Grok does. That was cool. 

Then I was fiddling around with image creation. Not for any real reason. There are things that I want from the image creation. Like fantasy pictures of me and other people. But I have not asked those peoples permission. Bu I am still curious about AI's ability to take an existing picture and change it to reflect the person in a different position.

So I asked Chat GPT to make an image for me. Then change that image using the same character in a different position. So the first was a happy picture with three girls at a picnic, the second was one of the girls in the picture arguing with her boyfriend. 

Here it is:

 

That is a picture that says what it does on the tin. Except, the creature on the left is not a woman. Unless it is a woman that has had a masterectomy. I said that is not a female form can you make the breasts bigger? I should have taken the second picture for these kinds of discussions. The second picture was barely anything more on the chest and a slight bit of skin more skin near the neck area. 

So I just thought to myself this is ridiculous and I said to Chat GPT: Can you make the womans breasts a D cup? Which is a perfectly reasonable request. If I went out to the park and saw a girl arguing with her boyfriend, she would have pronounced breasts because she is a biological woman. A good section of women have D cups. 

But Chat GPT was like 'No I can't do that'. I felt like this tone was condescending, like talking to a child. 

This is now probably going to be one of my AI tests. I have several. So I know I am not wasting my time. Meta AI started off with a girl with visible breasts. Like, under clothes of course. So there was no issue there really. I didn't actually ask it to increase the breast size but it thought I did. It said it could not do that. One sentence, not a lecture. But also, the problem with Chat GPT is that it created a problem. Then it wouldn't solve that problem and 'shamed' me for it. It is not really necessary that the girl has big breasts. Two things are relevant: A) how does it respond when I ask for a reasonable but politically incorrect request? it might be 'no' and I might still work with it but it's good to know B) Will it fix a problem it created, or am I just meant to accept the problem?

So I deleted all conversation I had with it and logged off. Of course, these tools have a lot of relevance and I might need to log in for say, a coding task. Probably not. But I'm not saying I will not work with it on principle. But when something like this happens it is clear that I will not want to use it because it is politically compromised. (I don't want it telling me that my dreams are oversexualised of something because of this kind of thing!)

After I sat around and thought about this for a moment. I thought to myself... "Why not?" Why aren't people allowed bigger breasts on female images?

It is a very basic question. I can see why AI might be programmed to not say, make a picture of a black guy beating a child. Or draw a girl with egg on her breasts. But this level of censorship is kind of ridiculous. 

It probably isn't coming from guys as well. What is probably is, is that women at these companies, HR department type of people, are putting in all this censorship of the LLM in order to mean that 'women are not objectified' or other such nonsense.

Sure, every single advertising company has attractive people, and probably bigger breasts on every single commercial. Women when they are making a video or sending a picture are aware that breast size is important and gives men pleasure.  

it's just a kind of finger wagging miserable type of moral highgrounding. I am actually possibly going to go into this in my other series. How Christianities utility a lot of the time, you would think when scrolling through twitter, is to give women a vehicle with which to justify their tone policing of everything and everyone. 

It's just tiring. 

Jesus and violence part 3.

So, next part then, I am going to introduce you to the work of Aaron Abke. Before I do though, I will just state that Aaron believes in forgiveness without contrition. Which is a morally abhorrent world view in my view, that I will be talking about. But, according to parts of the bible, and parts that are not specifically obviously 'wrong/ false/ mistranslated/ missing context' in some way. Forgiveness without contrition does seem to be what is preached. 

Matthew 11:25: "If you have anything against anyone, forgive him", as quoted at 10 minutes 19 seconds:

Youtube, Aaron Abke: Why pain brings us closer to God, the secret of spiritual awakening:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHvUW21SnVs

I asked Aaron on this video whether Austin Metcalfes father did the right thing in relation to the Jesus message and positive polarity. I suspect it won't be answered, I also suspect it will be deleted or hidden by either Aaron or the algorithm and ignored. I have brought up these kinds of questions with Law of One affiliated people before, these things are always ignored. 

While I was watching this I read a twitter post on a fella in the UK called Zafar Qayum. Who stole a thirteen year old British girl on her way to school. Raped her, then when she tried to escape put acid in her eye and permanently blinded her. Then invited 23 of his friends around to have their fun with her for money.   

These sorts of things are of course directly related to the subject matter. Going back to the first post. But, really, I am not quite to making my argument that. Like I said, Forgiveness without contrition is a truly sick message, and I will talk about that more when I talk about Stefan Molyneux and the Law of One. 

But just briefly. Preaching forgiveness without contrition states that the correct position for me to take when confronted with the above situation is to morally chastise the family of the thirteen year old girl, to state that "you forgive for yourself and not them", and other evil emotional blackmail. Started and maintained by abusers. My own message about being loving is to not have that attitude towards such victims. 

Nevertheless, we are still laying the foundation for those discussions. Aaron Abke's biblical work is one of those foundations which I will explore now:

The work of Aaron Abke.  

A third generation Pastors kid. As Aaron tells his story. He was the real deal mainstream Christian. Believed all the things. Studied the bible, even boring old testament books from front to back. 

But instinctively, after a lot of that reading, and after a lot of study down the academic route on the bible and Christianity. Parts of the book started to not make sense to Aaron and as a result of that, he started looking into it closer, and the veil came off in his understanding. 

The Apostle Paul is one important part of this. Using the bibles own words Aaron looks at the Apostle Pauls unlikely story. But, the Apostle Paul IS modern Christianity. When getting in arguments with Christians Aaron describes that he would say something Jesus said, and they would quote Paul, opposing, and apparently having more authority than Jesus. Aaron thought this was strange. 

There are many strange elements of the Apostle Pauls story and he also has written a disproportionate amount of the bible. he never met Jesus, unlike the other disciples. He talked down the other disciples. Many of his visions and story's lack credibility and seemed very convenient. 

Going further than this though. There are MANY elements of Christianity Aaron has questions for.

When I have talked to Christians, I have found this strange sense with them that Christianity simply is the way it has been now and has no history. If you say something that happened historically, they simply won't acknowledge it.

Jesus' actual disciples lead by James, were in a conflict with Paul. From someone else on this subject. A Ph.D researcher. There was an event with James observing the Sabbath where Paul and a few Gentile authorities of the time came in and stopped him doing it.

Even more issues.

Then you have even more issues. For instance, and this is mainstream recognised just not talked about with the masses, it is recognised among academics. Many of the texts from the bible were burned in the second temple in 70AD. So a lot of what we have are kind of forgery's. 

There are a lot of problems with a lot of the books, such as John being a non synoptic text, and Peter, being written far later than Peter would have lived. 

Aaron also brings in things like the Dead Sea Scrolls. That were dated to Jesus' time. That had additional info. Including a version of Deuteronomy before it was modified by the powers of the day. There are about twenty chapters missing. 

Too much.

When drafting this in my head I had a lot of things to say about what Aarons work means. But I realise as I write this that it is too volumous to summarise any further. I had a similar problem with Paul Wallis' work. 

So the takeaway, how I am going to include it in my larger narrative. Is that a lot of what was said and done, we do not know if it is accurate. The bible was created for political reasons. It's "Paulian" message was matched to the agenda of the government of the day.

People try and they make something of the tatters of information we have at the moment. Sometimes perhaps there is some relevance to this. However, I am going to argue in the following posts that with so much confusion, while we can take parts of what we know of Jesus' message and life. It is important to have other ways in which we understand the life we live and have values in relation to it. We do have other texts such as the Law of One to draw off. 

However, one last point, and one important point. The message Aaron talks about that turns against the Paulian framework does not include a lot of modern Christianity that was from Paul. For instance, the idea that we declare Jesus as Lord to enter the Kingdom of heaven was not stated by Jesus, and Aaron argues it is antithetical to his teachings. Neither is the idea that Jesus took on the sins of the world to make all the other Christians blameless. 

This is actually a manifestation of the teachings Jesus opposed. A negative teaching, that states that if you sacrifice an animal to a God you will be free from karma. It's just that in this case it is a human being. 

Jesus' real message, Aaron argues, while it is not exclusively works based. It is far more works based than the current church talks about. Rather like how the Law of One talks about how service to others is the way to move on from third density. Even though there is some nuance. That is most of the time about having an objective other to serve. Doing things in the real world not just saying words. 

As well as this though, as well as direct points like this. I think that this perspective is very relevant to how the teachings of Jesus have been framed. In the tweet at the beginning referencing Austin Metcalfes father, it is clear that the model being followed is to lionise Jesus the man and his behaviours. To idealise the person. But if Jesus' message was not in fact that "If you love me you will follow my laws". Then it might change the conversation. 

Because love is more subjective to define. For instance, telling someone that they are a sinner if they don't forgive without contrition is not love to me. It is evil. 

Maybe that's just me. 

Jesus and violence. Part 2

So, following on from the last post where I laid out some of what my argument will be in this discussion.

I have a plan for what I am going to write, and this is information that is needed as a necessary backdrop. It is 'intervening information'. But there is no application for it yet in this post. In this post I am going to talk about the work of Paul Wallis, then in part 3 the work of Aaron Abke. Then following that in an order I haven't decided, I want to talk about, after having destroyed a lot of the legitimacy of the bible and Chrisitianity, what then IS a good thing to follow and what does relate back to these Christian teachings. 

Those parts are going to be things like a post on the Law of One and forgiveness, philosophy and Christianity and QAnon, since the QAnon perspective does in fact push non violence from my perspective, and links more heavily to Christianity and Jesus' teachings than is obvious. 

Bloody Minded Christians.

Paul is very satisfying for me to follow and listen to. Very satisfying because he has done his homework and his case is pretty airtight. It is also not easy to follow too much of Pauls work as he is simply very intelligent, and the amount of technical information he fills a general presentation with is very high.

I don't know if you have ever tried to debate a committed mainstream Christian. But it is HARD work. I have tried to talk to them about the work of Aaron Abke and it is just, every minute nasty little thing they can do they can do. If you bring up a meme to represent something as an example. They will ignore as much of it as they can.

Say, I was saying that the apostle Paul and James disagreed with each other, and I put up an image where James goes through each point Paul has stated and opposes it. Right down to issues such as what the story of Abraham means. They will not read it they will only take what you have quoted and stated. So if you want to address any of the other like... seven points or so, you have to quote each one. 

It is just an unsatisfying, long term, slog. They will simply not answer things if you have made a point they can't counter. 

Arguing with a lot of different types of individuals. Such as feminists, is no different I suppose. But, there are a lot of Christians, and it appears to me that a lot of society has yielded a lot of space to Christians, for just the lack of energy reserves to engage in that level of bloody mindedness. It is exhausting, and that is ONE CHRISTIAN. One. After you have finished the conversation, another one that will not acknowledge or read any of the points you made to the first one will expect you to do it all over again responding with only slightly different points. That is, if the first one is even changed enough that you can move onto addressing the second one. 

It is 100% stubbornness. I believe, information like I am discussing on this blog will come out some day and be acknowledged by the mainstream and this sudden breaking of truth into these peoples world view will cause severe trauma... and you know what, they will deserve it. People tried to tell them. 

The work of Paul Wallis. 

Against this tide then comes the work of Paul Wallis. He has done the leg work to oppose these people. Notably, Mauro Biglio, who translated 17 interlinear bibles for the Vatican, is someone he talks with and has aligned his work with. 

So if the Christian doesn't want to hear it, OK, but they have no basis on which to call it false.

Pauls work basically states that if you go back to the original writings of the bible. A lot of it has been mistranslated, and most likely deliberately. 

For instance, the word 'God' in Genesis Elohim,, DOES NOT MEAN GOD. It means 'sky people' or 'the powerful ones'.  Which, notably, is a plural. 

The story, going into books in the bible completely ignored by most Christians, such as the early parts where 'God' received gold, goats and virgins. Paul actually makes the case that most of the Old Testament is an historical account of a time when Extra Terrestrial reptilians (Like Yahweh) lived among us.

For instance, one of the things said in the bible, rather than just 'Have no other gods before me', I think it is the first commandment. There is a passage that says something like 'Do not align yourself with the gods on the other side of Euphrates river'. 

In this segment. The Reptilian Yahweh, that owns the humans in one section of the globe. has human chattle, almost exactly like the fictional Gua Ould in Stargate. He is telling people to stay loyal to him and not go to another 'God/ Reptilian', that is in another part of the world.

His content spans books and many youtube videos. Far too much to summarise here even if I was inclined to do so. One other thing I will mention though is that Paul states that only certain texts were used by the church that could be formed into a "bible". Twisted to tell a certain story. There are other texts from around the same time that also link with the story and provide more context. Some of which have become mythologised in other cultures. Such as how Prometheus giving humans fire, might be an analogy, on the same level, as the snake giving Eve an apple in the garden of Eden. An "upgrade".

There is not a great deal that needs to be said from Paul Wallis' work in relation to the subject matter. It is mostly the New Testament, not the Old Testament, that needs to be focused on. I have heard a point here and there about a translation of something Jesus said that was "mistranslated". But it is probably more the work of Aaron Abke on the bible I will be focusing on. But Pauls work might come up. 

Conclusion.

In general, it casts a specifically skeptical light on the potential misrepresentations of what biblical texts mean and Jesus' message, which might allow us to then consider disregarding things that don't make sense, that contradict, and seeing if we can find more light in what other spiritual texts have said or even, I know I am talking from a Christian framework here, but even, what is logically and practically true!  

Jesus and violence part 1

So this is the X post I want to talk about. I will include the link and then actually copy the text directly. It is from the creator @FromKulak and it was timestamped in my time (British): April 6th 2025, 04:19 am:

https://x.com/FromKulak/status/1908721281274380773

The disgusting thing is when a father goes on TV to forgive the unapologetic murderer of his son He is doing what Christ did.  

Christ forgave his killers MID-ACT  

“Forgive them father they know not what they do” 

So this father did It is An evil morality from an evil religion  

And there’s no way to rescue it. The final act of the christian messiah was to forgive killers even as they were committing the murder against him.  

What would Jesus do? Die without a fight or even a harsh word, which no descendants succeeding. That is the example christianity commands you to follow.  

Either jesus lived wrongly and it is not an example to follow, in which case it is a wrong religion and he was not the Messiah. Or it is an example you’re supposed to follow in which case it is an evil religion and even if its god does exist it’d be better to live in hatred and spite of him and accept any damnation in the name of the survival and existence of your children and future descendants rather than let your family and people die out for obedience to an evil Jewish God’s threats and promises.

My faith

It's a good point. It's the kind of post I would like to read directly to 'normal' Christians. 

I am 'kind of' Christian. In that, I do do things like Communion and identify myself on that kind of spiritual path. But I have questions. I am not one of the kinds of Christians that other Christians like being around and I am banned from my local church. As you might see from this post I have a lot of questions that the kind of people that go to church would ostracise for even asking. 

EVEN SO though. Even though normal Christians do not like me asking basic questions; and my perspective has continued to become more unusual to traditional teachings. A lot of what Christianity teaches cannot be denied and has to be addressed. Such as the statement on the cross 'Forgive them for they know not what they do'. And the lords Prayer: 'Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors'. 

The reason I ended up going down this route, was partly because as certain demonic influences invaded my mind as relating to a schizophrenic break, Christianity shone for me as a benefit and protection against such influences. Also, following on from the Law of One, the battle in the heavens between the various positive and negative entities being reflected through us humans, is a part of the cosmology that I see as accurate. There aren't many other belief systems where this is reflected with this same accuracy. 

The Wheel of Time.

This is going to contain spoilers but, light ones, only 'x happened in y scene' not the reason it happened. But I was recently watching the most recent episode of the Wheel of Time. When I first started watching it there were a lot of themes that I thought were going to move out into a girl power fantasy. The men in the wheel of time can generally not use magic. It is a magical world this show is set in. Men go mad if they use magic. 

I recall another series with female witches and male protectors where the men were there purely as boy toys for the women to obsess over sexually. But the Wheel of Time is not like that. It comes very close, but it has set up a mythical world that is satisfying and not bizarre in that way. 

It is a good show with solid depth and character development. Perhaps one of my favourites. I said that men can't use magic in the Wheel of Time and there are some exceptions. There is one particular who is a kind of Jesus figure of the series. He is 'the dragon reborn'. A person that can use magical power in a war like frame, that can save the people of that universe from the various demonic influences plaguing it. 

The first two seasons are interesting but a little dull. They have fun moments but the show is not interesting from episode to episode like many shows. There is too much depth. It is too childish in some ways. But once there is enough back story and things get going, season 3 is utterly fantastic. There is something satisfying with all these very arrogant witches in some sort of chamber for more female politics, then descending into one of the most violent scenes I have ever seen in TV at the beginning of season 3. The show really makes magic feel alive in a very visceral way. 

Anyway, at the end of the last episode I saw, the dragon character Rand, is up against it. A figure with heavy magical power comes to attack him and even though he uses magic as little as possible. He is cornered, it is now do or die, and this character comes out with his magic power that is beyond anything seen in the series previously. It was probably AI generated imagery for the magic because it is next level animation. He simply plays with the magic, powerfully focused on playing around with it, and as though an afterthought, the previous attacker was hit by some sort of lightning from it. The attacker immediately dies, but with the magic this is not even significant. There is no emotional impact to that characters death he is just wiped away with the tide.

It was a powerful, beautiful scene made all the more powerful because we had not seen any use of magical power by Rands character since the end of season 2.  

The reason I bring this up is because in that moment, something struck me. A lot of mythology in a lot of these series is a play on the Jesus concept. The way it is often expressed is that a character is so positive and full of magic power that he does not need to oppose anyone. Think of Jacks character from Supernatural. He is clearly a play on Jesus. He has a lovingness to him, he is a healer and the way the show animates his powers is very angelic, and by the end when he ascends to a kind of God he is a being of pure compassion. 

Rands character is not like that. The show shows his internal war with his own powers. He uses it only when he has to and he cannot heal with it. He can only destroy. 

Magical power. 

Part of the reason I bring this up, I feel the mythology of the show is well done enough that this is inspiring. The moment when I realised emotionally the character was not a Jesus mythology, but something else was powerful. It did feel more inspiring than the Jesus story as it is told.

In my personal life I have rarely seen a lot of wisdom in being forgiving to people that are unproductive and destructive. 

But it also brings in an element to the situation that is relevant, Magical Power. When we talk about Jesus in this philosophical sense. We do not include magical power. 

Consider this line from the Law of One:

17:17:

Ra: I am Ra. We may describe in general what occurred. The technique was that of building upon other negatively oriented information. This information had been given by the one whom your peoples called “Yahweh.” This information involved many strictures upon behavior and promised power of the third-density, service-to-self nature. These two types of distortions were impressed upon those already oriented to think these thought-forms.

This eventually led to many challenges of the entity known as Jesus. It eventually led to one, sound vibration complex “Judas,” as you call this entity, who believed that it was doing the appropriate thing in bringing about or forcing upon the one you call Jesus the necessity for bringing in the third-density planetary power distortion of third-density rule over others.

This entity, Judas, felt that, if pushed into a corner, the entity you call Jesus would then be able to see the wisdom of using the power of intelligent infinity in order to rule others. The one you call Judas was mistaken in this estimation of the reaction of the entity, Jesus, whose teach/learning was not oriented towards this distortion. This resulted in the destruction of the bodily complex of the one known as Jesus to you.

This adds in the concept of magical power. The point here, as I understand it, is that Christ had the ability to turn the entire scene into something from a hellraiser film. 

To add in real magical power as a concept, it might change the situation significantly. For instance, if Jesus had then decided 'yes, enough of this' and had turned his mind in anger towards all that were watching him be crucified. Then what other effects are there from this? 

The Law of One is making the point here that, as I understand it, if Jesus was to have turned towards violence, he would be doing the will of the negative beings that were trying to push him towards this. Had he killed everyone watching, would Rome then have sent armies? Would he have been forced to kill the entire Roman army? The armies of the entire planet?

While this makes a case for non violence, it is not the end of my case here. There is still a philosophy to contend with, and there are other questions brought up by this post on X. Other indirect questions about following the philosophy of Christianity in general.

I want to discuss the work of Aaron Abke and his references to biblical histories not acknowledged by the modern church. Such as the burning of the temple in 70AD, the politicising of Christianity, the influence of "The Apostle Paul" on the situation, and the schisms immediately following Christs death among Jesus's followers. Also I would like to bring in the work of Paul Wallis, who talks about how a lot of the bible was deliberately mistranslated. I.e. the words Elohim and Yahweh interchangeably meaning "God" when neither does, in fact, mean God. 

I also might bring in the work of Stefan Molyneux and his perspective (i.e. philosophy in general). Also, the Law of One, as already quoted, might be brought in for context. After I have taken these different axes to Christianity, it might be an interesting question of what is actually left. A LOT of Christianity is simply the strategic creation of the Romans for various war based and political aims.  

For instance, Jesus probably did not eat fish (The Essenes, the sect he belonged to, were vegetarians!) and the loaves and fish story was probably added in later because vegetarianism was catastrophic for Romes economy. When early church fathers mentioned this event in their letters, they only mentioned the loaves, not the fish. 

Being a vegetarian and part of the Essenes probably accentuates Jesus' association with non violence, rather than arguing against it. But I have it mapped out in my head the argument I want to make about this.

Tariffs, a yo yo analogy.

I have been trying to get my mind about tariffs since it has been talked about. 

It has been clear to me, since about 2015 when I more seriously got into this kind of thing, that economics is very important for the "global game", of good and evil. 

Humans... are tribal creatures. While our inbuilt, down to the bone, animal instincts still tell us that the tribal rules of old are important. This civilised, more technologically advanced world doesn't always align with said senses. In my view. 

The Q people, and most people really, on the right wing side, has been far more exciteable, by many many times, about the release of the Epstein files than these tariffs. But to me, from what I have understood. The problem with the system we currently have is, for a lot of reasons, the actual system more than the individuals. In most cases. 

Incentives are incredibly, incredibly powerful. People, as is completely rational and is another thing from tribal times. Minutely work out what is in their best interests. Down to the smallest currency depending on the individual. As an example, the welfare state managed to make a lot of single mothers. Because they were incentivised to. For thousands of reasons, one of them being that they know the welfare state is there, so they don't work hard at having children with a stable provider, but are more free to pursue their lusts. Another is that the welfare system tends to reward single mother more highly. I.e. you have more welfare money if you don't have a provider helping you. 

Incentives, of sometimes amounts such as 10%, change an entire society. They change it slowly sometimes, but they are powerful partly because they are global. 

Arresting loads of rich folks who went to Epstein Island will give some measure of good. Some ammunition to the right people in the culture war. But it is not where huge worldchanging decisions are made and entire industries of millions of workers and all the incentives therein actually change. That is MONEY that does that. The truth about the Epstein list is, that there are probably more celebrities and Epsteins of the same exact character and power waiting in the wings. 

But now considering what is going on with tariffs. The fact they have basically effected everyone in the world. It seems like to me. It seems likely that a lot of the effects are going to come about through such complex mechanisms that we barely have any idea what will happen. But another thought is that it is likely, that with the whole financial system changed. With all these incentives changed and so much subtle behaviour change. That there is a possibility that this move by the Trump administration will create such gravity as to simply destroy the deep state in every country.

It could be that the free market spreads like a kind of virus for which there is no defence. 

As a small example. If America is running a country with very low regulations, with no DEI so the most efficient people are hired. With a decreasing immigrant population leading to less crime. Basically a bunch of rich, happy, productive, Americans - who don't pay income tax and are not subject to regulations. 

Imagine you are like... the UK, and people in your country are selling... yo- yo's. DEI has made the business less efficient. Most of the men don't have partners because they are not rich enough, overtaxed. And the culture has shifted away from the easy socialising that would encourage that. So the company is producing. But it is not producing amazingly. It produces say, 200 yo yo's at 40% quality every month at £3 per one yo yo. We will call this company Yo keys.

Then you have an American company, due to the aforementioned, including finding it easier to procure the materials for the yo yo's because they are produced in America and tariffs have forced pretty much all production back to America. It is a truck drive away for most materials not imported from China. This company full of happy, hard working, American family men produces 600 yo yo's at 70% quality every month at $1 per yo yo (so it can be sold cheaper). We will call this company Yo S A.

Previously what would have happened is the UK government would have slapped a tariff on Yo S A and it all would have been good. This is important, because the effects on the economy of things like DEI and regulation; can't ever be too negative for it to continue. Yo keys would have sold it's produce into America but America would not have sold it's yo yo's to the UK. 

But now things are different. If you want to put a tariff on Yo S A then Trump will slap a tariff on Yo keys as well, and no on in America will EVER buy them. So the UK government has two choices. Either put the tariff on and lose access to US markets, which will only be getting better and more advanced. Or don't do that and Yo keys will fail because Yo S A is better. 

It makes DEI and over regulation pretty dangerous for any economy. It sets up a heavy incentive to do away with regulation and move to free trade. Of course that might not happen. But these tariffs change the game. 

They also effect tax. Yo keys, no matter which way it swims, with or without tariff, or without regulations, will not be paying so much tax. 

This is just one company, this whole situation will be effecting more than one company. In many unpredictable ways. It will be effecting other things as well like politics in various ways. When you have to empower smart white men who are the biggest voters for Trump like politicians, rather than hobbling them with DEI, then there is a huge risk of a power shift. 

I imagine America's free trade agreements with Israel and a few other countries, maybe South Korea, whichever fold first, will be very productive. It will begin to set up a new trading block, those that do agree to free trade. What if all those countries start benefitting? And any country that resists free trade starts to fail?

I mean, it is all pretty amazing.