The power of the state:

This tweet interested me:

Now perhaps this is simply an inane threat, a petti statement designed to intimidate that the MP in question does not intend to follow up from. However, peoples response to this has been telling, and twitter as a sociology mechanism is organically highlighting something here. This is not a work of statistics but something that has happened in real time:

One set of responses is as follow:

Lol, that was funny Jess is a Labour candidate.

This encapsulates it:

As far as I scrolled down I could not find one MALE response that was supportive of this comment

Most people, including the women that were against this comment were not really part and parcel of the establishment. They were either fairly hard left, fairly libertarian as above, or had interests such as video games which is definitely not mainstream.:

These were some that were supportive of this comment:

So this is our case study of people that most likely support the use of state power in the policing of 'upsetting' tweets on twitter.

Before I continue I'll say I don't believe Jess had any threatening tweets on twitter. She would have RT'd them if she had and the problem would have been dealt with far more efficiently:

 


So, all of these people are pretty establishment. An author of awaken your inner fairie (left wing new age LoA kind of thing... I said these were related), an ECB accountant who's part of a civil service riding club, and the last one is a care worker who seems emotionally quite positive about todays society.

I might perhaps profile the 'in' crowd of the EU referendum as well, it might be interesting.

The men who are pro EU can be Citiboys, or councillor politicians. or who tweet anonymously putting down everything and anything, people who unthinkingly push the establishment line.

So this can be explained from a biological perspective. After a woman has set up her life there is no benefit to her to upset the system. Her genes are assured and she simply has to raise her children in the tribe as it is (regardless of whether she has them or not). Those women who are NOT happy with this threat of state power (for disagreement) are those who, I would argue, are acting slightly outside their biological drives with a spiritual component. As there is a spiritual component to the men involved. (Jihad... A bad situation where the spirit must fight.)

The men here however, are not happy with the situation 'as it is'. Since men always have to extend themselves since it increases their chance of reproduction. (If a man takes over a whole country he will have more children! If a woman does she will not.) Also, the background of this is the rather frightening expansion of state power into the tyrannical nanny state. Men, who are more disposable to the tribe and have more testosterone, are more likely to be worried about this threat.

Why does this matter?

Why does it matter?

There is something I have been trying to say here but it just hasn't really formed. The future is likely to have less state power and in some way change the game on how things are at the moment.

I would argue, as I have experience, that the reason some women want everyone else to be censored is so that they can engage in nasty behaviours and then play victim when the person they have behaved badly towards justifiably responds with anger at said behaviour. Thus not receiving karma for their actions.

Consider how much power Michelle Fields had just be making a tiny, completely ludicrous claim of abuse, and many, many supported her! Would it be the same if it was a male reporter?

This game is more or less up in that the revolution has happened on the quiet but the results are not in yet, to explain where we are I'm going to do a little bit of finance and geopolitics:

Finance: 

The stock market might survive up until the EU referendum, however, this is one signal that it is struggling and might come down before that:

Major technical resistance is under threat:

This essentially means that if the S&P/ Dow falls too far in the next week we COULD, (might not will) face a kind of cliff edge effect and a plunge leading to a Lehman moment somewhere and a crash far bigger than 2008. Either now or in the next year or so the EU will probably fail because of this. Because the necessity of returning to some sort of free market, not a rigged market for political power, is becoming dangerously apparent!

The establishment is trying its best with this California wildfire thing but the stocks have still plunged last week, it is not enough and it is unlikely they will be able to plan anything threatening enough to keep it up.

(No accelerant here, this is perfectly natural!):

That being said it has seemed equally hopeless many many times but the establishment has somehow managed to pull through, but who knows. (Recently when looking at finance I pushed down what I was feeling and went with the data and I was very correct. I feel they will push through, the data is non conclusive but seems to be pushing towards a drop.)

When it all does go wrong there are several things that could happen, including initially, problems with food, petrol, and many other things that would cause some discomfort. This is where the problem will be for the EU/ establishment supporting liberal cause because, this is when the police forces and other services will not be able to enforce state power and is also when, the people who will gain power in this societal shift, will be those who have paid attention and somehow prepared for it. The libertarians who understand the free market, the gold bugs, the geeks, perhaps even the preppers)

Who will be the rulers in this new age?... Donald Trump very likely, Brexit supporting politicians especially with hindsight. These are not the people that are going to be overly friendly to the mainstream feminist/ attention seeking cause.

Who will be the losers? The supporters of the way things are, the establishment. Those who pushed 'Blairism' for the months before Blair got sent to jail for war crimes. (Which is the kind of thing that will definitely happen when power comes away from the financial system). The anti Trumps, the citiboy bankers who have kept a similar karmic immunity going through money.

But it's all going to come down!