Pluto moving into gate 41 on December 5th.

A video for this blog:

Youtube, Denise Mathew: Pluto in Gate 41 (2025 to 2028): The Cycle Reset that Changes everything. 

https://youtu.be/6doxdgNAJaI?si=tG7N2LgvoVtrM49A

If you are following this blog you will know that I am going through a little bit of a crisis. Not able to marry my abstract/ metaphysical/ spiritual knowledge with my actual life. 

This subject is no different, although, unlike the Law of One. I plan to continue seeking understanding through the Human Design. Whereas I have found myself struggling a bit with the Law of One. 

For me, (and I have done multiple videos on this subject). Pluto's transit of gate 60 has been a big deal. It has lead me to powerful insights because it links with my conscious Jupiter in gate 3.4.

Gate 60 is the gate of limitation. Pluto talks about huge societal patterns including a lot of the darkness of humanity. Where it's survival threats lie. As Pluto entered into gate 60.1 and then retrograded out I observed patterns. Which I made videos about. Each time Pluto retrograded out and returned it deepened my understanding of the limitations in my life. At first it was just bad luck and bad coincidence. Then it was mental health. Then it was physical health etc. 

In this way I was able to map out the entire pattern of this hexagram. What it is like in lower trigram then upper trigram. Even these blogs are recognising a sense of limitation of the spiritual (us now being in line 6!) 

I talked in depth about when Pluto was to enter gate 41. It did so in April 2024 for about three weeks. Then again more recently. But at no point have I discovered really solid differences. It seems to correlate to job kind of issues for me. When Pluto is in gate 60 the limitations I experience are up front and centre. When Pluto was in gate 41 the story tended to be: OK, but since those limitations do exist. How can I improve things? Can I do a course? etc. 

The day Pluto retrograded into gate 60 I moved to a new job advisor who wanted me to apply to work in a prison. It was very specifically metaphorical. Of note also is that Pluto is now moving out of Gate 60 permanently. Before it was in gate 41 for a while and returned to gate 60.6 for only a few months. An annoying pattern. 

But, like all things in this area, it is extremely shaded in mystery. I have done quite a bit on what might happen and why with Pluto in the gate 41. Which I will not repeat here. But suffice to say. With Pluto in gate 60 the incredible feeling of stuckness we are experiencing is kind of justified. Roll on December 5th 2025, and things might start to slowly break loose from that date. 

'That which is not needed falls away.'

I like Americans. I recall when I went to University. Which was a generally depressing experience as it was absolutely full of foreigners that were not really intellectually engaged. I wanted to read every book. I wanted to understand every thinker and engage with every class. But the rest of them just sat there like they were being walked through school as petulant children that did not want to be there. 

Meaning that classes were kind of quiet. No one engaged or put their hand up or seemed to want to be there. But one time we had just one American (a literal big fat guy) in the class who talked and talked and talked. I didn't completely agree with him but God damn it was good to have someone offering their opinion. 

Any place, online places especially, that do not have Americans in them is kind of quiet. Twitter before Americans used to wake up, back before the algorithm was as good as it now is, was really empty and boring. 

Now though, with Elons new update, meaning that a lot of those Indians pretending to be Americans have filtered out. Well, you can have too much of a good thing. The place is filled with so much intensity from everyone offering their opinions, that it is just exhausting.

It also did not take them long to start saying things like 'Sort out your own country that is full of third worlders'. At just any minor point they disagree with. Not too much, but it's there.  

This is another kind of personal update thread. It is a shift in my emotions that I did not think was possible and has been influenced by the gym. Stefan Molyneux once said that before you go to the gym, you do not know what your real opinions are. Because you do not have the testosterone to assert them. My views are changing so completely that it feels like something like that is happening.

Part of why I talk about this though is that my life fits in a Law of One paradigm. It really does fit in my life in a big way. My life works better when I am re reading the Law of One books. I reflect on the quotes. I talk about and reflect on the Human Design Chart that I believe is also a reflection of those same kinds of teachings. 

There is a holistic element to life that is hard to explain that also goes through my life that relates to the Law of One. 

That is the case here but my life is also getting very real world and slightly less attached to metaphysical concerns in general. I am feeling alive, grounded and 'real world'. This is because of the gym. I am going again in an hour and a half. I love the gym. I love it so much. 

The thing that has seemed to happen to me recently with the gym is... That the information in the Law of One about balancing the lower centres. Is true. The information about coming away from 'transcient' material. 

I can't describe it, but I have just woken up and I do not emotionally believe in Q anymore. Nothing has changed in my technical mind. In my technical understanding of the phenomena. But emotionally, I just can't get behind it! 

This is not the first time Trump has posted Q memes on his Truth Social. There are many instances of the Anons taking one or the other hint, meme, or piece of political news and saying it's all gonna happen tomorrow. I am just tired of it. 

This might have been an influence as well:

I used to have a lot of respect for this guy. Built up over tweets. But, a confession that he believes the bible is the inerrant word of God. I just can't. 

I have asked Christians a lot of questions on twitter.  Things like how do they justify banning porn which is something they are promoting? Taking it down to the philosophy. Never any actual good answer. It is always that they just feel like they have the right to take away others liberties and rule over others with government power... "just because".

Ideally, going to the gym, being super grounded. It is probably that I will simply stop caring about most of this though. Perhaps Q is real but I don't care sort of thing. I can't influence anything there anyway.  

My realisation that biblical Christianity is incompatible with ethics.

I did my last post. "Actually a bit of a nothing update", partly because I was not sure I was going to post again any time soon. My mind had gone to mush a bit. I cannot recall precisely what the issue was but I had a bunch of insights I did not feel I could communicate. So I was stuck not being able to express anything.

Things have moved on though, and I have had a new insight in a different area. This kind of correlated with the sun changing hexagrams. We are now in the 34-20.

I have started to have a central insight. One that has shaken me a little:

Biblical (mainstream) Christianity is incompatible with ethics. 

I kind of consider myself a Christian of sorts. Like, I do communion. I pray and hold that paradigm to be true. The idea of God and negative entities. 

I also, in line with that, hold the ideas of Jesus to be very true. But I differ from mainstream Christianity in a lot of very important ways. For instance; I follow Aaron Abke and do not believe in 'salvation by faith'. I believe that Jesus had a more philosophical take explaining a kind of service to others mindset. This is somewhat closer, but not exactly, 'salvation by works'. 

Aaron Abke's narrative is that Paul. Who wrote most of the New Testament. Was a false prophet who preached an opposing message to Jesus and his apostles. Consider these two biblical quotes. The first from Jesus. The second from Paul:

Matthew 7:21-23:

Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’  And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; leave Me, you who practice lawlessness.’ 

Contrast with Romans 10:9 from Paul:

If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.  

Jesus never said anything about believing he was raised from the dead. In fact, he gave a quite different map to salvation. 

Aaron holds these two quotes to be a direct contradiction and I think he's right. 

But I did not fully realise what this means until just recently.  

Salvation by faith, as Paul preaches. Is not an ethical system. It does not inspire ethics in Christians because they literally are better than other for no other reason of stating things they apparently believe. 

Coincidentally, at almost the same time. Stefan Molyneux has taken a harder line against Christians than normal, offering a well researched post that proves that Christians hit their kids more than atheists and agnostics. Melissa, the woman from the Love Covered Life podcast. Who was very involved in Christianity and now also follows Aarons message, has recently talked about this. Also, Paul Wallis has recently talked about how Christianity threatens it's believers with the mythology of hell that is scripturally inaccurate.  

Like I said, the stories of Jesus do mean something to me. I am not quite sure how to classify myself to make this clear to others. Aaron talks about 'The Jesus Way'. But Aaron is a committed vegan and I am not doing that. Veganism is part of 'The Jesus Way'. But how do you say like... "Yeah, I follow Jesus, but I am anti Christianity"? 

Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson followed an interpretation of Christianity that rejected Jesus' divine nature. Seeing him more as a philosopher. The early church fathers considered this as well as I understand it (that is that Jesus was a philosopher and they talked about him in the same breath as other philosophers. But not the lack of a divine nature!) Before Constantine replaced them with war mongers then the churches battle with Marcion.  

I suppose I could say I follow the Law of One. Which kind of means that I escape most of these stereotypes. 

I have far deeper criticisms of Christianity. There is far more depth to this whole discussion. To me, ethics cannot be an argument from authority and top down, and I could go into that in detail. They would have to be objective and secular like Stefan Molyneux's system. Because otherwise, you are forcing ideas on others they don't agree with. But people can't really disagree with objective reality. If you start your ethical system by something that can't be justified ethically, (that is forcing your ideas on others that have no objective proof) then it doesn't have validity. Also, Christianity considers things like astrology to be unethical. When there is no proof of that. They just say things are unethical. And even worse... Sometimes they say without proof that things are OBJECTIVELY unethical. Like, even non Christians should accept their opinion AS FACT. With no proof, no logical explaining that. Just because it suits their virtue signalling and puritannical persuasion. 

It is quite a change in my mindset. Part of me felt like these are ethical people. But I have seen no evidence of that. 

Actually a bit of a nothing update.

I had the feeling I should be writing but my subconscious did not reveal to me what the subject was going to be about. Having evaluated this blog post though I realise they can't all be bangers! 

Firstly, I am going to stop with the trend of writing out what I think has been happening for the human design transits of the last week. We did have the big new moon yesterday, and the Earth point is exactly conjunct Uranus today at 8.6.

It appears what I thought would happen on the larger scale was Trump pushing forward on this BBC lawsuit. But what in fact happened was that Trump has agreed a peace deal with Russia. Very Uranian. But not much to say on that. 

In my personal life, I am spending too much time arguing on twitter but I do not have anything else to do! It has become my place I go to for 'human contact' ESPECIALLY as I don't have access to a streaming service anymore. Those normal, slightly crappy TV shows, that don't always make a lot of sense, are good for simulating human company. 

In the UK, it is news how the job market is absolutely screwed. There is this big narrative about how younger people might get stuck on the benefit system. When I go to the jobcentre, the advisors there are completely overworked. I had a spate of unemployment at some time in 2012 and back then it was completely different. The entire atmosphere. The economy is quite seriously collapsing it seems like. 

I will probably not continue my series on the human design transits. I have my data points for this past week. The Pearl Lila Rose thing, the girl advertising her Ph.D and people getting upset, the Andrew Wilson having a dirty debate tactic used against him and the twitter Christians seemingly unanimously supporting it. But it is all so 'nothing'. It is... to use a Law of One phrase. To 'collect the details of the day.'

For me, the benefit is to continue getting insights. But, the only one that brings practical change is going to the gym which I have kept up with. 

The difficulty of following guidance.

I wonder, what the beneficial point of this blog is to others? Thinking of it, I realise that my self/ soul/ mind is always engaged in thinking about spiritual types of things. It is the energy that I have to use every day. I figure we all have three energies we have to use per day. Part of mine is that I have to re- experience the drive for meaning and to figure that out through intellectual means. Whether that be spirituality, philosophy, or something else. 

After the Law of One Carla Ruckert did a lot of channeling of Q'uo. I figure that is because once you have started down that road. Of seeing things in a Law of One paradigm. Then it becomes beneficial to have constant reminders. Like how, in church, a lot of the messages are basically repeated. Constant reminders is a big part of the spiritual journey and the life journey in general I suppose. 

Anyway, I wanted to mention tow ways that I have felt guided to a certain conclusion and then now figure I may have been wrong about that and the idea behind that. First I wanted to talk about a Law of One quote and what it might mean to me:

Questioner: In previous communications you have spoken of the mind/body/spirit complex totality. Would you please give us a definition of the mind/body/spirit complex totality?

Ra: I am Ra. There is a dimension in which time does not have sway. In this dimension, the mind/body/spirit in its eternal dance of the present may be seen in totality, and before the mind/body/spirit complex which then becomes a part of the social memory complex is willingly absorbed into the allness of the One Creator, the entity knows itself in its totality.

This mind/body/spirit complex totality functions as, shall we say, a resource for what you perhaps would call the Higher Self. The Higher Self, in turn, is a resource for examining the distillations of third-density experience and programming further experience. This is also true of densities four, five, and six with the mind/body/spirit complex totality coming into consciousness in the course of seventh density.

This quote then summarises something very fundamental about the Law of One world view. The higher self programs further experience. So we are living in a situation where the events in our lives are targetted to learning lessons of some description. As set by the higher self.  

Anyway, the two places where I have refined my ideas. One is that, recently I talked about coming off caffeine and alcohol. I have decided I have to stick with the alcohol. The reason is mostly due to communion and other related health issues. I have always kind of believed that Jesus said wine and so it is wine at Communion. I don't ascribe a lot of authority to the church in general (who do say grape juice is fine!)

Communion is not negotiable for me. I have had experiences of a very positive nature and very intense apparently connected with Communion. At the moment I am improving my health in a lot of ways because I am now able to go to the gym. There are MANY different factors to balance and they conflict. I need to lose weight. I have bone thinning. I have stomach issues. I have a huge tendency towards anxiety. Typically I am a very good sleeper even sleeping too much. But occasionally things go wrong and the sleep just stops. 

On two of these, the weight loss and anxiety, but primarily the weight loss. I need to stick with the alcohol. If I am not having wine I have grape juice at communion and I put on weight. It is a problem that I try and get around by just doing everything surrounding it right. But I put on a kilogram and I am not doing well with weight at the moment. (For instance, I have cheese to combat the bone thinning).

Also, I have slept three hours tonight and am completely wired which I know I will have to pay for. My medical condition has somewhat conditioned my body to be more easily made anxious. More than a decade of physiologically based extreme anxiety. It is this that is being improved with the gym.

The wine of course has no calories in it. Unlike the grape juice that is VERY sugary. I put on 1kg with my last communion. The communion without wine I feel a little less connected on as well. 

For the second thing. A previous blog I wrote called Conflicts in world views, applying the lessons learnt. I think the premise of this post is correct. But I think I have applied it wrongly.

It is interesting that in that post I summarised another idea that I eventually went back on. I summarised two wrong teachings there. As though highlighting that I was basically out of tune. 

This is one of those blogs where I carefully concealed where I had gotten the teaching. The tarot card idea at the beginning is actually an image from a dream. Not my amazing creativity! Those tarot cards are always my dream images. The dream itself had me using Stefans kind of thought process and not being able to grip Law of One concepts.

Pretty direct right? But now I think that was a metaphor. Previously, from my dreams I have determined that either Pearl Davis or Stefan Molyneux is causing an inner conflict for me. I did not know which one and have come off one or the other at various times trying to figure this out. 

The dream giving me exactly what the apparent issue was seems almost like wilfull deception. As though that deeper part of me is treating me like a genius. Because to have thought that was only a metaphor early on would have been to have thought like a genius I think. But now, over time. The guidance that staying off Stefan Molyneux is good has not borne out. Pearl on the other hand. I do not need to think about girls and their manipulations that much at the moment, they are not part of my life. There is also something wrong there, a bad feeling I get that is backed up by small things. I am not allowed in her chat for example because one of the moderators has a grudge against me. There are just a few things giving me a 'bad feeling' there. 

So, everything I said in that October 27th blog. The whole argument I laid out. Is not in fact correct. But a misinterpretation as I currently see it.  

Human Design Transits Part 3. Sun in gate 43, Earth in gate 23.

One of the women whose tweets I am going to probably excerpt here wanted to hear what insights my tweet had given her. So this blog is going to have to be a little more introductory with some of the concepts potentially. BUT, there is an extent to which that is not completely possible. I hope what I write basically makes sense but I can't be sure that it does. 

I am not going to go out of the way to inform any of the others tweets I excerpt on this. Primarily because I do not think I will have any impact on them. My blogs slowly climb over about a week and a half to maybe 10 viewers and that is simply not enough to have an impact. I am not even going to make the effort to hide their handles for this reason.  

There is no legal problem with this Twitter being a public site.  

I have set up this series to talk about the human design transits. I have used general twitter chat to capture what is going on. The first part I talked about Sun in the gate 44 and Earth in the gate 24. Discussing how the transit theoretically shows the real energy. The positive ideal energy. Then a lot of determined gossiping and group think produces opinions against that energy. The second part I talked mainly about the Sun in the gate 1 and transiting Uranus in the gate 8, because that is an electromagnetic channel. This one I am talking about the gates 43 and 23. Which define both the Ajna and the throat. The whole article is discussed with the Law of One and Human Design types of concepts considered to be truth. That is the baseline. 

The 43-23 then. 

Ra Uru Hu, the founder of the human design, had the 43-23:

That is, the upside down green triangle at the top. and the throat which is the square just below it. These are coloured in, their energy is stronger than the white centres. Because the 43-23 channel is defined. 

Ra Uru Hu was a complete genius. He was a genius in these metaphysical and spiritual matters. Which are not so easily understood since they are targets of narcissists and cult leaders to fake. I had not thought much about what the 43-23 really means in a person or in real life. It tends to be the gate of the individual. It is the channel where a kind of acceptance of different ways of being and different ways of thinking is really important. The 43-23 wants everyone to be accepted. Because it itself is weird and eccentric. It is assuring its own survival. 

Another example of the 43-23 is Dr James Fallon. Who talks about how some psychopaths, even though they have the brain of a psychopath. Are actually functional individuals who are not evil people by function of existing. So, accepting the difference.  

The Ajna is also where a lot of processing happens. People that don't have the Ajna just don't tend to think quite as much. Or they don't have their thinking as part of what they are here to do. Their 'life path' so to speak. Where Jordan Peterson and his 17-62, from the Ajna to the throat, the logical process, is endlessly talking about how do we define what's real or not. A little known celebrity with the 11-56 is Adam Elenbass, who processes the abstract information of astrology. 

But I had never really processed what the 43-23 really means. How it really expressed. As an individual channel descended from the 61-24. It is very much about a mystical or psychological process in my understanding. The reason I bring those two together is that a lot of ideas about karma and such, that we repeat the same experiences 'until the lesson is learned'. Have identical counterparts in psychotherapy. In my understanding the processes are both similar. Both into things like personal insight and dream interpretation.

So what we have then, is that this week, as it trundled on. Was going to tell me something about how the collective processes that kind of "mystical" type of thinking.

So on to the definition from Stefan Molyneux. Stefan talks a lot about this. His interpretation of mysticism is something of pure negativity. At least some of what I have heard has been that in my interpretation. I did not understand his critique of mysticism for a long time. But eventually I listened to things that explained it. 

As a small side plot, the world of Neo Platonism and Hellenistic Dualism is relevant here. Truly poisonous ideology that effected the early church and have formed their own kind of gravitas of, in my view, incorrect ideas and concepts. That have had a severe negative impact on almost all of modern society. Including, as I mentioned. Christianity. James Tabor mentions this in his recent interview with Aaron Abke on Mary. If you want more detail. 

Stefans interpretation is as follows: Evil, negativity. The process of the perversion of moral for evil ends is to create a moral rule and then create an exception for yourself. No one in society should steal, but I must steal. No one in society should initiate violence. But I must initiate violence. 

When objective reality and reasoning gets in the way. (Well... Why are you able to initiate violence?). To get around obvious, universal, moral rules. A 'higher realm' has to be created. You cannot initiate force on others or steal. But the king will do both of those things when he takes your taxes... Why? Because of the 'divine right of kings'. The mystical idea they are given their authority by God. 

This brings us to our first tweet example. This womans name is Philosophicat. She talks about philosophy in some manner and I think she interacted with Stefan somehow on twitter. Since Stefan is very grounded and atheist and this woman believes in things like astrology. My younger belief in the world, as someone that is very passionate about things like astrology. Was that she would be right in this argument. 

But no, this woman, while the 43-23 was transitting showed the EXACT thought process I mentioned. 

The discussion started off with her mentioning the conditions under which men should or should not express themselves. In the comments the idea was something like 'Men are allowed to express themselves but not to 'dump' their emotions. OK... well who decides that.

People took it, like they should take it. Like an annoying post that was not particularly coherent, pleasant or moral. This is what she came back with:

You don't have to read that. I did not even study most of it the point I am making is that she starts off the tweet with... 'People are misunderstanding my tweet. It is not open to interpretation, it is just correct.' Pretty much pure narcissism. Nobody, even if they have literally posted statistics themselves. Is just 'divinely correct'. Most of her tweets have carried on with this same kind of thinking. 'Men don't understand the divine feminine', or some such. 

This woman is exactly what Stefan says about mystics. She even states in her bio some variation of Hellenism. She wants to create a 'mystical zone' called 'divine feminine'. Which is immune from things like objective reality and criticism. I am pretty sure that is her entire output. I have seen men in her comments praising her for her mysterious 'wisdom' along these lines. Some people actually believe it.  

Nick, oh Nick. 

The Nick Fuentas drama was also happening at this time. 

I will just state my general opinion of Nick to add a bit of context, going back into my ideological views and general thoughts on the 'zeitgeist' of the day. 

Going from a kind of Ayn Rand perspective. Because it matches some of the relevant realities and I do not have time for nuance (no one will wish this blog any longer than it is!) The left, cancel culture, transgenderism, high taxes, their complete lack of any belief in freedom. This is a very serious opponent. I lack words to describe their negativity sometimes. These are the people that you are not allowed to say even a slightly 'risky' joke around. The politically correct people that police speech until we are all living in a kind of isolated hell. Where we have to remember weird things like asking for pronouns. 

The right, both the Trump right and the QAnon people. State, on paper. That they believe in the opposite of that. They believe in low or no taxes. Wealth. Everyone working. People being able to speak freely on issues like gender. The right, the Ayn Rands of the world. Believe in freedom. Believe that this is the path to virtue. The Q people actually believe that the left, the negative, are possibly aliens and have been mutilating children. That they are a satanic kind of evil. 

Nick, is just a kid really. To me. He is obviously 'something special' in that he has a platform when a lot of people don't. But this is a high IQ young man who thinks about things himself. I have seen Q women get upset and call him a "fed" because he says anti Trump things. 

How I see him, is, as I have said, incredibly fun, funny, articulate. He is very male in a way. Not really 'alpha' but very powerful and direct. He says things that upset people. That shouldn't (but do) upset men. These weird right wing Christian men, with no soul, that I'm sure would be better served as serfs living under the earth. 

And he just speaks what people are thinking. What a lot think is truth. Of the few clips of him I have seen. He says he finds women annoying and doesn't want to be with one. He talked down a fan that asked him to come to detroit joking at him that 'do you think that's gonna happen? hey, here is that podcaster you listen to, I'm in Detroit'. He says some very sweet and poignant things. And some things that are just so weird that I can't imagine how he comes to that conclusion. Like maybe Stalin had some good points. 

One of the things he often says is 'It's not that deep.' 

Men know, that when freedom is starting to be had. All sorts of strange things will crawl out from under the rocks. People that don't agree with your sensibilities. We are not a monotone like the left. We are groups of entrepeneurs and genius' that believe in freedom and freedom of speech. 

Nick shows that some of the women. They do not believe this. Not really. They perhaps like the abstract idea. But it is not in their DNA. They also perhaps fear the nebulous underworld of manosphere individuals that they believe exists. This post showed to me, that that female tendency towards word salad and mysticism is used in this way. To alleviate the anxiety of approaching freedom:

 

I thought this one was funny. It's so hyperbolic! What is a "parasocial trauma bond"? This is where I see the other side of the 43-23 show it's head. 

Also, what is Nick. He is an unusual individual  -> 43-23. So the negative side of this is not NOT accept the person.  

The point here, is that the guys listening to Nick are not... children. Women tend to believe everyone is an infant that they need to protect. Women are also, fairly vulnerable to propaganda and following cult like political parties. But men aren't. Men are just like... Ha ha, that was funny what Nick said. Then they go on with their day.

There are very few men who heard someone say something 'racist' and morphed into some sort of super psycho. Proven in part I think by the complete lack of white male, right wing violence the establishment so hoped existed to justify state tyranny.  

I just wanted to drop another tweet to show this general attitude. This tweet came in when the Sun was at 43.6. So just finishing the hexagram:

When I first saw this woman I thought she was quite sweet. As a Christian, even though I am far away now from a traditional Christian interpretation. Someone talking this passionately about Christ still warms my heart. 

I have, to my detriment I suppose. Got in debates in her threads where I have proven a perspective wrong with biblical quotes and a lot of explanation. This woman just ignores it and will tweet the same disproved thing the next day. 

She is not actually moral, she is sweet. There is a difference. It seems to me her goal is not virtue, but the solidifying of her own power and 'the female agenda' in the church. Like I said this blog doesn't need to be any longer so I will not explain further.  

So Nick said something that upset the church people on twitter. He said that Jesus was more about telling people the truth and he would rather be a rough around the edges truth teller, than a suave liar like most of the people criticising him. 

They did NOT like that. 

To me, this is a substantially correct point. Jesus spoke at length against the Pharisees. The Pharisses were corrupt spiritual leaders. He completely dressed them down. There was not much else that he did that upset the Romans it was probably this dressing down that got him killed. He was crucified for being impolite essentially. Polite society and the truth often conflict.

This woman has stated clearly here that she wants everyone to shut up and take her own personal view. To not offend her sensibilities. 

Here is another one of this kind of thinking:

 

And this one. This has to be my favourite. It is absolutely glorious in its hypocrisy:

Every single tweet this woman makes. Like the one I just quoted trying to nag people for acting 'impolitely'. Is claiming a position of authority. She claims authority through her belief that she has that authority through being 'saved' and can speak on these kinds of matters. 

You will not find a single tweet of mine that is telling others how to behave! 

I have also not once seen any posting about her service on there. 

Mainstream Christianity, especially how she practices it, is also pure mysticism from a Stefan Molyneux definition. Which Pauls gospel is. If you believe Jesus rose from the dead you are saved from all sins. But no one else is. Everyones works are 'filthy rags'. So you are literally better than someone that actually goes out and does good things in the world but hasn't been dunked in a pool of water! There exists a dimension where normal objective morals do not hold sway called being 'saved'. 

Conclusion:

Like I said, no one is going to say of this blog post that they wished it was longer than it is. What comes next is actually very interesting but is in process. The Sun moves to gate 14, the Earth to gate 8 and it will soon conjunct Uranus! It is all big. It is Venus that is in the position of gate 1. 

I have seen some interesting tweets and pushbacks against manosphere types of tweets since this. We are only at 14.2 and 8.2 but the entire thing is very powerful. The new moon on the 20th is exact Cazimi (conjunction) Mercury retrograde. Exact, on the new moon. Less than one degree. Opposing Uranus is obviously a big deal. 

I don't know how that is going to be expressed but I think it is very interesting.  

Human Design Transits Part 2. Sun in gate 1, Earth in Gate 2.

I have not written this article despite wanting to, and now I have just in the last few minutes had an insight that pulls it together, so I can write it. 

It would be great to have a visual, but unfortunately, I don't. To plot a human design chart includes two separate sets of calculations. The self and the body. When you are viewing transits you only need one type of calculation. If I were to plot a previous set of transits. I would need a single set of calculations. But the only way to make a chart is with two calculations.

In the last article I talked about the gate 44-24 and talked about how the twitter sphere. Talking about what these gates probably mean. What their energy is. And also talking about the not self themes that come up to cover that energy. To prevent the real realisation coming up and messing up peoples world view. A theme in each part of this is that it is women fundamentally driving the not self theme. A kind of gossipy madness of women that walk in lock step and say certain things. 

There is a difference in this post. Because the transit of the Sun in the gate 1 linked to Uranus in the gate 8. 

Uranus is a distinctly political energy. Even though, as I will talk about, it also has personal implications. It's main implication is of a huge scientific intelligence that includes among other things. Knowledge of the free market and philosophy. 

Uranus is retrograde. In a retrograde the energy connected to that planetary transit is questioned. So when the planet goes forward in shadow. You are blissfully unaware there is an issue and continue forward with both the positive energy and with said issue. When it goes back you take a breath and the issue is revealed. Ideally, you get rid of it then and you move forward again without the issue. There are all sorts of ways this can go wrong I think. Especially in people that are unaware. The issue can be consciously capitalised on in the retrograde and used for negative purposes. But, ideally, of course. It works exactly like that. 

This means that a kind of revolutionary energy was there, but then we are now in a place where there is a re- evaluation of whether everything is OK "within the movement", so to speak. 

This was a much harder energy than the previous week. The 44-24 was on two undefined centres. Once definition comes into the picture it is a stronger energy. Unless perhaps it hits your chart personally. 

But we have the Sun in gate 1- connecting with transiting Uranus in gate 8. Then the discussion became suddenly very heated and what it was about was... There was a guy who posted that women shouldn't vote, and this suddenly became a discussion. Which makes sense. Uranus evaluating what is going on within it's movement. I think that the fact that this theme came up when Uranus was being energised in an electro magnetic channel, shows a strong element to Uranus' current position. I think a lot of men are more serious about this than twitters jovial nature would make apparent. Or at the very least, the fact 80% young women voted Democrat in NYC's recent election, as an example; is a thing that many people are aware of and wish to address. 

Part 1 and Part 3 had more to say on what was going on. More substance. Perhaps because the not self element here is not so apparent. This individual electromagnetic channel expressed what it did and the not self element wasn't able to gain so much prominance. Unlike the 44-24 and coming 43-23.

I have another realisation about this though. A personal realisation. In my next article I am going to speak positively about Stefan Molyneux's definition of mysticism which comes from listening to his history of Philosophers series. It has come from hard intellectual work in my thinking. Philosophy and insights and stuff is HARD. Even though through a kind of Dunning Kruger I believe, most people seem to think of themselves as divinely moral without philosophies aid. Which cheapens the value of the discipline for, I would say, most, normal people. 

BUT, I have had trouble with another of his definitions that I have talked about previously on this blog. 

On September 21st and 23rd I wrote two blogs around the same kind of theme. This is what I was really saying, although I hid it in loads of indirect speak. I had had an issue with a family member and due to this, it was uncomfortable for me to feel like I 'loved' this person. Since, I cannot think of a 'virtue' this person has. They are leftist and all that. I was trying to break down my understanding of the situation with this definition as I have also heard it talked about by Stefan. 

His definition is that 'love is our involuntary response to virtue, if we are virtuous'. So as an example. If I were talking to someone and I asked something and they came out with something they heard on the BBC, or in a University feminist class. Then this energy essentially 'covers' the person, and when we are not able to 'see' the person. We cannot love that person. So what we often feel in it's place is our body manipulating us. An example from Stefan I gave and which he goes through with his callers is the guys that have strong simpy feelings over a girl and then can't name a virtue of hers. Because... They just wanted to play hide the pickle. Even though they were not aware of that aspect of their motivation. 

The way we actually do love then according to this is if people have real emotions. What they really feel, not information out of a text book. Then we can love that thing that is that person. With our also real self. 

It is a very interesting definition. It is powerful information that has an 'outer planet' quality. Uranian things, often are linked with Neptunian and Plutonian as well. They often have an 'alien' quality to them. So, Human Design itself is one example. The whole thing looks like it was given to us by literal aliens and the entire thing speaks in a kind of language that is completely different to how most people process reality. Music might be another one. It is kind of Uranian. Mostly. It's technical aspect. 

But to give love a definition like this. One that changes reality itself in small ways. When the normal world would just say if you feel it, it is correct. You love that person. But using the definition it shifts you to the realisation it's not really love. It does have that Uranian quality. 

But, as I said Uranus is going retrograde and gate 8 Uranus is HUGE for me! But, this piece of insight from Stefan has not seemed to take. Perhaps that young family member doesn't seem to have any particular virtues, and I believed I had incorrectly believed the love idea for a while. But no, for whatever reason the irrational feeling has returned. I can't label it anything else.

Even though I fully intend to avoid the person as she is toxic as hell. 

This kind of thing might be relevant to previous posts I have written that talk about two world colliding (Conflicts in World Views, applying lessons learned, October 27th). The Law of One and Stefan Molyneux. To the point that that emotion, that 'love' might be incorrect. The Law of One does offer some tools. That of balancing. As summarised in 'Reflections on love and balancing'. Or perhaps the entropy meditation as I have talked about in relation to session 46.9 and 104.2.

Or, it's just a thing I have to deal with. I have positive feelings for her, and by all accounts in relation to objective reality. She has nothing but negative feelings for me and she is a nag. It's just something I have to deal with.