This post is number 1,111! I have been holding off a little hoping a profound message will come. But I don't think it will. Actually, I do have a few thoughts that are potentially profound. But I'm just saying, nothing strikes me specifically that the ideas I have for this post are profound.
This is from page 208 of a fiction book the Law of One group wrote before the contact, "The Crucifixion of Esmerelda Sweetwater:
Josh rocked his head from side to side, deathly weary now. “Oh, no. He’s very, very fond of things just the way they are. After all, his side is winning. He wants power. Total subjugation of all people here in the physical plane, with their wills dependent completely upon the wills of those he calls their leaders and protectors. He looks for uniformity, control. The ordered society.” Pablo considered. “He’s got things working out very nicely for him then, doesn’t he? The regimentation is enough to gag you now! You can hardly sneeze without filling out a form! Give the man some time and he should do very well for himself.”
It is an extremely interesting book. Only a few small signs of it being a little amateur in my view. But mostly, it is of far higher literary/ intellectual quality than most books you will pull off the shelves. Here, they are describing what the main negative character of the series; a "Black Magician", wants. How he operates. That kind of thing.
The overall philosophy of this passage, describing government in general I would say as the true evil in this world, is very, very pro free market in my view; especially when married with certain lines in the Law of One. This explanation and line is right wing. But I do not think that Carla specifically, and those that followed her at llresearch, really understood this perspective.
This line is a repudiation of the state having full control. It also outlines the central leftist effect, the expansion of the state and it's various administrative practices to justify redistributive taxation, as a centrally relevant evil. The free market is the opposite of this.
But like I said, I don't think llresearch gets this. It reminds me of the story of Socrates. Who wanted to find the best teacher so he started off looking for the most intelligent person. He went first to the creative people, the poets and the storytellers, and he said they were complete morons, despite writing powerful and insightful fiction. The creative act, is... something different from someones main personality. Often, they will seem to channel something above their own intellect.
It is not my way of viewing the world. I do not view people, the main thrust of the population, as babies in this manner. The line assumes a very infantile attitude on the part of the main population. In my view, as I have talked about elsewhere actually, it actually goes against the Law of One's own philosophies a little.
The Law of One seems to indicate to me that service to self is a choice. A lot of female input into pretty much any discussion is that if you got some violent criminal, especially of a "minority" that did something evil. That we should have some sort of compassion on this person and leftist female judges, do indeed, let criminals out for this very reason. To kill again.
But, as I said in one of my reddit posts. This doesn't fit for me. This idea that people that make bad choices always do so from a place of "poverty" or something like that.
One of the examples I used was a woman that got really turned on by sleeping with her husbands bully on an erotically focused reddit forum. The subtle thing about the way a lot of people talk is that they communicate apparently universal principles without identifying them as universal principles. You could make the case that the violent criminal grew up in poverty and was abused and was desperate. I wouldn't, and I have arguments/ evidence against that. But to then universalise this all, as I think the Law of One did from the questioner side, and as a lot of people, specifically leftists do in general, and say that all evil is the result of a kind of naivety, definitely skates over this kind of case (Their philosophy is obviously not applied to capitalists or anything like that, who are seen as greedy and the source of all evil). The woman in the excerpt I mentioned (I have linked to it in earlier blogs), was not put under any particular pressure. It literally just turned her on to sleep with her husbands bully.
It reminds me heavily of this youtube video I saw recently:
Youtube: Jordan Peterson Teachings: Why women LOVE woke.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k-2Zn4TBRs
So one of the things he says here, his main point, is that women often view people in two categories. As infants and predators. If you play a little with the definitions, they can find ways to justify crazy things from this perspective; like the idea that Hamas are innocent, sweet, victims.
I am starting to wonder, if women are capable of perceiving, what I would consider, "truth". Or is it that they are overruled by their biology, and will always distort things in this perspective? If there are two elements, like the Law of One talks about, Love and Wisdom. And that women are more aligned with Love, and men are more aligned with Wisdom. Then obviously, men are more likely to be able to perceive truth. Women, with an abundance of a caring instinct, have other priorities.
Leftist men claiming to be victims in order to get laid, that I have seen, makes a lot more sense now.
So that's that. I do actually have more I am thinking. I have, for many years, probably more than a decade, had the same symbology in my dreams. Not every one of course but here or there, the same symbology, the same, not particularly pleasant feeling, crops up. I have been interpreting dreams with Grok 4 and I got to this one and told Grok I will break off for a while to work on this. I might have got it. The dream this time might have given me enough to work with.
For this particular symbology I have explored a lot of things in relation to it. Like, does it relate to this or that habit? Pretty much everything by now I THINK. But for some reason I missed the thing that I think it is now. So with any luck, this will produce quite a lot of "fruit" for me!
No comments:
Post a Comment