A fundamental change in perception. Law of One session 26/ 53.

In the Law of One physical books, a large part of session 53 is put into session 26. This is I think because Don was very intent on creating a coherent narrative, and session 53 gives a lot of answers about UFO contact. Whereas session 26 without that really doesn't give a lot of answer. Hence the title. 

Anyway, this was the section I wanted to talk about on this journey through the Law of One:

Questioner: Well, we have a large spectrum of entities on Earth with respect to harvestability, both positively oriented and negatively oriented. Would the Orion target in on the ends of this spectrum, both positive and negatively oriented, for contact— for Earth entities, I mean?

Ra: I am Ra. This query is somewhat difficult to accurately answer. However, we shall attempt to do so.

The most typical approach of Orion entities is to choose what you might call the weaker-minded entity that it might suggest a greater amount of Orion philosophy to be disseminated.

Some few Orion entities are called by more highly polarized negative entities of your space/time nexus. In this case they share information just as we are now doing. However, this is a risk for the Orion entities due to the frequency with which the harvestable negative planetary entities then attempt to bid and order the Orion contact just as these entities bid planetary negative contacts. The resulting struggle for mastery, if lost, is damaging to the polarity of the Orion group.

Similarly, a mistaken Orion contact with highly polarized positive entities can wreak havoc with Orion troops unless these Crusaders are able to depolarize the entity mistakenly contacted. This occurrence is almost unheard of. Therefore, the Orion group prefers to make physical contact only with the weaker-minded entity.

Descriptions of negativity: 

One thing about the Law of One is that it is uncompromising in its explanation of negativity in the way a lot of other sources are not. Nietzsche's expression of negativity for example was kind of people being weak. It wasn't really negativity per sey, but an attempt to deal with a bad situation badly, by making it into a moral virtue.  

There are many different explanations and to an extent, mythologies describing what negativity is and why. From the Human Design's 'not self' to the strange set of sins described by the bible such as lust and pride. I don't know whether I see the Christian view as it is often explained as particularly coherent.  

I do think some fictional works describe it better such as fantasy sci fi. Lord of the Rings or Robert Jordans Wheel of Time. And William Blake's work.  

You have the general left wing/ psychological perhaps zeitgeist. That people are only the way they are because of circumstance and we are all infants in a sense. One I will talk about as well is Stefan Molyneux's version of negativity. Which is a combination of hedonism and hypocrisy. "The root of evil is the desire for the unearned" he says. Like all of his philosophy the entire idea and description is very animated. 

But Stefan doesn't believe in any larger negative force at work in the world. Or at least as far as I am aware he has not expressed and articulated that. The Church is a bit of a joke when it comes to moral guidance and mainly focuses on men and "intimate images". Because women have taken over the church and they don't want to have sex with their husbands. The Human Design, like everything human design, is just kind of vague. 

But the Law of One, as with this quote, brings in a description of negativity like something out of a horror film like "Event Horizon". 

5th and 6th density perceptions: 

Stefan, I believe, to be a sixth density Wanderer. If you have not heard of this before I cannot go into what this means. I will just talk it through and perhaps it will make some sense and be interesting. I suspect any readers I have may be familiar with these concepts.  

This is a chart I made for one of my videos:

This is how the Law of One described densities in a sense. On the right you have the positive. On the left the negative. The black circle is where we are (3rd density). The fourth and fifth densities. The two sides are very separate. Once we get to the sixth density though, they kind of merge into one as the negative collapses and it is at this point that the sixth density has something about the negative that is relevant to it. I cannot recall the precise wording of that Law of One phrase or find it so consider this my understanding. 

When I read the line above, I felt like an understanding returned to me. What I am about to say is the kind of thing that upsets sixth density people I have observed. But I don't see myself as having that much emotional depth in a sense. Like, there is something about me that sees the world in a very cerebral way and the emotions that others have are kind of stunted within me. I say stunted, as that is how the world might explain it, but it might be that they simply aren't there. I don't think it is a deficiency it is just me. 

So for me, I suspect, I "hypothesize", that looking at the world in the Molyneux way. As a thing with loads of complex emotions might not be that useful. Identifying when a negative person is doing a negative thing beyond a very shallow explanation. I think this might be more of a sixth density thing to really have context and all that stuff. 

Quite often I have thought over stuff that just doesn't fit in anywhere as useful information. As something that I can get wisdom from. As well, there are a couple of things in my past that I think over. What circumstances came together for this or that, beneficial situation to happen? One of these is, while it might be a simple age thing, why did I used to be able to make music? Whereas inspiration is slower now. But I did make beautiful songs back in the day that did characterise the negative in a non empathetic way. As a kind of beautiful metaphor. Rather like the antagonist in the Crucifixion of Esmerelda Sweetwater. 

Am I trying to take in a lot of emotional complexity that is just not me? It is also the circumstances in my life that are encouraging this thought. There is less grey areas for me. Less compromise. My life is very styled along just being in this kind of positive space and working things out from there. No complex relationships. 

The actual quote:

I wouldn't even encourage actually reading that quote. It's kind of messed up and so negative it is paranoia inducing. But it explains quite succinctly that understanding how a lot of fairly negative people function is simply a fools errand. It summarises that weak minded people are often kind of psychicly influenced to do negative things. I imagine these kind of negative things are stuff such as 'child violating'. 

It may be that fifth density positive people do actually require engagement with the negative in say, putting together strategies for dealing with narcissists or something like that. I don't think this is the case though. I think those that deal with a lot of difficult things which are more nuanced, are doing sixth density stuff, whereas the fifth is likely more about just separating or dealing with in other ways the negative. 

It's a hard insight to describe. Nevertheless, it feels like a good piece of wisdom at the moment. That there are a lot of things in life, that you don't think about, that you will never understand, that you put them in the "service to self" labelled box and carry on with your life!