I want to recount my recent experience on the subreddit about the Law of One. Just to outlet the energy really. But I have been quite interested in how things have worked out and it seems to me that it is somewhat holographic as to what goes on in society in general.
I am a TRUE believer in the Law of One. I have studied it since I was a teenager. I have blogged on it. it is a big part of just... Everything.
I have had various trysts on various forums as well. The pattern is similar on these forums as to how it works out because the people are not psychologically different from each other. They are NPC's.
For context, a thing of small relevance. There is a small different between when I am on caffeine/ chocolate. and when I am not. I think it is positive for my "spiritual evolution" to not be on it. But as I mentioned in my last blog currently I am on it.
When I am on it I have an easy going happiness. I have learned that I am just slightly less confrontational on it. I am just slightly more happy and am paying less attention to the other person. Just kind of broadcasting this happiness. When I go off it. I become more productive. That gritty energy gets directed towards actually doing spiritual practices like meditation and music, and I am more inclined to the gym.
This reflected in three of my recent posts. The subjects of these were 'How are you doing with session 32.1?' A general post on the tools the Law of One offers. Then I wrote a post about a passage in the Law of One saying sacrifice is necessary on the service to others path.
These were very much phrased in the friendly way of a guy eating chocolate regularly.
Then I wrote a post (so this is the fourth post) that changed the situation a bit. It changed my relationship to the forum in a subtle way I believed. I will go into why this is. But to just describe this post. I posted on how Carla had received an amazing compliment from the contact. I also posted, and this is the relevant part, about how I had reflected on how the different densities are expressed with Wanderers and how to spot these in people.
There are two points of relevance. One is what I just said about the densities of wanderers. The second is relevant to the subtle change in directness from the caffeine.
The next two I wrote were one; How does the law of One interact with your Christian faith since the Law of One seems to align with Christianity, and two; I reflected on a quote from the Law of One and hypothesized that this quote means that we do NOT send love to others who have not requested it.
There was a clear difference between how things went from the first three posts, in comparison to the last two posts. The first three were almost the same but not quite. I said that session 32.1. discouraged drug taking and there were a lot of people saying that they take drugs and don't plan to stop. That kind of thing.
However, the two last posts. These were both pointing directly at a change of behaviour if one wants to continue to identify with following the Law of One. They really hit a nerve. I quoted several passages where the Law of One had quoted the bible. But people, who obviously follow the Law of One and oppose Christianity DID NOT LIKE this perspective. This was fiercely pushed back on.
The last post. Where I talked about not sending visualised energy. it gave me real insight into what the problem was. Whereas all my output there, even in the comments, was often direct Law of One quotes. None of the people, NOT ONE in the comments quoted the Law of One. None of them quoted their own experience as I have at times when discussing this precisely. They all said basically the same thing: "No, I think it is absolutely fine to send love to other people". Something along those lines and then "don't overthink it". A sort of old person style passively saying: "I am better and more learned than you".
This, is intellectually lazy. It strikes me that the people in this forum are of mostly the same mindset. They generally want to be able to say "This here is the correct thing to think because it is my opinion"... and for no other reason. A very "normie" mindset.
Another thing, I said there were two elements in how these last two posts were received. In terms of comment count, there were a lot of comments. between 15-55 I think. For all but ONE post. That is the one where I talked about densities and noticing it within people. it feels strange as well how the posts were kind of fine and then there was just this subtle shift to more condescending. More passive aggressive.
I had not realised or consciously done it, I don't think about this kind of thing. But by stating I understood densities in that way I was making a play for a position of status within the Llresearch hierarchy. Within Llresearch, there is a hierarchy. Jim and other Llresearch peeps are the ones with the most knowledge and authority. If I say I understand something like that, it circumvents that authority. The best thing for them to do then is to ask me questions.
I knew it was somehow coming to a head. Shortly after I wrote the Christian post, which was the fifth not sixth post. I could feel that it would be coming to a head soon, and I thought I probably would be thrown off on the eclipse date precisely. The sun was already in gate 64. Which I think inspired the Christian post.
As a side note now. I want to focus on the kind of personality, the kind of perspective that these people have. The people on the other side of this.
I was surprised. I am never not surprised. By the amount of conformist thinkers on this subreddit. I mentioned Stefan Molyneux to xomeone and he was like "Oh that is a controversial person for me to look at" and the second time I mentioned it the person I was talking with did not like the post. Even though we seemed to be having a good chat and the post included other positive information.
There were also pro state people on there. Pro leftists. That predictably. Started an argument because I had one mention of Ayn Rand. Then played victim like they always do. I checked their profiles and their discussion points were things like how much they loved the vaccine and getting their fifth booster.
I think the moderators and people in general here. Were mediocre people. They also were women or beta males with a female perspective. You had me, who comes out with loads of ideas and such, loads of discussion and activity. But he argued with the pro leftist. (Not taking into account they started it!) So he is a meanie and should apologise to that feminist. Of course the feminist does NOT need to apologise. They never do. The left and women are always above reproach in this model, and everyone needs to serve them.
It is the same every single time. These are NPC's.
The issue come up with moderation though. There were two times I interacted with the moderators. Someone asked me a question on the density issue. I had seen on the forum that you need to ask permission before posting your own stuff so I was going to blog up the reasons I had for the density thing.
This is a position of power, if minor, the moderators hold. To write to them to ask to post your own stuff is to respect that power. But they chose to just ignore me. They didn't write back. Because they are scum.
It came to a head though with this last post. Late on the day of the eclipse. At about 22:30. I posted this about Grok Imagine:
Using videos from Grok Imagine as seeking reminders
Original Body
I originally used Grok Imagine to take photos of twitter and animate hot women. And any other photos I happened to have hanging about. Grok Imagine does do NSFW types of videos.
However, slowly, I had various ideas about videos that inspired a positive feeling or idea of seeking. There are a few different ones I have. There is one of a girl staring into a box of light which was like the little 'God boxes' that the Bajorans used to contact the Prophets in Star Trek DS9. Also, there is a nice picture of a harp on a seaside which is very like the quote about 'plucking the strings of the Creator'. If people are familiar with that.
This is one I did that reminded me of Carla. Bear in mind that I never met Carla and was never close so this can serve as a casual reminder to me about seeking, without bringing up strong associations and memories:
I don't know if this is interesting to people. But I just thought I would drop it here!
Knowing what NPC's think. What I suspect happened here is that the feminist/ beta male that saw this for moderation. Decided that the first few lines about me getting images of random women and putting it into Grok imagine was something I shouldn't be allowed to say.
Not that is wrong for any reason she can articulate. But that she just generally doesn't feel like I should be able to say it. Part of the TradCon game of excessively demonising male sexuality and giving women free reign. She probably thinks that women that post picture online should have full legal power over them and that the government should delete naked selfies from womens boyfriend when they are no longer with them.
It's always the same with NPC's.
But I'm not having that. On any forum that I am censored I will disappear and never be seen again. As happened with the last guy on "Philosophy of the Law of One". Who censored me for a subject that the law of One contact brought up first, before the questioner did, classifying it as transcient information.
Man these people are scum.
Part of where I think this meets a point in the everyday world. Part of the pattern I think this reflects. Is that in this situation .I have offered a lot of posts and energy and information to this forum. I have contributed something. Part of the reason that I contribute something is that I do not consider that I have all the answers. I am actively searching still to get things just right so I re- read the Law of One. It inspires me, and I comment on it.
But these people, as I have mentioned before. Their opinions come down as though from a god on up high. They say "This is the truth because it is my opinion". Not because it is in the text. So, in effect, they already have all the answers! So why the need for questions? They don't post on session 32.1. or Christianity or Sacrifice. Because they already have those answers.
Since I have stopped posting the forum has just died. There is one new post from a beginner saying he likes the material.
Because when these NPC's. That are always right about everything. Enter into a situation. They have an opinion on how things should be. But they do not contribute. They are not givers. So when someone else says something. They have an opinion on what that person should think. So their only contribution, is that when someone who actually contributes says something, is to criticise that person.
They are the self anointed gods from up high. What they want is to be recognised in their godliness. What they want is when someone contributes to a system. Someone intelligent and knowledgeable. That they come along and say "You shouldn't say that about women, apologise to Karen". The person does it, and they are thanked, as the reigning gods that they are!
But in reality what happens is that people that are alive and contribute, say something, are criticised, and do not have to put up with that. So they leave. Then these NPC losers sit in the empty room they have made, and tell themselves that they are indeed the gods they imagine themselves to be!
No comments:
Post a Comment