Wednesday, 9 August 2017
Disconnecting from big G.
Well, I have a lot to say.
But unfortunately not here, Google's persecuting of non liberal voices is too much for me. (I will sort out another blog and post that later today.)
I was just thinking about the difficulty of changing services to non google ones...
Firstly, I was looking at other blogs. Some of them have that annoying squared format which I do not really want, I like this format. Wordpress has some good things plus activism on net neutrality. But Wordpress's free blogging service has adverts... Will these be pop ups? Clearly that is a deal breaker. Hopefully the adverts will be fairly out of the way.
Secondly, email: Gmail has this wonderful service in that it separates social, promotions and your main inbox so you can ignore the other two. Gmail is also almost every sign in I have and is on my phone as well. It is unlikely I will completely disconnect from Gmail, it is more likely I will only use it scarcely and will have another email account if I can find a good one.
The other thing is search engines. Previously I used duck duck go and could not find news on a recent child trafficking set of arrests on it, I had to go to Google for that. Again, is the service that opposes Google any good?
Practically any of these services I might have to go back to Google for!
... and finally browser. My new computer did not come with Chrome and I have been happily not using it although Chrome is admittedly better on a lot of things.
So that's that. I have more to say, quite a bit more, but not on Google.
I'll see you later!
But unfortunately not here, Google's persecuting of non liberal voices is too much for me. (I will sort out another blog and post that later today.)
I was just thinking about the difficulty of changing services to non google ones...
Firstly, I was looking at other blogs. Some of them have that annoying squared format which I do not really want, I like this format. Wordpress has some good things plus activism on net neutrality. But Wordpress's free blogging service has adverts... Will these be pop ups? Clearly that is a deal breaker. Hopefully the adverts will be fairly out of the way.
Secondly, email: Gmail has this wonderful service in that it separates social, promotions and your main inbox so you can ignore the other two. Gmail is also almost every sign in I have and is on my phone as well. It is unlikely I will completely disconnect from Gmail, it is more likely I will only use it scarcely and will have another email account if I can find a good one.
The other thing is search engines. Previously I used duck duck go and could not find news on a recent child trafficking set of arrests on it, I had to go to Google for that. Again, is the service that opposes Google any good?
Practically any of these services I might have to go back to Google for!
... and finally browser. My new computer did not come with Chrome and I have been happily not using it although Chrome is admittedly better on a lot of things.
So that's that. I have more to say, quite a bit more, but not on Google.
I'll see you later!
Tuesday, 8 August 2017
Effects of the lunar eclipse/ Coding liberals.
I have gone to some lengths to be able to write this blog today, and when I am actually sitting down here I do not have a great deal to say!
However, let's have a go. Firstly, the lunar eclipse finished yesterday and there have been four events in four days for me personally:
A) A work do because someone has left.
B) A powerful dream related to my current progress
C) Meeting with a family member that was deeper than normal
D) Meeting with a close friend.
Two of these reflected an eclipse related movement, the other two did not, in that there was the metaphysical potential there but it did not happen.
a) My work do someone left which fits a closing cycle, and it became clear I have been noticed by some people I previously had considered probably did not notice me.
b) The dream was powerful but I could not follow it up. So it ended with instead of me being able to act on it only reflecting and feeling very bad about the reasons I could not follow up on this dream. I.e. worldly darkness. If I had have been able to and it had been successful my whole life would have changed and a lot would have been left behind in my understanding.
c) Meeting with a family member has lead to understanding on my father, which potentially ends an unspoken wall between us.
d) The close friend expressed that he did not want to talk about politics in even the milder disconnected sense of the word, plus has other personal tendencies of shutting things down. Although someone may think that this does reflect the end of a cycle in fact, shutting down communication and philosophical thought like this will only serve to make troublesome emotional trends longer.
I obviously need to set up a set of rules to relate online. I have found three types of leftist where the conversation ends predictably. (In fact I do not think I have met one outside this pattern):
What is also interesting about these three codes is that they require opposing responses. Code 3 types of individuals are often hard- ish people. Angry indviduals who will argue your every small point. Code 1 type of individuals are opposite to that. Rather than dogged arguing while not being sidetracked by their personal attacks they actually respond to the doggedness with the pathetic victim card.
With Code 1's perhaps it is easier to say reasonably nice things to allow them to save face, with Code 3's any sense of kindness will be met with aggression or the claim that their points are correct.
It is worth digging out these arguments I think to represent them by real conversations, because liberals will, because they emotionally prefer it, try and state that they do not exist. The other thing a liberal might do is to state, without evidence that right wing people are just as bad. I cannot see how that can be defended against but at least having the nasty or pathetic liberal conversations to hand to show they really exist makes a movement towards a proof of sorts. Also, it is not a relevant point if I say that I am not arguing with the right anyway, but to them it still is.
Another thing they do is tell you you are arrogant because the things you are saying 'cannot be questioned'. But if one person has done hundreds of hours of research and online communication and another has done none then that is the result you would expect. The online dictionary definition of arrogance is making claims or pretensions to superior importance or rights; overbearingly assuming; insolently proud. Accusations of arrogance have to, if they are correct (but when has a liberal ever cared about that?) be met with proof that the superior knowledge is a pretension or inaccurate claim. Not simply the natural result of a knowledge difference in a specific area.
An astrological book by one of the best authors there is (in my opinion of course); Liz Greene, explained how when a man was going to die one year and a bit more beforehand his children were letting go of him and his impact on their lives. With any large societal change I imagine that same trends would be apparent. Is it that those who resist the trend, those who are not emotionally easy going enough to explore emotions and as a result let certain things go... That will have a problem with this shift?
However, let's have a go. Firstly, the lunar eclipse finished yesterday and there have been four events in four days for me personally:
A) A work do because someone has left.
B) A powerful dream related to my current progress
C) Meeting with a family member that was deeper than normal
D) Meeting with a close friend.
Two of these reflected an eclipse related movement, the other two did not, in that there was the metaphysical potential there but it did not happen.
a) My work do someone left which fits a closing cycle, and it became clear I have been noticed by some people I previously had considered probably did not notice me.
b) The dream was powerful but I could not follow it up. So it ended with instead of me being able to act on it only reflecting and feeling very bad about the reasons I could not follow up on this dream. I.e. worldly darkness. If I had have been able to and it had been successful my whole life would have changed and a lot would have been left behind in my understanding.
c) Meeting with a family member has lead to understanding on my father, which potentially ends an unspoken wall between us.
d) The close friend expressed that he did not want to talk about politics in even the milder disconnected sense of the word, plus has other personal tendencies of shutting things down. Although someone may think that this does reflect the end of a cycle in fact, shutting down communication and philosophical thought like this will only serve to make troublesome emotional trends longer.
I obviously need to set up a set of rules to relate online. I have found three types of leftist where the conversation ends predictably. (In fact I do not think I have met one outside this pattern):
Code 1: People that try and assert an emotional reality over a factual one and are emotionally wounded when they lose.I remember three recent good examples of these sorts of behaviour. There are also other problems with online communication. If you talk on a public message board about people who you are having arguments with with whom the situation does actually blow over, or if you mention other usually hidden things in life, then the very permanent words on a chat board could potentially serve to harm the person stating them!
Code 2: People that will refuse to give a source because they have been actively lying and will simply ignore you and insist you are a troll to anyone who tries to interact with you.
Code 3: People that simply can’t accept new information and will offer a point, you respond to it, then they offer it again like a broken record
What is also interesting about these three codes is that they require opposing responses. Code 3 types of individuals are often hard- ish people. Angry indviduals who will argue your every small point. Code 1 type of individuals are opposite to that. Rather than dogged arguing while not being sidetracked by their personal attacks they actually respond to the doggedness with the pathetic victim card.
With Code 1's perhaps it is easier to say reasonably nice things to allow them to save face, with Code 3's any sense of kindness will be met with aggression or the claim that their points are correct.
It is worth digging out these arguments I think to represent them by real conversations, because liberals will, because they emotionally prefer it, try and state that they do not exist. The other thing a liberal might do is to state, without evidence that right wing people are just as bad. I cannot see how that can be defended against but at least having the nasty or pathetic liberal conversations to hand to show they really exist makes a movement towards a proof of sorts. Also, it is not a relevant point if I say that I am not arguing with the right anyway, but to them it still is.
Another thing they do is tell you you are arrogant because the things you are saying 'cannot be questioned'. But if one person has done hundreds of hours of research and online communication and another has done none then that is the result you would expect. The online dictionary definition of arrogance is making claims or pretensions to superior importance or rights; overbearingly assuming; insolently proud. Accusations of arrogance have to, if they are correct (but when has a liberal ever cared about that?) be met with proof that the superior knowledge is a pretension or inaccurate claim. Not simply the natural result of a knowledge difference in a specific area.
An astrological book by one of the best authors there is (in my opinion of course); Liz Greene, explained how when a man was going to die one year and a bit more beforehand his children were letting go of him and his impact on their lives. With any large societal change I imagine that same trends would be apparent. Is it that those who resist the trend, those who are not emotionally easy going enough to explore emotions and as a result let certain things go... That will have a problem with this shift?
I want to state clearly though that personally, I do not find that any of these problems are there in offline communication. Dealing with the emotions and reality of real people is not quite the same! Code 1 and code 3 are not so separated in real people.
Monday, 7 August 2017
Female vanity.
My we are living in strange times. I had so many high minded and philosophical thoughts late last night, all ready for quite a powerful blog. However, then I weighed my food, recorded my insulin level and woke up in the morning with very high bloodsugars (diabetic).
Thus, the anxiety broke my concentration.
That blog, that owes a great deal to the effect of todays eclipse, will probably be written at a later date. The information and emotions are still inside me but I cannot access them.
However I still have something to say.
Yesterday I showed Lauren Southern to a family friend and the effect was very good. Her main video is a message to young women, a video I would not normally watch. However, it contained an interesting fact in it... Women that have had more than ten sexual partners on their wedding day are NINETEEN times more likely to divorce than women who are virgins while for men, there is no statistical difference.
I think I can explain that, and very easily.
My experience of women that have slept around a lot is that they are simply not as nice as women that have not... Because they are vain (But only in relation to potential romantic relationships not otherwise). If you consider what sex actually indicates for a woman, they experience first hand that despite whatever doubts they may have about their attractiveness, (and even models have those) that there is no reason for them to doubt. That the men who are poking them very much desire them and the men are completely under the womans control.
This leads to a vanity on the womans behalf. This is the effect I get from such women. They simply expect you to bend your knee and worship them or fulfil some requirement that they have cooked up in their minds. They give absolutely nothing but they seem to be of the opinion from their implying that they have, or will, give something that they have given a great deal.
This sort of things must chip away at relationships. While women who do not have that history look directly at you and talk to you like a human being!... Radical!
Of course this expectation by such women will be fulfilled by the type of guy that wants to screw her and not much more! They have had the practice at that. While the guy who is not willing to sacrifice his self respect to grab her bits, possibly those that are more intelligent, and more likely to settle into a stable relationship, will not be bothered with this game.
An interesting sociological tidbit but not really ultimately meaningful in that it does not actually effect anything in the real world. Until some sort of karma is visited upon these women to derail that vanity, possibly in the form of them lying to themselves more and having that challenged by societal change. Nothing in this area will move forward.
Thus, the anxiety broke my concentration.
That blog, that owes a great deal to the effect of todays eclipse, will probably be written at a later date. The information and emotions are still inside me but I cannot access them.
However I still have something to say.
Yesterday I showed Lauren Southern to a family friend and the effect was very good. Her main video is a message to young women, a video I would not normally watch. However, it contained an interesting fact in it... Women that have had more than ten sexual partners on their wedding day are NINETEEN times more likely to divorce than women who are virgins while for men, there is no statistical difference.
I think I can explain that, and very easily.
My experience of women that have slept around a lot is that they are simply not as nice as women that have not... Because they are vain (But only in relation to potential romantic relationships not otherwise). If you consider what sex actually indicates for a woman, they experience first hand that despite whatever doubts they may have about their attractiveness, (and even models have those) that there is no reason for them to doubt. That the men who are poking them very much desire them and the men are completely under the womans control.
This leads to a vanity on the womans behalf. This is the effect I get from such women. They simply expect you to bend your knee and worship them or fulfil some requirement that they have cooked up in their minds. They give absolutely nothing but they seem to be of the opinion from their implying that they have, or will, give something that they have given a great deal.
This sort of things must chip away at relationships. While women who do not have that history look directly at you and talk to you like a human being!... Radical!
Of course this expectation by such women will be fulfilled by the type of guy that wants to screw her and not much more! They have had the practice at that. While the guy who is not willing to sacrifice his self respect to grab her bits, possibly those that are more intelligent, and more likely to settle into a stable relationship, will not be bothered with this game.
An interesting sociological tidbit but not really ultimately meaningful in that it does not actually effect anything in the real world. Until some sort of karma is visited upon these women to derail that vanity, possibly in the form of them lying to themselves more and having that challenged by societal change. Nothing in this area will move forward.
Sunday, 6 August 2017
Earthquake's and eclipses/ Other tidbits.
Hmmm. Yesterday I had not realised that the emotions I talked about in the first part of my blog would be broadcast over facebook!
I will be very careful about my first few words in the future.
Look at this:
Amazon: Great American Eclipse: Earth Quakes and Tsunami
Zerohedge has followed this up with an article of a quake that looks like it's soon to erupt!:
Zerohedge: 1400-Quake Swarm Prompts Question "If Yellowstone Erupted, What Would Be Left?"
There's something about that 1400 number!
Daily Express is reporting that Britain will pay "no more than £36 Billion"... Weird times. Speechless.
Stillness in the Storm is reporting a 1000 person sex trafficking bust that includes law enforcement and clergy.
So that's the general run down. Am not able to keep up with my reading of those articles until later though!
I will be very careful about my first few words in the future.
Look at this:
Amazon: Great American Eclipse: Earth Quakes and Tsunami
If the pattern of seismic activity seen in the Great Eclipses of 1999 and 2009 is repeated in the Great American Eclipse of 2017, then either one or a series of potential major quakes of magnitude 6 to a megathrust of magnitude 9 could happen a week to three months after the eclipse. A second wave of seismic episodes of the same potential magnitude could follow 8 to 18 months after the eclipse. Less frequent but no less damaging episodes of quakes and tsunamis could take place as late as 2 to 5 years after the moon’s shadow on 21 August 2017 had touched future epicenters inside these four seismically sensitive zones.No earth quakes in England in 1999 but still, I'm sure Mr Hogue's data withstands scrutiny!
Zerohedge has followed this up with an article of a quake that looks like it's soon to erupt!:
Zerohedge: 1400-Quake Swarm Prompts Question "If Yellowstone Erupted, What Would Be Left?"
There's something about that 1400 number!
Daily Express is reporting that Britain will pay "no more than £36 Billion"... Weird times. Speechless.
Stillness in the Storm is reporting a 1000 person sex trafficking bust that includes law enforcement and clergy.
So that's the general run down. Am not able to keep up with my reading of those articles until later though!
Saturday, 5 August 2017
Political change/ misrepresentation of women in society.
I feel personally, that the world, and my reality are cold, dark and not capable of improving!
Very dark feelings.
But then there's not much I can do about that is there? There is not much any of us can do about that. I do want to mention one thing though, the bad dream and feeling I complained about last blog/ earlier today could have been a 'download' so to speak. I feel as though there's too much information in my mind to hold and that will likely slowly unravel unravelled.
There have been, like I said earlier, important political developments. I mentioned yesterday about getting a 'gift from the creator' and these few things really do seem very much like they do effect the global game, and some that are just interesting anyway:
YouTube: Mandela Effect, Merging Timelines & Ancient Aliens from the Future - Corey Goode
I couldn't watch much past the Law of Attraction stuff about 45 min through the video. However, Corey almost never has updates since I've subscribed to him. He might have kicked it into gear along with some others that I'll get to, because of the coming eclipse. In this video he discusses how due to the Mandela effect we may have previously had things like nuclear strikes in America but none of us remember it.
Super weird stuff. But I can navigate through it comfortably with a set of theories that don't put me in a very good stead!
Anyway moving on:
When I got home from my work event the other day, David Wilcocks facebook:
And... Look, just LOOK at this:
Definitely in the stars that last one. Nigel and the Solar Eclipse!
However, here's what I want to talk about in this specific post, here is a point I want to make:
Here is a mainstream media article that summarises the sociological problem in how society views women... In my opinion of course:
I did do a little careful picking to get this article because the Daily Mail was, what I consider, fairly on the money here [link] and the Telegraph had the same message as Huffpost but said far more cleverly. Earlier on today when searching the subject the same kind of crappy article with the following reasons came up a few times, although I actually approved of the first part of the article that stated that women cheat as often as men but simply do not get caught as often:
From Why Women Cheat: 5 Reasons For Female Infidelity
Try this one for instance [link] or this [link]
OK, so the second one there is a bit 'storyfied' but it could be true. Here's another:
I'm guessing then since that last one was into porn, she does not fit anywhere into those five categories.
It seems to me that the reason a lot of women cheat is because... They want to, they are not particularly good people and don't have a commitment to ethics! Another one of those stories is where the woman got out of control drunk and her husband passed out so she slept with six guys on her wedding night. [link]
So why are these sorts of cases not represented in more mainstream articles? Because, if it is the case that it is somehow the mans fault that the relationship goes sour then men, if they can do everything "perfectly" are not getting a raw deal.
If on the other hand women are just cheating... Because they prefer to. Because the system of law is slanted in their favour so there are no consequences, then, well then what?
Well, if men are not getting anything out of society then there is no reason for them to commit to it! If society doesn't convince men to work and further convince them they are getting something back from it then it will not survive. If there are no consequences for women, but there ARE consequences for men for this sort of behaviour. Then do they want to pay tax to keep this system going?
I don't think they do.
Very dark feelings.
But then there's not much I can do about that is there? There is not much any of us can do about that. I do want to mention one thing though, the bad dream and feeling I complained about last blog/ earlier today could have been a 'download' so to speak. I feel as though there's too much information in my mind to hold and that will likely slowly unravel unravelled.
There have been, like I said earlier, important political developments. I mentioned yesterday about getting a 'gift from the creator' and these few things really do seem very much like they do effect the global game, and some that are just interesting anyway:
YouTube: Mandela Effect, Merging Timelines & Ancient Aliens from the Future - Corey Goode
I couldn't watch much past the Law of Attraction stuff about 45 min through the video. However, Corey almost never has updates since I've subscribed to him. He might have kicked it into gear along with some others that I'll get to, because of the coming eclipse. In this video he discusses how due to the Mandela effect we may have previously had things like nuclear strikes in America but none of us remember it.
Super weird stuff. But I can navigate through it comfortably with a set of theories that don't put me in a very good stead!
Anyway moving on:
When I got home from my work event the other day, David Wilcocks facebook:
- I am putting together an update to explain what has gone on in the last few months and why I didn't write any articles or release any new videos during that time.
In short, I needed to recover from 20 years of being in non-stop emergency mode... i.e. a workaholic -- and deal with a variety of things that were getting left behind.
As a result I have been through a very significant healing process and have gotten my inspiration back.
...I would still prefer not to be a public figure at all, but I will get back on the horse ASAP with a new update!
David is going to update soon as well, and he always has another perspective on things.
And... Look, just LOOK at this:
Definitely in the stars that last one. Nigel and the Solar Eclipse!
However, here's what I want to talk about in this specific post, here is a point I want to make:
Here is a mainstream media article that summarises the sociological problem in how society views women... In my opinion of course:
I did do a little careful picking to get this article because the Daily Mail was, what I consider, fairly on the money here [link] and the Telegraph had the same message as Huffpost but said far more cleverly. Earlier on today when searching the subject the same kind of crappy article with the following reasons came up a few times, although I actually approved of the first part of the article that stated that women cheat as often as men but simply do not get caught as often:
From Why Women Cheat: 5 Reasons For Female Infidelity
- She feels underappreciated, neglected, or ignored.
- She craves intimacy.
- She is bored and/or lonely.
- She never feels fully loved and appreciated.
- She has an intimacy disorder.
Try this one for instance [link] or this [link]
OK, so the second one there is a bit 'storyfied' but it could be true. Here's another:
I'm guessing then since that last one was into porn, she does not fit anywhere into those five categories.
It seems to me that the reason a lot of women cheat is because... They want to, they are not particularly good people and don't have a commitment to ethics! Another one of those stories is where the woman got out of control drunk and her husband passed out so she slept with six guys on her wedding night. [link]
So why are these sorts of cases not represented in more mainstream articles? Because, if it is the case that it is somehow the mans fault that the relationship goes sour then men, if they can do everything "perfectly" are not getting a raw deal.
If on the other hand women are just cheating... Because they prefer to. Because the system of law is slanted in their favour so there are no consequences, then, well then what?
Well, if men are not getting anything out of society then there is no reason for them to commit to it! If society doesn't convince men to work and further convince them they are getting something back from it then it will not survive. If there are no consequences for women, but there ARE consequences for men for this sort of behaviour. Then do they want to pay tax to keep this system going?
I don't think they do.
Damp squib again.
I had the most dreadful dream this morning. It has really lead me to be quite withdrawn today.
However, there is quite a lot of good news:
But I can't cover any of that yeesh. I might go back to bed.
Did very much intend to write a blog but there you go!
However, there is quite a lot of good news:
But I can't cover any of that yeesh. I might go back to bed.
Did very much intend to write a blog but there you go!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)