The material I am about to talk about is so profound it is something I am mindful not to discuss directly because there is a risk for violating free will.
But, the people that are following me, if there are any and it is not google algorithm fixing (as has happened previously with google blogs and viewcounts), The people that have followed me know they are getting some stuff of this kind of spiritual vibration. The constant processing of the human design chart and Law of One, so that might in some small way alleviate the pressure of assuring free will. Also, as I say every time I am quite the flawed individual in comparison to the Law of One channel, not nearly as "angelic" and with no authority. So that also pushes back against that issue.
The Law of One archetypes.
That what I am about to say is not more widely discussed and known is something that is quite the mystery to me. If people are in fact intent on learning things such as the human design. But in 1981, there was a powerful channeling system known as the Law of One. It was deeply theological and was an unconscious channel so more correct. It also had the same name that the founder of the human design changed his name to and was likely the same angelic source, so it stands to reason that things in the Law of One would explain things in the human design.
Alas no dice, no one is interested, except me. Perhaps this is my message!
Anyway, in the last book, where the Law of One system was left. Was that the highest thing that we can do to increase our spiritual progress is study archetypes and to do that one would use the tarot, astrology or Kaballah. The human design adds additional power to this by not only unifying those three systems but adding in far more depth and context, such as the I ching and bodygraph. Truly, it seems likely to me that if you are studying the human design properly, like having insights often, spiritual progress is not an option. You are going to progress.
Nevertheless, going back to the tarot, this is, I think, from memory, the hexagrams 35, 45 and 12; This is the significator of the mind:
Before the "veil" there were only three of each archetypes. The matrix, the potentiator and the significator. That is, the conscious mind, the subconscious mind, and this, the answer. There is too much to explain here. Now, after the veil, there are seven of the mind, and the significator is not even the end point. I won't go into any of the myriad of other sets of information that might apply here. I will only talk to the significator and how I think it is relevant to life.
Each of these cards, these bases of the tarot cards, has a lot of metaphor within it to talk about some aspect of life. I will talk vaguely in terms of what the Law of One said about the significator but it is a violation of free will to be too explicit about this I believe. There is reference in this card to Christianity, or at least a bases for some of Christianities beliefs (I.e. the system and knowledge before it became part of Chrisianity).
But, what it essentially means I believe is this, at least what I have taken from it: Before people find something that brings meaning to their lives (this could be religious or not), they will tend to persecute the things that are good in their life and be positively improved by the things that are negative.
Negative catalyst.
This is, uncomfortable, and it makes a huge amount of sense. It almost justifies a kind of quote unquote "psychopathic" approach and pushes back hard on any codependent tendencies. Bear in mind here that this is partly my interpretation. It only hints, it does not say in this card that this reversal tendency stops at all when a positive viewpoint is discovered.
But I think that, Christianity as an example encourages appreciation.
But this is what I think it might mean in practical terms. Amongst a lot of 'normies' in life that haven't discovered a coherent philosophical framework that brings a meaning to life. The natural tendency will be to respond more strongly to negative catalyst and to take advantage of, and respond negatively, to positive catalyst.
Examples abound but I won't go there.
It is also possibly true that amongst the normies, it is unpleasant negative experiences that improve them. If what we are doing here is attempting to grow in service to others polarity. That would make sense.
Letting go.
It solves a lot of real everyday problems. Have you ever had someone that you tried your best with, tried to care about but they just didn't really like or respect you? Eventually, you will separate from these people and potentially, they will go through difficult experiences as they meet the results of their own actions. We have all seen this behaviour.
In general, as someone that was once politically and conspiracy inclined, I used to experience quite a bit of upset over the fact that negative things in some manner are likely coming (market crashes and stuff) and people are utterly unprepared. They have not stood up and investigated the lies told to them.
This also is the case when it comes to finally telling people that you are not going to see them anymore when they have screwed you over. Of course, negative catalyst might not always be the thing. There comes a point where it traps people if there is no way out. But, to think of it like this I think is a little helpful. In the "unawakened" person with no moral framework, experiencing crappy things might be very good for them. While we can set boundaries in a sense for ourselves and perhaps go no contact, we do not want to be the ones providing the negative catalyst; and the world is only too happy to oblige in that space.
It's just something to think over. No contact, for me, in a lot of cases has been the only option. Perhaps because it is other people initiating it, even if not directly. The only thing likely, or the only thing that might, just might, change this, is an increase in wealth and status. Illness might prevent that.
But it is something to consider, something to think about, in our many interactions.
No comments:
Post a Comment