Session 61.9. Subjectivity.

Firstly starting off with a reflection on this Q and A from the Law of One:

Questioner: This brings out the point of the purpose for the physical incarnation, I believe. And that is to reach a conviction through your own thought processes as to a solution to problems and understandings in a totally unbiased or totally free situation with no proof at all or anything that you would consider proof, proof being a very poor word in itself. Can you expand on my concept?

Ra: I am Ra. Your opinion is an eloquent one although somewhat confused in its connections between the freedom expressed by subjective knowing and the freedom expressed by subjective acceptance. There is a significant distinction between the two.

This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other inpourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.

That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third density. 

Subject knowing versus subjective acceptance! 

This session and answer has definitely joined a few neurons in my brain. Provided a kind of answer to a very internal query. 

There is a bit of a trap that a person can find themselves in I think. When looking for truth. Weighing up a belief in a larger spiritual reality, which cannot be completely justified objectively. For instance, in the Law of One. 

The trap is, I think, that if you have to throw out objectivity to some extent. The tendency is to fall back on a subjective truth. The reality becomes that the subjective has larger meaning. Perhaps based on a religious or spiritual experience of some sort. 

But then subjective knowing and subjective acceptance are not distinguished between and I will do my best to explain what I think each does mean:

Subjective acceptance: This is something that I cannot justify why it is a virtue. But is talked about in the Law of One. Subjective acceptance is that our subjective experiences are accepted. So if we do have a spiritual experience that is purely subjective. We do not pretend it didn't happen. That this extends to accepting what is going on in our lives and what that would mean in general. So it kind of becomes objective eventually. 

Subjective knowing: Subjective information. Like let's say a lot of this information, such as talked about by the Law of One. Becomes kind of formalised, in New Age beliefs as an example. If we were to take the belief that life is a set of lessons that are planned by higher forces. Then we can impute that belief onto the real world. It can become dogmatic. 

This means that we really can be sure of very little. To restrict our experience to subjective acceptance, rather than subjective knowing that would seem to come from that.