A few fairly complex ideas to work through here. To begin with, I am going to show my chart without the side numbers. I have not planned out this article beyond a basic outline but I know that this is going to come up. So here it is:
Finding my footing in my spiritual beliefs.
Recently, I have talked about on my youtube a realisation while Uranus was transiting gate 8. That I had a certain not self behaviour in feeling or believing I was a 1-8 individual and acting like it in small ways. But as you see from my chart in fact I only have the 1.
This is all very complex things I am working on and is likely linked to my recent confusions and resultant clarity on my faith that is "lightly Christian". But as part of this, I have done a lot of introspection on people and the message of the G-self through to throat connections. And this is definitely one of those.
This is a chart of a person called Aaron Abke, who does teaching based upon his interpretation of the bible and Christianity. What Jesus originally meant and how that message has been twisted etc.
The relevance of the 1-8 is something that I wanted to point out but not more specifically focus on. The point being that Aaron Abke's ideas on Christianity is what I now follow and Aaron supports a very works based idea of Jesus' original teachings. Matthew 25:37 describes what Aaron sees as Jesus' message. That if you love God you must actually be loving in the real world and also, as a secondary point of relevance. Jesus did not ever say anything about insisting others believe in him or the resurrection. Those messages were all coming from people that came after Jesus often. When asked, Jesus gave two messages. Love god with all your heart and love your neighbour as yourself. No accept that Jesus has risen.
It is the message that I attempt to follow and find value in. With my last dog, I used to find that putting on a lead and actually walking with him just had more real world relevance than reading about the spiritual message of being loving.
This is what I have experienced over the past week. From Saturday through to Friday I was run off my feet with having to prepare the house for a new dog. I took Saturday off, thinking it was over. Then today had to do a bunch more stuff. I have reached a level of deep exhaustion. I did not eat very well over most of this time. I did not pray, meditate or play music; activities that usually give me energy. I tended to eat multiple chocolate bars to support my energy. Gained weight. Very often tidied or did other tasks from the moment I woke up. A few hours here and there some days to watch TV and get back to myself a bit. Some days bad sleep. Some days hardly any, like, three hours or so.
I felt pretty crap about this. Pretty resentful. But I realise. It is what I have asked for. If we want something then when it arrives I don't think it right to complain internally about how unfair it all is. I did stuff in the real world that leads in a loving direction.
Alex Hormozi's chart.
Stefan Molyneux, Carla Rueckert, Aaron Abke as mentioned and quite a few more, all have G- self to the throat connections. The message of these centres/ channels and how I differ from them is an insight and message that I am slowly learning how to understand and articulate.
It has come up here. I have been quite surprised by a change in my understanding of Alex Hormozi. This was the chart I originally had for him due to his currently listed birthday on a lot of websites:
So one of the reasons I mentioned Aaron Abke and the way I am attempting to understand and experience the world. Is that the process I am about to describe is all so completely abstract. It's a strange process. Most of astrology, most of the human design, is fundamentally subjective. It lacks objective measures that we can use for support. It does not seem to be able to be explained from first principles.
The point of all this information is to use it in the real world. So there is always a risk with the kind of thing I am talking about here. Taking one subjective set of understandings and finding fault in them, only to substitute another subjective set of understandings. It does lie on the barrier of mental health in my view. To apply too much weight to subjective understandings is to risk insanity. Literal insanity.
With that proviso I will continue though.
Even when I first ran this incorrect chart of Hormozi's, something just did not sit right with me. Interviews with Hormozi do not to me, reflect, the almost maddening, often semi theological understandings of the 64-47 channel as shown in this chart. Below is the chart of Stefan Molyneux:
This is the energy of the 64-47 for real. Also, as might be relevant on the individual stream, please notice that Stefan has the 14-2.
Nevertheless, I was convinced by the correctness of this chart. The video I will draw off for both of these Hormozi based examples is Youtube: Chris Williamson: 24 Harsh Truths about Distraction, Motivation and Focus - Alex Hormozi. Dated: August 26th 2024.
36:40:- That guy showed up, unannounced or whatever, and he said "Hey man, can we do a podcast?" And I was like; Um, I'm just in town, gonna hang out with Laila for the next few days, like, not really trying to do that". And he asked again, and he was like "Hey, it will be like 20 minutes, we can just rock one out" And I was like, well, let me show you my calendar, and I pulled out my calendar and it was all empty. And I said, "See, there's nothing on there, I just want to keep it that way". And, I didn't think anything of it. But, apparently, he left, and my friend just started just crying, laughing, just thinking how hilarious he's like; "I can't believe you said that, that was so boss," and I was like "What is he talking about?" He was like "You just showed him your calendar, you had like nothing and you were like, you're STILL not gonna get any of my time".
I realise that I have done an English literature no no here and used a full stop before an and several times. But that is just how he talks. He pauses and then starts a new sentence with "and".
The thing is with this, is it fits for me, quite precisely, the reality, as expressed by the 21-45 in the incorrect chart that I posted. It is a pure manifesting channel. My theory was that the 21-45 communicates very clearly, as per the will power. That you are over there and I am over here and you have to provide value for me to interact with you.
I (as a person with the 21-45) once had an experience very similar to this. I was walking down the street with a friend and was vaguely aware of a person bothering me. After my friend had told this other person I was not interested he was surprised that I was actually not listening to the individual that had been following me trying to talk to me. I wasn't pretending to ignore them, I was not listening. Who was some sort of charity worker I think. It is a similar thing to what Hormozi has described here.
I think this is a problem in general with something like the human design when we notice things like this. Even though Hormozi's incorrect chart did not feel right to me for reasons described. I found, what I think is convincing evidence it is correct, and if I had been inclined might make a whole set of theories about that.
Alex Hormozi's real chart.
Credit to this goes to a woman who teaches the Human Design called Kelsey Crookshanks. Who snipped for ma a facebook post from Hormozi where he discusses his real age. This is likely his real chart, this is a better guess based on current knowledge:
It feels a relief to look at this chart. But what is that emotion really? Am I really refining a kind of intuitive emotion with these things? Something completely lacking in any objectivity.
Anyway, so here is the man himself. As mentioned previously, I have some thoughts and experience around G-self to the throat channels. So perhaps I can capture how this is working in Alex's life.
Firstly, as we saw with Stefan Molyneux. Who has the 14-2 and the 8-1. Which is a sacral going through the G- self to the throat. We can see a similar drive, success, and that the sacral energy is being plugged through an entire set of values.
Unlike Stefan however, in correlation with Ra Uru Hu and Aaron Abke, we see the 10-20 going from the G-self to the throat, and I think this channel often wants to communicate in a way that isn't excessively meaningful, or morals based. It wants to get down to the basics, the mechanics. Like Aarons explanation of biblical quotes.
The individual channel going from 14-2 does tend to be entrepeneurial. I have yet to meet a person with the gate 14 who doesn't stack resources. Even if they have pretty much no other redeeming qualities. That individual stream starts with resources and goes into taking those resources and creating a message.
I have also noticed in the human design that parts in the stream talk about the same story even if hexagrams are missing. For instance, I have the gate 58 and the gate 48. I am missing the gate 18. Nevertheless, even without gate 18 things that happen in gate 58 reflect strongly in the themes of the gate 48. The gate 18 still exists and the collective fills in the story.
Connecting it to a speech.
Anyway, about five minutes later in that same video, we get to this:
45:13:... and so, I think, all of it comes down to when you change yourself, you will change the world, because you'll change how you see it.
46:15:... So if I say, is there a version of yourself that is better than you are right now? Most people, hopefully, would say yes. It's like right, accept THAT person. And I think that, to me, when we talk about the authenticity, accepting yourself is accepting the ideal we can live up to.
So, connecting this to Alex's chart. We can see that this is your classic G- self to Throat kind of theme. The kind of things Stefan talks about and Carla channels. It seems to me no coincidence that this channel (either 8-1 or G-self to the throat generally) shows up very often in some of the people whose destiny has very strongly given them a wisdom based platform. That they express to others something about the way the world works. It is this channel that wants to be understood and expressed.
The higher forces decided that the love theme going through the new age and psychology community was not enough. We need it everywhere so we want this bro's bro businessman saying it as well.
Conclusion:
This has been a long post with a lot of energy expenditure. As though I had some powerful message to communicate and for the life of me, I don't know what that is.
I must have been wrong about the 21-45 or perhaps Alex was expressing something of that theme even though it was not in his chart for some reason (transit, or synastry from someone involved perhaps?) Donald Trump, Tom Cruise and Al Pacino are the first people that come to mind with the 21-45 but none of them have a particular theme linking how they express themselves as far as I can see. I suppose they are vaguely intimidating. It is not clear that ignoring people and transactional relationships is in fact the 21-45. Perhaps I am just weird.