When the curtain comes down.

I went on twitter today, and have decided to not log onto twitter for a while. There were so many posts about recent Epstein file and related information, that I thought I'd take a break. 

I need to go through a bit of personal history to explain how I see this recently. But it is under the paradigm (another word doesn't fit!) of attempting to follow the teachings of the Law of One. So because I think the Law of One is important, I am going to explain it best I can, even if it goes through boring territory. 

When I was somewhere between 15 and 25. I first studied the Law of One. I did not apply much of it. I thought through a lot of things like trying to solve a puzzle and I suppose it did lead me to a whole lot more "service to others" things than I would otherwise have done. But I did not apply all of it. A lot of it I just kind of memorised and didn't really used. This is not an uncommon occurence, I don't think. With how people experience various insights and teachings. 

One of the teachings I did not apply was the Law of One's perspective on 'transcient' information. I do not have an understanding of this teaching directly from the text. But, I have been slowly working through its relevance. Like, when I was still paying close attention to conspiracy information. When I would stop, I would have insights into my psychology and stuff. My normal process. 

After my "schizophrenic break" at 27. I was not able to meditate and was disinclined from spirituality in a way I had not been before. In fact, I deliberately did bad stuff to suppress the madness within. Conspiracy was that. 

During my kind of worship of David Wilcock, as I see it now. And my obsession with conspiracy theory. I also had a lot of anger towards leftists around me. I was an annoying schizophrenic truther. I did keep myself to myself a great deal. I still believed in the Free Will. But, I felt passionately about these things and wanted others to come around to my views. So I would discuss right wing politics and do things like read the Qur'an and talk to people about that. The Islam angle is a bigger part of conspiracy information in the UK. 

It was at this point, where what is going on in the world at the moment would have been amazing to me. It would have been what I really wanted. I did not only want the truth to be revealed. But the people surrounding me to be forced to acknowledge it. So that I would not be the mad person that believes in QAnon, but would actually be right about these things and also, so that what would logically follow. Mass arrests and a golden age of humanity, would also follow. 

On top of basic information I also had absorbed a great deal of Pizzagate type of stuff. The full horror aspect that I won't go into here. I thought that this horror being exposed to generally left wing centrist people that refused any of this was a kind of karma. 

This is the main emotional point I wanted to bring up here. Since there are probably people freshly awakening that are experiencing this. And are pushing forward the Epstein information due to this. I was never able to get any official information to back up my perspective. It was a different time. 

However, my life and my perspective changed. Bear in mind that I have been pretty much "awake" since I was 14. In investigating my medical condition, I realised they were not seriously trying to cure it. 

Come COVID lockdown, and the energy of conspiracy was winding down. Friends and family wrote me angry letters and said they were not seeing me again due to right wing viewpoints. Or just ghosted me. But I discovered dream interpretation. Which was always the solution against the schizophrenic stuff. I was able to meditate again and started praying and such. My "Christian path" so to speak. Was maturing. 

But as I have gone through all this. Years of looking at the conspiracy stuff in detail. Several elements are relevant. I have looked closely at it and having been interested in it, got to the point where it is less interesting. Things are more interesting when you first look at them. I have thought through the whole thing from a spiritual or philosophical perspective. Emotionally, it is hard to not try and incorporate a lot of very dark information into my world view. As an example, times when prayer has not worked for people. 

Most recently though. Now that I am properly reading the Law of One, and properly meditating. My meditations are an experience all of their own. It allows me to truly not be interested in that conspiracy stuff. I have experienced it. I have looked at it in the past. I experience it as disturbing the positive state I am in when I meditate and such. 

There is a deceptive belief I have observed. That somehow, by not looking at stuff, you are not honouring the victims or something like that. That they had to experience all that, and you are not even going to read about it. 

But, that is not relevant. I always wanted to be able to genuinely, emotionally experience a lack of interest in transcient types of information. Now we are here, now it seems like things are starting to actually move. This is exactly what I am experiencing. 

It would be an interesting twist of fate if everyone else starts getting interested in this now; and all I wanted to do was meditate and play music.  

Reflections on negative philosophy

Oh man, plumbing problem. So a few days away from blogging or even thinking of these things. No meditation.

I am just rebuilding myself a little after life chaos. Like, eating properly and stuff. But one of the things I did to chill recently. Is started a fight on reddit.

It was on a male, and probably older male focused subreddit. But I engaged in a philosophical discussion about determinism. It was a good enough subforum for me to passionately state my case, without being haranged and banned. They could handle conflict.

It started indirectly. I responded to something someone said and then got the idea to challenge the forum from what I have understood of Stefan Molyneux's understandings of determinism. 

But I learnt something I think. Or I observed something that I think illustrates an important point. 

I also, when looking for this material, went through my notes on Stefan Molyneux. I found them unbelievably profound and, for whatever reason. While I have retained a good deal of what he talks about. There is a lot I also haven't seemed to retain. A lot of things I read from my notes were as though I was reading for the first time. 

Anyway, Stefan Molyneux's argument against determinism. Not his full argument. Because he has many hours on it. But his argument from a podcast that was, 5682 "Determinism murders virtue". But just that podcast that I have already listened to makes several interesting cases. And it became my material to argue against the group of people I was arguing against, who were HEAVILY pro determinism. 

It is a good, intuitive argument, I think. But still, one pattern emerged. My understanding of determinism is that it is a philosophy that strips moral agency from people, by putting down the idea of free will. So an example from Stefans podcast, which none on that forum argued against, is that if a person is a determinist. They might believe that because their father beat them. They are destined to beat their child. That we have no free will. So this is just how it is.  

From this perspective, I am defining determinism as a fairly negative philosophy. Since the Law of One defines free will as the most important law of the Universe. We can say at least that it is categorically confused. 

So in examining this fairly negative philosophy. A few interesting patterns came up. It is also interesting as to how to handle negativity in general. 

Going back to Saint Francis of Assissi's definition. That negativity is a lack. It is a void. A few experiences I have had have made me think about that. So what happens when you confront negativity I think is that you attach, a person ideally attaches. Not to the negativity itself. Not to the substance of the determinists argument. Of which there is no substance. But to the more positive things that indirectly connect to it.

What did Stefan talk about? He talked about the intuitive change a person would experience if they thought they were speaking to a real person (I.e. the free will person) Or an AI (A being without free will). He talked about technical arguments. "Why would you do x if there was no y?" The flaw and bad faith in the argument that everyone is powerless relative to Omniscience.  He ends it on the description of the malevolence of the idea in relation to moral reasoning. 

But these are mostly things that don't actually reference the idea. But reference the natural positive instinct that people have that show that the idea is ridiculous or damaging. 

A lot of the examples I got back were kind of slimey. What people with bad theories often do is they simply try to represent their ideas well, by using generally positive terms and not defining said terms. There was not a lot of consistency in the response. Some people seemed to be using over intellectualised language. Which I thought through and challenged. 

People just tried to endlessly redefine what Determinism was. One time someone clearly said that we are compelled by our survival instincts. So everything is determinism and there is no free will. I said that there are people that commit to things such as feminism, and decide not to have kids. There are deliberate martyrs. 

The guy then said that this was no proof against determinism. So I said then that it is an unfalsifiable belief and was more of a "faith". There were a few attempts to define it as a kind of theological belief. So the goalposts shift. 

I can't expect a reddit subforum to properly articulate a high level philosophical belief. But I don't know that this is one. The Law of One subforum, with some notable exceptions. Had very little conception of what the Law of One actually said, and often made posts wildly diverging from it. I doubt a few of them had even read the Law of One. 

But, the emotional core of the argument. The motivation of why a lot of people pursue it, can be explored. Because it will be revealed under this kind of conflict. A few people started saying "Well, what do you think about free will". The argument is, semi obviously from the forum. Not so much a love of determinism. But a hatred of free will.  

So the points made were partially things like "If the belief is a rejection of another things, like Santa Claus or God, you don't need to justify it, so lack of a null hypothesis doesn't invalidate it."

The deep point of this forum is simply the refusal to believe in free will. Any point made against them meant that the definition of determinism shifted, to avoid being targeted. Because the thing that is fundamentally true and didn't shift. Is the idea of free will, that was being opposed. 

This is why the negative is so chameleon like. Because they are defining themselves against something, rather than for something. Which kind of puts them in the middle of "nothing", in a way. 

Which is why their belief cannot really be tackled head on. The Law of Free Will itself means that there are certain things that we cannot make others accept. To me, that says that for certain concepts. Proof will never be perfect.  

So how to handle this? In truth I believe these concepts CANNOT be opposed. I doubt very much whether what I have said on that forum has made an impact. It might have. But if and when it does, it will probably be in relation to other life events. 

I have often wondered to myself why the world is so bereft of supernatural events. In line with the Law of One. I do not accept that matter simply never responds like that. But I do see an incredible advantage in terms of polarity and spiritual laws, if all our conflict is restricted to the physical. To the real world, and the movement of resources. 

Theoretically, if what I have been saying is correct. If determinism is a really unpleasant ideology that paralyses the person. The pain for the people following it will come when they apply these ideas in the real world, and somehow, somewhere, someone pushes against them. It is how I think the world will work at other times. If someone I know disliked me for political reasons. If those were suddenly removed. The political reasons would be no excuse. Only their behaviour would be left. And they would have to justify it in other ways. 

Meditation: -> The funnel.

A second day of the same kind of meditation as yesterday. Completely mentally involved for half and hour and two days in a row means that I can repeat the process. That this is simply my new method of meditating. 

I am putting forward a tentative theory, as to a benefit of meditation. The Law of One talked about meditation in relation to processing. That if we hear and absorb information. If we don't meditate, then we don't process it. 

While meditating today I got a result. The result was that I became deeply aware, as a feeling, of one of the truths that I have heard again and again from social media and youtube videos. One of the truths that opposed my early childhood conditioning. Where we set up the general background emotional commitment to "how things are". 

As we grow older though, those things are less easy to change. So meditating creates this zone where that information finally slips deeper into our being. 

This direction also is on the way to answering a question I have constantly asked myself about real life. 

But another thing that seems relevant to me is that it is kind of like this:

What this shows, in my very crappy illustration. Is that deep inside us is this system I think. Each shape here represents a section of stuck beliefs/ feelings/ thoughts that blocks our general life force and experience. (The red life is our life force that becomes unobstructed as these things are solved!)

Meditation just detonates these, and the way it does so is that the various wisdom we have absorbed are actually applied to our emotions and thoughts. Often, the reason we have found this information is so that we can use it. Something we subconsciously know. 

Meditation though, is a tool. It is not the answer. Meditation will bring me these powerful insights and it solves my ... "psychological difficulties" for want of a better term. But there is no work put in to do meditation. I have done it for many years so there is that. I have probably trained myself physiologically to be very open to it and trained myself in the kind of faith and thinking through sources like the Law of One. But it does not provide anything in the real physical world

I am very excited about long term positive results of this practice. I feel I am deeply learning each time I do it.  

To meditate is to be.

A very self centered post but you will realise from reading this is because I am unusually happy with a recent success... 

Well, success, and I mean BIG success. Success that felt a bit like a drug high. That I think might have come close to 'contact' in a sense (In the Law of One, the contact talked a bit about how they valued the subtle connections we have with the spirits in our daily lives, even as much as a full on ET contact). 

Anyway, since I am praying regularly, things are good. (Gotta keep on top of that). I have also been trying to keep up with meditation. I tell myself that doing daily meditation is not the point, since I will not be able to do it one day. But I can pray every day. So my energy can be focused on the prayer, rather than the meditation per sey.

But I digress. 

I got my meditation together. I set up a few minutes, ahead of the meditation, to get things in order. I actually read the bible in this time, and I have a suspicion that my path will grow more in that direction as things continue. I will become more devout. But as yet, only a suspicion. Daily reading the Law of One is a big thing at the moment. 

Anyway, after this preparation. My meditation was deep. I mean DEEP. I have started to appreciate my earlier years of not having much of a life, being ill, and a bit of a 'loser' in the shallowest sense. Because it did allow me to meditate a lot. I value that now. 

So, what did I experience? I can't fully describe it. It was better than most of what I have experienced in life so far. It was a strange synergy of every little bit of information I have gained from the Law of One. My understanding of the spiritual reality. How it relates to real life. The realest of life. All combined with active insights. 

It was beautiful. It gave so much clarity. It was like when you suddenly gain a new perspective and you realise something that you thought was important, is not actually important. The insights are continuing but in a far more grounded and subtle way. It's just clarity really.

It is perfect.  

I have quite a lot to say that I can't articulate. Or that I suppose I could if I tried. But it also doesn't seem that important. 

I suppose I wondered if this blog, I would spontaneously come out with more profound stuff. I often come out with points I don't expect while writing these blogs. But it hasn't actually. I will leave it up though. Because at the very least. If there are other spiritual seekers out there. Another reminder to meditate (The Q'uo readings basically say that every reading!) Might be good. 

The Primacy of Prayer.

Very very often I have thought to myself. In my general rotation of the different tools that I use. Is there one that I can use, that if I used it every single day, would have the effect of improving my life. 

Meditation? Looking at the human design transits? Playing Music? Refraining from masturbation? Reading the Law of One?

But I think, finally. I have found what that thing may be.... Prayer. Making sure that I set an alarm to do two main prayers a day, and saying an additional set of prayers from a book at night. 

As might be obvious if someone were to read the last few weeks of this blog. I am reading through the Law of One again. Many of these blogs produce quotes that were sequential from the one before. So one from 48, 50, 53 etc. 

I had an unpleasant experience the other day. One that could have easily escalated in an unpleasant direction. I felt that it would go wrong a few moments before it did in a similar way to how it did (we can call this situation A). There was just an unpleasant vibe in the air. I was wondering, in general, as to the point of things and it was in fact a non positive coincidence that lead to the situation. In a way it was pointless. 

I have found a very strong correlation, impossibly strong. When I pray. Things kind of go OK. When I pray for a while they go so OK that I stop praying because it is not obvious that it is doing anything. But when I stop. I will just get some sort of nasty coincidence. Things will just start to go wrong in some way. When I was actually making a philosophy out of NOT praying a few days ago. A set of posts I may have deleted deciding it was not useful or correct. I got a health issue from a minor lack of judgement that put me out for four days and created a lot of discomfort. 

For me, the protective value of prayer is not in doubt. Even though I am still wrestling with a skeptical side to my nature. So I have reflected on what the value might be even if there was no larger positive entities not interacting with us. The take away is that doing prayer is very positive. It is this that I hope to do, day after day, and to look back on my life and see positive results. 

I said, in reference to 'scenario A', that it was unpleasant, could have gone far more wrong and was kind of pointless. In the Law of One, session 68, the three of talking to and transcribing the contact. Found that they were in real danger of being negatively infringed upon. It feels similar to my situation at the moment, albeit in a less important way. 

I also want to make another point here about the Law of One, this also from session 68:

Questioner: Then you are saying that if this fifth-density negative entity is successful in its attempts to transfer the mind/body/spirit complex when that complex is in what we call the trance state to negatively polarized time/space, then the higher self has no choice but to allow incarnation in negatively polarized space/time? Is that correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The Higher Self could allow the mind/body/spirit complex to remain in time/space. However, it is unlikely that the Higher Self would do so indefinitely due to its distortion towards the belief that the function of the mind/body/spirit complex is to experience and learn from other-selves thus experiencing the Creator. A highly polarized positive mind/body/spirit complex surrounded by negative portions of space/time will experience only darkness, for like the magnet, there is no, shall we say, likeness. Thus a barrier is automatically formed.

What is interesting here to me is that even though, the Law of One contact is talking about opposing entities of a kind of galactic level evil. That this also applies to the most basic every day situations we get with even mildly annoying people. "Thus a barrier is automatically formed". Is a principle that is relevant to our daily lives. 

Anyway. The reason that prayer is THE thing, I believe. Is that meditation is very liable to be stopped by illness or life chaos and once you don't do something only one day. The momentum is broken. Last week I had a few days where I was stressed about something and didn't sleep. The next few days I slept for about twelve hours each day. When you sleep for twelve hours and you are not necessarily expecting it. Like, you fall to sleep at 18:00, and you have other things going on. Then you don't have time to meditate. 

We'll see how it goes. But hopefully, this is the thing! 

Reflections on my schizophrenic break.

In 2014 I had a severe schizophrenic break. One which had real world consequences. 

With all the insights I am currently having. I am starting to get to a place where I have insight into this. Not only the situation itself, but the situations that followed it. 

I have annoyed a great deal of friends and family through being fairly focused on right wing talking points. It seems to me though that the right wing talking points were a desperate inner attempt at gaining some sort of objectivity, from not having it in my previous understandings. Combining mild left wing leanings and spiritual teachings like the Law of One. 

However, there was also the lack of strength in my spiritual beliefs. I had read through the Law of One. But the Law of One is a set of deeply powerful spiritual concepts. When life happens, it is easy to let some half imagined, abstract idea come in and mess with an understanding. The Law of One's understanding are refined and powerful, so when you are kind of in the 'flow' of life. Those understandings becoming confused, can be quite catastrophic. 

I talked two blogs ago about sending love and light to people in general. My previous thought process had started to think of this as a very bad thing to do. In fact, this was a distinct part of my paranoia. That if I did send any kind of love or positive feeling, it would have extremely negative consequences. 

Later on in my life, things that I am reflecting now. In relating to certain individuals where I did not feel they were necessarily that positive. I am starting to realise that having come away from this tactic was not positive at that time either. 

Bringing us to this specific quote from the Law of One:

Questioner: Thank you. In closing that part of the discussion I would just say that if there is anything that we can do that is within our ability— and I understand that there are many things such as the ones that you just mentioned that are not within our ability— that we could do for this particular entity, if you would in the future communicate its requests to us we will at least consider them because we would like to serve in every respect. Is this agreeable to you?

Ra: I am Ra. We perceive that we have not been able to clarify your service versus its desire for service. You need, in our humble opinion, to look at the humor of the situation and relinquish your desire to serve where no service is requested. The magnet will attract or repel. Glory in the strength of your polarization and allow others of opposite polarity to similarly do so, seeing the great humor of this polarity and its complications in view of the unification in sixth density of these two paths.

At the very base of it, this is something that I should have been aware of a long time ago. To 'relinquish your desire to serve where no service is requested', (a line to reread when it is hard to remember). From having first learned about the Law of One, having had the energy to kind of improve me. It seems obvious to me that in order to remain sane and strong to the principles relevant to it. It was important, and is important, to re-read the books and make sure that the information is strong in a sense. Not modifiable by passing thoughts and fancies. 

This line from the Law of One also clarifies for me something that I have thought about and written about before. 

Stefan Molyneux: "Love is our involuntary response to virtue if we are virtuous".

I have still been thinking about this. It is clarified a little by another quote by him: "Reason, leads to virtue, leads to happiness".

To understand this. I imagine two people. Two women. One is right wing in a sense. Has her own viewpoints. Settled down early with a husband she loves with a couple of rug rats. Has a good relationship with her family and such. Supports things like perhaps Christianity, and literature like Charles Dickens.

The second woman is a leftist. A real leftist. Believes in climate change/ feminism, and is all sorts of insane. Leftists have a passionate hate for right wing people in general. Tend to believe and act on things like the positivity of the independent woman and hook up culture. Tends to hate men. Tends to hang around with people that take all kinds of drugs. Not interested in a long term relationship. Slept with a lot of very high status men she hoped would want her for more than a hook up. 

Life is not as simple as this. These are stereotypes and caricatures. In actual fact often right wing/ Christian women, even if they are traditional, can be quite controlling since they now have to do a lot to keep up their status. But on a basic level. One of these people seems like she would be nice to hang around. The second one does not seem like she is nice to hang around. Talking to a woman who mostly is concerned with looking after kids and has awareness of powerful literature. Would be positive and a relief. The second sounds like endless unproductive drama. Like a real headache, that will probably not want to deal with you anyway if you have anything other than left wing cult like beliefs. 

This makes sense as to the 'love is our involuntary response to virtue if we are virtuous'. This feeling is involuntary. You don't have to work to prefer to deal with the first one.  

And this is what might be meant by "The magnet will attract or repel".  

Sending love/ The Characterisation of Villainy.

In this blog I will include casual spoilers of The Mentalist, Person of Interest and Breaking Bad. Not real spoilers. Not like "This is the identity of Red John". But, "this is how it was emotionally with Red Johns accomplice".

Firstly though, just a personal note. I wrote two blogs ago about reading session 67 of the Law of One and, in my interpretation of the material, the idea that sending 'love and light' to people in general IS a correct thing to do.

There is actually quite a lot going into this, it became something I really thought over a few years ago. I have had quite powerful insights into how I originally got a schizophrenic break. I think insights into this could be a very positive thing to communicate in the future.

Right now though, the good thing is... "Sending love to people". I believed I should not do this previously, so I have reversed this. I am doing it with both people I have known personally and organisations and such. Not always with a clear cut agenda. Like, I believe the Law of One said that sending love to negative entities harms them in a sense. Reference sessions 25 and possibly 67. I also believe it is likely that sending positive energy to people you do get along with is mostly positive. Although, in some cases I explicitly don't do so. I think if you have an open, loving, normal relationship with someone. Artifically sending "love" is not necessarily a good thing. 

Results, are few, and internal. But good. The main positive one. I mentioned on my original post how my ability to create music has kind of taken a nose dive in the past few years. In a strong way, said musical 'flow' returned. Not in making new music, but in playing old. It is true indeed I believe, that in order to connect with certain half finished previous songs. Sending love and light IS important. 

I do feel that it is a big thing, a big insight I have had and I am expecting ongoing positive things. I just want to quote this first to explain one of the things I don't think is right about 'sending love':

This woman talks a lot, directly opposing the non violence beliefs of Christianity and any other single thing that is non violent. She seems very high IQ. She provides a very good counterweight to articulate opposing arguments to the validity of certain spiritual ideas, I think. 

I've thought through her opinions at various times, internally, as I go through my various experiences in relation to spirituality. 

But, I want to oppose this one here. Sending love and light to a person does NOT, in my view, mean that you see them as more positive than you did before. Or that you would be less equipped to deal with conflict with them (in my case this is emotional conflict).

In general. When sending love and light to others. I get insights in general into my connections with them. This is simple things, but powerful things. Things such as: 'Oh, of course this person would have this perspective on the situation'. In a sense, I find that I am more able to let them go with these insights. It is folly to assume a certain thing will definitely cause a certain result. Sending love and light to someone does not automatically mean that I wish to never harm a hair on their head (perhaps this is the case with women and a more maternal love!) It might be shortened in a sense to 'attention'. And giving attention to something tends to reveal its truth. Rather than dictate a certain direction. 

I seriously think that this mental change for me will create real life changes as time goes on. The music insight alone is extremely powerful!

Anyway, onto our next subject here. This might not be relevant but I'm just posting it since it got to me a bit:

 

I made an article angry at this but then deleted it. '10 days' is a significant date in the Q communities and people were retweeting this. The Q communities are very used to false starts and disappointments. But they still will give it another weak shot. It's kind of annoying in a sense because a lot of people are suffering and holding out hope. 

Donald Trump had a statement today, and this man, Stephen Miller, was part of that statement. Was it of groundbreaking importance? I don't know, time will tell. It is not significant in the same way a mass arrest of Democrats including the Clintons would be significant. But it might still be significant.

Stephens announcement was that he has found corruption and lies within the reporting of crime statistics in Washington D.C. For me, I have always thought the mechanisms of gaining statistics is one of the best manipulation tactics of our politicians and neo liberal elite. If you don't know what a problem is, you can't address it. It was not crime statistics specifically that made me catch onto this. 

The characterisation of villainy.

The mentalist: 

I've been thinking, in general recently, as I watch a LOT of TV. (Being unemployed and of ill health). About the way these shows characterise negativity in general. Sort of like, crime or evil. 

In the Mentalist. a cop show but focused on a protagonist that uses mental tricks to solve crimes. The show focuses, for FAR too long in my view. On chasing a serial killer who has started off a kind of cult and has a lot of supporters. Hidden supporters. 

In almost all of the episodes of this show where a supporter is caught, they turn out to be the most mundane person that you could imagine. A therapist, a policeman, some guy on the board of a charity or something. The character will be all normal, and then when they are cornered completely shift: "I serve Red John". 

It makes me wonder about the nature of evil. I would expect a certain 'eliteness' to malevolence. But truly, is this the case? Anyone you talk to who has worked with victims of severe physical abuse, will tell you that it is quite common, and quite severe. People all over the world are going home and beating their kids half to death. Child trafficking is a big problem in the west. 

If that is the case, if it is not just 'the elite' doing these things, if the numbers are large, many of us could have interacted with some truly evil people, unawares. 

Though, it is not in that same style. It is not people that get a glaze over their eyes and start telling you about something as evil, and unambiguous, as their worship of a serial killer. 

One thing that springs to mind is the sudden aggressive physical opposition of ICE even when they are attempting to deport, sometimes, people that have violated children. But in a lot of cases serious criminals. It is difficult to strongly connect people with left wing beliefs from the genocidal chaos that is leftism as it gets more pure. A lot of left wing policies, if you try and communicate them to others, you won't be believed. Even their own supporters don't understand these things. 

But the pattern is kind of there all the same. The AWFUL's being arrested by ICE are the most normal people that you would hope to meet! 

Breaking Bad:

The world of criminality, is one that I do not have any experience of. I wonder sometimes how much I am being educated about real criminality when I watch these shows. How much is just completely incorrect and made up. Breaking Bad, when I watched it, really gave me a feel I was looking into some very educated information about how said criminal world works. 

A lot of inside information about how to make Meth. In one scene Jessie, who has experience in the criminal underworld, says to Walter: "Why are we here? This is like a non drug dealers idea of where a drug deal should be. We should have gone to the mall". Then when the drug dealer they are dealing with meets them he says "Why are we out here homie? Was the mall closed?"

Person of Interest;

A new gem I have found. I don't think it is as popular as the previous two. I am not that far through it. But so far it is a professional show. 

In Person of Interest, there is a group of corrupt cops. The reasoning behind one of the senior members makes a great deal of sense. He said that he liked one of the new up and coming criminals because he "keeps a low profile and he greases the right wheels". To him, for the police to control an entire territory is too much work. Too unpredictable. To have a criminal that is reasonably civilised doing it. This makes sense in strange, structured, cop logic. 

One of the things I also wondered about in this show was that this 'up and coming' criminal was a bit like a Wall Street Guy. Extremely intelligent. The kind of person that would get more money in stocks than controlling the streets. It is another thing I wonder. Do these people really exist in the criminal world? 

Going the other way

The other way this could work is looking at real criminal things and seeing if they correlate with the show. 

In one of these shows. there was a person going around killing single parents. When investigated, this turned out to be that they were not in fact single parents before they were killed. The children were falsified after they die so an individual could claim to have adopted the children and receive money for this. 

Well, let us look at a real situation like this. The daycare fraud in Minnesota. In the show, this was all a very refined event. Full of complex maneouvering and generally smart, high IQ, people. The Somalian fraud is not that. The Minnesota fraud is very unsophisticated. It was discovered by a 23 year old youtuber driving around different daycares having a look. 

I don't know if there is this incredible refinement to negativity. Evil is, in a lot of cases, incredibly lazy. It's excuses are often made on the fly and they are ridiculously easy to see through. I can't remember where I heard this, perhaps in some analysis of Lord of the Rings. But there is an incredibly reliable, "disgusting" aspect to evil. 

And, not evil but negativity in general. Crime, drugs, sexual degeneracy of various intensities. There is a LOT of it. If it ever does start to be handled. It does seem to be at the moment. Perhaps we will get a clearer image of what it is.