The Problem of Evil (Part 2).

Not well today. So I will have to make this shorter than I would prefer. I've realised I am making a different argument than what I intended. I will follow up on my theme of "The problem of evil". But I will use this as a potential nudge to differences in how people see the world in relation to their human design. Differences in how the sacral and splenic authority process things. 

I just wanted to repeat a point I had made recently though. With the full quote. A more full explanation of what I referred to earlier. After re reading previous blogs. I have realised that actually quoting the Law of One is probably better than just referring to a session in brackets (I.e. this point is in 85.4). It just reads better. It feels warmer and more pleasant. 

So I wanted to make a point about negativity: 

Questioner: What is the nature of this crisis?

Ra: I am Ra. The nature of this crisis is the determination of the relative polarity of your companion and yourselves. You are in the position of being in the third-density illusion and consequently having the conscious collective magical ability of the neophyte, whereas your companion is most adept. However, the faculties of will and faith and the calling to the light have been used by this group to the exclusion of any significant depolarization from the service-to-others path.

If your companion can possibly depolarize this group it must do so and that quickly, for in this unsuccessful attempt at exploring the wisdom of separation it is encountering some depolarization. This shall continue. Therefore, the efforts of your companion are pronounced at this space/time and time/space nexus.

This is talking about a negative entity that was psychicly pressurising everyone linked to the Law of One and the contact. Because it was unable to stop them doing so. It faced a kind of crisis. It was having a kind of melt down. 

It gives me a lot of insight into how the negative functions. The negative has it's "negative wisdom". I assume there is some relevance here to a kind of simple equation. x + y = z. X is the negatively polarised self. Y is the negative wisdom and Z = a successful result.

Let's not think about what the negative wisdom is. Because that would be unpleasant and maddening. But we could make simpler analogies. Which is the point of this. 

Let us say that someone is following an insane political or religious tract. One that legitimates that theft from that person is good. That he is allowed to steal and no one else is. x + y = z indicates that this person would have to be fairly successful at this endeavour. They would have to gain something palpable back. Otherwise, they would "lose polarity". 

If they are prevented from stealing, if it goes badly wrong, then they should, theoretically, go into the same kind of crisis. 

This is relevant because, the world has been very deliberately set out a certain way. Very deliberately so that if people behave in a certain bad way, they get a good result, and they get very little consequence. 

The world is basically unchanging in this capacity. Take for instance, the general punishing of high performers in a lot of jobs. Where they don't get paid more than anyone else and just get overloaded with work while lazy people take it easy. This gets a good result from the managers and staff exploiting the situation. From the lazy people.  

But if the world were to change. If some free market ideology was to become successful and that high performer could go off to another better job, and also, that that company would start doing better than the first company. Then it would give less palpable benefits to the people following those strategies. Presumably, potentially, they would start losing polarity. 

When you think about this, it justifies something that didn't really make sense to me previously. The idea that 'the best revenge is to live well'. In general, it seems that if the right things are put into place, and the people that are determined to succeed do succeed. And the more envious, loserish people are not able to stop them. Then they would lose polarity. Which would be very unpleasant for them indeed. 

This puts the end to the fantasy of actually following up in the real world on revenge against evil doers. It seems to me. It doesn't mandate forgiveness without contrition and general soft heartedness either though.